BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Oct 19, 2026; 16(10): 118743
Published online Oct 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.118743
Figure 1
Figure 1 Comparison of different groups. A: Comparison of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores among different patient groups. Patients with anxiety/depression had significantly higher scores; B: Comparison of functional outcomes between risk groups. The low-risk group significantly outperformed the high-risk group. cP < 0.001. ADL: Activities of daily living; HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS-A: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety; HADS-D: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-depression.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Forest plot of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Blue squares indicate significant associations (P < 0.05); gray squares indicate non-significant associations. CO: Cardiac output; DTF: Diaphragm thickness fraction; IVC-CI: Inferior vena cava collapsibility index; LUS: Lung ultrasound score; RF-CSA: Rectus femoris cross-sectional area.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Dose-response relationship between abnormal ultrasound parameters and anxiety/depression incidence. The black trend line indicates a linear increase in incidence rate (Spearman r = 0.452, P < 0.001).


Write to the Help Desk