Bipolar depression (BDD) is the predominant polarity in bipolar disorder type I, and poses challenges for diagnosis, treatment, and associated disability. Over the last 20 years, the FDA has approved new drugs for BDD, including lurasidone. This study summarizes the literature on lurasidone's efficacy in treating BDD, with a focus on depressive symptoms and disability. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), following PRISMA reporting guidelines. Our findings demonstrate that lurasidone reduces depressive symptom in adults with bipolar depression - as assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MD -3.05 [95 % CI, -4.48 to -1.62]) and the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Scale (MD -0.42 [-0.60 to -0.25]) - and improves associated disability - as measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale (MD -1.92 [-3.29 to -0.55]). While these results are promising, further RCTs are needed to confirm lurasidone's efficacy and assess its role in long-term therapeutic strategies.

Symptoms of hostility in patients during acute exacerbations of schizophrenia have been associated with aggressive behavior. Data suggest that some second-generation antipsychotics have specific anti-hostility effects, independent of sedation and positive symptom improvement. Two post hoc analyses were performed to examine the efficacy of lurasidone for reducing hostility in patients with schizophrenia. One analysis pooled adults ( N  = 1168) from 5 placebo-controlled, 6-week trials of lurasidone (40-160 mg). Another analysis pooled younger patients (up to age 25 years, N  = 427) from the adult studies and a similarly designed trial of lurasidone (40 or 80 mg) in adolescent patients (13-17 years old). The outcome measure was mean change in the hostility item (P7) of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). To address pseudospecificity, results were adjusted for positive symptom change and sedation. In adults with a baseline PANSS hostility score ≥2, significant improvement in hostility was observed for all doses with a dose-related increase in effect size (Cohen's d): lurasidone 40 mg = 0.18, 80 mg = 0.24, 120 mg = 0.36, and 160 mg = 0.53. The same dose-response pattern was observed for the more severe hostility subgroups (P7: ≥3, ≥4), and in the early-onset population. Results suggest that lurasidone has specific, dose-related anti-hostility effects.

We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (LUR) in outpatients with depressive episodes of bipolar disorder II (BD2) in real world setting.

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data obtained from the medical records of the Horikoshi Psychosomatic Clinic between February 2020 and April 2022. A total of 78 patients with BD2 who experienced a depressive episode were included in this study. The primary outcome was the mean change in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score from baseline to 8 weeks (W). The secondary outcome was the mean change in the MADRS score from baseline to 2, 4, and 12 W. Discontinuation and adverse event rates were measured after 24 W.

After starting LUR, the mean total score of the MADRS significantly decreased at 8 W (-11.8 ± 8.26, P < 0.0001). Patients with BD2 who underwent the treatment with LUR showed significantly great improvement at 2 W (-8.38 ± 8.75, P< 0.0001), 4 W (-11.2 ± 8.36 P < 0.0001), and 24 W (-11.6 ± 7.29, P < 0.0001). The discontinuation and adverse event rates in patients who underwent LUR were 23.1 % and 37.2 %, respectively.

LUR significantly improved depressive symptoms in patients with BD2 at 8 W. Moreover, treatment with LUR resulted in early improvement at 2 W and efficacy for 24 weeks. In summary, LUR demonstrated effectiveness and safety in acute depressive episodes of BD2, including mid-term efficacy in real-world clinical settings.

Anxiety comorbidity is common in patients with bipolar disorder and is associated with higher severity and reduced treatment response. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of lurasidone in patients with bipolar depression who present with or without severe anxiety symptoms.

Data were pooled from 2 bipolar I depression studies of very similar design that randomized patients, double-blind, to 6 weeks of treatment with lurasidone (20-60 mg/day or 80-120 mg/day) versus placebo. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on their Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) score at baseline: a "severe" anxiety group (HAM-A ≥ 18) and a "non-severe" anxiety group (HAM-A < 18). The primary efficacy measure was the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

In the severe anxiety group, significant improvement in the MADRS total score was observed with a moderate effect size (0.40) on lurasidone 20-60 mg, but lurasidone 80-120 mg was not significant (effect size, 0.21); however, in the non-severe anxiety group significant improvement was observed in both lurasidone treatment groups (effect size, 0.51 and 0.54, respectively). Common adverse events were akathisia and nausea, and the change in laboratory parameters and body weight were small and not clinically meaningful.

This was a post-hoc analysis of a short-term study.

This analysis suggests that lurasidone 20-60 mg is effective in patients with bipolar I depression regardless of their anxiety severity, with a generally good safety profile.

Anhedonia, a transdiagnostic symptom prevalent in depressive and psychotic disorders, poses a significant challenge for pharmacological intervention due to its association with impaired motivation. Understanding how psychotropic drugs can modulate this pathological domain and elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying such effects are crucial endeavors in psychiatric research. In this study, we aimed to investigate the pro-motivational properties of lurasidone in a rat (Sprague Dawley males) model of anhedonia and to unravel the interplay between lurasidone and the brain regions critical for reward processing. Exposure to unpredictable chronic stress (UCS) led to a marked reduction in motivation, a deficit that was restored by lurasidone treatment at 3 mg/kg, but not at 10 mg/kg. Interestingly, the stress-induced decrease in reactivity to negative stimuli was reversed by both doses of lurasidone. At the molecular level, stressed animals exhibited reduced expression of neuroplastic markers, that was increased following lurasidone administration. Furthermore, UCS exposure impaired the activation of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) in response to hedonic stimuli, an effect amended by lurasidone treatment. Additionally, lurasidone restored the impaired phosphorylation of DARPP-32, a key regulator of dopamine signaling, in mPFC and NAc of UCS rats exposed to a hedonic stimulus. These findings underscore the potential of lurasidone in improving various psychopathological domains, like impaired motivation and emotional reactivity, core elements contributing to the disability associated with mental disorders. These effects highlight the therapeutic potential of lurasidone in addressing the intricate behavioral and neurochemical alterations associated with anhedonia and related mood disorders.

Antipsychotic drugs (APs) have profoundly changed the treatment landscape for psychiatric disorders, yet their impact on neuroplasticity and neurotrophism remains only partially understood. While second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are associated with a better side effect profile than their predecessors, the emergence of third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs)-such as brexpiprazole, cariprazine, lurasidone, iloperidone, lumateperone, pimavanserin, and roluperidone-has prompted renewed interest in their potential neuroprotective and pro-cognitive effects. This review attempts to carefully examine the evidence on the neurotrophic properties of TGAs and their role in modulating brain plasticity by analyzing studies published between 2010 and 2024. Although data remain limited and focused primarily on earlier SGAs, emerging findings suggest that some TGAs may exert positive effects on neuroplastic processes, including the modulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factors (BDNFs) and synaptic architecture. However, robust clinical data on their long-term effects and comparative efficacy are lacking; therefore, further research is necessary to validate their role in preventing neurodegenerative changes and improving cognitive outcomes in patients with psychiatric conditions.

This study aimed to explore the comparative risks for dystonia among different second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), the influence of sex, and the relationship between the time-to-onset of dystonia and its outcomes.

We analyzed data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database from April 2004 to November 2023. Cases involving oral SGAs, excluding clozapine, were extracted. We used the odds ratios to assess the reporting proportions among SGAs and sex, analyzed the median time-to-onset and interquartile ranges (IQRs), and conducted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to investigate the time-to-onset of dystonia and its relationship to outcomes.

We extracted 9837 cases involving oral SGAs. Lurasidone was associated with a significantly higher proportion of dystonia reports than risperidone, aripiprazole, quetiapine, and olanzapine. The reporting proportion of dystonia associated with aripiprazole was lower than that of paliperidone and risperidone, but higher than that of quetiapine and olanzapine. Female sex was significantly associated with a higher reporting proportion of dystonia compared with males. Among the 148 cases of oral SGA-induced dystonia, the median time-to-onset was 125 days (IQR, 19.75-453.25 days). Divided into the three outcome groups (recovered, improved, and unrecovered/residual), those with better outcomes had a shorter time-to-onset than those with poorer outcomes. ROC curve analysis suggested a threshold of 91.5 days for discriminating outcomes, with a sensitivity of 71.7% and specificity of 69.9%.

The risks of dystonia may vary among SGAs and between sexes. SGA-induced dystonia often manifests in the tardive form.

Prediction of treatment response by genetic biomarkers has potential for clinical use and contributes to the understanding of pathophysiology and drug mechanism of action. The purpose of this study is to detect genetic biomarkers possibly associated with response to lurasidone, during the first four weeks of treatment. One-hundred and seventy-one acutely psychotic patients from two placebo-controlled clinical trials of lurasidone were included. Genetic associations with changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score at weeks one, two, and four were examined. Genotyping was done with the Affymetrix 6.0 microarray and associations were computed using PLINK regression model. Although genome-wide significance was not reached with a limited sample size, signals of potential interest for further studies were with genes important for neurogenesis. Possible week one marker, rs6459950 (p = 7.05 × 10-7), was close to the sonic hedgehog gene (SHH), involved in neuronal differentiation and neurogenesis. Possible week two marker, rs7435958, was a SNP of GABRB1, encoding the GABAA Receptor β1. Notably, possible week four signals included a SNP within PTCH1, a specific receptor for the SHH, the possible week one marker. Pathway analysis supported the possibility that neurogenesis might be involved in early antipsychotic response. Tissue enrichment analysis suggested that potential signals were enriched in anterior cingulate cortex, reported to be relevant in antipsychotic action. This is the first study to examine genes possibly associated with very early response to lurasidone. Further replication studies in larger sample size should be required.

In this study, lyophilizates with the second-class antipsychotic agent lurasidone hydrochloride were developed as orodispersible platforms to improve patients' adherence. The primary aim was to evaluate the effect of the amino acid additive (L-arginine, L-lysine, L-histidine) and the freeze-drying stage on the pharmaceutical performance of the designed formulations. The composition was initially optimized using an experimental design approach. The amino acids (in particular L-histidine) acted as dispersing agents, prevented drug aggregation and assured high drug content uniformity within the lyophilizate matrix. The freeze-drying stage reduced the particles dimensions which significantly increased solubility of lurasidone hydrochloride, and consequently, it's dissolution rate. The presence of L-arginine in lyophilizate composition balanced out sufficient compression strength with a rapid drug release. Despite the fact that L-lysine enhanced the mechanical strength, it also caused delayed drug release. Notably, L-histidine and L-arginine accelerated transport of lurasidone hydrochloride through the porcine buccal epithelium with approximately 100% and 50% increase in absorption, respectively, when compared to commercial reference drug. Overall, the designed lyophilizates containing L-histidine and L-arginine, hold promise as orodispersible platforms for improved performance of lurasidone hydrochloride.

For patients with psychosis, early, intensive therapeutic intervention is thought to improve long-term outcomes. Furthermore, patients with a first-episode psychosis (FEP) who experience a good early response to antipsychotic medication show a clinical and functional benefit over the longer term if they continue low-dose antipsychotic treatment. Lurasidone is an atypical antipsychotic agent which is approved in Europe for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults and adolescents (13-17 years). The efficacy and tolerability of lurasidone have been demonstrated in both antipsychotic-naïve and previously treated patients.

This paper provides a review and commentary regarding the use of lurasidone in patients with FEP. Case studies based on the authors' clinical experiences with lurasidone in real-world practice are provided.

In our experience, lurasidone has shown efficacy in FEP in different patient profiles, including those with psychoses associated with substance use disorders. Lurasidone provides clinically relevant benefits, especially in patients with affective symptomatology, and has a good tolerability profile.

The optimal dose of lurasidone for bipolar depression is unclear. This study examined its dose-response relationship for efficacy, acceptability, and metabolic/endocrine profiles.

Five databases and grey literature published until 1 August 2024, were systematically reviewed. The outcomes included efficacy (changes in depression, anxiety, clinical global impression, disability and quality of life), acceptability (dropout, manic switch, suicidality and side effects) and metabolic/endocrine profiles (changes in body weight, glucose, lipid and prolactin levels). Effect sizes were calculated using a one-step dose-response meta-analysis, expressed as standardised mean differences (SMDs), risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs.

Five randomised clinical trials (2032 patients, mean treatment duration 6 weeks) indicated that the optimal therapeutic dose of lurasidone (40-60 mg) improved depression (50 mg: SMD -0.60 (95% CI -0.30, -0.89)), anxiety (50 mg: -0.32 (95% CI -0.21, -0.42)), clinical global impression (50 mg: -0.67 (95% CI -0.30, -1.03)) and disability (50 mg: -0.38 (95% CI -0.08, -0.69)). Side effects increased with higher doses (50 mg: RR 1.15 (95% CI 1.05, 1.25); 100 mg: 1.18 (95% CI 1.02, 1.36)), but dropout, manic switch and suicidality did not show a dose-effect relationship. Weight increased at doses<60 mg (40 mg: MD 0.38 (95% CI 0.16, 0.60) kg), while blood glucose levels rose at doses>70 mg (100 mg: 3.16 (95% CI 0.76, 5.57) mg/dL). Prolactin levels increased in both males (50 mg: 3.21 (95% CI 1.59, 4.84) ng/mL; 100 mg: 5.61 (95% CI 2.42, 8.81)) and females (50 mg: 6.64 (95% CI 3.50, 9.78); 100 mg: 5.33 (95% CI 0.67, 10.00)).

A daily dose of 40-60 mg of lurasidone is a reasonable choice for bipolar depression treatment.

INPLASY202430069.

Serotonin 5-HT7 receptor (5-HT7R), one of the most recently discovered members of the serotonergic system, has become a promising target in the search for central nervous system disorders. Despite the number of preclinical results, none of the selective 5-HT7R agents has been approved; therefore, the clinical significance of this protein has not been confirmed yet. Recently, we described very promising, selective, and highly potent hydantoin-derived 5-HT7R antagonists with confirmed antidepressant activity in vivo and a very good ADMET profile; however, they have been tested in behavioral studies as racemates. In this work, the synthesis of optically pure hydantoin-derived 5-HT7R agents using cost-effective, classical methods has been presented for the first time. X-ray crystallographic analysis confirmed the absolute configuration on both stereogenic centers and allowed for the elucidation of the mechanism of introduction of epichlorohydrin into the hydantoin N3-position. The radioligand binding results showed a clear configuration preference for 5-HT7R affinity. The molecular modeling results further indicated the key interaction responsible for lower affinity (with amino acid I3 × 29). Finally, the comparison of the antidepressant and anxiolytic effects of racemates versus stereoisomers suggests an influence of additional, apart from the action on 5HT7R, factors responsible for the activity in vivo, which is worthy of deeper insight within further studies.

A relevant approach based on the attractive inherited merits of fluorescence spectroscopy has been established for quantitative estimation of a newly approved second-generation atypical antipsychotic lurasidone (LUR) in its raw materials and pharmaceutical dosage forms. This study brings to light the strong native fluorescence of LUR at 400 nm in water after excitation at 316 nm. Different experimental parameters that may compromise the fluorescence of the drug were carefully investigated and optimized. A linear response was established between the relative fluorescence intensity and concentration over the concentration range of 50-650 ng/mL with excellent correlation (r = 0.9998). The validity of the method was evidenced in accordance with International Council for Harmonization guidelines, with minimal detection and quantification limits of 2.88 and 8.73 ng/mL, respectively. The method was effectively applied for the estimation of LUR in spiked human plasma and urine samples with acceptable recoveries. The biopharmaceutical significance of the method was heightened by its successful applications for both content uniformity and in vitro dissolution testing. Three different tools accredited the greenness character of the presented study. Eco-friendliness, effortlessness, and cost effectiveness are crucial hallmarks of our study. The presented study demonstrates potential applicability in quality control laboratories with limited resources.

The illicit use of the psychostimulant methamphetamine (METH) is a major concern, with overdose deaths increasing substantially since the mid-2010s. One challenge to treating METH use disorder (MUD), as with other psychostimulant use disorders, is that there are no available pharmacotherapies that can reduce cravings and help individuals achieve abstinence. The purpose of the current review is to discuss the molecular targets that have been tested in assays measuring the physiological, the cognitive, and the reinforcing effects of METH in both animals and humans. Several drugs show promise as potential pharmacotherapies for MUD when tested in animals, but fail to produce long-term changes in METH use in dependent individuals (eg, modafinil, antipsychotic medications, baclofen). However, these drugs, plus medications like atomoxetine and varenicline, may be better served as treatments to ameliorate the psychotomimetic effects of METH or to reverse METH-induced cognitive deficits. Preclinical studies show that vesicular monoamine transporter 2 inhibitors, metabotropic glutamate receptor ligands, and trace amine-associated receptor agonists are efficacious in attenuating the reinforcing effects of METH; however, clinical studies are needed to determine if these drugs effectively treat MUD. In addition to screening these compounds in individuals with MUD, potential future directions include increased emphasis on sex differences in preclinical studies and utilization of pharmacogenetic approaches to determine if genetic variances are predictive of treatment outcomes. These future directions can help lead to better interventions for treating MUD.

The management of schizophrenia necessitates a comprehensive treatment paradigm that considers individual patient nuances and the efficacy of lurasidone in addressing schizophrenia symptoms, particularly at elevated dosages. Numerous randomized trials have affirmed the efficacy of lurasidone across various dimensions of schizophrenia, demonstrating marked enhancements in positive, negative and cognitive symptoms compared to a placebo. In addition, lurasidone exhibits potential in ameliorating agitation amongst acutely ill patients, showcasing greater efficacy at higher doses. However, despite the favourable outcomes observed with higher lurasidone doses, routine clinical practice often opts for lower doses, potentially limiting its maximal therapeutic impact. Furthermore, lurasidone also shows efficacy in reducing post-psychotic depression in dual psychosis. Moreover, practical insights into lurasidone usage encompass swift dose escalation within a 1-5-day span and recommended combination strategies with other medications such as benzodiazepines for insomnia or agitation, beta-blockers for akathisia, and antihistamines or antimuscarinic drugs for patients transitioning rapidly from antipsychotics with substantial antihistamine and/or anticholinergic effects. Finally, a series of clinical cases is presented, highlighting benefits of lurasidone in terms of cognitive function, functional recovery and other therapeutic aspects for the management of schizophrenia.

To evaluate the effect of lurasidone on a new, patient Life Engagement scale in schizophrenia.

This post-hoc analysis included participants (ages 18 to 74) diagnosed with schizophrenia who were randomized to lurasidone (40 mg/day) or placebo in a 6-week double-blind efficacy study and those who continued in a subsequent 12-week open-label extension study during which patients received either 40 or 80/mg day lurasidone (flexibly dosed). Change in life engagement was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) 11-item Life Engagement subscale score, and individual subscale items, at week 6 during the double-blind phase and extension phase week 12 during the open-label extension phase.

Analysis focused on 478 subjects randomized to lurasidone or placebo during the 6-week trial, and 146 who received lurasidone during the extension phase. During the 6-week trial, there was a significantly greater change on the PANSS11 Life Engagement subscale score from baseline to week 6 in the lurasidone group compared to the placebo group (mean changes of -6.4 and -4.8, respectively, p = 0.006; effect size = 0.27). Further improvement was evident during the extension phase for patients who received lurasidone in both phases, with a mean change from double-blind baseline to week 12 of the open-label treatment phase of -10.1 on in PANSS11 Life Engagement subscale.

This post-hoc analysis suggests that lurasidone may improve life engagement in patients with schizophrenia, a meaningful outcome from patients' perspective. Further studies are needed to confirm this effect.

Trial registration: EudraCT Numbers: 2016-000060-42; 2016-000061-23.

We describe herein a gold-catalyzed three-component reaction of o-alkynylbenzaldehydes, aryldiazonium salts, and trimethoxybenzene. This process enables the one-pot formation of valuable isoindoles and 1,2-dihydrophathalazines. The regioselectivity of the reaction is dictated by the nature of the aryldiazonium salt. Noticeably, the reaction is performed at room temperature under mild conditions and tolerates a variety of functional groups on both the o-alkynylbenzaldehyde and the aryldiazonium salt. Experimental mechanistic studies suggest that it is catalyzed by arylAu(III) species.

This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lurasidone (160 mg/day) compared to quetiapine XR (QXR; 600 mg/day) in the treatment of acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia.

Patients were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with lurasidone 160 mg/day (n=105) or QXR 600 mg/day (n=105). Primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions severity (CGI-S) score. Adverse events, body measurements, and laboratory parameters were assessed.

Lurasidone demonstrated non-inferiority to QXR on the PANSS total score. Adjusted mean±standard error change at week 6 on the PANSS total score was -26.42±2.02 and -27.33±2.01 in the lurasidone and QXR group, respectively. The mean difference score was -0.91 (95% confidence interval -6.35-4.53). The lurasidone group showed a greater reduction in PANSS total and negative subscale on week 1 and a greater reduction in end-point CGI-S score compared to the QXR group. Body weight, body mass index, and waist circumference in the lurasidone group were reduced, with significantly lower mean change compared to QXR. Endpoint changes in glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels were also significantly lower. The most common adverse drug reactions with lurasidone were akathisia and nausea.

Lurasidone 160 mg/day was found to be non-inferior to QXR 600 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia with comparable efficacy and tolerability. Adverse effects of lurasidone were generally tolerable, and beneficial effects on metabolic parameters can be expected.

Lurasidone is an atypical anti-psychotic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. It is mainly used to treat schizophrenia in adults through its antagonistic action on dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors. The present study systematically assessed the efficacy and safety of lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia. Clinical, double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of lurasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia were retrieved from PubMed\Medline, EBSCO, Embase, Cochrane Library, OVID, Web of Science and related clinical trial registration websites up to May 2023. A total of two investigators independently screened the included references and evaluated their quality. RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis of each measure outcome. The present systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (ID=CRD42018108178). A total of eight RCTs were included in the present study, including a total of 2,456 patients with schizophrenia. All eight references were randomized, double-blind and parallel control trials. All eight references were evaluated as high quality. The meta-analysis results demonstrated that there were no significant change in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score, Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) score and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) between the 40 mg lurasidone group and the placebo group (P>0.05). However, as the dosage increased, the 80, 120 and 160 mg lurasidone groups had significant changes in total PANSS score, CGI-S score and MADRS Compared with placebo (P<0.05), although changes in MADRS in the 120 mg lurasidone group were not statistically significant (P>0.05). In terms of safety, the changes in the incidence of agitation in the 40 mg lurasidone group (P<0.05), vomiting in the 80 mg group (P<0.05) and akathisia in the 160 mg group (P<0.05) were statistically significant and there were also statistically significant changes in the incidence of akathisia, nausea, somnolence and extrapyramidal disorder among the 40, 80 and 120 mg lurasidone groups (P<0.05); No statistically significant changes in the in the incidence of other adverse reactions (P>0.05). In conclusion, existing evidence suggests that the initial dose of lurasidone for schizophrenia can be adjusted to 80 mg. As the condition aggravates, the dose can be incrementally increased to 160 mg. A dose of 160 mg lurasidone is recommended as the most efficacious and safe dose for acute schizophrenia and the risk of occurrence of akathisia, nausea, somnolence and extrapyramidal disorder is still high when lurasidone is administered at a dose of 80-120 mg. The dose should be promptly adjusted or the drug should be withdrawn if the aforementioned adverse reactions worsen. Multi-center, high-quality and long-term clinical RCTs influenced by the included references are still necessary to support the aforementioned conclusions.

The majority of schizophrenia-affected individuals display deficiencies in multiple cognitive domains such as attention, working memory, long-term memory, and learning, deficiencies that are stable throughout the disease. The purpose of this narrative review was to examine the effect of antipsychotics on several cognitive domains affected by schizophrenia. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Elsevier, Scopus, and DOAJ databases for randomized controlled trials and other studies investigating the effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics on cognition in patients with schizophrenia in studies conducted in the last decade. Results: The majority of studies included in this review showed that antipsychotics (especially SGAs) have positive effects on both cognition and general psychopathology of schizophrenia. We mention that treatment with antipsychotic substances represents an ongoing effort of the researchers, who are constantly searching for the best approach to meet the mental health needs of schizophrenia patients. Conclusions: Even with those positive results, it should be noted that more studies are needed in order to fully observe the various effects of certain antipsychotic substances on cognition.

D-Cycloserine (DCS) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic that is currently FDA-approved to treat tuberculosis (TB) disease and urinary tract infection (UTI). Despite numerous reports showing good clinical efficacy, DCS fell out of favor as a UTI treatment because of its propensity to cause side effects. NRX-101, a fixed-dose combination of DCS and lurasidone, has been awarded Qualified Infectious Disease Product and Fast Track Designation by the FDA. In this study, we tested NRX-101 against the urinary tract pathogens Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (caMHB) and artificial urine media (AUM). Several strains were multidrug resistant. Test compounds were serially diluted in broth/media. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of the test compound at which no bacterial growth was observed. DCS exhibited antibacterial efficacy against all strains tested while lurasidone did not appreciably affect the antibacterial action of DCS in vitro. In AUM, the MICs ranged from 128 to 512 mcg/mL for both DCS and NRX-101. In caMHB, MICs ranged from 8 to 1024 mcg/mL for NRX-101 and 32 to 512 mcg/mL for DCS alone. Our data confirm that DCS has antibacterial activity against reference and drug-resistant urinary pathogens. Furthermore, lurasidone does not interfere with DCS's antimicrobial action in vitro. These results support the clinical development of NRX-101 as a treatment for complicated urinary tract infections.

Cognitive impairment, a core feature of schizophrenia, is associated with poor outcomes. Pharmacotherapy and psychosocial treatment, when used alone, have inadequate effect sizes for cognitive impairment, leading to recent interest in combination interventions. A previous study examined the additive effect of cognitive remediation on lurasidone in patients with schizophrenia, which was negative. Although improvement in cognitive function was suggested for lurasidone, it was inconclusive because there was no antipsychotic control in the study. To clarify whether lurasidone has a meaningful impact on cognitive function in combination with cognitive remediation, we use paliperidone as a control antipsychotic in this study. We hypothesize that combination with lurasidone will improve cognitive and social function to a greater extent than paliperidone.

The valuable interaction with cognitive remediation and optimal antipsychotics for recovery in schizophrenia study is a multicenter, interventional, open-label, rater-blind, randomized comparison study, comparing the effect of lurasidone plus cognitive remediation with that of paliperidone plus cognitive remediation in patients with schizophrenia. The Neuropsychological Educational Approach to Remediation (NEAR) is used for cognitive remediation. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive lurasidone or paliperidone combined with NEAR (6 weeks antipsychotic alone followed by 24 weeks combination antipsychotic plus NEAR). The primary endpoint is the change from baseline in the tablet-based Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia composite T-score at the end of the NEAR combination treatment period. Secondary endpoints will include change from baseline in social function, schizophrenia symptoms, and quality of life at the end of the NEAR combination treatment period. Furthermore, change from baseline to the end of the pharmacotherapy period and change from the end of the pharmacotherapy period to the end of the NEAR combination treatment period will be assessed for all endpoints. Safety will also be evaluated.

Achievement of adequate cognitive function is central to supporting social function, which is a key treatment goal for patients with schizophrenia. We think this study will fill in the gaps of the previous study and provide useful information regarding treatment decisions for patients with schizophrenia.

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials ID, jRCTs031200338.

This narrative review explores the efficacy and tolerability of third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs)-aripiprazole, cariprazine, brexpiprazole, and lurasidone-for the management of substance-induced psychosis (SIP). SIP is a psychiatric condition triggered by substance misuse or withdrawal, characterized by unique features distinct from those of primary psychotic disorders. These distinctive features include a heightened prevalence of positive symptoms, such as hallucinations and delusions, in addition to a spectrum of mood and cognitive disturbances. This review comprehensively investigates various substances, such as cannabinoids, cocaine, amphetamines, and LSD, which exhibit a greater propensity for inducing psychosis. TGAs exhibit substantial promise in addressing both psychotic symptoms and issues related to substance misuse. This review elucidates the distinctive pharmacological properties of each TGA, their intricate interactions with neurotransmitters, and their potential utility in the treatment of SIP. We advocate for further research to delineate the long-term effects of TGAs in this context and underscore the necessity for adopting an integrated approach that combines pharmacological and psychological interventions. Our findings underscore the intricate and multifaceted nature of treating SIP, highlighting the potential role of TGAs within therapeutic strategies.

In the present study, a reliable LC-QTOF-MS method was developed and employed for the separation and characterization of process-related substances and forced degradation products of Lurasidone hydrochloride. The chromatographic separation was carried out using an Agilent Poroshell 120 Bonus-RP C18 column (100 mm × 4.6 mm, 2.7 µm) and a mobile phase consisting of a gradient elution of 10 mM ammonium formate solution and methanol. The degradation studies followed the guidelines outlined in ICH Q1A (R2). It was observed that Lurasidone hydrochloride exhibited instability under photolytic, alkaline, and oxidative stress conditions, while remaining relatively stable under acidic and thermal stresses. Through positive ESI-QTOF mass spectrometric analysis, fourteen related compounds in total, including both process-related and stress degradation products, were identified based on the accurate masses of parent and product ions and calculated elemental compositions. Amongst these substances, nine had not been previously reported, and their formation mechanisms were speculated. The process-related substances were further confirmed by NMR spectra determination, and suggestions were proposed to eliminate them. This study highlights the potential for monitoring and controlling related substances during the manufacturing processes, providing valuable insights for process optimization and quality control of Lurasidone hydrochloride.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are versatile and vital proteins involved in a wide array of physiological processes and responses, such as sensory perception (e.g., vision, taste, and smell), immune response, hormone regulation, and neurotransmission. Their diverse and essential roles in the body make them a significant focus for pharmaceutical research and drug development. Currently, approximately 35% of marketed drugs directly target GPCRs, underscoring their prominence as therapeutic targets. Recent advances in structural biology have substantially deepened our understanding of GPCR activation mechanisms and interactions with G-protein and arrestin signaling pathways. This review offers an in-depth exploration of both traditional and recent methods in GPCR structure analysis. It presents structure-based insights into ligand recognition and receptor activation mechanisms and delves deeper into the mechanisms of canonical and noncanonical signaling pathways downstream of GPCRs. Furthermore, it highlights recent advancements in GPCR-related drug discovery and development. Particular emphasis is placed on GPCR selective drugs, allosteric and biased signaling, polyphamarcology, and antibody drugs. Our goal is to provide researchers with a thorough and updated understanding of GPCR structure determination, signaling pathway investigation, and drug development. This foundation aims to propel forward-thinking therapeutic approaches that target GPCRs, drawing upon the latest insights into GPCR ligand selectivity, activation, and biased signaling mechanisms.

The elevated prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in patients with depression has been associated with increased mortality. This post hoc analysis assessed the effect of treatment with lurasidone on risk of MetS in patients with bipolar depression.

Data used in the current analyses consisted of 3 double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled, 6-week studies in adults with bipolar I depression (N = 1192), consisting of 1 monotherapy, and 2 adjunctive trials (lithium or valproate). Also analyzed was a 6-month open-label (OL) extension study (monotherapy, N = 316; adjunctive therapy, N = 497); and a 5-month, OL, stabilization phase followed by randomization to a 28-week DB, placebo-controlled, adjunctive therapy study with lurasidone (N = 490). MetS was defined based on NCEP ATP III criteria (2005 revision).

The proportion of patients with new-onset MetS was similar for lurasidone vs placebo in the short-term studies (monotherapy, 13.9% vs 15.3%; adjunctive therapy, 13.6% vs 11.0%); and remained stable during both the 6-month extension phase study (monotherapy, 15.2%; adjunctive therapy, 16.9%), and the 5-month stabilization study (adjunctive therapy, 12.2%). After 28 weeks of DB treatment (following 5-month treatment in the stabilization study), new onset MetS was observed at endpoint (OC) in 26.2% of the lurasidone group, and 30.8% of the placebo group.

This post hoc analysis found that both short and long-term treatment with lurasidone was associated with a relatively low risk for the development of MetS in patients with bipolar I disorder. These findings are consistent with similar analyses in patients with schizophrenia.

The aim of this study was to investigate the impacts of 24 variants of recombinant human CYP3A4 and drug interactions on the metabolism of lurasidone. In vitro, enzymatic reaction incubation system of CYP3A4 was established to determine the kinetic parameters of lurasidone catalyzed by 24 CYP3A4 variants. Then, we constructed rat liver microsomes (RLM) and human liver microsomes (HLM) incubation system to screen potential anti-tumor drugs that could interact with lurasidone and studied its inhibitory mechanism. In vivo, Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were applied to study the interaction between lurasidone and olmutinib. The concentrations of the analytes were detected by ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). As the results, we found that compared with the wild-type CYP3A4, the relative intrinsic clearances vary from 355.77 % in CYP3A4.15 to 14.11 % in CYP3A4.12. A series of drugs were screened based on the incubation system, and compared to without olmutinib, the amount of ID-14283 (the metabolite of lurasidone) in RLM and HLM were reduced to 7.22 % and 7.59 %, and its IC50 were 18.83 ± 1.06 μM and 16.15 ± 0.81 μM, respectively. At the same time, it exerted inhibitory effects both through a mixed mechanism. When co-administration of lurasidone with olmutinib in rats, the AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-∞) of lurasidone were significantly increased by 73.52 % and 69.68 %, respectively, while CLz/F was observably decreased by 43.83 %. In conclusion, CYP3A4 genetic polymorphism and olmutinib can remarkably affect the metabolism of lurasidone.

Although the symptoms of persistent genital arousal disorder/genito-pelvic dysesthesia (PGAD/GPD) can have negative impacts on patients' lives, it is an under-recognized clinical entity. We describe the case of a 61-year-old Japanese female who suffered simultaneously from bipolar disorder and PGAD/GPD. She developed PGAD/GPD approx. 10 years after being diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Despite 20 years of various drug treatments, her bipolar disorder and PGAD/GPD symptoms showed little improvement. She had also undergone multiple sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness, nerve block, botulinum toxin injections, and laser treatment for PGAD/GPD. Her PGAD/GPD symptoms remained with no significant improvement, and her bipolar disorder symptoms had also not responded well to medication. With the administration of brexpiprazole, she achieved remission of her bipolar disorder. Her PGAD/GPD symptoms also eventually improved. When PGAD/GPD is comorbid with bipolar disorder, the improvement of bipolar disorder may also lead to relief of PGAD/GPD symptoms. This case reveals that brexpiprazole, which has a unique profile, may be effective for PGAD/GPD.

We reported a versatile protocol to chemodivergently construct significant heterocyclic scaffolds of benzothiadiazin-3-one 1-oxides and benzisothiazol-3-ones by visible light-promoted photocatalysis. This substrate-dependent chemoselective strategy enables N-(2-mercaptophenyl)-N'-substituted ureas through the N-S bond coupling/oxidation cascade to selectively produce benzothiadiazin-3-one 1-oxides; however, the transformation of 2-mercaptobenzamides only occurs via N-S bond coupling to access benzisothiazol-3-ones with moderate to good yields. This strategy features mild conditions, excellent chemoselectivity, and functional group compatibility, which has potential applications in organic and medicinal chemistry.

In a previous meta-analysis, the use of serotonin1A(5-HT1A) receptor partial agonists of the azapirone class as an add-on therapy was associated with beneficial effects on positive symptoms and attention/processing speed in schizophrenia patients. This meta-analysis builds on that study by examining the effects of adjunctive treatment with 5-HT1A partial agonists in improving other domains of neurocognitive function in schizophrenia patients.

A literature search was performed from 1987 to May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials. The standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) was calculated when there were two or more studies. Four studies, involving 313 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were used in the analysis.

5-HT1A partial agonists (buspirone or tandospirone) did not have a significant effect on verbal learning (SMD = 0.08, 95 % CI = -0.31 to 0.47) or working memory (SMD = 0.15, 95 % CI = -0.09 to 0.39). Regarding executive functions (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), positive but non-significant results were seen with the category number (SMD = 0.26, 95 % CI = -0.81 to 1.32), while non-significant effects were noted for percent preservation errors (SMD = -0.10, 95 % CI = -0.53 to 0.33).

The absence of any significant benefits in the cognitive domains studied here may have been due to the variance in the concomitant medication (typical vs atypical antipsychotic drugs), the level of cognition at baseline, or other factors. Further studies with various types of 5-HT1A agonists are warranted to examine the potential cognitive efficacy of stimulating these receptors.

Lurasidone is a novel atypical antipsychotic drug acting on dopaminergic, serotonergic and noradrenergic receptors; it is applied for the long-term treatment of schizophrenia and depression in patients with bipolar disorders. We aimed at performing a comparative study on the influence of chronic treatment with lurasidone on the expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes in the liver and in peripheral blood lymphocytes, and to evaluate the relationship between changes in the expression of CYP enzymes in the two experimental models. The obtained results show a fairly similar expression pattern of the main CYP enzymes in the rat livers and lymphocytes, and they indicate that in the liver, lurasidone exerts an inhibitory effect on the activity, protein and mRNA levels of CYP2B1/2 (not CYP2B2 mRNA), CYP2C11 and CYP2E1, while in the case of CYP3A1 and CYP3A2, it causes enzyme induction. At the same time, lurasidone decreases the expression of CYP2B, CYP2C11 (CYP2C11 protein only) and CYP2E1 but increases that of CYP3A2 (not CYP3A1) in lymphocyte cells. In conclusion, chronic treatment with lurasidone simultaneously and in the same way influences the expression and activity of CYP2B, CYP2C11, CYP2E1 and CYP3A2 in the liver and peripheral blood lymphocytes of rats. Thus, the lymphocyte cytochrome P450 profile may be utilized as an indicator of the hepatic cytochrome P450 profile in further clinical studies with lurasidone, and lymphocytes may serve as easily available surrogates for examining the impact of new drugs and chronic in vivo treatments on CYP enzyme expression, as well as to estimate drug-drug interactions and toxicity risk.

Most atypical antipsychotics derive from a high dropout of drug treatments due to adverse cardiometabolic side effects. These side effects are caused, in part, by the H1 receptor blockade. The current work sought a clozapine derivative with a reduced affinity for the H1 receptor while maintaining its therapeutic effect linked to D2 receptor binding. Explicit molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations of clozapine in complex with the D2 and H1 receptors embedded in cholesterol-rich lipid bilayers were performed to analyze the intermolecular interactions and address the relevance of clozapine-functional groups. Based on that, free energy perturbation calculations were performed to measure the change in free energy of clozapine structural modifications. Our results indicate the best clozapine derivative is the iodine atom substitution for chlorine. The latter is mainly due to electrostatic interaction loss for the H1 receptor, while the halogen orientation out of the D2 active site reduces the impact on the affinity.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current literature on the drug design, development, and therapy of lurasidone for the treatment of schizophrenia. Lurasidone has antagonistic effects on the dopamine D2, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A, and 5-HT7 receptors and a partial agonistic effect on the 5-HT1A receptor with low affinities for muscarinic M1, histamine H1, and a1 adrenergic receptors. The receptor-binding profile of lurasidone is thought to be associated with fewer side effects such as anticholinergic effects, lipid abnormalities, hyperglycemia, and weight gain. Behavioral pharmacological studies have demonstrated that lurasidone exerts anxiolytic and antidepressive effects and improves cognitive function, which are associated with the modulation of 5-HT7 and 5-HT1A receptors. Literature search using PubMed was performed to find published studies of randomized controlled trials and recent meta-analyses regarding efficacy and safety, particularly metabolic side effects of lurasidone in schizophrenia. In short-term studies, the results of randomized placebo-controlled trials and meta-analyses have suggested that lurasidone was superior to placebo in improving total psychopathology, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and general psychopathology in patients with acute schizophrenia. Regarding safety, lurasidone had minimal metabolic side effects, and was identified as one of the drugs with the most benign profiles for metabolic side effects. Long-term trials revealed that lurasidone had the preventive effects on relapse, with minimal effects on weight gain and other metabolic side effects. Furthermore, lurasidone improves cognitive and functional performance of patients with schizophrenia, especially in long-term treatment. Patients with schizophrenia require long-term treatment with antipsychotics for relapse prevention; thus, minimizing weight gain and other side effects is crucial. Lurasidone is suitable as one of the first-line antipsychotic drugs in the acute phase, and a switching strategy should be considered during the maintenance phase, to balance efficacy and adverse effects and achieve favorable outcomes in the long-term course of schizophrenia.

Clozapine is listed as one of the most effective antipsychotics and has been approved for treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS); however, several type A and B adverse reactions, including weight gain, metabolic complications, cardiotoxicity, convulsions, and discontinuation syndromes, exist. The critical mechanisms of clinical efficacy for schizophrenia, TRS, and adverse reactions of clozapine have not been elucidated. Recently, the GABA isomer L-β-aminoisobutyric acid (L-BAIBA), a protective myokine in the peripheral organs, was identified as a candidate novel transmission modulator in the central nervous system (CNS). L-BAIBA activates adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signalling in both the peripheral organs and CNS. Activated AMPK signalling in peripheral organs is an established major target for treating insulin-resistant diabetes, whereas activated AMPK signalling in the hypothalamus contributes to the pathophysiology of weight gain and metabolic disturbances. Clozapine increases L-BAIBA synthesis in the hypothalamus. In addition, the various functions of L-BAIBA in the CNS have recently been elucidated, including as an activator of GABA-B and group-III metabotropic glutamate (III-mGlu) receptors. Considering the expressions of GABA-B and III-mGlu receptors (localised in the presynaptic regions), the activation of GABA-B and III-mGlu receptors can explain the distinct therapeutic advantages of clozapine in schizophrenia or TRS associated with N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor disturbance compared with other atypical antipsychotics via the inhibition of the persistent tonic hyperactivation of thalamocortical glutamatergic transmission in the prefrontal cortex. L-BAIBA has also been identified as a gliotransmitter, and a detailed exploration of the function of L-BAIBA in tripartite synaptic transmission can further elucidate the pathophysiology of effectiveness for treating TRS and/or specific adverse reactions of clozapine.

Somnolence is a common adverse effect of antipsychotic drugs used to treat psychotic disorders. It causes problems in many areas of life, such as gainful employment, driving, childcare, and social interactions. Somnolence is a major problem for a relatively new antipsychotic drug, lurasidone, whose dose-effect relationship remains unclear. Based on data from a bioequivalence study of two 40 mg lurasidone hydrochloride tablets, we designed two case-control studies to explore the correlation between somnolence and exposure to lurasidone and determine the factors associated with lurasidone-induced somnolence. In the first case-control study, lurasidone was administered to healthy volunteers; 30 experienced somnolence (as pre-defined) but 29 did not. Moreover, plasma concentration at 1 h was significantly associated with somnolence (OR = 1.124; p = 0.001). In the second case-control study, 48 volunteers administered lurasidone were classified into somnolence and no-somnolence groups based on different time-related criteria. We observed a positive association between plasma concentration at 0.75 h and somnolence (OR = 1.024; p = 0.002). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that a plasma lurasidone concentration >21.65 ng/mL 1 h after administration strongly predicted somnolence. Our findings in healthy volunteers need to be further validated in patients in clinical settings to determine the optimal dose and duration of lurasidone administration.

Purpose: Extemporaneously compounded drug suspensions are often necessary for patients who are intubated or receiving nutrition through enteral feeding tubes. Lurasidone is a relatively new antipsychotic medication available only as oral tablets (Latuda®), and there is no data to support its use in this patient population as a compounded liquid formulation. This study was designed to assess the feasibility of preparing lurasidone suspensions from tablets and their compatibility with enteral feeding tubes. Methods: Representative nasogastric tubes were selected for this study, including polyurethane, polyvinylchloride, and silicone tubes with a range of 8 to 12 Fr (2.7-4.0 mm) in diameter and 35 to 55″ in length. Two strengths of lurasidone suspensions, 1 and 8 mg/mL, were prepared by the standard mortar-pestle method. Latuda® tablet 120 mg was used as the drug source, and a 1:1 mixture of Ora-Plus®:water was used as the suspension vehicle. The drug suspensions were delivered through the tubes mounted on a peg board to simulate patient position in a hospital bed. The ease of administration through the tubes was evaluated visually. The drug concentration before and after the tube delivery was analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). In addition, a 14-day stability study of the compounded suspensions was performed at room temperature to support the beyond-use dating. Results: Freshly prepared lurasidone suspensions, 1 and 8 mg/mL, met the potency and uniformity requirements. Both strengths of suspensions exhibited satisfactory flowability through all the tube types studied with no signs of clogging. The HPLC results confirmed that greater than 97% of drug concentration was retained after tube delivery. During the 14-day stability study, the suspensions retained greater than 93% of their original concentration. There was no significant change in pH or visual appearance. Conclusions: The study demonstrated a practical procedure to prepare 1 and 8 mg/mL lurasidone suspensions that are compatible with commonly used enteral feeding tube materials and dimensions. A beyond-use date of 14-day was established for the suspensions stored at room temperature.

The efficacy and safety of lurasidone monotherapy in patients with bipolar I depression with or without rapid cycling has not been previously investigated.

We performed subgroup analysis (rapid cycling/non-rapid cycling) of pooled data from two 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of lurasidone monotherapy (20-60 mg/day or 80-120 mg/day). Analyses included mean change from baseline to week 6 in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score. Safety assessments included the number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and laboratory assessments.

Of 1024 patients randomized, 85 were rapid cycling. Mean change in MADRS total score in patients with non-rapid cycling and rapid cycling, respectively, was -14.8 (effect size = 0.47) and - 12.8 (effect size = 0.04) in the lurasidone 20-60 mg/day group, -14.3 (effect size = 0.41) and - 13.0 (effect size = 0.02) in the lurasidone 80-120 mg/day group and -10.6 and -13.3 in the placebo group. The most common TEAE in each subgroup was akathisia in both lurasidone groups. Treatment-emergent mania was reported only in a small number of rapid cycling and non-rapid cycling patients.

This was a post-hoc analysis of a short-term study that excluded patients with ≥8 cycles in the past year.

In patients with non-rapid cycling bipolar depression, lurasidone monotherapy significantly improved depressive symptoms relative to placebo at both the 20-60 mg/day and 80-120 mg/day doses. In patients with rapid cycling, both doses of lurasidone displayed depressive symptom score reduction from baseline, but significant improvement was not observed likely due to high levels of improvement on placebo and small sample size.

Antipsychotics are commonly used in treating psychiatric disorders. These medications primarily target dopamine the serotonin receptors, they have some affinity to adrenergic, histamine, glutamate and muscarinic receptors. There is clinical evidence that antipsychotic use decreases BMD and increases fracture risk, with dopamine, serotonin and adrenergic receptor-signalling becoming an increasing area of focus where the presence of these receptors in osteoclasts and osteoblasts have been demonstrated. Osteoclasts and osteoblasts are the most important cells in the bone remodelling and the bone regeneration process where the activity of these cells determine the bone resorption and formation process in order to maintain healthy bone. However, an imbalance in osteoclast and osteoblast activity can lead to decreased BMD and increased fracture risk, which is also believed to be exacerbated by antipsychotics use. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide an overview of the mechanisms of action of first, second and third generation antipsychotics and the expression profiles of dopamine, serotonin and adrenergic receptors during osteoclastogenesis and osteoblastogenesis.

Major depressive disorders (MDD) pose major health burdens globally. Currently available medications have their limitations due to serious adverse effects, long latency periods as well as resistance. Considering the highly complicated pathological nature of this disorder, it has been suggested that multitarget drugs or multi-target-directed ligands (MTDLs) may provide long-term therapeutic solutions for the treatment of MDD.

In the current review, recent lead design and lead modification strategies have been covered. Important investigations reported in the last ten years (2013-2022) for the pre-clinical development of MTDLs (through synthetic medicinal chemistry and biological evaluation) for the treatment of MDD were discussed as case studies to focus on the recent design strategies. The discussions are categorized based on the pharmacological targets. On the basis of these important case studies, the challenges involved in different design strategies were discussed in detail.

Even though large variations were observed in the selection of pharmacological targets, some potential biological targets (NMDA, melatonin receptors) are required to be explored extensively for the design of MTDLs. Similarly, apart from structure activity relationship (SAR), in silico techniques such as multitasking cheminformatic modelling, molecular dynamics simulation and virtual screening should be exploited to a greater extent.

For many patients and their treating clinicians, the pharmacological management of psychotic symptoms centres on trying to find a regime that balances efficacy and quality of life, impairing side effects associated with dopamine antagonism. Recent reports of a positive Phase III study from Karuna Therapeutics indicate that the first primarily non-dopamine-based treatment for schizophrenia may come to market soon with the potential for substantially reduced or differentiated side effects. Against a background of repeated failures, Karuna's success promises a desperately needed new treatment option for patients. It also reflects some hard-won lessons about the methodology for schizophrenia drug development. Teaser A positive Phase II study and positive media report from a Phase III study with xanomeline/trospium may herald the first truly new treatment option for schizophrenia patients in decades. This drug's journey to this point reflects some hard-won lessons about the methodology for schizophrenia drug development.

Cognitive impairment is a core feature of bipolar disorder (BD) that impedes recovery by preventing the return to optimal socio-occupational functioning and reducing quality of life. Presently, there are no efficacious treatments for cognitive impairment in BD, but many pharmacological interventions are being considered as they have the potential to target the underlying pathophysiology of the disorder.

This review summarizes the available evidence for pharmacological interventions for cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder. We searched PubMed, MedLine, and PsycInfo from inception to December 1^st, 2022. Traditional treatments, such as lithium, anticonvulsants (lamotrigine), antipsychotics (aripiprazole, asenapine, cariprazine, lurasidone, and olanzapine), antidepressants (vortioxetine, fluoxetine, and tianeptine) and psychostimulants (modafinil), and emerging interventions, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (galantamine and donepezil), dopamine agonists (pramipexole), erythropoietin, glucocorticoid receptor antagonists (mifepristone), immune modulators (infliximab, minocycline and doxycycline), ketamine, metabolic agents (insulin, metformin, and liraglutide), probiotic supplements, and Withania somnifera are discussed.

The investigation of interventions for cognitive impairment in BD is a relatively under-researched area. In the past, methodological pitfalls in BD cognition trials have also been a critical limiting factor. Expanding on the existing literature and identifying novel pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for cognitive impairment in BD should be a priority.