This paper reviews the scientific evidence generated in the last two decades on the effects and mechanisms of action of most commonly misused inhalants. In the first section, we define what inhalants are, how they are used, and their prevalence worldwide. The second section presents specific characteristics that define the main groups of inhalants: (a) organic solvents; (b) aerosols, gases, and volatile anesthetics; and (c) alkyl nitrites. We include a table with the molecular formula, structure, synonyms, uses, physicochemical properties and exposure limits of representative compounds within each group. The third and fourth sections review the direct acute and chronic effects of common inhalants on health and behavior with a summary of mechanisms of action, respectively. In the fifth section, we address inhalant intoxication signs and available treatment. The sixth section examines the health effects, intoxication, and treatment of nitrites. The seventh section reviews current intervention strategies. Finally, we propose a research agenda to promote the study of (a) solvents other than toluene; (b) inhalant mixtures; (c) effects in combination with other drugs of abuse; (d) age and (e) sex differences in inhalant effects; (f) the long-lasting behavioral effects of animals exposed in utero to inhalants; (g) abstinence signs and neurochemical changes after interrupting inhalant exposure; (h) brain networks involved in inhalant effects; and finally (i) strategies to promote recovery of inhalant users.

Inhalants are a loosely organized category of abused compounds defined entirely by their common route of administration. Inhalants include volatile solvents, fuels, volatile anesthetics, gasses, and liquefied refrigerants, among others. They are ubiquitous in modern society as ingredients in a wide variety of household, commercial, and medical products. Persons of all ages abuse inhalants but the highest prevalence of abuse is in younger adolescents. Although inhalants have been shown to act upon a host of neurotransmitter receptors, the stimulus effects of the few inhalants which have been trained or tested in drug discrimination procedures suggest that their discriminative stimulus properties are mediated by a few key neurotransmitter receptor systems. Abused volatile solvent inhalants have stimulus effects that are similar to a select group of GABAA positive modulators comprised of benzodiazepines and barbiturates. In contrast the stimulus effects of nitrous oxide gas appear to be at least partially mediated by uncompetitive antagonism of NMDA receptors. Finally, volatile anesthetic inhalants have stimulus effects in common with both GABAA positive modulators as well as competitive NMDA antagonists. In addition to a review of the pharmacology underlying the stimulus effects of inhalants, the chapter also discusses the scientific value of utilizing drug discrimination as a means of functionally grouping inhalants according to their abuse-related pharmacological properties.

Acute solvent exposures may contribute to automobile accidents because they increase reaction time and decrease attention, in addition to impairing other behaviors. These effects resemble those of ethanol consumption, both with respect to behavioral effects and neurological mechanisms. These observations, along with the extensive data on the relationship between ethanol consumption and fatal automobile accidents, suggested a way to estimate the probability of fatal automobile accidents from solvent inhalation. The problem can be approached using the logic of the algebraic transitive postulate of equality: if A=B and B=C, then A=C. We first calculated a function describing the internal doses of solvent vapors that cause the same magnitude of behavioral impairment as ingestion of ethanol (A=B). Next, we fit a function to data from the literature describing the probability of fatal car crashes for a given internal dose of ethanol (B=C). Finally, we used these two functions to generate a third function to estimate the probability of a fatal car crash for any internal dose of organic solvent vapor (A=C). This latter function showed quantitatively (1) that the likelihood of a fatal car crash is increased by acute exposure to organic solvent vapors at concentrations less than 1.0 ppm, and (2) that this likelihood is similar in magnitude to the probability of developing leukemia from exposure to benzene. This approach could also be applied to other potentially adverse consequences of acute exposure to solvents (e.g., nonfatal car crashes, property damage, and workplace accidents), if appropriate data were available.

Several neurotransmitter systems have been hypothesized to be involved in the in vivo effects of volatile anesthetics. Drug discrimination may represent a novel procedure to explore the neurochemical systems underlying the sub-anesthetic behavioral effects of these compounds.

The purpose of the present study was to examine the contribution of GABA(A) and NMDA receptors to the discriminative stimulus effects of a behaviorally active sub-anesthetic concentration of isoflurane vapor.

Sixteen B6SJLF1/J mice were trained to discriminate 10 min of exposure to 6,000 ppm isoflurane vapor from air. Substitution tests were conducted with volatile anesthetics, abused vapors, GABA(A) positive modulators, NMDA antagonists, and nitrous oxide.

The volatile anesthetics, enflurane and halothane as well as the abused vapors toluene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane fully substituted for isoflurane. The GABA(A) positive modulators, pentobarbital, midazolam, and zaleplon but not the direct GABA(A) agonist, muscimol, produced high levels of partial substitution for isoflurane. The anticonvulsant, valproic acid fully substituted for isoflurane but a second, tiagabine, did not substitute. The competitive NMDA antagonist, CGS-19755, fully and the non-competitive NMDA antagonist, dizocilpine, partially substituted for isoflurane. The glycine-site NMDA antagonist, L-701,324 did not substitute for isoflurane. Gamma-hydroxybutric acid and nitrous oxide gas also failed to substitute for isoflurane.

The discriminative stimulus effects of sub-anesthetic concentrations of isoflurane vapor are shared by other vapor anesthetics and abused inhalants. The discriminative stimulus effects of isoflurane vapor appear to be mediated by both positive allosteric modulation of GABA(A) receptors as well as antagonism of NMDA receptors.

The present study examined the involvement of the GABAA, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), nicotinic acetylcholine, and mu-opioid receptor systems in the transduction of the discriminative stimulus effects of the abused inhalant 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCE). Sixteen B6SJLF1/J mice were trained to discriminate 10 min of exposure to 12,000-ppm inhaled TCE vapor from air. Substitution and antagonism tests and TCE blood concentration analysis were subsequently conducted. TCE blood concentrations decreased rapidly after cessation of exposure, falling by 66% within 5 min. TCE vapor concentration-dependently substituted for the 12,000-ppm training stimulus. The volatile anesthetic halothane concentration-dependently and fully substituted for TCE. The benzodiazepine midazolam partially substituted for TCE, producing a maximum of 68% TCE-lever selection. The benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil attenuated midazolam substitution for TCE, but not the discriminative stimulus effects of TCE itself. The noncompetitive NDMA receptor antagonists phencyclidine and dizocilpine failed to substitute for TCE. Nicotine and the central nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine also failed to produce any TCE-lever selection, nor did they antagonize the discriminative stimulus of TCE. The mu-opioid receptor agonist morphine did not substitute for TCE. The opioid antagonist naltrexone failed to antagonize the discriminative stimulus of TCE. Overall, the present results, combined with previous studies, suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of TCE are mediated primarily by positive GABAA receptor modulatory effects though a mechanism distinct from the benzodiazepine binding site.

Primarily, rats have served as subjects in Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol's (THC) discrimination studies although other species such as monkeys and pigeons have been used. While the introduction of the knockout and transgenic mice has vastly stimulated the study of the discriminative stimulus effects of drugs there is only a single published report of mice trained to discriminate THC. Thus, this study extended those results by providing a systematic replication that THC serves as an effective discriminative stimulus in mice and by further investigating the mechanisms of action involved in the THC discrimination model in the mouse. Male C57BL/6J mice were trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg THC from vehicle in 2-lever drug discrimination. THC fully and dose dependently substituted for itself. Cannabinoid indoles, except one with low cannabinoid CB(1) receptor affinity, substituted for THC. Anandamide failed to substitute for THC when administered alone but completely substituted when administered with the non-specific fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor, phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride. As expected, nicotine failed to substitute for THC. Lastly, the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist rimonabant blocked THC's discriminative stimulus effects. Taken together these studies demonstrate THC's ability to produce discriminative stimulus effects as well as demonstrate its pharmacological specificity and mechanism of action in a two-lever drug discrimination mouse model.

Because the toxicity of many inhalants precludes evaluation in humans, drug discrimination, an animal model of subjective effects, can be used to gain insights on their poorly understood abuse-related effects.

The purpose of the present study was to train a prototypic inhalant that has known abuse liability, 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCE), as a discriminative stimulus in mice, and compare it to other classes of inhalants.

Eight B6SJLF1/J mice were trained to discriminate 10 min of exposure to 12,000 ppm inhaled TCE vapor from air and seven mice were trained to discriminate 4,000 ppm TCE from air. Tests were then conducted to characterize the discriminative stimulus of TCE and to compare it to representative aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbon vapors, volatile halogenated anesthetics as well as an odorant compound.

Only the 12,000 ppm TCE versus the air discrimination group exhibited sufficient discrimination accuracy for substitution testing. TCE vapor concentration- and exposure time-dependently substituted for the 12,000 ppm TCE vapor training stimulus. Full substitution was produced by trichloroethylene, toluene, enflurane, and sevoflurane. Varying degrees of partial substitution were produced by the other volatile test compounds. The odorant, 2-butanol, did not produce any substitution for TCE.

The discriminative stimulus effects of TCE are shared fully or partially by chlorinated and aromatic hydrocarbons as well as by halogenated volatile anesthetics. However, these compounds can be differentiated from TCE both quantitatively and qualitatively. It appears that the degree of similarity is not solely a function of chemical classification but may also be dependent upon the neurochemical effects of the individual compounds.

The drug discrimination procedure in animals has been extensively utilized to model the abuse related, subjective effects of drugs in humans, but it has seldom been used to examine abused volatile inhalants like toluene. The present study sought to characterize the temporal aspects of toluene's discriminative stimulus as well assess toluene blood concentrations under identical exposure conditions. B6SJLF1/J mice were trained to discriminate 10 min of exposure to 6000 ppm inhaled toluene vapor from air. Toluene vapor concentration dependently substituted for the training exposure condition with longer exposures to equivalent concentrations producing greater substitution than shorter exposures. Toluene's discriminative stimulus effects dissipated completely by 60 min after the cessation of exposure. Injected liquid toluene dose-dependently substituted for toluene vapor as well as augmenting the discriminative stimulus effects of inhaled toluene. Toluene blood concentrations measured under several exposure conditions which produced full substitution were all nearly identical suggesting that the concentration of toluene in the animal tissues at the time of testing determined discriminative performance. These results indicate that the discriminative stimulus effects of inhaled toluene vapor are likely mediated by CNS effects rather than by its pronounced peripheral stimulus effects.

Abused solvents have effects similar to those of abused depressant drugs. This experiment evaluated the time course of the discriminative stimulus effects of toluene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TRI). Mice were trained to discriminate between i.p. injections of ethanol (EtOH; 1.25 g/kg) and saline in a two-lever operant task in which responding was under the control of a fixed-ratio 20 schedule. After 20-min inhalation exposures to toluene (500-6000 ppm) or TRI (1000-12,000 ppm), stimulus generalization was examined at 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 min post-exposure. Ethanol doses>or=0.25 g/kg produced increases in EtOH-lever responding with full substitution occurring immediately after testing for doses between 1.25 and 2.5 g/kg. Toluene and TRI produced increased EtOH-lever responding at 0-10 min post-exposure with some EtOH-lever responding occurring up to 20-min post-exposure. Response rates were not decreased for any concentration of toluene or TRI immediately following inhalant exposure but several concentrations elevated rates from 5 to 40 min post-exposure. These results confirm and extend previous studies and show these solvents produce similar effects in EtOH-lever responding but with potency differences. The time-dependent differences in EtOH-lever responding suggest that as solvents are cleared from the body, the EtOH-like subjective effects also fade.

We present a substantial series of behavioral and imaging experiments, which demonstrate, for the first time, that increasing AMPA receptor-mediated neurotransmission via administration of potent and selective biarylsulfonamide AMPA potentiators LY404187 and LY451395 reverses the central effects of an acutely intoxicating dose of ethanol in the rat. Using pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI), we observed that LY404187 attenuated ethanol-induced reductions in blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) in the anesthetized rat brain. A similar attenuation was apparent when measuring local cerebral glucose utilization (LCGU) via C14-2-deoxyglucose autoradiography in freely moving conscious rats. Both LY404187 and LY451395 significantly and dose-dependently reversed ethanol-induced deficits in both motor coordination and disruptions in an operant task where animals were trained to press a lever for food reward. Both prophylactic and acute intervention treatment with LY404187 reversed ethanol-induced deficits in motor coordination. Given that LY451395 and related AMPA receptor potentiators/ampakines are tolerated in both healthy volunteers and elderly patients, these data suggest that such compounds may form a potential management strategy for acute alcohol intoxication.

Sevoflurane, an inhalant of the volatile anesthetic class, has neurobiological and behavioral effects in common with abused inhalants and ethanol. We sought to determine if choice for subanesthetic doses of sevoflurane, and its subjective and psychomotor effects, would differ as a function of alcohol-drinking status in healthy volunteers.

The effects of four concentrations of sevoflurane (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8% sevoflurane in oxygen) were studied in 16 light drinkers and 16 moderate drinkers. During each of four sessions, subjects sampled a concentration of sevoflurane and 100% O(2) (placebo) for 10 min each. Subjective and psychomotor testing commenced 5 min into each sampling trial. Later, within the session, subjects chose nine times, once every 5 min, among sevoflurane (e.g., "Agent A"), placebo (e.g., "Agent B," 100% O(2)), or neither (and were administered 100% O(2), identified as "drug-free air").

Choice for sevoflurane at the 0.4% concentration was significantly higher in the moderate drinkers than in the light drinkers. A number of subjective effects reported during inhalation of sevoflurane were markedly lower in the moderate-drinking group than in the light-drinking group. However, psychomotor impairment induced by sevoflurane was similar in magnitude in both groups.

Alcohol-drinking status affected sevoflurane choice. The results are consistent with several studies comparing light and heavier drinkers, using other drugs. Although both drinking groups were similarly impaired by sevoflurane, the moderate drinkers reported less of a subjective response than light drinkers, suggestive of cross-tolerance.

Few studies exist exploring the discriminative stimulus effects of inhalants and none that have trained an interoceptive discrimination using the inhaled route. This study was designed to assess if it was possible to train an inhaled toluene discrimination. The second objective was to determine whether the discrimination was based on interoceptive or exteroceptive stimulus effects. Eight B6SJLF1/J mice were trained to discriminate 10 min of exposure to 6000 ppm inhaled toluene vapor from air, using a standard food-reinforced operant procedure. Toluene vapor produced robust, concentration-dependent, discriminative stimulus effects, with concentrations of 4000 ppm and higher producing full substitution. Substitution of inhaled toluene vapor for the training condition was exposure-time dependent. A minimum of 7 min of exposure to 6000 ppm was required to produce complete substitution. Injected intraperitoneal toluene produced dose-dependent full substitution for inhaled toluene vapor. Both inhaled and intraperitoneal ethylbenzene produced similar levels of partial substitution for 6000 ppm toluene vapor. Inhaled isoflurane vapor produced no substitution for toluene vapor. These results show that a toluene vapor discrimination can be successfully trained in mice and the discrimination is selective for toluene compared to ethylbenzene and isoflurane. The results also suggest that the discrimination was likely to have been based primarily on interoceptive rather than exteroceptive stimulus effects.

Toluene, an abused solvent, shares behavioral and pharmacological effects with abused depressant drugs. These effects include ethanol- and pentobarbital-like discriminative stimulus effects. There is also emerging evidence that this abused inhalant may share stimulus effects with abused central nervous system (CNS) stimulants.

To further explore the discriminative stimulus effects of one abused inhalant, this experiment evaluated the amphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects of toluene.

Mice were trained to discriminate between d-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) and saline in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure in which responding was under the control of a fixed-ratio 15 schedule. Mice were tested after 10-min inhalation exposures to air or toluene (500-6,000 ppm) and stimulus generalization was examined at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 75 min post-exposure.

Concentration-related increases in amphetamine-lever responding were observed for amphetamine doses >0.56 mg/kg with full substitution occurring immediately after testing for 1.0 and 1.78 mg/kg. Partial amphetamine-lever responding was observed for all concentrations of toluene across the 75-min post-exposure test trials. Response rates that had decreased immediately after all toluene exposures recovered within 15-min post exposure.

This partial substitution of toluene for amphetamine suggests that studies of the effects of abused solvents on brain dopaminergic systems need to be included in the study of possible CNS mechanisms.

Until recently, inhalant abuse and dependence have been overlooked as serious problems, perhaps because of their relatively low prevalence. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent advances in our understanding of the consequences, pharmacology, and etiology of inhalant use, and how we might develop preventive and management strategies to combat abuse and dependence on these drugs.

Animal models have cast light on how reinforcement of inhalant use occurs, and on mechanisms of development of tolerance and dependence. The reinforcing effects occur principally through GABA and dopamine-mediated mechanisms (rather than NMDA-mediated mechanisms). Assays for inhalants provide greater opportunities for accurate diagnosis. In addition to known medical consequences of inhalant use (including death), other risks associated with inhalant use and addiction include addiction to other substances, major depression, suicide, and impaired learning and memory.

The extensive medical, psychiatric, and psychological damage that can be caused by inhalant use argues for much greater attention to be paid to developing prevention and treatment programmes for inhalant abuse and dependence. These are currently nonexistent, but are badly needed.

Sevoflurane is a volatile anesthetic that is chemically similar to volatile substances of abuse and can be safely administered to humans in laboratory research. In this study, the reinforcing and subjective effects of five concentrations of sevoflurane (0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8% sevoflurane in O2) were studied in 20 non-drug-abusers. During each of five sessions, subjects sampled a concentration of sevoflurane and 100% O2 (placebo) for 10 min each. Later, within the session, they chose nine times, once every 5 min, among sevoflurane (e.g. "Agent A"), placebo (e.g. "Agent B"), or neither (and were administered 100% O2, identified as "drug-free air"). Although "neither" was selected most frequently, mean preference ratios (sevoflurane choices/[sevoflurane choices+placebo choices]) and total sevoflurane choice peaked at the 0.4% concentration. Choice patterns varied across subjects, with some subjects never choosing sevoflurane and other subjects showing monotonic increasing or bitonic concentration-choice functions. Concentration-related increases in subjective effects were observed, including effects that are putatively associated with abuse liability. Ratings of drug liking and of wanting to inhale the drug again were positively correlated with sevoflurane choice. This study shows that sevoflurane can function as a reinforcer and produce abuse liability-related subjective effects in some healthy volunteers.

It should be apparent from this review that far less is known about the neural basis for inhalant abuse than for other forms of drug abuse. This reflects a lack of research interest in this area (Balster, 1997). Indeed, conclusions are difficult to draw. In the case of the volatile alkyl nitrites, the most reasonable hypothesis at this time is that the cellular basis for their abuse resides in their actions on smooth muscles to produce vasodilation and relaxation, however, direct effects on the brain cannot be ruled out. Although there is some evidence that analgesic effects of nitrous oxide may involve opiate systems, even this conclusion is controversial. There is no evidence that opiate systems play a role in nitrous oxide intoxication or reinforcement. The mechanisms for these effects are unknown. They may reflect the same actions on lipid membranes or on hydrophobic sites on unspecified proteins that have been proposed as mechanisms for nitrous oxide anesthesia. In the case of the volatile solvents, fuels and anesthetics we are faced with a wide variety of specific chemicals which may produce different profiles of pharmacological effects. There is evidence that the prototypic abused solvents toluene and trichloroethane produce acute effects similar to subanesthetic concentrations of general anesthetics, as well as to the effects of classical CNS depressant drugs, such as alcohol and the barbiturates. For the anesthetics, evidence suggests that enhancement of GABAergic inhibition may be an important cellular target for their acute effects, just as it is for alcohol and other depressant drugs. For toluene, as with alcohol, recent evidence suggests a possible role for inhibition of glutamatergic neurotransmission involving NMDA receptors. Toluene has also been shown to have some dopaminergic effects which may be important to its abuse. As for the large number of other abused vapors, practically no information can be found on their cellular actions, and certainly not on actions that may be relevant to their abuse. This entire area would seem an important direction for future research.