BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Pharmacol. Nov 19, 2025; 14(1): 110200
Published online Nov 19, 2025. doi: 10.5497/wjp.v14.i1.110200
Messenger RNA vaccines for tuberculosis prevention: A narrative review of current research and prospects
Tanzeela Sameen Saeed, Department of Medicine, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan
Muhammad Ramish Saeed, Muneeb Saifullah, Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan
Muhammad Fahad Abdullah, Armeen Saeed, Sajal Munawar, Department of Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan
Muhammad Shoaib Qureshi, Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, King Edward Medical University, Lahore 54000, Punjab, Pakistan
Ikra Rana, Department of Medicine, International School of Medicine, International University of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek 720074, Kyrgyzstan
ORCID number: Muneeb Saifullah (0009-0003-8047-7270); Ikra Rana (0009-0006-8800-9967).
Author contributions: Saeed TS and Saeed MR conceived the manuscript and provided critical revisions; Abdullah MF, Qureshi MS, Saeed A, and Munawar S contributed to the drafting and editing of the manuscript; Saifullah M and Rana I were involved in literature review, manuscript preparation, and final revisions; all authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest in publishing the manuscript.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ikra Rana, MD, Department of Medicine, International School of Medicine, International University of Kyrgyzstan, 6 Street, Bishkek 720074, Kyrgyzstan. ikrarana100@gmail.com
Received: June 3, 2025
Revised: August 7, 2025
Accepted: October 15, 2025
Published online: November 19, 2025
Processing time: 167 Days and 15.8 Hours

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a critical global health challenge, with 10.8 million new cases and over 1.25 million deaths reported annually, disproportionately affecting low-income regions. Despite its use, the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine provides limited protection against adult pulmonary TB, necessitating novel solutions. The messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine technology, proven effective in combating coronavirus disease 2019, offers significant promise for TB prevention. These vaccines elicit robust immune responses by encoding antigens that stimulate humoral and cell-mediated immunity, essential for combating mycobacterium TB. Unlike traditional methods, mRNA vaccines are highly adaptable, scalable, and capable of targeting emerging strains. Preclinical studies highlight the enhanced efficacy of mRNA TB vaccines over BCG, demonstrating their ability to reduce bacterial burdens and generate memory T-cell responses critical for long-term protection. However, challenges persist, including mRNA instability, cold-chain storage needs, and mycobacterium’s complex immune evasion strategies. Innovative solutions, such as lipid nanoparticle delivery systems and self-amplifying mRNA platforms, are being developed to address these barriers. The initiation of clinical trials, notably BioNTech’s BNT164, marks a pivotal advancement in TB vaccine development. These trials focus on safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy, particularly in regions with high TB prevalence. While logistical and financial hurdles remain, mRNA vaccines hold transformative potential to bridge critical gaps in TB prevention. Their adaptability extends to tackling co-infections like human immunodeficiency virus, further amplifying their impact on global health. By integrating mRNA vaccines into existing TB control strategies, these advancements could revolutionize prevention efforts, especially in regions where current solutions fall short. Continued innovation and investment are crucial to harnessing the full potential of mRNA vaccines, positioning them as a cornerstone in the fight against TB and its global eradication.

Key Words: Tuberculosis; Messenger RNA vaccines; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Bacillus Calmette-Guérin; Vaccine development; Tuberculosis prevention

Core Tip: This narrative review explores the emerging role of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in the prevention of tuberculosis (TB). It highlights their immunological advantages, summarizes promising preclinical and early clinical findings, and critically discusses the limitations of current models, including TB pathogenesis, immune evasion, and vaccine delivery challenges. The narrative review provides a forward-looking perspective on how mRNA platforms could overcome the shortcomings of the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine and reshape global TB prevention strategies.



INTRODUCTION

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major global health challenge, affecting millions of people and causing a substantial number of deaths worldwide[1,2]. About one-third of the global population is infected with TB. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 10.8 million new cases of TB were diagnosed in 2023 with over 1.25 million deaths worldwide[3]. Despite the availability of effective treatment, the disease predominantly impacts developing countries. The WHO South-East Asia region accounts for 45% of global TB cases followed by the African Region (24%) and the Western Pacific Region (17%)[3].

The Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine is currently the only licensed vaccine against TB[4]. Although the BCG vaccine is effective against TB in infants and children, its efficacy against adult pulmonary TB is limited[5]. The low effectiveness of the BCG vaccine is influenced by factors such as variations in BCG strains, differences in immune responses among populations, and exposure to environmental mycobacteria[6]. The limitations of the current BCG vaccine, especially in adults, highlight the need for more effective TB vaccination strategies. New strategies aim to provide long-term protection while addressing the rising threat of drug-resistant mycobacterium TB (Mtb) strains and the high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)[7]. Some novel vaccine candidates are being developed to overcome these challenges, such as live attenuated Mtb vaccines, recombinant BCG, DNA vaccines, and subunit vaccines. In addition, messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines are also considered a promising approach for treating and preventing TB[8].

The mRNA vaccines are emerging as potential next-generation TB vaccines, currently in preclinical stages or clinical trials. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic accelerated the development of mRNA vaccines and highlighted their ability to rapidly generate strong immune responses. The first two authorized mRNA vaccines demonstrated over 90% efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infection[9]. Recent advancements in mRNA vaccine technology, spurred by the success of COVID-19 vaccines, have opened new avenues for TB vaccine development. The mRNA vaccine technology offers a versatile platform with many advantages compared to traditional vaccines. The mRNA vaccines stand out due to their quickly adjustable designs, high potency, rapid development, low severity of side effects, and cost-effective production. These advantages position mRNA vaccines as a promising treatment strategy for TB[10]. This narrative review aims to explore the current state of mRNA vaccines and their advantages for TB. This narrative review summarizes recent research advancements, identifies current challenges, and discusses prospects in the development of mRNA vaccines specifically for TB.

IMMUNE RESPONSE TO TB AND IMMUNE EVASION MECHANISMS

A successful vaccine against TB must effectively engage both arms of the immune system, i.e., innate and adaptive, to combat the complex intracellular lifecycle of Mtb. The host immune response to Mtb involves early recognition and containment by innate immune cells, followed by the activation of antigen-specific T cells. However, Mtb has evolved sophisticated strategies to evade these immune responses, which pose significant barriers to both natural immunity and vaccine efficacy, particularly with the BCG vaccine.

HOST IMMUNE RESPONSE TO TB

Following aerosol transmission, Mtb is engulfed by alveolar macrophages, dendritic cells, and neutrophils in the lungs. Macrophages act as the primary site of infection and as antigen-presenting cells (APCs), initiating the adaptive immune response[11]. Pattern recognition receptors such as toll-like receptors and C-type lectin receptors detect Mtb and activate signaling cascades that lead to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)[12]. These cytokines are critical in orchestrating granuloma formation and limiting bacterial spread.

Activation of CD4+ T helper (Th1) cells is essential for producing IFN-γ, which enhances macrophage bactericidal activity. CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes also play a crucial role by killing infected cells and contributing to the containment of intracellular bacteria[13]. B cells and antibody responses, though historically underemphasized, are now recognized to contribute to TB control via opsonization, neutralization, and modulation of cellular immunity[14].

A hallmark of TB immunopathogenesis is the formation of granulomas, an organized immune cell structure designed to contain Mtb. Granulomas are dynamic and can either lead to sterilization, persistence (latency), or eventual breakdown and disease progression[15].

TB IMMUNE EVASION MECHANISMS

Despite triggering robust immune responses, Mtb often persists within host cells, aided by several immune evasion strategies: (1) Phagosome maturation arrest: Mtb inhibits phagosome-lysosome fusion in macrophages, preventing its degradation. It manipulates host Rab GTPases and the ESX-1 secretion system to disrupt endosomal trafficking[16]; (2) Inhibition of antigen presentation: Mtb interferes with major histocompatibility complex class II expression and antigen processing in infected macrophages and dendritic cells. This results in impaired T-cell activation and delayed adaptive immunity[17]; (3) Suppression of pro-inflammatory signaling: Mtb limits the production of cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-12 and TNF-α, which are critical for Th1 differentiation and macrophage activation. It also upregulates anti-inflammatory cytokines like IL-10 and transforming growth factor beta, dampening host responses[18]; and (4) Modulation of autophagy: Mtb actively inhibits autophagy – a mechanism that would otherwise aid in bacterial clearance and antigen presentation through mechanisms involving 6 kDa early secreted antigenic target (ESAT-6) and microRNA regulation[19].

These evasion mechanisms not only facilitate long-term bacterial survival but also contribute to the establishment of latency and reactivation risk, making them formidable barriers to effective vaccine design (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Tuberculosis immune evasion mechanisms. IFN-γ: Interferon-gamma; Mtb: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; TB: Tuberculosis; TNF-α: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha.
IMPLICATIONS FOR BCG VACCINE EFFICACY

The partial and inconsistent protection offered by the BCG vaccine, especially against adult pulmonary TB, is largely attributable to Mtb’s immune evasion strategies and the complexity of human TB pathogenesis. BCG is effective in protecting infants against severe forms like TB meningitis, but it fails to reliably prevent adult pulmonary TB due to the following reasons: (1) Antigenic mismatch: BCG lacks key Mtb virulence antigens such as ESAT-6 and culture filtrate protein-10 (encoded in the region of difference 1 region), which are critical for inducing protective immunity against pulmonary disease[20]; (2) Weak induction of CD8+ T-cell responses: BCG primarily induces CD4+ T-cell responses. Its limited ability to stimulate robust cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell responses essential for targeting intracellular Mtb, compromises its effectiveness[21]; and (3) Lack of durability and waning immunity: Immunity conferred by BCG tends to wane after adolescence. In areas with high Mtb exposure, repeated environmental sensitization can mask or block vaccine-induced responses[22].

Understanding these immunological limitations is critical for guiding the development of new TB vaccines. The mRNA vaccine platforms have the potential to overcome many of these issues by delivering multiple, well-conserved Mtb antigens and promoting both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses, along with long-lived memory populations. Moreover, self-adjuvanted or nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA vaccines may improve antigen processing and presentation, enhancing immune recognition even in the face of Mtb’s evasion strategies.

The mechanism of mRNA vaccines in immunization

The basic mechanism of mRNA vaccines involves using synthetic mRNA to instruct body cells to produce a specific protein that triggers an immune response[23]. This prepares the immune system to recognize and fight off a particular pathogen in the future. The mRNA vaccines work by delivering mRNA that encodes tumor antigens or other target antigens to host cells. Once inside the cells, the mRNA is translated by the host's cellular machinery into the target protein antigen. These protein antigens are then displayed on the cell’s surface and are subsequently recognized by the immune system. The immune system initiates an immune response creating antibodies and activating T-cells specific to the pathogen[24]. This process also forms memory cells that provide a rapid and strong immune response against future infections by the pathogen[25]. Moreover, these vaccines are typically delivered as nucleoside-modified mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) which protect the mRNA from degradation and enhance its immunogenicity[26].

The effective prevention of TB relies on a strong T-cell response against Mtb, the causative agent of TB. The mRNA vaccines work by instructing host cells to produce specific Mtb antigens, effectively triggering both T-cell and B-cell responses. The mRNA vaccines provide a dual immune response i.e. cell-mediated and humoral immunity[27,28]. The cell-mediated response is driven by T cells of the immune system. The T-cells, particularly CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, target and eradicate intracellular pathogens like Mtb[29]. CD4+ T cells, also known as Th cells, facilitate the cytotoxic functions of CD8+ T cells and the activation of B cells. CD8+ T cells are directly involved in eliminating infected cells, a critical step in controlling TB. The activation of B cells produces antibodies to neutralize extracellular pathogens. Together, these mechanisms offer comprehensive protection against TB. A key advantage of mRNA vaccines is their ability to generate memory T cells. Upon re-exposure to Mtb, these cells prepare the immune system to respond rapidly and robustly. By promoting long-term immunity, memory T cells help control bacterial replication and prevent reinfection[30].

The immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines offers several advantages over traditional TB vaccines, such as BCG. BCG vaccine utilizes weakened live bacteria to elicit a T-cell-mediated immune response. However, it is not always sufficient to prevent TB infection in adults[31]. On the other hand, mRNA vaccines induce robust humoral (antibody-mediated) and cellular immunity, with a pronounced focus on T-cell activation. This is similar to the high immunogenicity observed in mRNA vaccines for COVID-19, which produce strong antibody and T-cell responses[32]. Recent studies have highlighted the superior immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines compared to BCG[33]. For example, an mRNA vaccine encoding ESAT-6 epitopes (5'-TPL-ESAT-6-3'-Mod) demonstrated higher efficacy compared to BCG in stimulating an adaptive immune response and protecting against Mtb infection in mice[34].

The primary types of mRNA vaccines under consideration are conventional non-amplifying mRNA vaccines and self-amplifying mRNA (saRNA) vaccines[35]. Conventional mRNA encodes only the target antigen while saRNA includes additional sequences that allow it to replicate, potentially enhancing immune responses with smaller doses[36]. The mRNA vaccines have emerged as a promising technology for combating complex pathogens like Mtb. These vaccines offer precise and adaptable immune targeting, efficient stimulation of immune responses, and rapid development. They also provide advantages such as high efficacy, relatively low side effects, and cost-effectiveness. These features position mRNA as a promising platform for TB prevention, addressing limitations associated with traditional vaccines like BCG (Figure 2).

Figure 2
Figure 2 The mechanism of messenger RNA vaccines in immunization. ESAT: Early secreted antigenic target; LPN: Licensed practical nurses; MHC: Major histocompatibility complex; mRNA: Messenger RNA; Mtb: Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Development of mRNA vaccines for TB

Efforts to develop mRNA vaccines for TB gained momentum following the success of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. These initiatives focus on identifying and utilizing antigens specific to Mtb to induce targeted immune responses. Preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential of RNA-based vaccines for TB. These vaccines have shown feasibility in development, elicited enhanced immune responses, and yielded improved outcomes in animal models[37]. A notable milestone is the establishment of mycobacterium-specific mRNA constructs, which are undergoing preclinical testing to assess their immunogenicity and safety. A key study by Lorenzi et al[8] illustrated the efficacy of mRNA vaccines for combating TB. The research demonstrated that intranasal administration of an mRNA vaccine encoding the mycobacterium leprae heat shock protein 65 provided significant protection against Mtb challenge in mice. This vaccine stimulated specific cytokine production and activated APCs within the lungs, critical for an effective immune response. These findings highlighted the broader potential of mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases, including TB. Another promising development involves a replicating RNA vaccine formulated in nanostructured lipids. Preclinical data indicate that this formulation effectively induces both cell-mediated and humoral immune responses while significantly reducing bacterial burden in animal models. Such advances underscore the versatility and potential of mRNA vaccine platforms in addressing TB.

Preclinical and clinical research on mRNA TB vaccines

Preclinical evidence from animal models: Preclinical research and animal models are essential tools in TB mRNA vaccine research and testing. They provide valuable insights into the pathogenesis of Mtb, immune response mechanisms, and the efficacy of vaccines[38]. These models have facilitated the development of innovative vaccine platforms like DNA and mRNA vaccines and have also been pivotal in evaluating their effectiveness against drug-resistant TB strains[39]. Preclinical studies have shown promising results for mRNA vaccines against TB, demonstrating enhanced immune responses and improved outcomes in animal models. Shepelkova et al[34] found that an mRNA vaccine encoding ESAT-6 epitopes exhibited greater efficacy in mice compared to the BCG vaccine. Similarly, Vasileva et al[31] demonstrated that a multi-epitope mRNA vaccine elicited a stronger T-cell response in mice than a full-length mRNA vaccine, highlighting the advantages of targeted antigen design. Additionally, Mishra et al[40] developed a self-adjuvanted mRNA vaccine expressing Mtb antigens, which significantly reduced the Mtb burden and enhanced both innate and adaptive immunity in mice. These findings underscore the potential of mRNA vaccines as next-generation tools for TB prevention, offering improved efficacy and immune activation compared to traditional approaches.

Limitations of animal models in reflecting human TB pathogenesis: Animal models are invaluable in vaccine research but often face limitations in accurately translating outcomes to humans. While mRNA vaccines for TB have shown promise in animal models, translating these results to humans presents obstacles, including differences in immune responses, TB pathogenesis, poor experimental design, inappropriate data analysis, and misuse of statistics[41]. One of the primary obstacles is the inability of animal models to replicate latent TB infection and post-primary TB, which are key stages of human TB pathogenesis. Human TB is characterized by structured granulomas, persistent latent infection, and reactivation potential, none of which are reliably modeled in animals. Mice typically fail to form structured granulomas and either clear the infection or develop acute disease, limiting the study of long-term immunity and reactivation[42]. Post-primary TB, the main driver of human-to-human transmission and a hallmark of adult disease, involves cavitation and chronic lung pathology. These features are rarely seen in animal models, even in advanced systems like guinea pigs or non-human primate[43,44]. Additionally, human immune responses to Mtb are highly complex, and the pathogen's ability to establish latent infections further complicates vaccine development[45]. Animal models, particularly mice, often do not fully replicate the human immune response to Mtb, leading to discrepancies in vaccine efficacy between preclinical models and human trials[46]. For instance, cytokine signaling (e.g., IL-2, IL-17) and memory T-cell formation behave differently across species, affecting the predictive value of immunogenicity data[47]. Vaccine responses that appear effective in animals may not elicit comparable immunity or protection in humans, especially in the context of TB’s complex intracellular lifestyle. Furthermore, TB vaccine trials also face challenges due to the long follow-up periods required to assess efficacy, especially in preventing latent infections from progressing to active disease. These extended timelines make trial outcomes more variable, necessitating careful selection of trial sites with high TB incidence to ensure statistically significant results. Despite these limitations, animal models remain invaluable in TB research, providing critical insights into Mtb pathogenesis, drug development, and vaccine efficacy[48]. To address their limitations, researchers now advocate for the complementary use of multiple models, such as mice for immunogenicity, guinea pigs for disease progression, and non-human primates for latency and pathology[49]. Emerging approaches like humanized mouse models, computational simulations, and biomarker-guided clinical validation are also being explored to better bridge preclinical and clinical data.

CLINICAL TRANSLATION AND EARLY HUMAN TRIALS

Human clinical trials for mRNA TB vaccines are still in the early stages, with efforts primarily focused on evaluating safety, immunogenicity, and preliminary efficacy. In 2023, BioNTech initiated a phase 1 randomized, controlled, dose-finding trial for BNT164, the first mRNA vaccine candidate for TB to enter clinical evaluation. This trial aims to assess the vaccine’s safety and immune response in humans, marking a significant milestone in TB vaccine development[50]. The path to regulatory approval is rigorous, particularly given the unique technical and ethical challenges associated with TB. TB disproportionately affects populations in low-income countries, necessitating careful consideration of trial locations, control group selection, and informed consent to ensure ethical responsibility[51]. Additionally, safety assessments and compliance with regulatory standards are critical, further complicating the development and approval process. Despite these hurdles, progress is being made, offering hope for innovative solutions to address this high-burden disease.

CHALLENGES IN DEVELOPING MRNA VACCINES FOR TB

Developing mRNA vaccines for TB presents several significant challenges. These challenges stem from the complex nature of Mtb, the inherent difficulties associated with mRNA vaccine technology, and the logistic and financial barriers involved in vaccine development.

BIOLOGICAL AND PATHOGEN-SPECIFIC CHALLENGES

The development of vaccines for TB faces significant biological and pathogen-specific challenges, primarily due to the complex nature of Mtb and its ability to evade the immune system. Mtb has evolved sophisticated mechanisms to persist within the host. These mechanisms include manipulating the phagosomal environment in macrophages, engaging pattern recognition receptors, and modulating cytokine production[52]. Additionally, the pathogen's genetic complexity, with approximately 4000 genes, makes selecting the ideal antigens for vaccine formulation a substantial hurdle.

One of the key challenges in TB vaccine development is identifying immune correlates of protection. The different stages of TB disease and the complex immune response required to combat Mtb slow the progress of vaccine candidates. Effective TB vaccines need to elicit a strong T-cell response, particularly involving CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Designing mRNA vaccines that can trigger such responses is complex and requires precise epitope selection. Furthermore, TB vaccines must induce a durable immune response, which is particularly difficult due to Mtb's ability to establish latent infections. With over 2 billion people worldwide harboring latent TB, this represents a significant challenge in TB control[53]. Current mRNA vaccine designs must address both active and latent TB cases, highlighting the urgent need for novel vaccination strategies to effectively target all stages of the disease[54].

Scientific and technical challenges

Developing mRNA vaccines for TB presents unique challenges, particularly due to the inherent instability of mRNA molecules and the complexities of designing TB-specific antigens. The mRNA is naturally unstable and highly susceptible to enzymatic degradation, making its delivery and storage difficult[55]. This instability requires advanced stabilization methods, such as encapsulation in LNPs, which protect mRNA from degradation and facilitate its delivery into cells. Thus, mRNA’s large size, instability, and need for cold-chain storage complicate distribution, especially in low-resource, high-TB-burden regions.

Efficient intracellular delivery of mRNA remains a major hurdle. While non-viral delivery systems are being explored, they must ensure mRNA stability and proper translation within the target cells. Recent advances in mRNA vaccine technology have improved stability and delivery, but challenges remain, including immune activation and the need for precise antigen selection[56]. For TB, a successful vaccine must induce durable T-cell-mediated immunity[57], as TB infection often involves prolonged or latent phases where Mtb remains dormant within the host. A robust and long-lasting T-cell memory is essential to protect against re-exposure to TB. The mRNA vaccines, with their potent immunogenicity, are being explored to specifically encode Mtb antigens that can stimulate strong and enduring T-cell responses. However, overcoming the barriers to reliably inducing protective T-cell immunity remains one of the key challenges in developing an effective TB vaccine[58].

Logistical and financial barriers

Large-scale production of mRNA vaccines presents significant logistical and financial challenges, particularly for global distribution[59]. The manufacturing process is complex and resource-intensive, with high production costs and stringent cold-chain requirements to maintain stability[60]. These vaccines typically require ultra-cold storage temperatures, which complicates their distribution in resource-poor countries, where TB is most prevalent[61]. Adapting mRNA vaccine production for TB in such settings poses additional economic and infrastructural hurdles, making affordability a critical consideration for widespread implementation. Furthermore, funding for TB vaccine research has historically been insufficient due to limited commercial incentives and fears of inadequate returns on investment[62,63]. Despite the global health burden of TB, private firms have conducted minimal research, leaving vaccine development underfunded, particularly in low-income, high-burden regions. These challenges underscore the need for increased investment and innovative approaches to make mRNA vaccines for TB accessible and sustainable worldwide.

Prospective benefits of mRNA vaccines for TB prevention

The development of mRNA vaccines for TB offers several potential benefits that could revolutionize TB prevention.

Improved immunogenicity: The mRNA vaccines offer a more tailored and effective approach than traditional vaccines like BCG, demonstrating superior immunogenicity in recent studies. They are particularly adept at inducing both humoral (antibody-mediated) and cellular (T-cell-mediated) immune responses, which are critical for controlling TB due to the intracellular nature of Mtb. Robust T-cell responses, essential for combating Mtb, are a key advantage of mRNA vaccines. This dual stimulation of immune pathways makes mRNA vaccines highly promising for TB control, offering enhanced and specific immune activation compared to BCG or adenoviral vector-based vaccines.

Rapid and scalable production: The mRNA vaccines present a compelling alternative to conventional vaccines, offering the advantage of rapid development and adaptability. Their ability to be designed and produced swiftly makes them particularly valuable for responding to global health emergencies, such as TB outbreaks or the emergence of drug-resistant strains. The success of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the feasibility of scaling production efficiently, paving the way for accelerated deployment to high-burden TB regions[64]. This platform not only addresses global health disparities but also holds promise for improving vaccine supply and accessibility worldwide.

Adaptability and customization: The mRNA vaccines offer a transformative approach to TB prevention, with their ability to be rapidly modified to address emerging strains, including drug-resistant variants. This adaptability is particularly critical given the high mutation rate of Mtb. Unlike traditional vaccines, mRNA platforms allow for the precise inclusion of multiple TB antigens or epitopes, enabling a more robust and comprehensive immune response. This flexibility could overcome the limitations of the BCG vaccine, which demonstrates inconsistent efficacy across regions and populations. By facilitating swift adjustments to vaccine formulations, mRNA technology ensures preparedness against evolving TB strains, making it a powerful tool in global TB control efforts[65].

Safer profile: The safety profile of mRNA TB vaccines has been a focal point of clinical and preclinical studies. These studies consistently demonstrate that these vaccines are well-tolerated with mostly mild to moderate side effects. Common adverse reactions include localized pain, redness, and swelling at the injection site. Other transient systemic symptoms include fever, fatigue, and muscle or joint aches, all of which are self-limiting. Unlike live-attenuated vaccines, mRNA vaccines eliminate the risks of uncontrolled replication or reactivation. This quality makes them particularly suitable for immunocompromised populations, such as those with HIV, who are at higher risk for TB but have limited vaccine options. Drawing on the successful safety record of mRNA vaccines developed for COVID-19, early results for mRNA TB vaccines suggest a similarly favorable safety profile. However, the long-term effects of these vaccines remain uncertain, necessitating robust post-market surveillance and follow-up studies to ensure their continued safety and efficacy.

Implications for global health: The development of mRNA vaccines for TB represents a transformative opportunity for global health. These vaccines demonstrate the potential to significantly reduce TB incidence and mortality, especially in high-burden, low-income regions where the disease remains a leading cause of death. An effective mRNA TB vaccine could help bridge disparities in prevention and control efforts between high-income and low-income nations, addressing critical gaps in global TB management. By reducing transmission and preventing drug-resistant TB cases, these vaccines could substantially lower mortality rates in endemic areas. Additionally, leveraging mRNA platforms for combination vaccines offers the possibility of tackling TB alongside co-infections like HIV, which frequently coexist in affected populations, further amplifying the impact on public health.

Future public health strategies: The mRNA vaccines hold a significant role in advancing TB eradication programs by offering unparalleled safety, adaptability, and efficacy. Their integration into existing TB control frameworks, especially in areas where the BCG vaccine has limited effectiveness, could transform global prevention efforts. The mRNA technology also enables the development of multi-component vaccines, combining TB prevention with protection against other respiratory pathogens, thus streamlining immunization strategies. The integration of effective vaccines, improved drugs, and diagnostics could substantially lower TB incidence. However, achieving eradication will require innovative delivery approaches and interventions targeting latent infections to address the disease's complex nature comprehensively[66].

Innovations and future directions in mRNA TB vaccine research

The development of mRNA vaccines for TB is benefiting from significant technological advancements and novel approaches. Recent advancements in mRNA technology have revolutionized biomedicine, particularly in vaccine development and immunotherapy[67].

Innovations in LNPs, the leading delivery system for mRNA vaccines, have enhanced mRNA stability, protected it from degradation, and improved cellular uptake. LNPs now include optimized components such as ionizable lipids, polyethylene glycol, and cholesterol, with ongoing modifications to increase efficacy and minimize side effects[68]. Concurrently, advancements in mRNA stability have further strengthened vaccine performance. Structural modifications to the 5' cap, untranslated regions, coding regions, and poly(A) tails have enhanced mRNA translation efficiency and immune response induction[69]. Additionally, techniques such as sequence modifications and complexation with protamine have improved mRNA stability and immunogenicity[70], paving the way for more robust and effective mRNA vaccines. Emerging technologies in mRNA vaccine platforms are also paving the way for broader applications. Encapsulation techniques, including novel nanoparticle designs and hybrid delivery systems, show promise in increasing vaccine potency and accessibility[71]. Multi-antigen and multistage mRNA vaccines targeting different phases of TB infection, such as active and latent forms, are being explored[72,73]. These innovations aim to induce robust immune responses, including long-term protection against TB.

Research is also focusing on identifying biomarkers to monitor vaccine efficacy and immune responses in clinical trials. These biomarkers are critical for evaluating the success of mRNA TB vaccines, offering valuable insights into vaccine-induced immunity. Techniques like peripheral blood analysis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay are widely used to measure humoral responses[74], while ongoing research aims to discover markers predictive of long-term immunity against TB. Such advancements could enhance mRNA vaccine designs, ensuring durable protection and increasing their overall effectiveness in TB control.

Future directions in TB vaccine research emphasize the transformative potential of mRNA technology to address global health challenges. Inhalable mRNA vaccines are under exploration, offering non-invasive delivery options ideal for respiratory diseases, including TB[75]. Multi-pathogen vaccines could combine protection against TB and other respiratory infections, addressing co-infection challenges and reducing logistical burdens, particularly in high-burden regions. The adaptability of mRNA platforms also enables combination strategies targeting TB-HIV co-infections, providing safer and more effective immunity for immunocompromised populations[76]. Clinical trials in TB-endemic regions are critical to assess the efficacy of these vaccines across diverse populations and environmental conditions, with a focus on equitable access through collaboration with low-income countries. The mRNA’s modularity supports personalized vaccination approaches, tailoring formulations for high-risk groups like children or immunocompromised individuals. Advanced delivery techniques, including aerosol-based systems, promise to enhance vaccine administration. Studies on long-term immunity and booster needs will ensure sustained protection. Establishing standardized manufacturing and regulatory frameworks is essential to scale these innovations safely, signaling a pivotal shift in TB vaccine development and global disease management.

Insights from the WHO meeting on mRNA-based TB vaccine development

The WHO mRNA Technology Transfer Programme meeting held in April 2023 highlighted the promise of mRNA-based platforms for TB vaccine development. Experts, policymakers, and industry representatives collectively acknowledged mRNA’s potential as a complementary tool alongside other vaccine technologies. While success in COVID-19 vaccination underscores the platform's safety and efficacy, rigorous testing in animal models and human trials is crucial to confirm its suitability for TB. The meeting emphasized open data sharing and cross-disciplinary collaboration to accelerate vaccine evaluation. Moreover, enhancing research and manufacturing capacity in low-income and middle-income countries was identified as a priority to ensure equitable access and build trust in mRNA-based solutions. Despite logistical challenges, advancements in antigen selection, immune response studies, and pandemic-driven investment in infrastructure have positioned mRNA vaccines as a viable option for addressing the global TB burden. Recommendations from the meeting advocate for targeted research, consensus-building on antigen selection, and robust community engagement to overcome barriers to TB vaccine development and access[77].

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, mRNA vaccines for TB hold great promise in overcoming the challenges of developing an effective vaccine against Mtb. These vaccines offer rapid design, adaptability to emerging strains, and the ability to induce both humoral and T-cell-mediated immune responses. However, the development of mRNA TB vaccines faces hurdles, including Mtb’s immune evasion mechanisms, the need for long-lasting immunity, and logistical challenges such as cold-chain storage and high production costs. The potential impact of mRNA vaccines is immense, especially in high-burden, low-income regions, where they could reduce new cases and curb the spread of drug-resistant strains. Addressing the gaps left by the BCG vaccine, mRNA vaccines could significantly improve TB prevention. To unlock this potential, increased research investment, collaboration, and large-scale clinical studies are essential. Overcoming TB-specific challenges and refining vaccine delivery systems will be key to improving efficacy and accessibility. With continued innovation, mRNA vaccines could become a vital tool in the global effort to combat TB and potentially help eradicate this deadly disease.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Pharmacology and pharmacy

Country of origin: Kyrgyzstan

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B

Novelty: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade B, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Bouayad A, MD, Associate Professor, Morocco; Li HB, PhD, Additional Professor, China S-Editor: Luo ML L-Editor: A P-Editor: Xu J

References
1.  Sulis G, Roggi A, Matteelli A, Raviglione MC. Tuberculosis: epidemiology and control. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2014;6:e2014070.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 92]  [Cited by in RCA: 102]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Zaman K. Tuberculosis: a global health problem. J Health Popul Nutr. 2010;28:111-113.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 121]  [Cited by in RCA: 144]  [Article Influence: 9.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  World Health Organization  Tuberculosis (TB) [Internet]. [cited December 27 2024]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
4.  Fatima S, Kumari A, Das G, Dwivedi VP. Tuberculosis vaccine: A journey from BCG to present. Life Sci. 2020;252:117594.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 33]  [Cited by in RCA: 95]  [Article Influence: 19.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Whitlow E, Mustafa AS, Hanif SNM. An Overview of the Development of New Vaccines for Tuberculosis. Vaccines (Basel). 2020;8:586.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Haile M, Källenius G. Recent developments in tuberculosis vaccines. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2005;18:211-215.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in RCA: 32]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Principi N, Esposito S. The present and future of tuberculosis vaccinations. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2015;95:6-13.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in RCA: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Lorenzi JC, Trombone AP, Rocha CD, Almeida LP, Lousada RL, Malardo T, Fontoura IC, Rossetti RA, Gembre AF, Silva AM, Silva CL, Coelho-Castelo AA. Intranasal vaccination with messenger RNA as a new approach in gene therapy: use against tuberculosis. BMC Biotechnol. 2010;10:77.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 62]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Szabó GT, Mahiny AJ, Vlatkovic I. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: Platforms and current developments. Mol Ther. 2022;30:1850-1868.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 78]  [Cited by in RCA: 181]  [Article Influence: 60.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Xu S, Yang K, Li R, Zhang L. mRNA Vaccine Era-Mechanisms, Drug Platform and Clinical Prospection. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:6582.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 202]  [Cited by in RCA: 219]  [Article Influence: 43.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Flynn JL, Chan J. Immunology of tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:93-129.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1545]  [Cited by in RCA: 1555]  [Article Influence: 64.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  O'Garra A, Redford PS, McNab FW, Bloom CI, Wilkinson RJ, Berry MP. The immune response in tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31:475-527.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 842]  [Cited by in RCA: 977]  [Article Influence: 81.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Lewinsohn DA, Lewinsohn DM, Scriba TJ. Polyfunctional CD4(+) T Cells As Targets for Tuberculosis Vaccination. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1262.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 105]  [Cited by in RCA: 136]  [Article Influence: 17.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Achkar JM, Casadevall A. Antibody-mediated immunity against tuberculosis: implications for vaccine development. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13:250-262.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 130]  [Cited by in RCA: 146]  [Article Influence: 12.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Saunders BM, Britton WJ. Life and death in the granuloma: immunopathology of tuberculosis. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007;85:103-111.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 225]  [Cited by in RCA: 230]  [Article Influence: 12.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Sturgill-Koszycki S, Schlesinger PH, Chakraborty P, Haddix PL, Collins HL, Fok AK, Allen RD, Gluck SL, Heuser J, Russell DG. Lack of acidification in Mycobacterium phagosomes produced by exclusion of the vesicular proton-ATPase. Science. 1994;263:678-681.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1025]  [Cited by in RCA: 962]  [Article Influence: 31.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Noss EH, Pai RK, Sellati TJ, Radolf JD, Belisle J, Golenbock DT, Boom WH, Harding CV. Toll-like receptor 2-dependent inhibition of macrophage class II MHC expression and antigen processing by 19-kDa lipoprotein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol. 2001;167:910-918.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 333]  [Cited by in RCA: 328]  [Article Influence: 13.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Redford PS, Murray PJ, O'Garra A. The role of IL-10 in immune regulation during M. tuberculosis infection. Mucosal Immunol. 2011;4:261-270.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 389]  [Cited by in RCA: 366]  [Article Influence: 26.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Deretic V. Autophagy in tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4:a018481.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in RCA: 76]  [Article Influence: 6.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Pym AS, Brodin P, Brosch R, Huerre M, Cole ST. Loss of RD1 contributed to the attenuation of the live tuberculosis vaccines Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Mycobacterium microti. Mol Microbiol. 2002;46:709-717.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 549]  [Cited by in RCA: 554]  [Article Influence: 24.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Lindenstrøm T, Agger EM, Korsholm KS, Darrah PA, Aagaard C, Seder RA, Rosenkrands I, Andersen P. Tuberculosis subunit vaccination provides long-term protective immunity characterized by multifunctional CD4 memory T cells. J Immunol. 2009;182:8047-8055.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 311]  [Cited by in RCA: 346]  [Article Influence: 21.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Brandt L, Feino Cunha J, Weinreich Olsen A, Chilima B, Hirsch P, Appelberg R, Andersen P. Failure of the Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine: some species of environmental mycobacteria block multiplication of BCG and induction of protective immunity to tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2002;70:672-678.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 325]  [Cited by in RCA: 331]  [Article Influence: 14.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  McNamara MA, Nair SK, Holl EK. RNA-Based Vaccines in Cancer Immunotherapy. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015:794528.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 120]  [Cited by in RCA: 170]  [Article Influence: 17.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Iavarone C, O'hagan DT, Yu D, Delahaye NF, Ulmer JB. Mechanism of action of mRNA-based vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16:871-881.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 101]  [Cited by in RCA: 160]  [Article Influence: 20.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Kowalczyk A, Doener F, Zanzinger K, Noth J, Baumhof P, Fotin-Mleczek M, Heidenreich R. Self-adjuvanted mRNA vaccines induce local innate immune responses that lead to a potent and boostable adaptive immunity. Vaccine. 2016;34:3882-3893.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in RCA: 80]  [Article Influence: 8.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Verbeke R, Hogan MJ, Loré K, Pardi N. Innate immune mechanisms of mRNA vaccines. Immunity. 2022;55:1993-2005.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 141]  [Cited by in RCA: 258]  [Article Influence: 86.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Grunwitz C, Kranz LM. mRNA Cancer Vaccines-Messages that Prevail. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;405:145-164.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 25]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Larsen SE, Erasmus JH, Reese VA, Pecor T, Archer J, Kandahar A, Hsu FC, Nicholes K, Reed SG, Baldwin SL, Coler RN. An RNA-Based Vaccine Platform for Use against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Vaccines (Basel). 2023;11:130.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 39]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Jasenosky LD, Scriba TJ, Hanekom WA, Goldfeld AE. T cells and adaptive immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in humans. Immunol Rev. 2015;264:74-87.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 208]  [Cited by in RCA: 267]  [Article Influence: 26.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Li F, Dang W, Du Y, Xu X, He P, Zhou Y, Zhu B. Tuberculosis Vaccines and T Cell Immune Memory. Vaccines (Basel). 2024;12:483.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Vasileva O, Tereschenko V, Krapivin B, Muslimov A, Kukushkin I, Pateev I, Rybtsov S, Ivanov R, Reshetnikov V. Immunogenicity of full-length and multi-epitope mRNA vaccines for M. Tuberculosis as demonstrated by the intensity of T-cell response: a comparative study in mice. Bull Russ.  2023.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
32.  Naranbhai V, Garcia-Beltran WF, Chang CC, Berrios Mairena C, Thierauf JC, Kirkpatrick G, Onozato ML, Cheng J, St Denis KJ, Lam EC, Kaseke C, Tano-Menka R, Yang D, Pavlovic M, Yang W, Kui A, Miller TE, Astudillo MG, Cahill JE, Dighe AS, Gregory DJ, Poznansky MC, Gaiha GD, Balazs AB, Iafrate AJ. Comparative Immunogenicity and Effectiveness of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and Ad26.COV2.S COVID-19 Vaccines. J Infect Dis. 2022;225:1141-1150.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 77]  [Cited by in RCA: 93]  [Article Influence: 31.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Whelan KT, Pathan AA, Sander CR, Fletcher HA, Poulton I, Alder NC, Hill AV, McShane H. Safety and immunogenicity of boosting BCG vaccinated subjects with BCG: comparison with boosting with a new TB vaccine, MVA85A. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5934.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in RCA: 57]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Shepelkova G, Reshetnikov V, Avdienko V, Sheverev D, Yeremeev V, Ivanov R. Impact of untranslated mRNA sequences on immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines against M. tuberculosis in mice. Bull Russ.  2023.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
35.  Deering RP, Kommareddy S, Ulmer JB, Brito LA, Geall AJ. Nucleic acid vaccines: prospects for non-viral delivery of mRNA vaccines. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11:885-899.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 102]  [Cited by in RCA: 121]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Nafian F, Nafian S, Soleymani G, Pourmanouchehri Z, Kiyanjam M, Berenji Jalaei S, Jeyroudi H, Mohammdi SM.   Perspective Chapter: Next-Generation Vaccines Based on Self-Amplifying RNA. In: Desheva Y, editor. Vaccine Development. London: IntechOpen, 2022.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
37.  Larsen SE, Baldwin SL, Coler RN. Tuberculosis vaccines update: Is an RNA-based vaccine feasible for tuberculosis? Int J Infect Dis. 2023;130 Suppl 1:S47-S51.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 14]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Gong W, Liang Y, Wu X. Animal Models of Tuberculosis Vaccine Research: An Important Component in the Fight against Tuberculosis. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:4263079.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 37]  [Article Influence: 7.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Okada M, Kita Y. Tuberculosis vaccine development: The development of novel (preclinical) DNA vaccine. Hum Vaccin. 2010;6:297-308.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Mishra A, Singh V, Court KP, Godin B, Sukhovershin R, Kiss D, Khan A, Jagannath C. A novel self-adjuvanted mRNA vaccine expressing the Antigen-85B-p25 epitope of Mycobacterium tuberculosis protects mice against tuberculosis. J Immunol. 2023;210:141.03.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
41.  Seyhan AA  Lost in Translation. In: Carini C, Fidock M, van Gool A, editors. Handbook of Biomarkers and Precision Medicine. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2019.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
42.  Lin PL, Flynn JL. Understanding latent tuberculosis: a moving target. J Immunol. 2010;185:15-22.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 340]  [Cited by in RCA: 342]  [Article Influence: 22.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Kolloli A, Kumar R, Venketaraman V, Subbian S. Immunopathology of Pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection in a Humanized Mouse Model. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:1656.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Getahun H, Sculier D, Sismanidis C, Grzemska M, Raviglione M. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of tuberculosis in children and mothers: evidence for action for maternal, neonatal, and child health services. J Infect Dis. 2012;205 Suppl 2:S216-S227.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in RCA: 71]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Larsen SE, Williams BD, Rais M, Coler RN, Baldwin SL. It Takes a Village: The Multifaceted Immune Response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Vaccine-Induced Immunity. Front Immunol. 2022;13:840225.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 30]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  McShane H, Williams A. A review of preclinical animal models utilised for TB vaccine evaluation in the context of recent human efficacy data. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2014;94:105-110.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 87]  [Cited by in RCA: 89]  [Article Influence: 7.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
47.  Ernst JD. The immunological life cycle of tuberculosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:581-591.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 353]  [Cited by in RCA: 418]  [Article Influence: 32.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
48.  Zhan L, Tang J, Sun M, Qin C. Animal Models for Tuberculosis in Translational and Precision Medicine. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:717.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in RCA: 46]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Singh AK, Gupta UD. Animal models of tuberculosis: Lesson learnt. Indian J Med Res. 2018;147:456-463.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in RCA: 64]  [Article Influence: 9.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Basaraba RJ, Hunter RL.   Pathology of Tuberculosis: How the Pathology of Human Tuberculosis Informs and Directs Animal Models. In: Jacobs Jr WR, McShane H, Mizrahi V, Orme IM, editors. Tuberculosis and the Tubercle Bacillus. United States: ASM Press. 2017.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
51.  Zhou F, Zhang D. Recent advance in the development of tuberculosis vaccines in clinical trials and virus-like particle-based vaccine candidates. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1238649.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Snider DE Jr. Ethical issues in tuberculosis vaccine trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30 Suppl 3:S271-S275.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Goldberg MF, Saini NK, Porcelli SA.   Evasion of Innate and Adaptive Immunity byMycobacterium tuberculosis. In: Hatfull GF, Jacobs Jr WR, editors. Molecular Genetics of Mycobacteria. United States: American Society for Microbiology, 2015.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
54.  Lin MY, Ottenhoff TH. Not to wake a sleeping giant: new insights into host-pathogen interactions identify new targets for vaccination against latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Biol Chem. 2008;389:497-511.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in RCA: 37]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Andersen P, Kaufmann SH. Novel vaccination strategies against tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;4:a018523.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 113]  [Cited by in RCA: 117]  [Article Influence: 10.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
56.  Wadhwa A, Aljabbari A, Lokras A, Foged C, Thakur A. Opportunities and Challenges in the Delivery of mRNA-based Vaccines. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:102.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 280]  [Cited by in RCA: 381]  [Article Influence: 76.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
57.  Counoupas C, Triccas JA. The generation of T-cell memory to protect against tuberculosis. Immunol Cell Biol. 2019;97:656-663.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
58.  Urdahl KB. Understanding and overcoming the barriers to T cell-mediated immunity against tuberculosis. Semin Immunol. 2014;26:578-587.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in RCA: 54]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
59.  Rosa SS, Prazeres DMF, Azevedo AM, Marques MPC. mRNA vaccines manufacturing: Challenges and bottlenecks. Vaccine. 2021;39:2190-2200.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 267]  [Cited by in RCA: 306]  [Article Influence: 76.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Güzel Tanoğlu E. Production and Distribution of mRNA Vaccines: SARS-CoV-2 Experience. J Mol Virol Immunol. 2021;1:27-34.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
61.  Uddin MN, Roni MA. Challenges of Storage and Stability of mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9:1033.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 149]  [Cited by in RCA: 216]  [Article Influence: 54.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
62.  Rappuoli R, Black S, Bloom DE. Vaccines and global health: In search of a sustainable model for vaccine development and delivery. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11:eaaw2888.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in RCA: 75]  [Article Influence: 12.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Kremer M. Creating Markets for New Vaccines. Part I: Rationale. Innov Policy Econ. 2000;1:35-72.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
64.  Fan XY, Lowrie DB. Where are the RNA vaccines for TB? Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021;10:1217-1218.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
65.  Jackson NAC, Kester KE, Casimiro D, Gurunathan S, DeRosa F. The promise of mRNA vaccines: a biotech and industrial perspective. NPJ Vaccines. 2020;5:11.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 294]  [Cited by in RCA: 307]  [Article Influence: 61.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
66.  Abu-Raddad LJ, Sabatelli L, Achterberg JT, Sugimoto JD, Longini IM Jr, Dye C, Halloran ME. Epidemiological benefits of more-effective tuberculosis vaccines, drugs, and diagnostics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13980-13985.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 289]  [Cited by in RCA: 270]  [Article Influence: 16.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
67.  Baptista B, Carapito R, Laroui N, Pichon C, Sousa F. mRNA, a Revolution in Biomedicine. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:2090.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
68.  Yihunie W, Nibret G, Aschale Y. Recent Advances in Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Vaccines and Their Delivery Systems: A Review. Clin Pharmacol. 2023;15:77-98.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
69.  Kim SC, Sekhon SS, Shin WR, Ahn G, Cho BK, Ahn JY, Kim YH. Modifications of mRNA vaccine structural elements for improving mRNA stability and translation efficiency. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2022;18:1-8.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 150]  [Article Influence: 37.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
70.  Rauch S, Lutz J, Kowalczyk A, Schlake T, Heidenreich R. RNActive® Technology: Generation and Testing of Stable and Immunogenic mRNA Vaccines. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1499:89-107.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in RCA: 40]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
71.  Li B, Zhang X, Dong Y. Nanoscale platforms for messenger RNA delivery. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2019;11:e1530.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 96]  [Cited by in RCA: 115]  [Article Influence: 19.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Keikha M, Eslami M, Yousefi B, Karbalaei M. Overview of multistage subunit tuberculosis vaccines: advantages and challenges. Rev Med Microbiol. 2020;31:144-149.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
73.  Khademi F, Derakhshan M, Yousefi-Avarvand A, Tafaghodi M, Soleimanpour S. Multi-stage subunit vaccines against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an alternative to the BCG vaccine or a BCG-prime boost? Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018;17:31-44.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in RCA: 44]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
74.  Ogi C, Aruga A. New concepts of biomarkers and clinical outcomes for therapeutic cancer vaccines in clinical trials. Immunotherapy. 2014;6:1025-1036.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Roh EH, Fromen CA, Sullivan MO. Inhalable mRNA vaccines for respiratory diseases: a roadmap. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;74:104-109.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
76.  Ramkissoon S, Mwambi HG, Matthews AP. Modelling HIV and MTB co-infection including combined treatment strategies. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49492.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
77.  Looney MM, Hatherill M, Musvosvi M, Flynn J, Kagina BM, Frick M, Kafuko Z, Schmidt A, Southern J, Wilder-Smith A, Tippoo P, Paradkar V, Popadić D, Scriba TJ, Hanekom W, Giersing B. Conference report: WHO meeting summary on mRNA-based tuberculosis vaccine development. Vaccine. 2023;41:7060-7066.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]