Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Exp Med. Jun 20, 2026; 16(2): 118828
Published online Jun 20, 2026. doi: 10.5493/wjem.118828
Published online Jun 20, 2026. doi: 10.5493/wjem.118828
Table 1 Liver tissue histopathological findings (means ± SEs)
| C group (n = 6) | IR group (n = 6) | IRRO group | IRITO group | IRIPO group | P value1 | |
| Hepatocyte degeneration | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.33 ± 0.21a | 0.67 ± 0.21 | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.67 ± 0.33 | 0.028 |
| Sinusoidal dilatation | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.33 ± 0.21a | 0.83 ± 0.31 | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.67 ± 0.33 | 0.045 |
| Pycnotic nucleus | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.33 ± 0.21a | 0.67 ± 0.21b | 0.33 ± 0.21b | 0.67 ± 0.21b | 0.005 |
| Cell undergoing necrosis | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.50 ± 0.22a | 0.67 ± 0.21b | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.67 ± 0.21b | 0.002 |
| MN cell infiltration in the parenchyma | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.33 ± 0.21a | 0.67 ± 0.33 | 0.33 ± 0.21b | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.018 |
Table 2 Lung tissue histopathological findings (means ± SEs)
| C group | IR group | IRRO group | IRITO group | IRIPO group | P value1 | |
| Interstitial edema | 0.50 ± 0.22 | 1.67 ± 0.33a | 0.83 ± 0.31b | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.67 ± 0.21b | 0.024 |
| Interstitial hemorrhage | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.33 ± 0.21a | 0.67 ± 0.33 | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.027 |
| Alveolar congestion | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.50 ± 0.22a | 0.67 ± 0.33b | 0.33 ± 0.21b | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.005 |
| Leukocyte infiltration (neutrophil/Lymphocyte) | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.67 ± 0.42a | 0.83 ± 0.40 | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.67 ± 0.33b | 0.039 |
| Thickness of the alveolar walls | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.50 ± 0.34a | 0.67 ± 0.33b | 0.33 ± 0.21b | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.014 |
| Total damage score | 1.17 ± 0.79 | 7.33 ± 0.84a | 3.50 ± 1.31b | 2.17 ± 1.01b | 3.00 ± 1.21b | 0.008 |
Table 3 Brain tissue histopathological findings (means ± SEs)
| C group (n = 6) | IR group (n = 6) | IRRO group | IRITO group | IRIPO group | P value1 | |
| Ischemic neuronal change in cortex/medulla | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.17 ± 0.31a | 0.83 ± 0.31 | 0.33 ± 0.21b | 0.50 ± 0.22 | 0.049 |
| Cellularity (macrophages and astrocytes) | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.33 ± 0.33a | 0.83 ± 0.31 | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.041 |
| Focal necrosis | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.17 ± 0.31a | 0.67 ± 0.21 | 0.33 ± 0.21b | 0.50 ± 0.22 | 0.047 |
| Inflammation, macrophagic and astroglial | 0.17 ± 0.17 | 1.33 ± 0.33 | 0.67 ± 0.21 | 0.33 ± 0.21b | 0.50 ± 0.22b | 0.018 |
Table 4 Rat liver tissue oxidant status parameters (means ± SD)
Table 5 Rat lung tissue oxidant status parameters (means ± SD)
Table 6 Rat brain tissue oxidant status parameters (means ± SD)
- Citation: Şengel N, Köksal Z, Küçük A, Sezen ŞC, Güneş I, Atlı M, Kip G, Gökgöz Acar S, Özer A, Kavutçu M, Arslan M. Comparison of ozone administration routes on liver, lung, and brain damage after spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury. World J Exp Med 2026; 16(2): 118828
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-315x/full/v16/i2/118828.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5493/wjem.118828