BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Exp Med. Jun 20, 2024; 14(2): 94135
Published online Jun 20, 2024. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i2.94135
Table 1 Ischaemia models of high-risk anastomosis
Ref.
Year
Sample size
Intervention
Test
Sampling day
Uzun et al[20]200856Sildenafil citrateNOx, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, glutathione3/7
Karliczek et al[21]200934Visible light spectrometry evaluationBPR in situ, tensile strength3/7
Coneely et al[22]201050KetotifenBPR ex situ, HP, IL-6, VEGF4
Karataş et al[23]201024AmelogeninBPR ex situ, HP4
Kaya et al[24]201048TadalafilBPR ex situ, HP, histology (as per Ehrlich et al[25])4
Adas et al[26]201140Bm-MSCs 1 × 106BPR in situ, HP4/7
Karatepe et al[27]201140AdrenomedulinBPR ex situ, HP, spectrophotometry, MDA, NOx, TNF-a, IL-6, VEGF, histology3/7
Kennelly et al[28]201130Electrical field stimulationBPR ex situ, HP, IL-6, VEGF4
Sümer et al[29]201130Pentoxifylline and vinpocetineBPR in situ, HP, histology (as per García et al[30])5
Yoo et al[31]201260AdMSC 1 × 106BPR ex situ, weight loss, macroscopic (adhesions as per van der Ham and Kort[32], strictures, ulcers), histology (as per Phillips et al[33]), wound infection, ileus, mortality7
Wu et al[34]201324TriptolideHistology, calprotectin, MPO, INF-g, IL-4, IL-17, TGF-b56
Portilla-de Buen et al[35]2014180Fibrin glueBPR ex situ, macroscopic, microscopic, HP5
Boersema et al[36]201640Hyperbaric oxygenMacroscopic (as per Zühlke et al[37]), histology (as per Phillips et al[33]), serum creatinine3/7
Ruiz-Luque et al[38]201993AlprostadilBPR in situ, macroscopic (as per Knightly et al[39]), histology (as per García et al[30])8
Kayapinar et al[40]202160CORM-2BPR ex situ, HP, glutathione, MDA, histology (as per Ehrlich et al[25])3/7
Table 2 Colitis models of high-risk anastomosis
Ref.
Year
Colitis method
Sample size
Intervention
Test
Sampling day
Kirkil et al[41]2008Intra-jejunal injection of iodoacetamide28Endothelin receptor blockade by bosentanBPR in situ, macroscopic (Mannheim index[42]), HP, histology (as per Mei et al[43])4
Rijcken et al[44]20107 d DSS 5%Not mentionedrhIGF-1BPR in situ, microscopic (as per Phillips et al[33], Ki-67), HP, MPO1/3/7
Myrelid et al[45]20155 d DSS 3%140IP prednisolone, AZA, infliximabBPR ex situ, bowel WT/length, histology, zymography3
Alvarenga et al[46]20192,4,6-TNBS66AdMSC 2 × 106Histology, IL-10, IL-17, IFN-g, TGF-b, TNF-a, MMP-2, MMP-97
Reischl et al[47]2021ANXA-1 k/o mice and 7 d DSS 2%-3%-5%Not mentionedAc2-26-nanoparticlesFluorescence imaging of MMPs, histology (as per Phillips et al[33]), whole transcriptome RNA sequencing and analysis3/7
Weber et al[48]20237 d DSS 2%84PrednisoloneBPR in situ, macroscopic (adhesions scoring), histology (as per Philips et al[33])3/7
Ntampakis et al[49]20237 d DSS 5%24AdMSC 5 × 106BPR ex situ, macroscopic (as per Bosmans et al[50]), HP, IL-6, TNF-a, VEGF7
Table 3 Malnutrition models of high-risk anastomosis
Ref.
Year
Colitis method
Sample size
Intervention
Test
Sampling day
McCauley et al[51]19913,5% agar diet for 7 d30BCAABody WT, BPR ex situ, tensile strength, protein content, HP-
Karahasanoglu et al[52]1998Low-protein diet for 10 d40Growth hormoneBody WT, BPR in situ, hydroxyproline4
Salman et al[53]200815 d72Cholerella sp. microalgaeBody WT, macroscopic (adhesions as per Ham et al[32]), BPR in situ, HP, histology (as per de Roy van Zuidewijn et al[54]), albumin, prealbumin, transferrin3/5/7/9/11/13/15
Gonçalves et al[55]200950% food restriction for 21 d80Pre-op nutritionTensile strength, histology5
Gündoğdu et al[56]201550% food restriction for 26 d18Pre-op nutritionBody WT, BPR in situ, HP4
Vizzotto Junior et al[57]2015Paired feeding160Omega-3Body WT, tensile strength, histology5
Danielski et al[58]201650% food restriction for 26 d45Vitamin CBody WT, macroscopic (as per Knightly et al[39]), histology, HP, MPO, TNF-a, nitrite/nitrate, oxidative damage7
Table 4 Obstruction models of high-risk anastomosis
Ref.
Year
Obstruction method
Sample size
Intervention
Test
Sampling day
Törnqvist et al[60]1990Silicone ring 6.5 mm54Diverting colostomyTensile strength, weight, HP2/7
Aguilar-Nascimento et al[61]1997Silk ligature108Nutritional solutions lavage of the colonMacroscopic, histology3/6
Erbil et al[62]2000Silk ligature144Nutritional solutions lavage of the colonBPR ex situ, HP, macroscopic3/6
Cağlikülekçi et al[63]2002Common bile duct ligation40rGHBPR ex situ, macroscopic, HP, macroscopic, histology (as per Greenhalgh et al[64])7
Lelyanov et al[65]2004Silk ligature60Sodium hypochlorite and ozone therapyBPR ex situ, survival, macroscopic, histology1/3/6/9/12
Krarup et al[59]2017Laparoscopic clip application32MMP inhibitionBody WT, HP, BPR in situ3
Table 5 Peritonitis models of high-risk anastomosis
Ref.
Year
Peritonitis method
Sample size
Intervention
Test
Sampling day
Vaneerdeweg et al[66]2000Gelatin capsule with faeces and barium sulphate40Gentamicin SpongesBPR in situ, mortality, weight loss4
Reijnen et al[67]2002Caecal ligation/perforation198Hyaluronan-based agentstPA activity1/3/7
Aydin et al[68]2006Caecal ligation/perforation24Laparostomy with Bogota bagBPR in situ, HP, adhesions (as per Zühlke et al[37])5
Li et al[69]2006Enterotomy360Fibrin glue and growth hormoneBPR in situ, HP, tensile strength, histology1/3/5
Buyne et al[70]2009Faecal inoculation148Recombinant tPABPR in situ, tensile strength, macroscopic, HP3/7
Kayaoglu et al[71]2009Caecal ligation/perforation80N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylateBPR ex situ, macroscopic (as per Knightly et al[39]), histology3/7
Pantelis et al[72]2010Caecal ligation/perforation or incomplete anastomosis206Collagen matrix coagulation factors I and IIa (Tachosil)BPR ex situ, histology (as per Biert et al[73], Verhofstad et al[74], Attard et al[75]), collagen type I-II, HP2/5/14
Rocha et al[76]2010Caecal ligation/perforation or incomplete anastomosis45Hyperbaric oxygen therapyTotal energy rupture test (tensile strength)4
Silva et al[77]2012Caecal ligation/perforation or incomplete anastomosis40BromoprideMacroscopic (Nair et al[78]), tensile strength (Versa test), histology, quantitative collagen analysis, HP3/7
Holmer et al[79]2014Faecal inoculation72Collagen fleece coatingBPR in situ, histology, collagen I, III, VEGF, MMP-131/3/7
Camargo et al[80]2013Faecal inoculation40Peritoneal lavage with bupivacaineTensile strength, survival5
Arikanoglu et al[81]2013Colon injury21Antibacterial sutureBPR in situ, HP, histology10
Donmez et al[82]2013Colon injury40Glutamine and GHBPR ex situ, HP5
Senol et al[83]2013E. Coli inoculation40Fibrin glueBPR ex situ, histology (as per Ehrlich-Hunt[25]), HP10
Silva et al[84]2014Caecal ligation/perforation80BromoprideMMP-1a, MMP-8, MMP-13, IL-1b, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-a, IFN-g3/7
Erginel et al[85]2014Caecal ligation/perforation40IP O3BPR ex situ, histology (as per Verhofstadt et al[74] and Philips et al[33]), HP7
Pommergaard et al[86]2014Incomplete anastomosis80Tachosil coatingTensile strength, clinical assessment7
Ercan et al[87]2015Caecal ligation/perforation40IP L-CarnitineBPR ex situ, histology (as per Ehrlich- Hunt[25]), HP5
Cakir et al[88]2015Incomplete anastomosis64SildenafilBPR ex situ, histology (as per Phillips et al[33]), HP, MDA, GSH3/7
Suárez-Grau et al[89]2016Incomplete anastomosis56Fibrinogen - thrombin collagen patchHistology (as per Biert scheme[73]), macroscopic (adhesions), survival15/30
Sozutek et al[90]2016Caecal ligation/perforation50PRPBPR in situ, Body WT, HP, histology (as per Verhofstadt et al[74])7
Ersoy et al[91]2016Caecal ligation/perforation60MelatoninBPR ex situ, HP, histology, IL-6, IL-10, INF-γ, CRP7
Çakır et al[92]2016Caecal ligation/perforation18IP O3BPR ex situ, TNF-a, IL-1β, MDA, MPO, histology22
Sukho et al[93]2018Incomplete anastomosis60AdMSCBPR in situ, macroscopic (as per Verco et al[94] and Zühlke et al[37]), histology3/7
Lorenzi et al[95]2017Caecal ligation/perforation40OmigananBPR in situ, histology (as per García et al[30]), HP7
Yıldırım et al[96]2021Caecal puncture21Growth factor collagen (FGF-C), abx collagen (AB-C)BPR ex situ, HP, macroscopic (as per Bosmans et al[50]), histology (as per Ehrlich et al[25])7
Nakamura et al[97]2021Incomplete anastomosis60HSMMBPR ex situ, macroscopic (as per Ham et al[32]), histology3/5/7/14/28
Aksu et al[98]2021Colon injury21Chlorhexidine gluconate and metronidazole-soaked spongesBPR in situ, hydroxyproline, histology10
Yilmaz et al[99]2021Caecal ligation/perforation32Polyurethane membraneBPR ex situ, HP, NOx, IL-6, TNF-a, tPA, macroscopic (as per Mazuji et al[100]), histology5
Table 6 Radiation models of high-risk anastomosis
Study
Year
Radiation dose
Sample size
Intervention
Test
Sampling day
Liu et al[101]200110 Gy74Lactobacillus plantarum 299vBody weight, WBC, mucosal MPO, HP, nucleotide, DNA and RNA content, colonic bacterial microflora, bacterial translocation, histology4/7/11
Kerem et al[102]2006500 cGy84Soluble FiberMacroscopic (adhesions as per van der Ham and Kort[32]), BPR in situ, HP, histology (as per de Roy van Zuidewijn et al[54]), MMP-2 activity3/7
Ozdemir et al[103]2013800 rad30AmifostineBPR ex situ, HP, histology5
Seker et al[104]2014485 cGy60PycnogenolBPR ex situ, HP, MDA, histology (as per Houdart et al[105])3/7
Simões Neto et al[106]2013660 cGy30Fraction electron beamBPR (not specified), histology7
Van de Putte et al[107]201727Gy48AdMSC18F-FDG-PET/CT, colonoscopy, histology32
Taşdöven et al[108]20196Gy48Ozon PRBPR in situ, histology (as per Houdart et al[105]), HP, MDA, MPO3/7
Yilmaz et al[109]202220Gy32Ozon PRBPR in situ, macroscopic (as per Knightly et al[39]), HP, MPO, histology (as per de Roy van Zuidewijn et al[54])5
Table 7 Ischaemia/reperfusion models of high-risk anastomosis
Ref.
Year
I/R method
Sample size
Intervention
Test
Sampling day
Terzi et al[110]2001SMA clampling 30 min65AllopurinolBPR in situ, macroscopic (adhesions as per Knightly et al[39]), histology (as per de Roy van Zuidewijn et al[54])3/7
Tireli et al[111]2003SMA clampling 30 min20PentoxifilineBPR ex situ, HP7
Miranda et al[112]2010SMA clamping 45 min45Methylene blueBPR ex situ, macroscopic, histology7
Celik et al[113]2013SMA clamping 45 min24ModelukastBPR ex situ, HP, MPO, MDA, caspase-3 activity, catalase, NOx, glutathione, SOD, TNF-a, IL-6, ALT, AST5
Akarsu et al[114]2017SMA clamping 10 min40SimvastatinBPR ex situ, HP8
Özkan et al[115]2018SMA clamping 30 min30MelatoninBPR ex situ, HP, histology (as per Nursal et al[116]), SOD, glutathione7
Özçay et al[117]2018SMA clamping 45 min40GHMacroscopic (as per Galili et al[118]), BPR ex situ, histology (as per Greenhalgh et al[64])7
Sayin et al[119]2020SMA clamping 45 min40IP montelukastBPR ex situ, macroscopic score (as per Knightly et al[39]), HP, histology (fibrosis)7
Eryilmaz et al[120]2020SMA clamping 45 min30Hydrogen rich salineBPR in situ, histology (as per Park et al[121] and Chiu et al[122]), TNF-a, IL-6, MDA, MPO5
Akıncı et al[123]2022SMA clamping 30 min36GenisteinBPR ex situ, HP, SOD, glutathione, histology (as per Piroglu et al[124])5
Table 8 Chemotherapy models of high-risk anastomosis
Ref.
Year
Chemo agent
Sample size
Intervention
Test
Sampling day
Nayci et al[125]2003IP 5-FU40Electromagnetic fieldTensile strength, HP7
Cetinkaya et al[126]2005IP mitomycin-C81GM-CSFBPR ex situ, HP, histology (as per Ehrlich et al[25])3
Kanellos et al[127]2006IP 5-FU and LEV60Fibrin glueBPR ex situ, HP, macroscopic (adhesions as per van der Ham and Kort[32]), histology (as per Phillips et al[33])8
Yildiz et al[128]20135-FU and 20 Gy60HBOTBPR ex situ, Weight, HP, histology (Fibrosis)5
Arapoglou et al[129]2017Irinotecan40IloprostBPR ex situ, macroscopic (as per van der Ham and Kort[32]), histology (as per Phillips et al[33]), HP8
Akyuz et al[130]20185-FU IV32MelatoninBPR ex situ, HP, histology, TNF-a, IL-1β7
Ocak et al[131]2019HIPEC with CIS30PRPBPR ex situ, HP, histology (as per Verhofstad et al[74])7
Gorur et al[132]2020IP 5-FU40PRPBody weight, BPR in situ, HP, histology (as per Verhofstad et al[74])7
Buk et al[133]2020IP OX30PRPBPR ex situ, histology (as per Verhofstad et al[74]), HP7
Table 9 Immunosuppression models of high-risk anastomosis
Ref.
Year
Immunosuppression method
Sample size
Intervention
Test
Sampling day
Dinc et al[134]2002Methylprednizolone80GM-CSFBPR ex situ, HP, histology (as per Ehrlich et al[25])3
Colak et al[135]2003Dexamethasone24TrapidilBPR ex situ, HP, histology (as per Ehrlich et al[25]), NOx, MDA7
Sakallioglu et al[136]2004Dexamethasone60eGFBPR ex situ, bursting site, HP, histology7
Inglin et al[137]2008MMF63IGF-IBPR ex situ, histology, Ki-672/4/6
Netta et al[138]2014Methylprednizolone50SCFABPR ex situ, CRP, IL-6, TNF-a4
Karakaya et al[139]2021Everolimus60AdMSCMacroscopic (as per Houston and Rotstein[140]), BPR ex situ, HP, histology4/7
Table 10 Macroscopic assessment of the anastomosis
Macroscopic assessment
Wound healing
van der Ham and Kort[32] scoreAdhesions
Zühlke et al[37] score for adhesions Adhesions
Mannheim index[42]Peritonitis presence and severity
Knightly et al[39] score for adhesionsAdhesions
Bosmans et al[50] score Anastomotic complication score
Nair et al[78] score Adhesions
Verco et al[94] score Abscess formation
Mazuji et al[100] score Adhesions
Galili et al[118] score Adhesions
Houston and Rotstein[140] score Adhesions
Table 11 Histologic assessment of the anastomosis
Ref.
Histologic assessment
Ehrlich et al[25]Erythrocytes, polymorphonucleated cells, mononuclear cells, fibroblasts, collagen fibers, fibrin
Houdart et al[105] and Hutschenreiter et al[144] as modified by García et al[30]Mucosal anastomotic re-epithelialization, neovascularization, fibroblasts, fibrosis, muscle layer destruction, neutrophil infiltration, lymphocyte infiltration, histiocyte infiltration, giant cell infiltration
Ehrlich et al[25] as modified by Phillips et al[33]Inflammatory cell infiltration, blood vessel in growth, fibroblast ingrowth, collagen deposition
Houdart et al[105]Granulocyte infiltration, mononuclear cell infiltration, fibroblastic proliferation, focal necrosis, exudate formation
Mucosal damage index by Mei et al[43]0: Normal mucosa, no damage on mucosal surface; 1: Mild hyperemia and edema, no erosion or ulcer on mucosal surface; 2: Moderate hyperemia and edema with erosion on mucosal surface; 3: Severe hyperemia and edema with necrosis and ulcer on mucosal surface, the major ulcerative area < 1 cm; 4: Severe hyperemia and edema with necrosis and ulcer on mucosal surface, the major ulcerative area > 1 cm
de Roy van Zuidewijn et al[54]Re-epithelialization, regeneration of muscularis propria, mucosal muscularis propria damage, necrosis, inflammatory exudate, granulation tissue, granulocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts, granulation tissue
Greenhalgh et al[64]Epithelization, cellular infiltration, fibroblastic proliferation, collagen deposition, neovascularization
Biert et al[73]Necrosis, polymorphonuclear cells, lymphocytes, macrophages, edema, epithelium, submucosal - muscular continuity, neovascularization, fibrosis
Attard et al[75]Mucosal continuity, muscular continuity, re-epithelialization, granulation tissue, polymorphonuclear cells, lymphocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts
Verhofstad et al[74]Necrosis, polymorphonuclear cells, lymphocytes, macrophages, edema, mucosal continuity, submucosal – muscular continuity
Nursal et al[116]Fibroblast infiltration, capillary formation, re-epithelialization, granulocyte infiltration, mononuclear cell infiltration
Park et al[121] and Chiu et al[122]Grade 1: Normal mucosa; grade 2: The subepithelial space at the tip of the villus; grade 3: Increase in subepithelial space; grade 4: Overlapping and spills of the floor of the villus; grade 5: Disintegration of the lamina propria; grade 6: Crypt layer injury; grade 7: Transmucosal infarction and grade 8: Transmural infarction
Piroglu et al[124]Inflammatory cell infiltration/concentration, neovascularization, fibroblastic activity, collagen fibers
Miltschitzky et al[15]Blood vessel ingrowth, fibroblasts, collagen formation, inflammatory cell infiltration, first layer in which continuity has been restored, number of healed layers, epithelium closed, crypt architecture restored, overall healing quality


Write to the Help Desk