Autologous blood therapy has emerged as a promising modality in managing ocular surface disorders. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current literature regarding the use of autologous blood in ocular surface disorders, encompassing its physiological basis, clinical applications, techniques, challenges, and future perspectives. The ocular surface, comprising the cornea, conjunctiva, and tear film, plays a critical role in maintaining visual function, and its disruption can lead to various pathological conditions. With its rich composition of growth factors, cytokines, and other bioactive molecules, autologous blood offers therapeutic potential in promoting corneal wound healing, reducing inflammation, and improving tear film stability. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of autologous blood therapy in diverse ocular surface disorders, including persistent epithelial defects, neurotrophic keratopathy, and dry eye disease. However, challenges such as variability in treatment response, adverse effects, and optimal patient selection remain areas of concern. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of action, refine treatment protocols, and explore synergistic approaches with other therapeutic modalities. Despite these challenges, autologous blood therapy holds promise as a valuable adjunctive treatment option for ocular surface disorders, offering new avenues for improving patient outcomes and quality of life. This review examines the mechanisms underlying ocular surface disorders while discussing existing autologous blood-based therapies for managing these disorders. Current clinical trials are also summarized, and a comparison between autologous blood therapy and conventional eyedrops is attempted. Finally, safe techniques and protocols for autologous blood medicine are elucidated, and adverse effects and future perspectives of this novel therapy are reviewed.

The 0bjective is to compare treatment effects between undiluted autologous platelet-rich plasma (APRP) and autologous serum (AS) in patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye disease (DED).

A single-centre, randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted. 96 adult DED patients with an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score of ≥23 and/or Oxford staining grade of ≥2 were randomised to receive either 100% APRP (n=48) or 100% AS (n=48) for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included OSDI Score and ocular surface staining measured by Oxford grading scale at 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included fluorescein tear break-up time, Schirmer's test, meibum quality and expressibility, and adverse events. The 95% CI for the mean difference in OSDI scores between groups was estimated to assess non-inferiority of the OSDI score at a prespecified margin of 4.18 points.

At week 4, there was no significant difference in decreased OSDI scores between groups, with the mean difference (100% APRP-100% AS) of 1.41 (95% CI -1.26, 4.08, p=0.299). The upper limit was less than the prespecified margin, indicating non-inferiority of 100% APRP vs 100% AS. The probabilities of achieving an Oxford grade 0-1 after treatment were not significantly different between groups, with an OR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.25, 1.52, p=0.288). No significant differences in secondary outcomes were observed between groups.

In the short-term, 100% APRP was not inferior to 100% AS in reducing dry eye symptoms and ocular surface staining in moderate-to-severe DED.

NCT04683796.

As the most common acute optic neuropathy in older patients, nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) presents with varying degrees of visual acuity loss and visual field defect. However, there is no generally accepted treatment for NAION.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for patients with acute NAION within 2 months.

A prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial.

Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients were enrolled. Of them, 13 received anisodine hydrobromide and butylphthalide-sodium chloride injection continuously for 10 days as basic treatment in the control group, and 12 received two tenon capsule injections of PRP on a 10 days interval as an additional treatment in the PRP group. We compared the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and capillary perfusion density (CPD) of radial peripapillary capillaries and the moth-eaten eara of the peripapillary superficial capillary plexus and deep capillary plexus at 1 day (D1) before the first PRP treatment and 7 days (D7), 14 days (D14), and 30 days (D30) after the first PRP injection. Ocular and systemic adverse effects were assessed.

In the PRP group, a better BCVA occurred at D30 (adjusted p = 0.005, compared with D1, recovered from 0.67 ± 0.59 to 0.43 ± 0.59), and a significant improvement in CPD was observed at D30 (adjusted p < 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.027, compared with D1, D7, D14, in sequence, the value was 35.97 ± 4.65, 38.73 ± 4.61, 39.05 ± 5.26, 42.71 ± 4.72, respectively). CPD at D7 in the PRP group was better than that in the control group (p = 0.043). However, neither BCVA nor the moth-eaten area index were significantly different (all p > 0.5) between the two groups. The main adverse effect was local discomfort resolved within 1 week, and no other systemic adverse events occurred.

Tenon capsule injection of PRP was a safe treatment for AION and could improve capillary perfusion of the optic nerve head and might be helpful in increasing short-term vision in patients with acute NAION.

Dry eye disease has public health and economic significance. Platelet-rich plasma is rich in anti-inflammatory agents and growth factors, both beneficial for ocular surface repair. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the benefits of platelet-rich plasma for treating dry eye disease and its adverse effects.

Prospective comparative studies using platelet-rich plasma as monotherapy for dry eye disease were included for efficacy assessment. Before-after studies were included for adverse events assessment. Data sources included PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022347982). PRISMA guidelines were followed. The National Health Institute (NIH) quality assessment tool for before-after studies, the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2), and the methodological index for non-randomized studies were used to assess the risk of bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

19 studies (10 comparative and 9 before-after) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The occurrence rate of adverse effects was 2.6 % (95 % CI: 0.5 - 4.7). The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for dry eye symptoms was 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.25 - 1.37; I2 = 82 %; p < 0.00001; Z = 2.84, p = 0.004); tear quality was 0.44 (95 % CI: 0.06 - 0.81; I2 = 67 %; p = 0.003; Z = 2.26, p = 0.02); tear quantity was 0.45 (95 % CI: 0.03 - 0.88; I2 = 74 %; p = 0.0003; Z = 2.10, p = 0.04); and corneal staining 0.72 (95 % CI: 0.14 - 1.30; I2 = 85 %; p < 0.00001; Z = 2.43, p = 0.02).

The current study shows that platelet-rich plasma is efficacious in managing dry eye disease, significantly reducing dry eye signs and symptoms. Such significant improvements could translate to improved quality of life.

The ocular surface refers to the outermost layer of the eye, which includes the cornea, conjunctiva and eyelids [...].

The aim of the study was to compare the difference in composition between 100% autologous serum (AS) and 100% platelet-rich plasma (PRP) eye drops and assess their impact on the clinical outcomes after the treatment of severe dry eye (DE) in primary Sjogren Syndrome patients (pSS).

This is an interventional, non-randomized, comparative, three-month study. 22 patients with severe DE in pSS were treated with 100% AS (22 eyes) and 100% PRP (22 eyes) eye drops 5 times per day in monotherapy mode. The quantifications of growth factors (GFs) such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), nerve growth factor (NGF), transforming growth factor (TGF-b), insulin-like growth factor (IGF), fibronectin, and substance p in hemoderivates were done. The main outcome measures were: Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), the Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining according to the Oxford scale, conjunctival hyperaemia, and Meibomian gland parameters. The results were compared at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months following the treatment. The clinical results were correlated with the concentration of GFs in the biological tear substitutes.

Significant differences were observed in the concentration of FGF (4.42 ± 0.86 vs. 15.96 ± 7.63, p < 0.0001), EGF (4.98 ± 0.97 vs. 39.06 ± 20.18, p < 0.0001), fibronectin (929.6 ± 111.5 vs. 823.64 ± 98.49, p = 0.0005), VEGF (175.45 ± 65.93 vs. 717.35 ± 488.15, p < 0.0001), PDGF AB (619.6 ± 117.30 vs. 349.66 ± 79.82, p < 0.0001), NGF (85.22 ± 23.49 vs. 8.29 ± 9.06, p < 0.0001), PDGF (935.38 ± 434.26 vs. 126.66 ± 54.41, p < 0.0001), substance p (112.58 ± 27.28 vs. 127.51 ± 26.56, p = 0.0125) in PRP compared to AS. The level of TGF-β was undoubtedly higher in AS than in PRP (1031.37 ± 330.23 vs. 726.03 ± 298.95, p = 0.0004). No significant differences between AS and PRP were observed in the concentration of IGF. Therapy with blood products relieved the signs and symptoms in pSS DE patients. There was a statistically significant improvement in BCVA, the Schirmer test, TBUT, Meibomian gland parameters, and the reduction of the OSDI scores, Oxford staining, and conjunctiva hyperaemia in each of the groups. However, the clinical changes were more significant in the PRP group. There were numerous correlations between the level of GFs and the mean change in clinical outcomes. No adverse events were reported.

Despite the fact that blood derivatives differ in composition, they seem to be effective and safe in the treatment of severe DE in pSS patients. The signs and symptoms of DE were reduced in both groups, but only the mean change in OSDI was statistically significant. A greater reduction in OSDI scores was observed in the PRP group. The obtained results and the composition of haemoderivates may indicate the superiority of PRP in relieving the symptoms of DE in pSS patients compared to AS.