BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Exp Med. Dec 20, 2025; 15(4): 109839
Published online Dec 20, 2025. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i4.109839
Pregnancy and diabetes: Emerging insights from contemporary diabetes research
Sanjana Aggarwal, Department of Internal Medicine, Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital, New Delhi 110062, India
Vatsalya Choudhary, Department of Internal Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
Azra Kothawala, Department of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum 590010, Karnātaka, India
Denise Mourad, Department of Internal Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48858, United States
Charu Agarwal, Department of Family Medicine, Marion Health, Marion, IN 46952, United States
Juhi V Amin, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SSG Hospital and Medical College, Baroda 390001, Gujarāt, India
Maneeth Mylavarapu, Department of Health Informatics Management, Baptist Health Walker Hospital, Jasper, AL 35501, United States
Shaylika Chauhan, Department of Internal Medicine, Geisinger Health System, Wikes-Barre, PA 18711, United States
Rupak Desai, Outcomes Research, Independent Researcher, Atlanta, GA 30079, United States
ORCID number: Sanjana Aggarwal (0009-0008-4761-6810); Vatsalya Choudhary (0009-0006-9566-9277); Azra Kothawala (0000-0001-6830-3591); Denise Mourad (0009-0003-8599-6619); Charu Agarwal (0000-0002-7247-9917); Juhi V Amin (0009-0009-2740-7824); Maneeth Mylavarapu (0009-0004-2367-9615); Shaylika Chauhan (0000-0002-0253-3973); Rupak Desai (0000-0002-5315-6426).
Co-first authors: Sanjana Aggarwal and Vatsalya Choudhary.
Author contributions: Aggarwal S and Choudhary V contributed equally to this manuscript and are co-first authors. Aggarwal S, Choudhary V, Kothawala A, Mourad D, Agarwal C, Amin JV, and Mylavarapu M contributed to writing-original draft, review and editing; Chauhan S contributed to methodology, writing-review and editing, visualization, supervision; Desai R contributed to conceptualization, methodology, software, formal analysis, resources, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing, visualization.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose related to this manuscript. No financial support, grants, or other forms of compensation have been received that could have influenced the outcomes or interpretation of this work.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Shaylika Chauhan, MD, FACP, Department of Internal Medicine, Geisinger Health System, 1000 E Mountain Blvd, Wikes-Barre, PA 18711, United States. drshaylikachauhan@gmail.com
Received: May 23, 2025
Revised: June 25, 2025
Accepted: November 25, 2025
Published online: December 20, 2025
Processing time: 210 Days and 12.4 Hours

Abstract

This review summarizes the breakthrough studies on diabetes management in pregnancy presented at the 84th American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions, encompassing 31 presentations, categorized into basic science, clinical studies, therapeutic interventions, and maternal/neonatal outcomes. Basic science investigations reported the enduring impact of gestational diabetes mellitus on offspring adiposity, neurodevelopment, transgenerational metabolic risk, and key insights on β-cell functioning and islet dysfunctioning. Clinical studies explored novel diagnostic and monitoring approaches, highlighting the potential of continuous glucose monitoring for early detection, risk prediction, and personalized management. Therapeutic interventions demonstrated the efficacy of glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists in preventing cognitive deficits in offspring. Maternal and neonatal health studies emphasized the critical role of optimal glycemic control, early gestational diabetes mellitus intervention, and risk stratification utilizing HbA1c and electronic heart records.

Key Words: Gestational diabetes mellitus; Continuous glucose monitoring; Pregnancy outcomes; Insulin resistance; Maternal-fetal health

Core Tip: Emerging research from the 84th American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions emphasizes the importance of early detection, continuous glucose monitoring, and targeted interventions in managing gestational diabetes. Findings highlight improved maternal and neonatal outcomes through personalized care, with continuous glucose monitoring metrics and metabolic profiling offering promising tools for risk prediction and therapeutic optimization.



INTRODUCTION

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) Scientific Sessions have historically served as a central platform for presenting groundbreaking research in diabetes, including maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancy-related diabetes. This review focuses on highlights from the 2024 meeting, which featured a breadth of translational and clinical findings. Managing diabetes in pregnancy presents unique challenges, necessitating tailored therapeutic approaches to ensure maternal and fetal health. Despite advancements, significant gaps remain in optimizing treatment strategies. Late-breaking research usually bridges this gap by providing crucial insights that can refine clinical guidelines and improve patient outcomes. The ADA Scientific Sessions serves as a crucial annual event, presenting the most recent advancements in diabetes research. Consequently, several late-breaking trials and clinical studies on diabetes during pregnancy management were presented at the 2024 edition of the ADA Scientific Sessions.

Multiple studies provided proof of an association between gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and developmental deficits in the child[1]. At the same time, a study demonstrated that prenatal use of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analog diminishes cognitive deficits[2]. In a 2024 ADA study, Thaker et al[3] reported metabolomic and transcriptomic profiles suggesting increased adiposity and inflammatory pathway activation among women with GDM. It was also proposed that the pathophysiology of diabetes in South Asian women following GDM was more likely due to insulin deficiency than insulin resistance[4]. Some therapeutic studies suggested continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) as a superior and more acceptable glucose monitoring method than the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)[5]. CGM at 13-14 weeks could be an alternative to OGTT at 24-28 weeks. A sleep study suggested that among women with a history of GDM, those with frequent snoring are at a significantly increased risk of developing overt diabetes[6]. This narrative review aims to identify emerging threads and discuss the implications of the latest groundbreaking studies for clinical practice.

BASIC SCIENCE/TRANSLATIONAL STUDIES
Neurodevelopmental effects of intrauterine exposure to gestational diabetes

Chakravartti et al[1] examined the impact of GDM exposure on children’s adiposity and brain development from childhood to adolescence. The study showed that GDM-exposed children had higher body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.058), body fat percentage (P < 0.049), waist circumference (P < 0.015), and increased growth in total cortex and gray matter volume, significantly if exposed before 26 weeks of gestation[1].

Metabolomic and transcriptomic profiles in gestational diabetes reveal nutritional and inflammatory mechanisms underlying intergenerational risk

Thaker et al[3] assessed the impact of GDM on the intergenerational transfer of metabolic risk. Relative to controls, participants with obesity or GDM showed increased activity in pathways involving intracellular protein movement, steroid signaling, cell cycle regulation, histone and DNA modifications, insulin receptor expression, and other metabolic processes.

Altered adipocyte expandability and function in gestational diabetes and preeclampsia compared with healthy pregnancies

Lees et al[7] investigated the impact of GDM and pre-eclampsia (PE) on adipose tissue (AT) morphology and function in the third trimester. Subcutaneous AT (SAT) and visceral AT (VAT) biopsies were obtained during cesarean sections. While SAT adipocyte size remained consistent across groups, GDM was associated with VAT adipocyte hypertrophy, fibrosis, elevated pericellular fibrosis, and increased hypoxia-inducible factor-1α mRNA expression[7].

Comparative assessment of postpartum β-cell function following gestational diabetes and normoglycemic pregnancy

In this prospective cohort study, when examined for islet cell function postpartum, at 3 months, the GDM cohort had significantly higher fasting glucose (P = 0.04) and fasting glucagon (P = 0.03) compared to the normal cohort. Furthermore, the study reported that both α- and β-cell dysfunction could contribute to the GDM, with residual dysfunctioning present up to 3 months post-partum[8].

Loss of β-cell insulin receptor substrate 1 increases susceptibility to gestational diabetes in female mice

Wang et al[9] explored how gestational diabetes develops and examined the role of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1) in supporting β-cell adaptation during pregnancy. In islets lacking IRS1, transcriptomic data indicated suppressed GATA4 signaling and downregulation of its downstream effectors Reg1 and Reg3a, both important for β-cell replication. Conversely, pregnancy in wild-type mice was associated with enhanced IRS1 expression together with increased GATA4, Reg1, and Reg3a, reflecting the normal gestational rise in β-cell mass[9].

CLINICAL/EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES
Insulin deficiency as a determinant of early postpartum glucose intolerance in women

Gitlin et al[4] studied the development of postpartum type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in South Asian women with GDM. The study reported that 45% of participants developed prediabetes or T2DM. Furthermore, these women exhibited significantly lower insulinogenic index and oral disposition index at 6 weeks postpartum, indicating insulin deficiency[4].

Clinical insights from CGM during type 1 diabetic pregnancy

This retrospective study Fisher et al[10] used a linear mixed-effects model to assess third-trimester CGM metrics (Dexcom G6 CGM) and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies with T2DM. At 28 weeks, pregnancies with hypertensive disorders (HDP) had higher time above range (TAR) (P < 0.01) and lower time in range (TIR) (P < 0.05) than those without HDP. HDP also significantly influenced TIR trends throughout the third trimester, particularly between 28 weeks and 31 weeks[10].

Predictive value of CGM in identifying gestational diabetes and poor pregnancy outcomes

Li et al[11] collected CGM data from 760 pregnant women. Logistic and elastic net regression models were developed, and their performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Time above 140 mg/dL (TA140) in the 2nd trimester and weeks 13-14 predicted GDM with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.81 and 0.74, respectively. Furthermore, TA140 at weeks 12-14 showed similar sensitivity to the OGTT at 24-28 weeks for predicting HDP and large gestational age births (LGA)[11].

CGM among pregnant individuals with glucose intolerance

This single-blinded, prospective observational study Gordon et al[12] divided pregnant women (24-32 weeks) with varying glucose tolerance into four groups. The mean TIR for the normal glucose challenge test (GCT) was 96.65%, while the abnormal GCT/OGTT groups ranged from 91.8% to 92.6%. The normal GCT group had significantly higher TIR than the abnormal GCT/1 abnormal OGTT and GDM groups (P = 0.04)[12].

Association between CGM metrics and adverse pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes

This interventional study Kusinski et al[13] assessed the association of CGM metrics at 29 weeks and 36 weeks with adverse pregnancy outcomes in 432 women with BMI > 25 kg/m2. Mean glucose, TIR, and TAR at 29 weeks were significantly associated with adverse outcomes, and time below range at 36 weeks was associated with neonatal hypoglycemia[13].

CGM as a tool to identify neonatal hypoglycemia in infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes

Jones et al[14] examined the role of CGM in detecting neonatal hypoglycemia in 13 mother-neonate pairs with GDM. CGM revealed instances of suspected neonatal hypoglycemia that routine clinical practices overlooked[14].

Characterization of postprandial glycemic patterns across uncomplicated pregnancies

This prospective observational study Carlson et al[15] examined CGM data from 157 uncomplicated pregnancies. The mean fasting glucose was 88 mg/dL, and the mean postprandial peak was 126 mg/dL. Glycemic excursion was significantly higher in women who developed HDP of pregnancy[15].

The risk of progression from gestational diabetes to T2DM

This study Yin et al[6] investigated the associations between sleep, T2DM risk, and metabolic biomarkers in 2999 women with a history of GDM from the Nurses’ Health Study II. A shorter sleep duration (≤ 6 hours) was associated with increased T2DM risk. Snoring also increased T2DM risk[6].

Associations between sleep duration and cardiometabolic biomarkers during pregnancy

Chen et al[16] examined the associations between sleep duration and cardiometabolic biomarkers during pregnancy using data from a case-control study nested in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies-Singleton Cohort. The proportion of participants with ≤ 6 hours of sleep increased from 15.1% at visit 0 to 39.6% at visit 4. Furthermore, sleep duration ≥ 9 hours at visit one was positively associated with insulin levels[16].

Predicting late-onset gestational diabetes in women without early pregnancy GDM

In this prospective cohort study, pregnant women without early GDM (EGDM) but with GDM risk factors underwent HbA1c on entry and a 2-hour 75 g OGTT at 24-28 weeks’ gestation. Women with late GDM (LGDM) vs no GDM were older, more likely to be overweight/obese, non-European, and to have a family history of diabetes. Pregnant women who were older, overweight/obese, non-European, and with a family history of diabetes were found to have LGDM even if they did not have EGDM[17].

Pregnancy outcomes in women with one abnormal value on the Carpenter-Coustan OGTT

Scifres et al[18] controlled trial that comprised 827 participants, and among them, those with one abnormal value on a 100 g OGTT (1ABNL) on Carpenter-Coustan GDM were not treated and compared to (non-GDM) NGDM and GDM. Relative to the NGDM group, participants with 1 ABNL demonstrated higher glucose and insulin concentrations but showed diminished insulin sensitivity and impaired β-cell function. Similarly, LGA and maternal composite were higher, while neonatal composite and small for gestational age were lower[18].

Efficacy of real-time CGM in gestational diabetes

Ehrhardt et al[19] conducted to assess outcomes of real-time CGM (RT-CGM) compared with self-blood glucose monitoring (SMBG) in gestational diabetes. By 32 weeks gestational age, CGM metrics were similar for both groups, except for mean glucose and time below the range (TBR54). At 36 weeks, mean glucose decreased for RT-CGM but increased for SMBG, with a significantly lower TBR54 for RT-CGM (P = 0.03). A1c levels were similar between groups, while diabetes medication use was higher in the RT-CGM group (69% vs 32% for SMBG)[19].

RT-CGM improves TIR in pregnant individuals with gestational diabetes

This randomized, open-label trial compares RT-CGM for longer than 7 days to 4-times-daily SMBG (with blinded CGM). Two-sample t-tests were used, and glucose TIR (60-140 mg/dL) was the primary outcome. The CGM arm had more glucose TIR than the SMBG arm, especially during the daytime[20].

Reevaluating the role of the antenatal OGTT in diagnosing gestational diabetes

In this prospective cohort, Kusinski et al[21] examined the extent to which suboptimal specimen processing led to missed diagnoses of gestational diabetes and investigated the potential of a 28-week HbA1c measurement as an alternative to the OGTT for identifying hyperglycemic pregnancies. Among 1308 pregnant participants from nine United Kingdom centers, enhanced glucose processing led to 0.6 mmol/L higher glucose levels, increasing the gestational diabetes diagnosis rate from 9% to 22%[21].

THERAPEUTIC INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES
Postpartum screening for glucose abnormalities using CGM

This prospective cohort study investigates the feasibility of postpartum CGM in detecting dysglycemia by assessing sensor return rates and participant experience. On OGTT, dysglycemia (7 impaired glucose tolerance, 1 diabetes) was accurately predicted when > 4% of time was spent above 180 mg/dL, yielding 86% sensitivity, 85% specificity, a positive predictive value of 60%, and a negative predictive value of 96%[5].

Prenatal GLP-1 agonist therapy ameliorates offspring cognitive deficits in maternal diabetes via ADGRL3-mediated placental modulation

This study Ito et al[2] tested the hypothesis that administering a GLP-1 agonist to mothers with diabetes could alleviate cognitive defects in offspring when given prenatally. To generate a pregestational diabetes model, 8-week-old female C57BL/6J mice were treated with streptozotocin. Cell-based studies using human trophoblast (HTR8/SVneo) and human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cell lines demonstrated that ADGRL3 transmits GLP-1 signals through Gαs and Gαq pathways, providing a mechanistic basis for the beneficial effects[2].

Association of fasting lactate concentrations with preeclampsia development among women with gestational glucose intolerance

This prospective cohort examined whether patients with GGI-defined as an abnormal screening GTT at 24-28 weeks of gestation-who later developed preeclampsia had higher blood lactate levels. 13% of the included patients developed PE, and in these patients, the median fasting lactate level was higher. After controlling for pre-pregnancy BMI, it was a significant predictor of PE (P = 0.047)[22].

MATERNAL AND NEONATAL HEALTH
Association between late-pregnancy HbA1c levels and adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes

Wu et al[23] investigated the association between third-trimester HbA1c levels and obstetric and perinatal adverse outcomes. The study’s primary endpoint was defined as combined obstetric and perinatal adverse outcomes. Elevated HbA1c (> 5.8%) predicted increased likelihood of cesarean section (both overall and primary), macrosomia, neonatal hypoglycemia, and composite perinatal complications, independent of confounding factors.

Fasting vs postprandial glucose increments and overall hyperglycemia in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes

Ling et al[24] investigated and compared the relative contribution of fasting hyperglycemia and postprandial hyperglycemia across TIR and HbA1c in pregnant women with T1DM. 295 CGM-HbA1c profiles were analyzed in this study. As diabetes worsened, the postprandial hyperglycemia contribution rate steadily reduced, while the fasting hyperglycemia contribution rates went up gradually with decreasing TIR (P < 0.001) or increasing HbA1c (P < 0.001).

Impact of diagnostic timing of overt diabetes on maternal and neonatal outcomes

Reichelt et al[25] investigated the pregnancy outcomes in women with overt diabetes at the time of diagnosis. 217 of the total women developed overt diabetes (33.6%, 95%CI: 30.0%-37.0%). Women diagnosed before 13 weeks had lesser weight gain, lower third-trimester HbA1c levels, and fewer maternal hospital admissions than those diagnosed later. However, the pregnancy outcomes were similar in the groups and were unaffected by the diagnosis time.

Machine learning-based early prediction of gestational diabetes from electronic health records

Germaine et al[26] aimed to investigate the efficacy of machine learning models from data collected in the first trimester (8-14 weeks) of GDM patients using electronic health records (EHR) spanning from 2018-2022, excluding 2020. Four machine learning models-Random Forest, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Logistic Regression, and Explainable Boosting Machine were tested, with Logistic Regression demonstrating the best performance.

Impact of maternal hyperglycemia and HDP of pregnancy on adverse outcomes across the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

Zhang et al[27] evaluated how the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic influenced the association between maternal hyperglycemia, HDP, and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Findings showed that births occurring during both the early and late phases of the pandemic carried higher risks of complications-excluding preterm birth-than those delivered before the pandemic. The risk of LGA and macrosomia was higher among women with normal blood pressure in the early phase and among those with preeclampsia or eclampsia in the later phase[27].

Maternal weight and pregnancy outcomes following a reduced-energy dietary intervention

This randomized, controlled, double-blind trial included 423 women with gestational diabetes and BMI > 25 kg/m2. Participants were randomized at 29 weeks of gestation into two arms: The control arm with women who received a standard-energy diet and the intervention arm with women who received weekly diet boxes of reduced-energy diet until delivery. The results showed no significant differences in maternal weight change or offspring birth weight between the groups. However, the group on the reduced-energy diet required less insulin therapy[28].

Influence of early therapeutic intervention on glycemic control and maternal–fetal outcomes in early GDM

Immanuel et al[29] examined the impact of early GDM treatment on glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes. Results showed that women achieving optimal glycemia had significantly fewer pregnancy complications. Additionally, lower mean fasting glucose levels were associated with reduced complications. Women who initiated treatment for early GDM earlier in their pregnancy demonstrated better overall glycemic control, including lower mean glucose and mean fasting glucose levels, compared to those who started treatment later[29].

Pregnancy outcomes in congenital generalized lipodystrophy due to homozygous AGPAT2 mutations

Santomauro Junior et al[30] reported two successful pregnancies in a woman with congenital generalized lipodystrophy managed without recombinant leptin. In pregnancy, the patient presented with characteristic congenital generalized lipodystrophy manifestations, including muscular pseudohypertrophy, diabetes, hepatic steatosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, and hypertriglyceridemia complicated by pancreatitis. Her condition was managed through a low-carbohydrate diet and metformin at 1500 mg per day. However, in her second pregnancy, insulin therapy was used in the third trimester to maintain optimal glycemic and lipid profiles[30].

Associations between fasting and postprandial triglycerides, mean glucose, and TIR in early pregnancy

This observational study in early pregnancy of 31 overweight/obese women found: Median fasting triglycerides were 126 mg/dL; median postprandial triglycerides were 153 mg/dL; 28-week mean glucose was 100 ± 9 mg/dL; 28-week TIR was 94% ± 6%. Early fasting triglycerides correlated positively with 28-week glucose and negatively with 28-week TIR. Early postprandial triglycerides also correlated positively with 28-week glucose. Table 1 summarizes the key findings of all the late-breaking studies[31].

Table 1 Key findings of late-breaking studies on diabetes management in pregnancy of the 84th American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions.
Study category
Study number
Study design and population
Sample size (n)
Primary outcome (s)
Key methods
Key findings
Clinical and research implications
Basic science/translational studies1962-LBProspective cohort; children (7-11 years) exposed to GDM vs unexposed204 (110 GDM exposed, 94 unexposed)Adiposity and brain volumesBrain MRI, adiposity measurements over 6 years, mixed-effects modelsIn utero GDM exposure was associated with increased adiposity (BMI, body fat percentage, waist circumference) and increased growth of total cortex and gray matter in offspringProvides a mechanistic link between GDM exposure and adverse metabolic and neural outcomes in children. Population/setting: United States multiethnic cohort; IADPSG criteria. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
1965-LBProspective; mother-baby dyads (BMI < 25, obese, GDM)39 dyads (13 control, 14 obese, 12 GDM)Placental transcriptomic changes, cord blood metabolic profilesRNA sequencing (placenta), metabolic profiling (cord blood)GDM and obesity were associated with upregulation of genes involved in nutrient transport, inflammation, and methylation, as well as increased INSR expressionSuggests methylation and epigenetic changes may contribute to intergenerational transmission of metabolic risks. Population/setting: Japan (animal model); GLP-1 treatment. Risk-of-Bias Score: ARRIVE 2.0 = moderate
260-ORObservational; 3rd trimester biopsies (NT, GDM, PE)30 (GDM), 7 (PE), 30 (NT)Adipocyte size, AT fibrosis, mRNA expression, insulin signalingAdipocyte size measurement, AT fibrosis assessment, mRNA expression analysis, insulin signaling (immunoblotting)GDM was associated with increased visceral adipose tissue diameter, hypertrophy, and HIF1A mRNA expression. Both GDM and preeclampsia showed decreased insulin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation in subcutaneous adipose tissue. Preeclampsia did not affect visceral adipose tissueIndicates that GDM and preeclampsia have distinct effects on adipose tissue signaling and function. Population/setting: Obese United States cohort; WHO 2013 GDM criteria. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 6/9 (moderate)
200-ORProspective cohort; women with/without GDM postpartum20 (10 GDM, 10 control)Islet-cell function (glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon)75 g OGTT at 3, 6, 12 months postpartumWomen with prior GDM showed increased fasting glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and glucagon at 3 months postpartum, but no differences were observed by 6 monthsEarly postpartum islet-cell dysfunction may increase long-term metabolic risk in women with a history of GDM. Population/setting: United Kingdom cohort; postpartum GDM analysis. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
199-ORInterventional (mice); β-cell IRS1-knockout miceAnimal modelβ-cell compensation, glucose levelsIslet RNA transcriptome analysisIRS1 deficiency disrupted the IRS1-GATA4-Reg1/Reg3a pathway, impaired β-cell compensation, and led to GDMUnderstanding this pathway may lead to new prevention and treatment strategies for GDM. Population/setting: Mouse model; IRS1 KO strain. Risk-of-Bias Score: ARRIVE 2.0 = low
Clinical/epidemiological studies1969-LBProspective cohort; South Asian women postpartum49Insulin resistance and deficiency75 g OGTT, insulin levels at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum, HOMA-IR, IGI, oDIPostpartum glucose intolerance was associated with insulin deficiency (decreased IGI, oDI) but not with changes in insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)Postpartum insulin deficiency may be a better predictor of type 2 diabetes risk in South Asian women than insulin resistance. Population/setting: South Asian cohort; Chennai; postpartum glucose. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 8/9 (low)
62-ORRetrospective cohort; T1DM pregnancies86Adverse pregnancy outcomesCGM metrics (TIR, TAR, TBR, CV) from 28-39 weeks, linear mixed-effects modelHDP were associated with increased TAR and decreased TIR at 28 weeksEarly 3rd trimester CGM metrics are critical for preventing adverse pregnancy outcomes in T1DM pregnancies. Population/setting: United States T1DM pregnancies; Dexcom CGM. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
63-ORProspective observational; pregnant women760GDM, LGA, HDPCGM data, logistic and elastic net regressionCGM-based models (TA140) predicted GDM, LGA, and HDPCGM at 13-14 weeks could potentially serve as an alternative to the OGTT at 24-28 weeks for risk prediction. Population/setting: Multisite CGM trial; 760 pregnant women. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 8/9 (low)
64-ORProspective observational; pregnant women with glucose intoleranceVaries by groupTIRSingle-blinded CGM, GCT, OGTTAbnormal GCT or OGTT results were associated with decreased TIR on CGMAbnormal GCT/OGTT values should not be discounted, even if isolated findings. Population/setting: CGM data; abnormal GCT/OGTT cases. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
65-ORInterventional; women with GDM (BMI > 25)432Adverse pregnancy outcomesCGM, logistic regressionCGM metrics (mean glucose, TIR, TAR) at 29 weeks predicted adverse pregnancy outcomesCGM metrics can predict adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with GDM. Population/setting: CGM metrics in overweight women with GDM. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
66-ORProspective observational; GDM mothers and neonates13 mother-neonate dyadsNeonatal hypoglycemiaMasked CGM during labor and delivery, neonatal thigh CGMCGM identified neonatal hypoglycemia that was missed by routine practicesCGM is potentially useful for identifying neonatal hypoglycemia. Population/setting: Neonatal CGM; 13 mother-infant dyads. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 6/9 (moderate)
67-ORProspective observational; uncomplicated pregnancies157Postprandial glucose patternsBlinded CGM, smartphone appHDP were associated with increased postprandial glucose excursionsSuggests an association between HDP and elevated postprandial glucose excursions. Population/setting: Uncomplicated pregnancies; CGM data. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 8/9 (low)
1976-LBProspective cohort; women with GDM history2999T2D riskCox regression, metabolic biomarkersShorter sleep duration (≤ 6 hours) and frequent snoring were associated with increased T2D riskSleep characteristics are important predictors of T2D risk in women with a history of GDM. Population/setting: NHS II cohort; sleep and T2D risk. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 8/9 (low)
1978-LBMultiracial cohort; pregnant women321Cardiometabolic biomarkersSleep duration assessment, cardiometabolic biomarker measurements, linear mixed modelsShorter sleep duration was associated with increased glucose and HbA1c. Longer sleep duration was associated with increased insulin at the first visit. Shorter sleep duration at the second visit was associated with increased glucose, and longer sleep duration at the second visit was associated with decreased HbA1cAdequate sleep is crucial for maintaining cardiometabolic health during pregnancy. Population/setting: United States NICHD cohort; sleep/cardiometabolic markers. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
202-ORProspective cohort; pregnant women without early GDM2685LGDMHbA1c, OGTT, ROC assessment1HBG level best predicted LGDM, but OGTT was still needed.1HBG is a good predictor of LGDM, but OGTT remains essential for diagnosis. Population/setting: Prospective OGTT cohort; risk factors for LGDM. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 8/9 (low)
203-ORRandomized controlled trial; pregnant women with 1 abnormal OGTT value827Metabolic and clinical outcomesPropensity score models with IPTWWomen with 1 abnormal OGTT value had an increased risk of LGA compared to women with normal glucose tolerance and those with GDMWomen with 1 abnormal OGTT value have a metabolic profile closer to GDM and a higher risk of LGA. Population/setting: RCT; Carpenter-Coustan 1 abnormal OGTT. Risk-of-Bias Score: RoB-2 = moderate
1975-LBRandomized trial; GDM patients107Glycemic controlRT-CGM vs SMBGRT-CGM was associated with decreased mean glucose and TBR54 at 36 weeks, but increased medication useRT-CGM may offer benefits in lowering mean glucose and TBR54 in GDM, although it may be associated with increased medication use. Population/setting: RCT; CGM vs SMBG in GDM patients. Risk-of-Bias Score: RoB-2 = low
259-ORRandomized trial; pregnant women with GDM111TIRReal-time CGM vs SMBG, two-sample t-testsReal-time CGM was associated with higher TIR than SMBG, particularly during daytimeCGM is superior to SMBG in maintaining glucose range in women with GDM. Population/setting: RCT; CGM vs SMBG; TIR analysis. Risk-of-Bias Score: RoB-2 = low
198-ORProspective cohort; pregnant women undergoing OGTT1308GDM diagnosisEnhanced vs standard glucose processingEnhanced glucose processing was associated with increased GDM diagnosis ratesAccurate glucose processing is crucial for the appropriate diagnosis of GDM. Population/setting: United Kingdom cohort; HbA1c vs OGTT. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
Therapeutic interventions and outcomes1973-LBProspective cohort; postpartum women with GDM50Postpartum dysglycemiaPostpartum CGM vs OGTTPostpartum CGM was feasible and acceptable, and the percentage of time > 180 mg/dL predicted OGTT dysglycemiaCGM is a useful postpartum screening tool for dysglycemia. Population/setting: Prospective cohort; GGI and preeclampsia. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
1963-LBInterventional (mice); diabetic mothersAnimal modelCognitive deficits in offspringGLP-1 agonist treatment, placental development assessment, behavioral testing of offspring, immunohistochemistry, single-cell RNA sequencing, qRT-PCR, in vitro studiesPrenatal GLP-1 agonist treatment mitigated cognitive deficits in offspring of diabetic mothersGLP-1 agonists may have a role in preventing cognitive deficits in offspring of mothers with diabetes. Population/setting: HbA1c analysis in United States cohort. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 8/9 (low)
1964-LBProspective cohort; women with glucose intolerance106Preeclampsia developmentFasting lactate, insulin, glucose, HOMA-IR measurementsIncreased fasting venous lactate was predictive of preeclampsia development in women with glucose intoleranceFasting lactate may be a useful predictor of preeclampsia risk in women with glucose intolerance. Population/setting: T1DM women; CGM-HbA1c profiles. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 8/9 (low)
Maternal and neonatal health1970-LBProspective cohort; pregnant women at delivery609Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomesThird-trimester HbA1c measurementHbA1c > 5.8% was associated with increased adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes (C-section, hemorrhage, macrosomia, NICU admission, etc.)HbA1c > 5.8% in the third trimester is a risk factor for pregnancy complications. Population/setting: Retrospective United States cohort; overt DM timing. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
1971-LBObservational; T1DM pregnancies112Fasting and postprandial glucose contributions to hyperglycemiaCGM data analysisFasting hyperglycemia is a major contributor to overall hyperglycemia in T1DM pregnanciesOptimizing insulin regimens to reduce fasting hyperglycemia may improve outcomes in T1DM pregnancies. Population/setting: EHR + ML models for GDM; United States data. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 8/9 (low)
1972-LBRetrospective cohort; women with overt diabetes646Pregnancy outcomesComparison of outcomes based on timing of diagnosisEarly diagnosis of overt diabetes was associated with better metabolic control (decreased weight gain, decreased 3rd-trimester HbA1c) but similar overall pregnancy outcomes compared to later diagnosisEarly screening for hyperglycemia in pregnancy is important for achieving better metabolic control. Population/setting: Louisiana cohort; Medicaid + COVID impact. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
1968-LBRetrospective; pregnant women with GDMAbout 27500GDM predictionEHR data, machine learning models (logistic regression, etc.)Logistic regression models using EHR data can predict GDM in the first trimesterEHRs and machine learning can aid in early GDM prediction. Population/setting: RCT; energy diet in GDM (United Kingdom DiGest). Risk-of-Bias Score: RoB-2 = low
1974-LBRetrospective cohort; pregnant women in Louisiana110447Adverse pregnancy outcomesMedicaid claims data, logistic regressionMaternal hyperglycemia and hypertensive disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with increased adverse pregnancy outcomes (LGA, macrosomia)Tailored strategies are needed for managing high-risk pregnancies during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Population/setting: Early GDM management; capillary glucose data. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 8/9 (low)
257-ORRandomized controlled trial; women with GDM (BMI ≥ 25)423Maternal weight change, offspring birth weightDietary intervention (standard vs reduced-energy diet)A reduced-energy diet was associated with decreased insulin needs, but had no significant effect on maternal weight change or offspring birth weight compared to a standard dietStandard and reduced-energy diets have similar effects on maternal weight and offspring birth weight in women with GDM. Population/setting: Case study; congenital lipodystrophy, AGPAT2. Risk-of-Bias Score: ARRIVE 2.0 = moderate
258-ORProspective cohort; women with early GDM399Glycemic control, pregnancy complicationsCapillary blood glucose monitoring, comparison of early vs late treatmentEarly treatment of early GDM was associated with better glycemic control (decreased mean glucose, increased optimal glycemia) and fewer pregnancy complications compared to late treatmentEarly diagnosis and treatment of GDM are crucial for optimizing glycemic control and reducing complications. Population/setting: Obese pregnancy cohort; triglycerides, CGM. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
1977-LBCase study; woman with CGL1Pregnancy outcomesClinical observation of two pregnanciesSuccessful pregnancies are possible in women with CGL without leptin therapyCGL can present with varying degrees of metabolic severity, and successful pregnancy outcomes are possible. Population/setting: MRI + adiposity; LA-based United States cohort. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
201-ORObservational cohort; overweight/obese pregnant women31Correlation between early pregnancy triglycerides and glucose metrics at 28 weeksFTG and PPTG measurement, CGM at 28 weeksFasting and postprandial triglycerides in early pregnancy correlated with mean glucose and TIR at 28 weeksTriglyceride levels in early pregnancy may help identify women at risk for later hyperglycemia. Population/setting: Placenta transcriptomics; obesity/GDM cohort. Risk-of-Bias Score: NOS = 7/9 (moderate)
Discussion and future directions

Recent findings at the ADA Scientific Sessions complement and, in some cases, expand upon prior research in gestational diabetes. Research on GDM’s impact should focus on uncovering the pathways linking maternal diabetes to brain development and cognitive outcomes in the children, particularly the role of MBH gliosis[32] and immune changes in obesity. Furthermore, investigations on how epigenetic modifications due to GDM contribute to intergenerational metabolic risk and understandings of the changes in VAT[33] and their distinct mechanisms in GDM vs PE are needed. Regarding early GDM screening, postprandial glucose patterns via CGM need to be studied to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes and optimize CGM protocols. Additionally, for GDM prevention/treatment, the IRS-1-GATA4-Reg1/Reg3a pathway in β-cells should be explored as a potential target.

Research on postpartum dysglycemia suggests that CGM may outperform OGTT, specifically in women with limited healthcare access, warranting further exploration. Compared to previous literature, which primarily emphasized OGTT for GDM screening, these CGM-based predictive models show improved early detection and patient acceptability, supporting a potential shift in clinical protocols.

Studies should also explore GLP-1 agonists as an alternative to insulin for diabetic mothers and investigate elevated fasting venous lactate levels in patients who develop PE. While prior trials have emphasized pharmacologic interventions in GDM, these ADA 2024 studies extend the evidence base by evaluating dietary modification and GLP-1 receptor agonists, suggesting a broader therapeutic landscape that includes both nutritional and neurodevelopmental endpoints.

Furthermore, optimizing early HbA1c screening and leveraging EHRs for GDM prediction could enhance early diagnosis and interventions. Additionally, the long-term benefits of early initiation of GDM management need to be further assessed. Together, these findings underscore the evolving landscape of GDM research, where integration of early screening, mechanistic insights, and population-specific data is critical to refine guidelines and improve maternal-fetal outcomes.

Limitations

This review summarizes studies presented at the June 2024 ADA Scientific Sessions and does not represent all current research on gestational diabetes. The heterogeneity in study populations, diagnostic criteria, and research designs may limit generalizability. Included studies drew from varied cohorts-such as South Asian, Japanese, and United States populations-with differing BMI classifications, screening protocols, and outcome measures. While structured bias assessments (NOS, RoB-2, ARRIVE 2.0) were performed, some assessments were limited by the level of detail available in abstracts rather than full-text articles. Additionally, abstract-based data often lacked information on treatment duration, comparator arms, and definitions of clinical endpoints, which constrained our ability to evaluate study rigor uniformly. As this review is based on scientific meeting abstracts, full peer-reviewed data and detailed methods were often unavailable, which limited the depth of reference formatting and methodological detail.

CONCLUSION

The 84th ADA Scientific Sessions revealed key findings for future research and clinical guidelines in managing overweight or obese pregnant women with or without GDM. CGM can serve as a screening tool for hyperglycemia and predict adverse pregnancy outcomes. Earlier diagnosis and treatment of hyperglycemia, linked to poorer pregnancy and fetal outcomes, can help reduce complications for both mothers and babies.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Corresponding Author's Membership in Professional Societies: GEISINGER Health System.

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country of origin: United States

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C, Grade C, Grade C

Novelty: Grade C, Grade C, Grade D

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade D, Grade D

Scientific Significance: Grade C, Grade C, Grade D

P-Reviewer: Mohib MM, Research fellow, Researcher, Germany; Ravi PK, MD, Assistant Professor, India S-Editor: Liu H L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhao YQ

References
1.  Chakravartti SP, Gao X, Xiang A, Page KA. Intrauterine Exposure to Gestational Diabetes and the Developing Brain. Diabetes. 2024;73:1962-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
2.  Ito M, Sugai K, Sasaki J, Suzuki R, Odawara M, Torii M, Hashimoto-torii K. Prenatal Treatment of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Agonist Mitigates Cognitive Deficits in Offspring of Mothers with Diabetes by Modulating Placental Development Mediated by ADGRL3. Diabetes. 2024;73:1963-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
3.  Thaker VV, Firestein M, Masson C, Liu Z, Reddy U, Gallagher D, Leduc CA. Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Signatures of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) Suggest Nutritional and Inflammatory Pathways in Intergenerational Transfer of Risk. Diabetes. 2024;73:1965-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
4.  Gitlin ES, Kulkarni V, Alexander M, Naik S, Kole A, Tambe S, Deshpande P, Brown T, Mathad JS, Chebrolu P. Insulin Deficiency in Women with Early Postpartum Glucose Intolerance. Diabetes. 2024;73:1969-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
5.  Cabrera C, Ogyaadu SJ, Kaplan L, Ipek A, Levy CJ, O'malley G. Postpartum Dysglycemia Screening with Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes. 2024;73:1973-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
6.  Yin X, Bao W, Yang J, Yu G, Liu P, Zhang C. Sleep Characteristics in Association with the Risk of Progression from Gestational Diabetes to Type 2 Diabetes—A Prospective Cohort Study. Diabetes. 2024;73:1976-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
7.  Lees Z, Salt I, Freeman DJ. Differences in Adipocyte Expandability and Function between Healthy Pregnancies and Pregnancies Complicated by Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Preeclampsia. Diabetes. 2024;73:260-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
8.  Egan AM, Christie HE, Mohan S, Vella A. Postpartum Islet-Cell Function in Individuals With and Without Gestational Diabetes. Diabetes. 2024;73:200-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
9.  Wang X, Usman T, Chhetri G, Quan Zheng W, Yeh H, White MF, Henry Dong H. Beta-Cell IRS1 Deficiency Predisposes Female Mice to Developing Gestational Diabetes. Diabetes. 2024;73:199-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
10.  Fisher SA, Villa Tamayo MF, Pavan J, Moscoso-Vasquez M, Fabris C, Conboy N, Niznik CM, Yee LD, Kohn MA, Kobayashi E, Majithia AR, Huang J, Tian T, Aaron R, Klonoff DC. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancies with Type 1 Diabetes—A Retrospective Study. Diabetes. 2024;73:62-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
11.  Li Z, Beck R, Durnwald C, Carlson AL, Norton E, Bergenstal RM, Johnson ML, Dunnigan SM, Banfield M, Krumwiede KJ, Sibayan J, Calhoun P. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Diabetes. 2024;73:63-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
12.  Gordon RD, Grasch J, Nandam N, Wu J, Schneider P, Gabbe SG, Landon MB, Costantine M, Venkatesh K, Buschur E. Continuous Glucose Monitoring among Pregnant Individuals with Glucose Intolerance. Diabetes. 2024;73:64-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
13.  Kusinski LC, Jones D, Atta N, Turner E, Oude Griep LM, Rennie KL, De Lucia Rolfe E, Murphy HR, Taylor R, Meek CL. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Suboptimal Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes—Secondary Analysis of the DiGest Trial. Diabetes. 2024;73:65-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
14.  Jones D, Thomson L, Kusinski LC, Beardsall K, Meek CL. Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring to Identify Neonatal Hypoglycemia following Gestational Diabetes—The DiGest Newborn Study. Diabetes. 2024;73:66-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
15.  Carlson AL, Li Z, Beck R, Durnwald C, Norton E, Bergenstal RM, Johnson ML, Dunnigan SM, Banfield M, Krumwiede KJ, Sibayan J, Calhoun P. Postprandial Glycemic Patterns throughout Uncomplicated Pregnancies. Diabetes. 2024;73:67-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
16.  Chen Z, Yu G, Yin X, Zhang C. Sleep Duration during Pregnancy and Cardiometabolic Biomarkers—A Multiracial Pregnancy Cohort. Diabetes. 2024;73:1978-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
17.  Simmons D, Hague W, Sweeting A, Wah Cheung N, Nolan CJ, Teede H, Peek MJ, Kautzky-willer A, Hibbert E, Fadl HE, Wong VW, Harreiter J, Immanuel J, Gianatti EJ, Mohan V;  Research Group T. Prediction of Late Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Those without Early GDM. Diabetes. 2024;73:202-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
18.  Scifres CM, Davis E, Costacou T, Orris SR, Lalama CM, Abebe K, Catalano P. Metabolic and Clinical Outcomes with One Abnormal Value on Carpenter Coustan Criteria. Diabetes. 2024;73:203-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
19.  Ehrhardt NM, Fay E, Abdalla G, Mandava P, Fonda SJ. A Randomized Trial of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Gestational Diabetes. Diabetes. 2024;73:1975-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
20.  Valent AM, Huertas-Pagan C, Ward L, Rickert MC, Rincon M. Real-Time CGM Achieves Higher TIR among Pregnant Persons with GDM. Diabetes. 2024;73:259-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
21.  Kusinski LC, Jones D, Barker P, Burling K, Halsall I, Meek CL. Should We Improve or Replace the Antenatal Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes? Diabetes. 2024;73:198-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
22.  Purvis R, Van Nes J, Zite N, Reeder C, Mastronardi A, Oyedeji O, Broskey NT, Maples JM. Association between Fasting Venous Lactate Level and Development of Preeclampsia in Pregnant Individuals with Gestational Glucose Intolerance. Diabetes. 2024;73:1964-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
23.  Wu JHC, Ulin M, Hassan S, Mai-phuong Tran Quang C, Karri A, Sieben D, Alvarado F, Geraldo V, Jha KK, Bishop-royse JC, Lampley EC. A Sugary Recipe for Adverse Outcomes? Third Trimester HbA1c and Composite Obstetric and Perinatal Adverse Outcomes, a Prospective Study. Diabetes. 2024;73:1970-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
24.  Ling P, Yang D, Wang C, Zheng X, Luo S, Yang X, Deng H, Xu W, Yan J, Weng J. Contributions of Fasting and Postprandial Glucose Increments to Overall Hyperglycemia in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2024;73:1971-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
25.  Reichelt AJ, De Campos MA, Guerra GL, Hirakata VN, Oppermann MLR. Timing of Overt Diabetes Diagnosis and Pregnancy Outcomes. Diabetes. 2024;73:1972-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
26.  Germaine MA, O'higgins AC, Healy G, Egan B. Early Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Electronic Health Records and Machine Learning. Diabetes. 2024;73:1968-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
27.  Zhang L, Shen Y, Hu G. Impact of Maternal Hyperglycemic and Hypertensive Disorders on Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes across the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Comprehensive Analysis in an Underserved Population. Diabetes. 2024;73:1974-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
28.  Kusinski LC, Jones D, Atta N, Turner E, Oude Griep LM, Rennie KL, De Lucia Rolfe E, Sharp S, Murphy HR, Taylor R, Meek CL. ADA Presidents' Select Abstract: The Effect of a Reduced-Energy Diet upon Maternal Weight and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes—The DiGest Trial. Diabetes. 2024;73:257-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
29.  Immanuel J, Hague W, Sweeting A, Wong VW, Hibbert E, Gianatti EJ, Peek MJ, Teede H, Mohan V, Wah Cheung N, Nolan CJ, Kautzky-Willer A, Harreiter J, Backman HE, Simmons D. The Effect of Early Initiation of Treatment on Glycemia and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Early Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes. 2024;73:258-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
30.  Santomauro Junior AC, Franco PC, Costa-Riquetto AD, Jorge AA, Teles MG. Successful Occurrence of Two Separate Pregnancies in a Patient with Congenital Generalized Lipodystrophy Due to Homozygous AGPAT2 Mutations without Recombinant Leptin Therapy. Diabetes. 2024;73:1977-LB.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
31.  Barbour LA, Fosdick BK, Dunn EZ, Pierce S, Rolloff KP, Phillips E, Moss LK, Phipers J, Edwards RK, Friedman JE, Hernandez TL. Fasting and Postprandial Triglycerides in Early Pregnancy Correlate with Mean Glucose and Time-in-Range by CGM at 28 Weeks of Gestation. Diabetes. 2024;73:201-OR.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
32.  Chandrasekaran S, Melhorn S, Olerich KLW, Angelo B, Chow T, Xiang A, Schur EA, Page KA. Exposure to Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prior to 26 Weeks Is Related to the Presence of Mediobasal Hypothalamic Gliosis in Children. Diabetes. 2022;71:2552-2556.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Pantham P, Aye IL, Powell TL. Inflammation in maternal obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus. Placenta. 2015;36:709-715.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 275]  [Cited by in RCA: 441]  [Article Influence: 44.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]