Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Table 1 Comparison of age between group A and B, n (%)
| Age | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| 18-20 years | 4 (3.33) | 9 (7.50) | 13 (5.42) | 0.109 |
| 21-30 years | 39 (32.50) | 44 (36.67) | 83 (34.58) | 0.109 |
| 31-40 years | 46 (38.33) | 31 (25.83) | 77 (32.08) | 0.109 |
| 41-50 years | 20 (16.67) | 16 (13.33) | 36 (15) | 0.109 |
| 51-60 years | 8 (6.67) | 14 (11.67) | 22 (9.17) | 0.109 |
| 61-70 years | 1 (0.83) | 5 (4.17) | 6 (2.50) | 0.109 |
| 71-80 years | 2 (1.67) | 1 (0.83) | 3 (1.25) | 0.109 |
| mean ± SD | 35.89 ± 10.09 | 36.08 ± 13.45 | 35.99 ± 11.86 | 0.901 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 33.5 (29-41) | 33 (26.75-45) | 33 (28-42.25) | 0.901 |
| Range | 19-78 | 18-80 | 18-80 | 0.901 |
Table 2 Comparison of gender between group A and B, n (%)
| Gender | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| Female | 43 (35.83) | 36 (30) | 79 (32.92) | 0.336 |
| Male | 77 (64.17) | 84 (70) | 161 (67.08) | 0.336 |
| Total | 120 (100) | 120 (100) | 240 (100) | 0.336 |
Table 3 Comparison of side between group A and B, n (%)
| Side | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| Left | 56 (46.67) | 73 (60.83) | 129 (53.75) | 0.098 |
| Right | 64 (53.33) | 47 (39.17) | 111 (46.25) | 0.098 |
| Total | 120 (100) | 120 (100) | 240 (100) | 0.098 |
Table 4 Comparison of comorbidities between group A and B, n (%)
| Comorbidities | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| Hypertension | 26 (21.67) | 36 (30) | 62 (25.83) | 0.14 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 31 (25.83) | 23 (19.17) | 54 (22.50) | 0.216 |
| Hypothyroidism | 1 (0.83) | 2 (1.67) | 3 (1.25) | 1 |
Table 5 Comparison of stone length between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone length (mm) | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| mean ± SD | 15.97 ± 5.22 | 16.74 ± 4.6 | 16.35 ± 4.93 | 0.224 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 17 (12-19) | 17 (14-19.25) | 17 (13-19) | 0.224 |
| Range | 5-28 | 6-31 | 5-31 | 0.224 |
Table 6 Comparison of stone diameter between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone diameter (mm) | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| mean ± SD | 10.91 ± 3.53 | 11.07 ± 4.12 | 10.99 ± 3.83 | 0.749 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 10 (8-13) | 11 (8-14) | 10 (8-14) | 0.749 |
| Range | 5-19 | 5-20 | 5-20 | 0.749 |
Table 7 Comparison of stone Hounsfield units between group A and B
| Stone HU | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| mean ± SD | 933.33 ± 406.27 | 942.92 ± 351.19 | 938.12 ± 378.96 | 0.845 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 950 (550-1350) | 900 (600-1200) | 925 (600-1250) | 0.845 |
| Range | 300-1600 | 400-1550 | 300-1600 | 0.845 |
Table 8 Comparison of stone length between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone length (mm) | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| ≤ 5 mm | 2 (1.67) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.83) | 0.054 |
| 5.1-10 mm | 18 (15) | 11 (9.17) | 29 (12.08) | 0.054 |
| 10.1-15 mm | 35 (29.17) | 29 (24.17) | 64 (26.67) | 0.054 |
| 15.1-20 mm | 42 (35) | 64 (53.33) | 106 (44.17) | 0.054 |
| > 20 mm | 23 (19.17) | 16 (13.33) | 39 (16.25) | 0.054 |
| mean ± SD | 15.97 ± 5.22 | 16.74 ± 4.6 | 16.35 ± 4.93 | 0.224 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 17 (12-19) | 17 (14-19.25) | 17 (13-19) | 0.224 |
| Range | 5-28 | 6-31 | 5-31 | 0.224 |
Table 9 Comparison of stone diameter between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone diameter (mm) | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| ≤ 5 mm | 5 (4.17) | 8 (6.67) | 13 (5.42) | 0.225 |
| 5.1-10 mm | 58 (48.33) | 50 (41.67) | 108 (45) | 0.225 |
| 10.1-15 mm | 44 (36.67) | 39 (32.50) | 83 (34.58) | 0.225 |
| 15.1-20 mm | 13 (10.83) | 23 (19.17) | 36 (15) | 0.225 |
| mean ± SD | 10.91 ± 3.53 | 11.07 ± 4.12 | 10.99 ± 3.83 | 0.749 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 10 (8-13) | 11 (8-14) | 10 (8-14) | 0.749 |
| Range | 5-19 | 5-20 | 5-20 | 0.749 |
Table 10 Comparison of stone Hounsfield units between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone HU | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| ≤ 500 | 29 (24.17) | 17 (14.17) | 46 (19.17) | 0.102 |
| 501-1000 | 38 (31.67) | 53 (44.17) | 91 (37.92) | 0.102 |
| 1001-1500 | 48 (40) | 43 (35.83) | 91 (37.92) | 0.102 |
| 1501-2000 | 5 (4.17) | 7 (5.83) | 12 (5) | 0.102 |
| mean ± SD | 933.33 ± 406.27 | 942.92 ± 351.19 | 938.12 ± 378.96 | 0.845 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 950 (550-1350) | 900 (600-1200) | 925 (600-1250) | 0.845 |
| Range | 300-1600 | 400-1550 | 300-1600 | 0.845 |
Table 11 Comparison of stone clearance between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone clearance | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| At 1 week | 28 (23.33) | 114 (95) | 142 (59.17) | < 0.0001 |
| At 8 weeks | 67 (55.83) | 114 (95) | 181 (75.42) | < 0.0001 |
| At 3 months | 67 (55.83) | 114 (95) | 181 (75.42) | < 0.0001 |
Table 12 Comparison of stone clearance in different stone length between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone clearance in different stone length | Group A | Group B | Total | P value |
| ≤ 5 mm | 1 (50) | 0 (0) | 1 (50) | - |
| 5.1-10 mm | 11 (61.11) | 10 (90.91) | 21 (72.41) | 0.11 |
| 10.1-15 mm | 18 (51.43) | 28 (96.55) | 46 (71.88) | < 0.0001 |
| 15.1-20 mm | 21 (50) | 61 (95.31) | 82 (77.36) | < 0.0001 |
| > 20 mm | 16 (69.57) | 15 (93.75) | 31 (79.49) | 0.109 |
Table 13 Comparison of stone clearance in different stone diameter between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone clearance in different stone diameter | Group A | Group B | Total | P value |
| ≤ 5 mm | 1 (20) | 7 (87.50) | 8 (61.54) | 0.032 |
| 5.1-10 mm | 31 (53.45) | 49 (98) | 80 (74.07) | < 0.0001 |
| 10.1-15 mm | 24 (54.55) | 37 (94.87) | 61 (73.49) | < 0.0001 |
| 15.1-20 mm | 11 (84.62) | 21 (91.30) | 32 (88.89) | 0.609 |
Table 14 Comparison of stone clearance in different stone Hounsfield units between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone clearance in different stone HU | Group A | Group B | Total | P value |
| ≤ 500 | 16 (55.17) | 16 (94.12) | 32 (69.57) | 0.007 |
| 501-1000 | 24 (63.16) | 51 (96.23) | 75 (82.42) | < 0.0001 |
| 1001-1500 | 23 (47.92) | 40 (93.02) | 63 (69.23) | < 0.0001 |
| 1501-2000 | 4 (80) | 7 (100) | 11 (91.67) | 0.417 |
Table 15 Comparison of complications between group A and B, n (%)
| Complications | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| No complications | 52 (43.33) | 30 (25) | 82 (34.17) | 0.006 |
| Grade 1 | 64 (53.33) | 80 (66.67) | 144 (60) | 0.006 |
| Grade 2 | 4 (3.33) | 10 (8.33) | 14 (5.83) | 0.006 |
| Total | 120 (100) | 120 (100) | 240 (100) | 0.006 |
Table 16 Comparison of number of sessions between group A and B, n (%)
| Number of sessions | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| 1 | 28 (23.33) | 120 (100) | 148 (61.67) | < 0.0001 |
| 2 | 92 (76.67) | 0 (0) | 92 (38.33) | < 0.0001 |
| mean ± SD | 1.77 ± 0.42 | 1 ± 0 | 1.38 ± 0.49 | < 0.0001 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 2 (2-2) | 1 (1-1) | 1 (1-2) | < 0.0001 |
| Range | 1-2 | 1-1 | 1-2 | < 0.0001 |
Table 17 Comparison of stone clearance rate between group A and B, n (%)
| Stone clearance rate | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| Stone not cleared | 53 (44.17) | 6 (5) | 59 (24.58) | < 0.0001 |
| Stone clearance in 1 session | 28 (23.33) | 114 (95) | 142 (59.17) | < 0.0001 |
| Stone clearance in 2 sessions | 39 (32.50) | 0 (0) | 39 (16.25) | < 0.0001 |
| Total | 120 (100) | 120 (100) | 240 (100) | < 0.0001 |
Table 18 Descriptive statistics of duration of hospital stay (group B)
| Variable | mean ± SD | Median (25th-75th percentile) | Range |
| Duration of hospital stay (days) | 3.2 ± 0.4 | 3 (3-3) | 3-5 |
Table 19 Comparison of analgesics between group A and B, n (%)
| Analgesics | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| Pre-procedure | Pre-procedure | Pre-procedure | Pre-procedure | Pre-procedure |
| NSAID | 27 (22.50) | 26 (21.67) | 53 (22.08) | 0.988 |
| Opioid | 11 (9.17) | 11 (9.17) | 22 (9.17) | 0.988 |
| PCM | 82 (68.33) | 83 (69.17) | 165 (68.75) | 0.988 |
| mean ± SD | 7.08 ± 1.68 | 7.08 ± 1.68 | 7.08 ± 1.67 | 1 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 7 (6-8) | 7 (6-8) | 7 (6-8) | 1 |
| Range | 5-10 | 5-10 | 5-10 | 1 |
| Post-procedure | Post-procedure | Post-procedure | Post-procedure | Post-procedure |
| NSAID | 10 (8.33) | 16 (13.33) | 26 (10.83) | 0.415 |
| Opiod | 4 (3.33) | 5 (4.17) | 9 (3.75) | 0.415 |
| PCM | 106 (88.33) | 99 (82.50) | 205 (85.42) | 0.415 |
| mean ± SD | 4.94 ± 1.36 | 4.94 ± 1.38 | 4.94 ± 1.36 | 1 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 5 (4-6) | 5 (4-6) | 5 (4-6) | 1 |
| Range | 2-8 | 2-8 | 2-8 | 1 |
| At 1 week | At 1 week | At 1 week | At 1 week | At 1 week |
| No medication | 39 (32.50) | 44 (36.67) | 83 (34.58) | 0.335 |
| NSAID | 0 (0) | 2 (1.67) | 2 (0.83) | 0.335 |
| PCM | 81 (67.50) | 74 (61.67) | 155 (64.58) | 0.335 |
| mean ± SD | 3.42 ± 0.92 | 4.42 ± 1.33 | 3.92 ± 1.25 | < 0.0001 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 3 (3-3) | 4 (3-5) | 3 (3-4) | < 0.0001 |
| Range | 3-7 | 3-9 | 3-9 | < 0.0001 |
| At 8 weeks | At 8 weeks | At 8 weeks | At 8 weeks | At 8 weeks |
| No medication | 85 (70.83) | 96 (80) | 181 (75.42) | 0.133 |
| NSAID | 1 (0.83) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.42) | 0.133 |
| PCM | 34 (28.33) | 24 (20) | 58 (24.17) | 0.133 |
| mean ± SD | 2.94 ± 0.95 | 3.42 ± 0.99 | 3.18 ± 1 | 0.0001 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 3 (2-4) | 3 (3-4) | 3 (3-4) | 0.0001 |
| Range | 1-6 | 1-6 | 1-6 | 0.0001 |
Table 20 Comparison of EQ5D5 L scale between group A and B
| EQ5D5 L scale | Group A (n = 120) | Group B (n = 120) | Total | P value |
| Post-procedure | Post-procedure | Post-procedure | Post-procedure | Post-procedure |
| mean ± SD | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 0.9 ± 0.04 | 0.9 ± 0.04 | 0.042 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 0.87 (0.858-0.932) | 0.9 (0.874-0.949) | 0.88 (0.874-0.949) | 0.042 |
| Range | 0.81-0.95 | 0.81-0.95 | 0.81-0.95 | 0.042 |
| At 8 weeks | At 8 weeks | At 8 weeks | At 8 weeks | At 8 weeks |
| mean ± SD | 0.99 ± 0.02 | 0.98 ± 0.02 | 0.98 ± 0.02 | 0.674 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 1 (0.949-1) | 1 (0.949-1) | 1 (0.949-1) | 0.674 |
| Range | 0.95-1 | 0.95-1 | 0.95-1 | 0.674 |
| At 3 months | At 3 months | At 3 months | At 3 months | At 3 months |
| mean ± SD | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 ± 0 | 1 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 1 (1-1) | 1 (1-1) | 1 (1-1) | 1 |
| Range | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 1 |
Table 21 Comparison of cost between group A and B
| Cost | Group A (n = 120) | Group B(n = 120) | Total | P value |
| mean ± SD | 4386.67 ± 1827.76 | 5049.17 ± 2067.26 | 4717.92 ± 1975.19 | 0.009 |
| Median (25th-75th percentile) | 4575 (3237.5-5650) | 5150 (3087.5-7012.5) | 4775 (3200-6250) | 0.009 |
| Range | 750-7850 | 1500-8650 | 750-8650 | 0.009 |
- Citation: Jain J, Navriya SC, Chintapalli RC, Choudhary GR, Singh M, Bhirud DP, Sandhu AS. Extracorporeal shockwavelithotripsy vs ureteroscopy for management of acute ureteric colic due to stones: A randomized controlled trial. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(2): 114619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i2/114619.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619