BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 115169
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.115169
Table 1 Evolution of the Monro-Kellie doctrine in intraventricular hemorrhage management
Era
Core mechanism
Clinical applications
Key limitations in IVH
1.0 (1783-20th century)Static volume compensationCSF displacement to spinal compartmentNeglects compensatory thresholds and dynamic interactions
2.0 (2016)Venous capacitance shiftsJugular optimization during EVD clampingOverlooks arterial inflow dynamics during autoregulatory failure
3.0 (2019)Parenchymal deformationManagement of chronic hydrocephalusLimited relevance to acute hemorrhage phases
4.0 (2025)Integrated neurodynamics: CA + glymphatics + ICCPredictive analytics for compliance failureRequires advanced multimodal monitoring integration
Table 2 Comparative analysis of intracranial pressure monitoring techniques in severe intraventricular hemorrhage
Technique
Accuracy
Advantages
Limitations
IVH-specific utility
EVD with ICP integrationGold standardTherapeutic drainage + monitoringInfection risk (8%-15%), occlusion by clotEnables thrombolytic administration, preferred for obstructive hydrocephalus
Parenchymal fiberoptic± 2 mmHgLow infection risk, compartment-specific dataDrift > 1 mmHg/day, no therapeutic functionEssential for large parenchymal extensions (> 15 mL)
ONSD ultrasoundUnstable, sensitivity 90%, specificity 60%-85%Rapid bedside applicationOverestimates ICP in acute hydrocephalusBest for rapid triage when EVD unavailable
TCD pulsatility indexr = 0.68 with ICPAutoregulation assessmentOperator-dependent, limited temporal windowsCPP titration during vasopressor use