Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Crit Care Med. May 9, 2022; 11(3): 139-148
Published online May 9, 2022. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.139
Published online May 9, 2022. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.139
Table 1 The control and patients' demographic and clinical and laboratory data
Control group (n = 30) | EOS group (n = 30) | LOS group (n = 30) | t/Z | P value | ||
Age (mean ± SD, d) | 2.10 ± 0.8 | 2.47 ± 0.57 | 12.47 ± 4.03 | 147.024 | 0.001 | |
Weight (mean ± SD, g) | 2.98 ± 0.4 | 2.85 ± 0.41 | 2.95 ± 0.3 | 0.895 | NS | |
Male: Female | 0.9:1 | 0.87: 1 | 1.5:1 | 0.356 | NS | |
% of cesarean section | 23 (76.7%) | 22 (73.3%) | 21 (70%) | 0.381 | NS | |
PROM | 0 | 6 (20%) | 0 | |||
Risk factors (invasive procedure) | UVC | 0 | 4 (13.3%) | 0 | 0.001 | |
ETT | 0 | 5 (16.7%) | 4 (13.3%) | 0.001 | ||
UVC + ETT | 0 | 7 (23.3%) | 13 (43.3%) | 0.001 | ||
None | 100% | 14 (46.7%) | 13 (43.3%) | 0.001 | ||
Respiratory distress | 0 | 27 (90%) | 23 (77%) | 1.920 | NS | |
Apnea | 0 | 3 (10%) | 3 (10%) | FE | NS | |
Cyanosis | 0 | 10 (33.3%) | 14 (46.7%) | 1.111 | NS | |
Positive Gerdes score (≥ 2) | 0 | 22 (73.3%) | 19 (63.3 %) | 38.258 | 0.001 | |
Thrombocytopenia | 2 (6.7%) | 22 (73%) | 12 (40%) | 6.787 | 0.009 | |
CRP (mg/dL) | 4 ± 2 | 57.53 ± 38.82 | 65.47 ± 39.62 | 0.783 | NS | |
D-dimer (mg/L) | 0.60 ± 0.70 | 1.48 ± 1.44 | 2.27 ± 1.86 | 10.512 | 0.001 | |
Hospital duration | 0 | 21.6 ± 10 | 22 ± 9 | 0.051 | NS | |
Mortality | 0 | 9 (30%) | 11 (36.7%) | 0.300 | NS |
Table 2 Microbial profile in the patients' groups
EOS group (n = 30) | LOS group (n = 30) | Total (n =60) | t | P value | ||
Gram-negative bacteria | Total | 21 (70.0%) | 28 (93.3%) | 49 (81.67%) | 2.3 | < 0.01 |
Klebsiella | 15 (50%) | 20 (67%) | 35 (58%) | 1.3 | NS | |
E. coli | 4 (13.30%) | 1 (3.3%) | 5 (8.33%) | -1.4 | NS | |
Acinetobacter | 2 (6.66%) | 4 (13.30%) | 6 (10%) | 0.85 | NS | |
Serratia | 0% | 1 (3.3%) | 1 (1.66%) | |||
Pseudomonas | 0% | 2 (6.66%) | 2 (3.33%) | |||
Gram-positive bacteria | Total | 8 (26.7%) | 2 (6.7%) | 10 (16.7%) | -2.07 | < 0.01 |
Group B Streptococcus | 5 (16.60%) | 0% | 5 (8.33%) | |||
CoNS | 2 (6.66%) | 1 (3.3%) | 3 (5%) | -0.6 | NS | |
Enterococcus | 1 (3.3%) | 0% | 1 (1.66%) | |||
MRSA | 0% | 1 (3.3%) | 1 (1.66%) | |||
Candida | 1 (3.3%) | 0% | 1 (1.66%) |
Table 3 Comparing D-dimer and C-reactive protein levels according to the isolated organisms
Organism | D-dimer (mean ± SD) | CRP (mean ± SD) | |
Gram-negative bacteria | E. coli | 1.3 ± 0.81 | 44.2 ± 4.3 |
Klebsiella | 2.0971 ± 1.98916 | 71.1 ± 3.9 | |
Acinetobacter | 2.1333 ± 1.63 | 37.7 ± 3.4 | |
Pseudomonas | 1.95 ± 0.92 | 64.0 ± 5.65 | |
Serratia | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 99.0 ± 0.79 | |
Gram-positive bacteria | Group B Streptococcus | 1.6 ± 10.6 | 39.7 ± 2.5 |
CoNS | 1.3 ± 0.51 | 53.7 ± 2.7 | |
MRSA | 1.2 ± 0.60 | 58.0 ± 8.2 |
Table 4 Correlation between D-Dimer and other variables
Table 5 Recipient observer characteristics curve results for D-dimer to diagnose neonatal sepsis
ROC curve results | The area under the curve | P value | Cut off point | Sensitivity | Specificity |
D-dimer (mg/L) | 0.822 | 0.001 | 0.75 | 72.7% | 86.7% |
- Citation: Al-Biltagi M, Hantash EM, El-Shanshory MR, Badr EA, Zahra M, Anwar MH. Plasma D-dimer level in early and late-onset neonatal sepsis. World J Crit Care Med 2022; 11(3): 139-148
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v11/i3/139.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.139