Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.115389
Revised: December 13, 2025
Accepted: February 14, 2026
Published online: June 9, 2026
Processing time: 217 Days and 23.6 Hours
Sepsis is associated with impaired tissue perfusion and elevated serum lactate, a key prognostic marker. Magnesium plays a vital role in cellular energy metabo
To investigate the impact of magnesium on the clearance of lactate in critically sick patients with sepsis.
In this triple-blind, randomized trial, 138 adult patients with a diagnosis of sepsis (according to Sepsis-3 guidelines) and with serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L were randomized into the magnesium (M) group and the placebo (P) group. Randomi
Time to 20% lactate clearance was considerably lower in the M group (5.73 ± 2.19 hours) when compared to the P group (8.54 ± 2.72 hours), with a mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)]: -2.81 (-3.65 to -1.99), P < 0.001. Mean rise in lactate clearance was markedly more significant in M group than P group on day 1 [18.88% ± 1.80% vs 12.61% ± 1.94% respectively, with mean difference (95%CI): 6.26 (5.63-6.89), P < 0.001] on day 2 [30.02% ± 4.30 % vs 23.34% ± 4.76% respectively, with mean difference (95%CI): 6.68 (5.15-8.20), P < 0.001] and day 3 [50.74% ± 6.06 % vs 37.94% ± 4.53% respectively, with mean difference (95%CI): 12.80 (11.00-14.60), P < 0.001]. The length of ICU stay was considerably shorter in the M group, 8 (3-15) days, compared to the P group, 12 (5-19) days (P < 0.001). The duration of hospitalization was significantly decreased in the M group, 12 (4-24) days than in the P group, 16 (9-25) days (P < 0.001); however, the 28-day mortality was similar in both groups.
Magnesium supplementation was associated with shorter lactate clearance time and reduced ICU and hospital stay duration in patients with sepsis; however, the difference in 28-day mortality between the groups was statistically nonsignificant.
Core Tip: Early lactate clearance is a key therapeutic target and prognostic marker in sepsis. In this randomized clinical trial, magnesium supplementation significantly accelerated lactate clearance in critically ill patients with sepsis and was associated with reduced vasopressor requirements, shorter intensive care unit stay, and decreased overall hospital stay. Although the magnesium group demonstrated a numerically lower 28-day mortality, this difference did not reach statistical significance.
- Citation: Anbarasan C, Sharma A, Kothari N, Meshram TM, Kumari K, Goyal S, Bhatia PK. Impact of magnesium on the clearance of lactate in critically sick patients with sepsis: Randomized clinical trial. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(2): 115389
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i2/115389.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.115389
Sepsis is an aberrant host reaction to infection, causing a potentially fatal organ failure[1]. Serum lactate is a marker of tissue hypoperfusion that may help forecast the course of sepsis[2,3]. Several therapies, encompassing fluid resuscitation, antibiotic therapy, and vasopressor administration, significantly impact lactate clearance in sepsis[4-6].
Magnesium serves as an essential cofactor in a wide range of physiological processes, including cellular energy metabolism, mitochondrial function[7-9], neuromuscular transmission, regulation of vascular tone, and modulation of immune and inflammatory responses[10-14]. Magnesium can potentially mitigate cellular damage caused by endotoxins by modulating immune system function[13]. In patients suffering from sepsis, magnesium may help avoid insulin resistance, arrhythmia, respiratory failure, muscle weakness, and poor glycemic control[2,14]. Magnesium facilitates essential enzymatic processes in aerobic metabolism and mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate synthesis; a deficiency causes cells to transition toward anaerobic glycolysis, leading to elevated lactate production[14]. By optimizing mitochondrial function, improving microcirculatory perfusion, and diminishing catecholamine-induced metabolic stress, magnesium may contribute to decreased lactate production and promote its clearance[10-14]. There are only a few studies about the effects of magnesium supplementation on sepsis patients. Thus, this research aimed to assess the duration of lactate clearance among critically ill patients with sepsis who received magnesium supplementation.
The current placebo-controlled, triple-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted from November 2022 to March 2024 in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with sepsis at a tertiary care institute. Ethical approval for the current research was obtained from the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan Ethics Committee on September 23, 2022, with approval No. AIIMS/IEC/2022/4177. Subsequently, the study was registered prospectively at Clinical Trial Registry - India (CTRI Reg. No. CTRI/2022/11/047031).
Adult patients aged 18 years or more, with a diagnosis of sepsis (according to Sepsis-3 guidelines) and with serum lactate levels > 2 mmol/L, were screened. Patients with chronic renal impairment, liver failure (Child-Pugh B and C), pregnancy, diabetes mellitus on metformin treatment, diabetic ketoacidosis, alcoholism, mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg despite taking vasopressor therapy, and those refusing consent were excluded.
After acquiring informed signed consent, patients were randomly split into two groups: Group magnesium (M) and group placebo (P), with a 1:1 allocation ratio by a randomization method available online (http://www.randomizer.org), and the allocation concealment was performed by a sealed opaque envelope method that was opened just before the enrolment of research participants. Patients were blinded to their allocated group.
Patients assigned to group M were given 2 g of intravenous magnesium sulphate (Maget MB, Martin Brown Bio-Sciences Pvt. Ltd., India), which was diluted in 50 mL normal saline and then infused over 2 hours for three days. The chosen magnesium dose and duration were based on prior clinical trials and safety data in patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis[15]. Patients in group P received 50 mL of normal saline infused over 2 hours period for three days. Both interventions had a similar volume of 50 mL, making the appearance identical. The study infusions were administered by healthcare workers who were independent of the trial team and remained blinded to the group allocation. They were instructed to administer the ‘study drug’, which was prepared in an identical 50 mL syringe without any label indicating whether it contained magnesium sulphate or normal saline. Serum lactate levels were measured for three days using arterial blood gas analysis (Cobas b 221 analyzer; Roche Diagnostics International AG, Rotkreuz, Switzerland).
The primary research outcome was to compare the time to lactate clearance (a 20% decrease from baseline) between the two groups. The secondary outcomes included changes in lactate clearance, vasopressor dose requirement, duration of hospital stay, duration of ICU stay, and 28-day mortality. Lactate clearance was evaluated by the equation [(initial lactate - final lactate)/initial lactate] × 100 (%). Apart from demographic parameters, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, patients’ comorbidities, cause of ICU admission, serum creatinine, serum bilirubin, urine output, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, as well as ventilator requirement, were also noted in both groups. All the data were collected by an independent observer, who was not part of this study. Patient safety was closely monitored throughout the study, including regular assessments of vital signs, hemodynamic parameters, and clinical status, to ensure that any adverse events could be promptly identified and managed. The statistician analysing the data was blinded to the groups.
Noormandi et al[15] reported a time to lactate clearance of 47.28 ± 20.59 hours in the M group compared to 61.20 ± 24.31 hours in the P group with an effect size of 0.618 (File 1 in Supplementary material). Using this data for the calculation to detect lactate clearance in the M group compared to the placebo group, we estimated a sample size of 69 per group at a 95% confidence interval, 80% power, and 10% contingency for dropouts (File 2 in Supplementary material).
Patient records were evaluated by employing IBM-SPSS software, version 23. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of the data. For quantitative variables with a normal distribution, results were presented as mean ± SD; for non-normally distributed variables, the median (range) was shown. Categorical data were assessed as absolute n (%). t-test was used for comparing continuous variables, while the χ2 test was used for categorical variables. The Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze ordinal variables and quantitative data that did not follow a normal distribution. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Among 280 patients screened for eligibility, 142 were excluded. The relatives of 32 patients denied consent, and 110 patients did not meet the inclusion criteria [alcoholism (n = 39), diabetes mellitus on metformin (n = 28), chronic renal failure (n = 22), liver failure (n = 11), diabetic ketoacidosis (n = 8), and pregnancy (n = 2)]. The remaining 138 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited for randomization and were equally distributed into two groups: Group M (n = 69) and Group P (n = 69) (Figure 1). All randomized patients were included in the primary analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle.
The demographic, baseline clinical, and laboratory variables were comparable in both groups (Tables 1 and 2). There was no difference in baseline hemodynamic parameters between the two groups. Between the two groups, initial serum lactate values were comparable [2.78 (2.11-6.35) in group M and 2.67 (2.11-7.71) in group P, P = 0.988]. The time to 20% lactate clearance was significantly less in the M group (5.73 ± 2.19 hours) compared to the P group (8.54 ± 2.72 hours), P < 0.001.
| Parameter | Group M (n = 69) | Group P (n = 69) | P value |
| Age (years) | 54.00 (18-93) | 42.00 (19-84) | 0.1221 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 44 (63.77) | 43 (62.31) | 0.8602 |
| Female | 25 (36.23) | 26 (37.68) | |
| Weight (kg) | 68.00 (48-92) | 68.00 (48-90) | 0.9521 |
| Comorbidities | |||
| Hypertension | 25 (36.23) | 24 (34.78) | 0.8592 |
| Diabetes | 24 (34.78) | 18 (26.09) | 0.2672 |
| Chronic lung disease | 04 (5.79) | 05 (7.24) | 0.7302 |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 08 (11.59) | 05 (7.24) | 0.3822 |
| Cause of ICU admission | |||
| Surgical | 34 (49.28) | 32 (46.38) | 0.1162 |
| Medical | 35 (50.72) | 37 (53.62) | |
| Source of sepsis | |||
| Lung | |||
| CAP | 11 (15.94) | 13 (18.84) | |
| VAP | 10 (14.49) | 11 (15.94) | |
| ARDS | 5 (7.24) | 3 (4.34) | |
| Lung abscess | 1 (1.44) | 2 (2.89) | |
| Abdomen | |||
| Peritonitis | 13 (18.84) | 11 (15.94) | |
| Urinary tract infection | 9 (13.04) | 11 (15.94) | |
| Pancreatitis | 3 (4.34) | 2 (2.89) | |
| Liver abscess | 2 (2.89) | 1 (1.44) | |
| Blood | |||
| Candidemia | 2 (2.89) | 3 (4.34) | |
| Brain/CNS | |||
| Meningitis | 3 (4.34) | 4 (5.79) | |
| Pots spine | 2 (2.89) | 1 (1.44) | |
| Encephalitis | 2 (2.89) | 1 (1.44) | |
| Skin and soft tissue | |||
| Soft tissue | 2 (2.89) | 1 (1.44) | |
| Gluteal abscess | 1 (1.44) | 2 (2.89) | |
| Necrotizing fasciitis | 2 (2.89) | 1 (1.44) | |
| Pectoral abscess | 1 (1.44) | 2 (2.89) |
| Parameter | Group M (n = 69) | Group P (n = 69) | P value |
| Serum lactate at diagnosis (mmol/L) | 2.78 (2.11-6.35) | 2.67 (2.11-7.71) | 0.9881 |
| APACHE-II score at ICU admission | 19.00 (5 -32) | 20.00 (10-32) | 0.1921 |
| SOFA score | |||
| Day 1 | 6.00 (2-13) | 6.00 (2-13) | 0.2651 |
| Day 2 | 6.00 (2-13) | 6.00 (2-13) | 0.1361 |
| Day 3 | 7.00 (2-13) | 6.00 (2-12) | 0.1311 |
| Serum bilirubin (mg/dL) | |||
| Day 1 | 0.5 (0.3-4.7) | 0.5 (0.2-4.7) | |
| Day 2 | 0.5 (0.2-3.8) | 0.5 (0.2-3.8) | 0.6381 |
| Day 3 | 0.5 (0.3-4.7) | 0.5 (0.2-4.7) | 0.8491 |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | |||
| Day 1 | 0.80 (0.3-1.2) | 0.72 (0.3-1.2) | 0.5701 |
| Day 2 | 0.7 (0.4-1.0) | 0.7 (0.4-1.0) | 0.6841 |
| Day 3 | 0.8 (0.4-1.2) | 0.7 (0.3-1.1) | 0.2371 |
| Urine output (mL/day) | |||
| Day 1 | 1430 (820-1980) | 1430 (800-2000) | 0.3791 |
| Day 2 | 1350 (820-2000) | 1450 (800-1990) | 0.0901 |
| Day 3 | 1430 (930-2000) | 1350 (800-1980) | 0.8811 |
| Ventilator requirement | |||
| Day 1 | 34 (49.28) | 34 (49.28) | 1.0002 |
| Day 2 | 38 (55.07) | 42 (60.87) | 0.4902 |
| Day 3 | 30 (43.48) | 36 (52.17) | 0.3072 |
Lactate clearance significantly increased in the M group from day 1 to day 3 (Table 3). The mean lactate clearance was 18.88 ± 1.80 vs 12.61 ± 1.94 on day 1, 30.02 ± 4.30 vs 23.34 ± 4.76 on day 2, and 50.74 ± 6.06 vs 37.94 ± 4.53 on day 3 in M and P groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Median vasopressor dosage was much lower in group M than in P group [1.2 (0.6-1.6) vs 1.5 (1.2-1.7) in group M and group P, respectively, on day 2, P = 0.022 and 1.5 (0.9-2.3) vs 1.9 (1.5-2.3) in group M and group P, respectively, on day 3, P = 0.033]. Median length of ICU stay was considerably shorter in the M group, 8 (3-15) days, than in the P group, 12 (5-19) days (P < 0.001). The median duration of hospitalization was significantly decreased in the M group, 12 (4-24) days, compared to the P group, 16 (9-25) days (P < 0.001). During the 28-day follow-up, 39 (28.26%) patients died. Fifteen out of 69 (21.73%) patients in the M group died by day 28, compared to 24 out of 69 patients in the P group, indicating an insignificant difference in 28-day mortality between the two groups (P = 0.12) (Table 3). We did not observe any adverse event in this trial.
| Parameter | Group M (n = 69) | Group P (n = 69) | Mean difference (95%CI) | P value |
| Time to lactate clearance (hours) | 5.73 ± 2.19 | 8.54 ± 2.72 | -2.81 (-3.65 to -1.99) | 0.0011 |
| Lactate clearance (%) | ||||
| Day 1 | 18.88 ± 1.80 | 12.61 ± 1.94 | 6.26 (5.63-6.89) | 0.0011 |
| Day 2 | 30.02 ± 4.30 | 23.34 ± 4.76 | 6.68 (5.15-8.20) | 0.0011 |
| Day 3 | 50.74 ± 6.06 | 37.94 ± 4.53 | 12.80 (11.00-14.60) | 0.0011 |
| Vasopressor dose (mcg/kg/minute) | ||||
| Day 1 | 0.6 (0.1-1.2) | 0.7 (0.3-0.9) | 0.0742 | |
| Day 2 | 1.2 (0.6-1.6) | 1.5 (1.2-1.7) | 0.0222 | |
| Day 3 | 1.5 (0.9-2.3) | 1.9 (1.5-2.3) | 0.0332 | |
| Duration of ICU stay (days) | 8 (3-15) | 12 (5-19) | 0.0012 | |
| Duration of hospital stay (days) | 12 (4-24) | 16 (9-25) | 0.0012 | |
| 28-day mortality; n (%) | 15 (21.73) | 24 (34.78) | 0.123 |
In the current investigation, we observed that critically ill patients with sepsis who received magnesium supplementation exhibited improved lactate clearance, reduced vasopressor dose requirements, and shorter ICU and hospital stays. The M group showed a lower 28-day mortality rate than the placebo group, although this difference was not statistically significant.
In research conducted by Noormandi et al[15] in patients with severe sepsis, the time to lactate clearance (a 50% reduction from baseline) was found to be 47.28 ± 20.59 hours in the M group and 61.20 ± 24.31 hours in the P group. The findings from our study are comparable to those of Noormandi et al[15], demonstrating the effectiveness of magnesium supplementation in improving time to lactate clearance in individuals diagnosed with sepsis. In our research, we also found a rise in lactate clearance in the M group compared to the P group on days 1, 2, and 3. Similarly, Noormandi et al[15], in their study, found that the increase in lactate clearance on day 2 was (27.53 vs 23.79) and on day three was (49.83 vs 37.02) on the M and P groups, respectively.
In the current research, the vasopressor dosage was significantly lower in the M group on days 2 and 3. Similarly, in a retrospective cohort study, Lv et al[16] found that patients with sepsis who received magnesium had a median vasopressor-free time [72.4 (40.8, 171.6) hours] in contrast to individuals who did not receive magnesium [51.6 (30.8, 94) hours] Magnesium’s potential to influence vascular tone and improve microcirculatory perfusion may contribute to a reduced need for vasopressors in these patients.
Current research indicates that the median duration of ICU stay was shorter for the M group compared to the placebo group. Similarly, Noormandi et al[15] observed that the duration of ICU stay was shorter in the M group than in the P group. Assarian et al[17] discovered that the length of ICU admissions in the hypomagnesemia group compared to the normomagnesemia group was 14 (12.75-17.25) vs 10 (8.25-14.25) days, respectively. The median hours of ICU stay in research performed by Lv et al[16] was 145 (71, 296) hours vs 106 (57.5, 228) hours in the hypomagnesemia group and normomagnesemia group. Patil and Aslam[18] observed that the mean length of ICU stay was longer in patients with hypomagnesemia, 7.21 ± 1.74 days, compared to 5.24 ± 1.38 days in normomagnesemic patients. Comparing the findings of our study with the above studies, it was found that hypomagnesemia patients had a longer ICU stay duration, and hence, magnesium supplementation may significantly reduce the duration of ICU stay in patients having sepsis.
Our research revealed that the length of stay in the hospital for the M group was less than that for the placebo group. Islam et al[19] noticed that the hospital stay duration was more prolonged, at 14.94 ± 7.78 days in the hypomagnesemia group, compared with 10.47 ± 7.60 days in the normomagnesemia group, hence, magnesium supplementation in patients with sepsis may significantly reduce the length of hospital stay.
In our study, the M group exhibited a lower 28-day mortality rate compared to the placebo group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, Noormandi et al[15] in their investigation of patients with severe sepsis found that sepsis-associated 28-day mortality in the M group was lower than in the placebo group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (10.71% vs 21.42%, respectively, P = 0.65) In a study of the association of magnesium sulphate use with mortality, Gu et al[20] found that the 28-day all-cause mortality was 20.2% in the M group and 25.0% in the non- M group. Lv et al[16] analyzed the effect of magnesium supplementation on 14-, 28-, and 60-day mortality and showed a significant reduction in mortality in the M group (30.8%, 33.8%, 35.5%, respectively) compared to the P group (48.9%, 48.9%, 48.9%, respectively). In the present study, the difference in mortality was not statistically significant, likely because, as a single-centre study, the sample size may be insufficient to demonstrate a substantial survival effect.
This research is the first to evaluate the time to 20% lactate clearance in individuals diagnosed with sepsis after magnesium supplementation. No other study compared the vasopressor dose requirements in individuals diagnosed with sepsis with or without magnesium supplementation. However, this study had certain limitations. First, it was conducted at a single centre, which may limit the external validity and restrict the applicability of the findings to other healthcare settings. Second, serum magnesium levels were not measured, which prevented an assessment of baseline magnesium status and limited the interpretation of treatment effects. Finally, data on renal replacement therapy were not collected, which may influence lactate kinetics and could affect the accuracy of outcome comparisons.
The present study focuses on the influence of the addition of magnesium on lactate clearance among critically ill patients with sepsis. Magnesium supplementation accelerated lactate clearance time and reduced vasopressor dose requirements, as well as the duration of ICU and hospital stays. However, the 28-day mortality was not statistically significant in either group.
| 1. | Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801-810. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 22160] [Cited by in RCA: 19434] [Article Influence: 1943.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (5)] |
| 2. | Chaudhari M, Agarwal N. Study of Significance of Serum Lactate Kinetics in Sepsis as Mortality Predictor. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2022;26:591-595. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 3. | Lokhandwala S, Andersen LW, Nair S, Patel P, Cocchi MN, Donnino MW. Absolute lactate value vs relative reduction as a predictor of mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock. J Crit Care. 2017;37:179-184. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in RCA: 32] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 4. | Marik PE, Linde-Zwirble WT, Bittner EA, Sahatjian J, Hansell D. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:625-632. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 283] [Cited by in RCA: 258] [Article Influence: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 5. | Jat KR, Jhamb U, Gupta VK. Serum lactate levels as the predictor of outcome in pediatric septic shock. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2011;15:102-107. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in RCA: 48] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 6. | Bou Chebl R, Geha M, Assaf M, Kattouf N, Haidar S, Abdeldaem K, Halawi N, Khamis M, Makki M, Tamim H, Abou Dagher G. The prognostic value of the lactate/albumin ratio for predicting mortality in septic patients presenting to the emergency department: a prospective study. Ann Med. 2021;53:2268-2277. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in RCA: 40] [Article Influence: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 7. | Fairley J, Glassford NJ, Zhang L, Bellomo R. Magnesium status and magnesium therapy in critically ill patients: A systematic review. J Crit Care. 2015;30:1349-1358. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in RCA: 32] [Article Influence: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 8. | Kumar S, Honmode A, Jain S, Bhagat V. Does magnesium matter in patients of Medical Intensive Care Unit: A study in rural Central India. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015;19:379-383. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in RCA: 19] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 9. | Moskowitz A, Lee J, Donnino MW, Mark R, Celi LA, Danziger J. The Association Between Admission Magnesium Concentrations and Lactic Acidosis in Critical Illness. J Intensive Care Med. 2016;31:187-192. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in RCA: 22] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 10. | Panahi Y, Mojtahedzadeh M, Najafi A, Ghaini MR, Abdollahi M, Sharifzadeh M, Ahmadi A, Rajaee SM, Sahebkar A. The role of magnesium sulfate in the intensive care unit. EXCLI J. 2017;16:464-482. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 18] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 11. | Hansen BA, Bruserud Ø. Hypomagnesemia in critically ill patients. J Intensive Care. 2018;6:21. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 85] [Cited by in RCA: 98] [Article Influence: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 12. | Upala S, Jaruvongvanich V, Wijarnpreecha K, Sanguankeo A. Hypomagnesemia and mortality in patients admitted to intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. QJM. 2016;109:453-459. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 61] [Cited by in RCA: 56] [Article Influence: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 13. | Velissaris D, Karamouzos V, Pierrakos C, Aretha D, Karanikolas M. Hypomagnesemia in Critically Ill Sepsis Patients. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7:911-918. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 48] [Cited by in RCA: 61] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 14. | Jiang P, Lv Q, Lai T, Xu F. Does Hypomagnesemia Impact on the Outcome of Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Shock. 2017;47:288-295. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in RCA: 55] [Article Influence: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 15. | Noormandi A, Khalili H, Mohammadi M, Abdollahi A. Effect of magnesium supplementation on lactate clearance in critically ill patients with severe sepsis: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;76:175-184. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in RCA: 25] [Article Influence: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 16. | Lv CW, Hu J, Hu XX, Liu JY. Effect of Hypomagnesemia On The Prognosis of Patients With Sepsis in ICU: A Retrospective Cohort Study. 2021 Preprint. Available from: Research Square. [DOI] [Full Text] |
| 17. | Assarian A, Noormandi A, Khalili H, Mohammadi M, Abdollahi A. Correlation between Serum Magnesium and Lactate Levels at the Time of ICU Admission and Early Phase of Sepsis. Arch Anesthesiol Crit Care. 2019;5:86-90. [DOI] [Full Text] |
| 18. | Patil PS, Aslam SS. Study of Serum Magnesium Levels in Patients Admitted with Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2023;21:23-27. [PubMed] |
| 19. | Islam MM, Faruq MO, Asaduzzaman M, Sultana A, Mollick UK. Hypomagnesemia is associated with increase in mortality and morbidity in ICU: Can serum magnesium level be used as prognostic marker in critically ill ICU admitted patients? Bangl Crit Care J. 2017;5. [DOI] [Full Text] |
| 20. | Gu WJ, Duan XJ, Liu XZ, Cen Y, Tao LY, Lyu J, Yin HY. Association of magnesium sulfate use with mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2023;131:861-870. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in RCA: 38] [Article Influence: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |