Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619
Figure 1 Comparison of age, blood investigations, urine culture, and stone length.
A: Comparison of age between group A and B; B: Comparison of blood investigations between group A and B; C: Comparison of urine culture between group A and B; D: Comparison of stone length between group A and B.
Figure 2 Comparison of stone diameter, stone Hounsfield units, comparison of stone clearance, and complications.
A: Comparison of stone diameter between group A and B; B: Comparison of stone Hounsfield units between group A and B; C: Comparison of stone clearance between group A and B; D: Comparison of complications between group A and B. HU: Hounsfield units.
Figure 3 Comparison of post-operative complications, analgesics.
A: Comparison of post-operative complications between group A and B; B: Comparison of analgesics between group A and B.
Figure 4 Comparison of Visual Analog Scale, trend of EQ5D5 L scale.
A: Comparison of Visual Analog Scale between group A and B; B: Comparison of trend of EQ5D5 L scale at different time intervals between group A and B. VAS: Visual Analog Scale.
Figure 5 Comparison of working days lost , patient satisfaction, acceptability.
A: Comparison of working days lost between group A and B; B: Comparison of cost between group A and B; C: Comparison of patient satisfaction between group A and B; D: Comparison of acceptability between group A and B.
- Citation: Jain J, Navriya SC, Chintapalli RC, Choudhary GR, Singh M, Bhirud DP, Sandhu AS. Extracorporeal shockwavelithotripsy vs ureteroscopy for management of acute ureteric colic due to stones: A randomized controlled trial. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(2): 114619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i2/114619.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i2.114619