©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Crit Care Med. Mar 9, 2026; 15(1): 113426
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.113426
Published online Mar 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.113426
Figure 1 Summary data.
A: Sensitivity; B: Specificity; C: Positive likelihood ratio; D: Negative likelihood ratio; E: Diagnostic odds ratio. FN: False negative; FP: False positive; TN: True negative; TP: True positive; DOR: Diagnostic odds ratio; LR: Likelihood ratio.
Figure 2 Forest plot.
A: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) sensitivity; B: POCUS specificity; C: POCUS likelihood ratio (LR)+; D: POCUS LR–; E: POCUS diagnostic odds ratio. OR: Odds ratio; LR: Likelihood ratio.
Figure 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
ROC: Receiver operating characteristic.
- Citation: Seyala I, Soldera J. Point-of-care ultrasound for evaluating acute dyspnoea in emergency departments: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Crit Care Med 2026; 15(1): 113426
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3141/full/v15/i1/113426.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v15.i1.113426