Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Crit Care Med. Sep 9, 2026; 15(3): 119806
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.119806
Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.119806
Physiology-guided mechanical ventilation: Monitoring, proportional assist, and bounded automation
Robel Yohannes, Gavin Jeffries, Shervin Eskandari, Jacob Calamaro, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, United States
Nicola M Zetola, William J Healy, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912, United States
Author contributions: Yohannes R, Jeffries G, Eskandari S, Calamaro J and Healy WJ conceived and designed the manuscript framework; Yohannes R drafted the initial manuscript; Jeffries G and Eskandari S contributed to literature review and synthesis of physiologic monitoring and proportional ventilation sections; Calamaro J contributed to drafting and revision of sections related to computational and artificial intelligence applications; Zetola NM and Healy WJ provided critical revision for important intellectual content and clinical accuracy; Healy WJ supervised the project; and all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
AI contribution statement: During the preparation of this manuscript, Grammarly was utilized solely for spelling, grammar, and syntax refinement. Its use was limited to improving clarity and readability of text that had already been fully developed by the authors. No AI tools were used to generate any portion of the manuscript, including the Abstract, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, or Conclusion. No AI tool was used for language polishing, translation, data analysis, or writing assistance of the manuscript. AI tools did not contribute to the design of the study or the interpretation of its results, and no images included in this manuscript were generated using AI. All content was created, reviewed, and verified by the authors to ensure accuracy and maintain the originality and integrity of the work.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest related to the content of this manuscript.
Corresponding author: William J Healy, MD, Assistant Professor, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, 120 15th Street, Augusta, GA 30912, United States. wihealy@augusta.edu
Received: February 6, 2026
Revised: March 5, 2026
Accepted: May 14, 2026
Published online: September 9, 2026
Processing time: 196 Days and 15.8 Hours
Revised: March 5, 2026
Accepted: May 14, 2026
Published online: September 9, 2026
Processing time: 196 Days and 15.8 Hours
Core Tip
Core Tip: Mechanical ventilation should be approached as a dynamic, patient-specific therapy rather than a fixed protocol. Integrating physiologic monitoring of respiratory effort, lung stress, and regional ventilation can help clinicians individualize support while balancing lung protection and diaphragm preservation. For example, ventilatory assist may be titrated to maintain moderate inspiratory effort rather than targeting airway pressures or tidal volume alone. Emerging monitoring, proportional assist modes, and bounded automation are best viewed as tools that augment physiologic assessment while preserving clinician judgment in the management of critically ill patients.