BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Crit Care Med. Jun 9, 2024; 13(2): 89644
Published online Jun 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.89644
Ten misconceptions regarding decision-making in critical care
Tara Ramaswamy, Jamie L Sparling, Marvin G Chang, Edward A Bittner
Tara Ramaswamy, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
Jamie L Sparling, Marvin G Chang, Edward A Bittner, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
Author contributions: Bittner EA conceptualized and drafted the initial version of the manuscript; Ramaswamy T, Sparling JL, and Chang MG reviewed and substantially revised the manuscript; All authors accepted the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Corresponding author: Edward A Bittner, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States. ebittner@mgh.harvard.edu
Received: November 7, 2023
Revised: January 25, 2024
Accepted: March 1, 2024
Published online: June 9, 2024
Processing time: 208 Days and 11.1 Hours
Core Tip

Core Tip: Diagnostic errors are prevalent in critical care practice and associated with patient harm. Cognitive science has provided insight into the clinical decision-making process. By understanding how practitioners make clinical decisions and examining how errors occur, strategies may be developed and implemented to decrease errors in decision making and improve patient outcomes.

Write to the Help Desk