Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Crit Care Med. Dec 9, 2024; 13(4): 99587
Published online Dec 9, 2024. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i4.99587
Delta shock index predicts injury severity, interventions, and outcomes in trauma patients: A 10-year retrospective observational study
Hassan Al-Thani, Ahmad Kloub, Ibrahim Taha, Abdel Aziz Hammo, Abubaker Alaieb, Saji Mathradikkal, Mushreq Al-Ani, Khalid Ahmed, Ayman El-Menyar, Mohammad Asim
Mohammad Asim, Ayman El-Menyar, Department of Surgery, Trauma and Vascular Surgery Section, Clinical Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar
Ayman El-Menyar, Department of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, PO Box 24144, Doha, Qatar
Khalid Ahmed, Mushreq Al-Ani, Saji Mathradikkal, Abubaker Alaieb, Abdel Aziz Hammo, Ibrahim Taha, Ahmad Kloub, Hassan Al-Thani, Department of Surgery, Trauma Surgery Section, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar
Author contributions: Asim M and El-Menyar A contributed to conception and design of the study, data analysis and interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript; Ahmed K, Al-Ani M, Mathradikkal S, Alaieb A, Taha I, Kloub A, and Hammo AA contributed to data acquisition and interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript; Al-Thani H contributed to conception and design of the study, interpretation of the results, and drafting of the manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: The Medical Research Center (institutional review board, MRC-01-21-990) approved the study protocol at Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Informed consent statement: A waiver of informed consent was approved for the retrospective chart review of the anonymous data from the QNTR database.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: All data are presented in the manuscript and tables.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ayman El-Menyar, FRCP, MBChB, MRCP, MS, Professor, Senior Research Scientist, Department of Surgery, Trauma and Vascular Surgery Section, Clinical Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Al-Rayyan Street, Doha 3050, Qatar. aymanco65@yahoo.com
Received: July 25, 2024
Revised: September 24, 2024
Accepted: October 10, 2024
Published online: December 9, 2024
Processing time: 97 Days and 22.2 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Most trauma occurs among young male subjects in Qatar. We examined the predictive values of the delta shock index (DSI), defined as the change in the shock index (SI) value from the scene to the initial reading in the emergency unit (i.e., subtracting the calculated SI at admission from SI at the scene), at a Level 1 trauma center.

AIM

To explore whether high DSI is associated with severe injuries, more interventions, and worse outcomes [i.e., blood transfusion, exploratory laparotomy, ventilator-associated pneumonia, hospital length of stay (HLOS), and in-hospital mortality] in trauma patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted after data were extracted from the National Trauma Registry between 2011 and 2021. Patients were grouped based on DSI as low (≤ 0.1) or high (> 0.1). Data were analyzed and compared using χ2 and Student’s t-tests. Correlations between DSI and injury severity score (ISS), revised trauma score (RTS), abbreviated injury scale (AIS), Glasgow coma scale (GCS), trauma score-ISS (TRISS), HLOS, and number of transfused blood units (NTBU), were assessed using correlation coefficient analysis. The diagnostic testing accuracy for predicting mortality was determined using the validity measures of the DSI. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

This analysis included 13212 patients with a mean age of 33 ± 14 years, and 24% had a high DSI. Males accounted for 91% of the study population. The trauma activation level was higher in patients with a high DSI (38% vs 15%, P = 0.001). DSI correlated with RTS (r = -0.30), TRISS (r = -0.30), NTBU (r = 0.20), GCS (r = -0.24), ISS (r = 0.22), and HLOS (r = 0.14) (P = 0.001 for all). High DSI was associated with significantly higher rates of intubation, laparotomy, ventilator-associated pneumonia, massive transfusion activation, and mortality than low DSI. For mortality prediction, a high DSI had better specificity, negative predictive value, and negative likelihood ratio (77%, 99%, and 0.49%, respectively). After adjusting for age, emergency medical services time, GCS score, and ISS, multivariable regression analysis showed that DSI was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio = 1.9; 95% confidence interval: 1.35-2.76).

CONCLUSION

In addition to sex-biased observations, almost one-quarter of the study cohort had a higher DSI and were mostly young. High DSI correlated significantly with the other injury severity scores, which require more time and imaging to be ready to use. Therefore, DSI is a practical, simple bedside tool for triaging and prognosis in young patients with trauma.

Keywords: Delta shock index; Trauma; Injury severity scores; Interventions; Outcomes

Core Tip: The delta shock index (DSI) is defined as the change of SI value from the scene to the initial reading in the emergency unit (i.e., subtracting calculated SI at admission from SI at the scene). Among young trauma patients, high DSI is associated with severe injuries, more interventions, and worse outcomes (i.e., blood transfusion, exploratory laparotomy, ventilator-associated pneumonia, hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality). Apart from gender-biased observation, almost one-quarter of the study cohort had a higher DSI and were mostly young. High DSI correlated significantly with the other injury severity scores that need more time and imaging to be ready to use. Therefore, DSI is a practical, simple bedside tool for triaging and prognosis in young, injured patients.