1
|
Retrospective assessment of the association between inhalation anesthesia and post-operative complications in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. JOURNAL OF SURGERY AND MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.28982/josam.1083644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
2
|
Desflurane versus propofol for general anesthesia maintenance in obese patients: A pilot meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2020; 68:110103. [PMID: 33075628 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
3
|
Demirel I, Yildiz Altun A, Bolat E, Kilinc M, Deniz A, Aksu A, Bestas A. Effect of Patient State Index Monitoring on the Recovery Characteristics in Morbidly Obese Patients: Comparison of Inhalation Anesthesia and Total Intravenous Anesthesia. J Perianesth Nurs 2020; 36:69-74. [PMID: 33012596 DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2020.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Obese patients have a significantly higher risk of adverse effects associated with general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of Patient State Index (PSI) monitoring on recovery from anesthesia and the incidence of any postoperative complications among patients undergoing bariatric surgery with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and inhalational anesthesia. DESIGN This prospective, double-blind, and randomized controlled trial was conducted between February 2017 and August 2017 and included 120 morbidly obese patients (body mass index >40 kg/m2). METHODS Patients were randomly divided into four groups; group P-PSI (n = 30): TIVA with PSI monitoring; group P (n = 30): TIVA without PSI monitoring; group D-PSI (n = 30): desflurane with PSI monitoring; and group D (n = 30): desflurane without PSI monitoring. The discharge time from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), postoperative complications, and hemodynamic parameters were recorded and evaluated. FINDINGS No significant differences were found in demographic data, duration of anesthesia, admittance to PACU, discharge from PACU, modified Aldrete scores, and perioperative mean blood pressure and heart rate. Nausea and vomiting scores were significantly lower in group P-PSI, group P, and group D-PSI compared with group D. CONCLUSIONS Although TIVA and inhalational anesthesia can be safely used for obese patients, intraoperative PSI monitoring may decrease the discharge time from PACU and reduces incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting caused by inhalation anesthetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Demirel
- Medicine Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.
| | - Aysun Yildiz Altun
- Medicine Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Esef Bolat
- Medicine Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Mikail Kilinc
- Medicine Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Deniz
- Medicine Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Aksu
- Medicine Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| | - Azize Bestas
- Medicine Faculty, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carron M, Safaee Fakhr B, Ieppariello G, Foletto M. Perioperative care of the obese patient. Br J Surg 2020; 107:e39-e55. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Obesity has become an increasing problem worldwide during the past few decades. Hence, surgeons and anaesthetists will care for an increasing number of obese patients in the foreseeable future, and should be prepared to provide optimal management for these individuals. This review provides an update of recent evidence regarding perioperative strategies for obese patients.
Methods
A search for papers on the perioperative care of obese patients (English language only) was performed in July 2019 using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library electronic databases. The review focused on the results of RCTs, although observational studies, meta-analyses, reviews, guidelines and other reports discussing the perioperative care of obese patients were also considered. When data from obese patients were not available, relevant data from non-obese populations were used.
Results and conclusion
Obese patients require comprehensive preoperative evaluation. Experienced medical teams, appropriate equipment and monitoring, careful anaesthetic management, and an adequate perioperative ventilation strategy may improve postoperative outcomes. Additional perioperative precautions are necessary in patients with severe morbid obesity, metabolic syndrome, untreated or severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, or obesity hypoventilation syndrome; patients receiving home ventilatory support or postoperative opioid therapy; and obese patients undergoing open operations, long procedures or revisional surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Carron
- Department of Medicine – DIMED, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - B Safaee Fakhr
- Department of Medicine – DIMED, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - G Ieppariello
- Department of Medicine – DIMED, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - M Foletto
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Section of Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oguz A, Akcil EF, Tunali Y, Vehid H, Dilmen OK. Effects of propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane on respiratory functions following endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a prospective randomized study. Korean J Anesthesiol 2019; 72:583-591. [PMID: 31602965 PMCID: PMC6900426 DOI: 10.4097/kja.19336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background General anesthesia with intravenous or inhalation anesthetics reduces respiratory functions. We investigated the effects of propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane on postoperative respiratory function tests. Methods This single-center randomized controlled study was performed in a university hospital from October 2015 to February 2017. Ninety patients scheduled for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery were randomly categorized into either of these three groups: propofol (n = 30, the Group TIVA), desflurane (n = 30, the Group D) or sevoflurane (n = 30, the Group S). We analyzed the patients before, after, and 24 h following surgery, to identify the following parameters: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) %, forced vital capacity (FVC) %, FEV1/FVC, and arterial blood gases (ABG). Furthermore, we also recorded the intraoperative dynamic lung compliance and airway resistance values. Results We did not find any significant differences in FEV1 values (primary outcome) among the groups (P = 0.336). There was a remarkable reduction in the FEV1 and FVC values in all groups postoperatively relative to the baseline (P < 0.001). The FVC, FEV1/FVC, ABG analysis, compliance, and airway resistance were similar among the groups. Intraoperative dynamic compliance values were lower at the 1st and 2nd hours than those immediately after intubation (P < 0.001). Conclusions We demonstrated that propofol, desflurane, and sevoflurane reduced FEV1 and FVC values postoperatively, without any significant differences among the drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulvahap Oguz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, University of Istanbul-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Eren Fatma Akcil
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, University of Istanbul-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yusuf Tunali
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, University of Istanbul-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hayriye Vehid
- Department of Biostatistics, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, University of Istanbul-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Korkmaz Dilmen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, University of Istanbul-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sharma S, Bhalotra AR, Awal S. Changes in Lung Function Parameters after Total Intravenous Anaesthesia and Balanced Anaesthesia with Desflurane: A Prospective Randomised Study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2019; 48:17-23. [PMID: 32076675 PMCID: PMC7001799 DOI: 10.5152/tjar.2019.81594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Following anaesthesia, there is a decrease in pulmonary function. Unlike volatile anaesthetics, propofol decreases the upper airway tone, and total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol may decrease coughing on emergence. Coughing may reduce postoperative atelectasis. Thus, TIVA may lead to greater decreases in lung function postoperatively as compared to balanced anaesthesia with desflurane. Methods Sixty patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status I/II, who were to undergo mastoid surgery, were randomly allocated to Group B and Group T. Anaesthesia was maintained with desflurane, nitrous oxide and oxygen in Group B, and with TIVA in Group T. Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were done preoperatively, and 1, 3 and 24 hours postoperatively. Results Demographic data and preoperative PFT were comparable in both groups. One hour after surgery, there was a greater decrease in FEV1 and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) in Group T (p=0.044 and 0.042, respectively). Three hours postoperatively, the decrease in MEFR and PEFR was again greater in Group T (p=0.005 and 0.008, respectively), while the MEFR recovered to preoperative values in Group B. By 24 hours, the forced vital capacity (FVC), MEFR and PEFR recovered to preoperative values in Group T, while FVC remained reduced in Group B (p=0.006). Conclusion Both anaesthetic techniques cause a postoperative impairment in the lung function, but while TIVA causes a greater reduction in PFT in the early postoperative period, recovery is also earlier. On the other hand, balanced anaesthesia with desflurane was associated with a greater reduction in PFT at 24 hours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurabh Sharma
- Department of Neuroanaesthesia, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
| | - Anju Romina Bhalotra
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Maulana Azad Medical College and associated Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Shikha Awal
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Kalinga Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Memtsoudis SG, Cozowicz C, Nagappa M, Wong J, Joshi GP, Wong DT, Doufas AG, Yilmaz M, Stein MH, Krajewski ML, Singh M, Pichler L, Ramachandran SK, Chung F. Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Guideline on Intraoperative Management of Adult Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Anesth Analg 2019; 127:967-987. [PMID: 29944522 PMCID: PMC6135479 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of the Society of Anesthesia and Sleep Medicine Guideline on Intraoperative Management of Adult Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is to present recommendations based on current scientific evidence. This guideline seeks to address questions regarding the intraoperative care of patients with OSA, including airway management, anesthetic drug and agent effects, and choice of anesthesia type. Given the paucity of high-quality studies with regard to study design and execution in this perioperative field, recommendations were to a large part developed by subject-matter experts through consensus processes, taking into account the current scientific knowledge base and quality of evidence. This guideline may not be suitable for all clinical settings and patients and is not intended to define standards of care or absolute requirements for patient care; thus, assessment of appropriateness should be made on an individualized basis. Adherence to this guideline cannot guarantee successful outcomes, but recommendations should rather aid health care professionals and institutions to formulate plans and develop protocols for the improvement of the perioperative care of patients with OSA, considering patient-related factors, interventions, and resource availability. Given the groundwork of a comprehensive systematic literature review, these recommendations reflect the current state of knowledge and its interpretation by a group of experts at the time of publication. While periodic reevaluations of literature are needed, novel scientific evidence between updates should be taken into account. Deviations in practice from the guideline may be justifiable and should not be interpreted as a basis for claims of negligence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavros G Memtsoudis
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Weill Cornell Medical College and Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Crispiana Cozowicz
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Weill Cornell Medical College and Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mahesh Nagappa
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre and St Joseph's Health Care, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean Wong
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | - David T Wong
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anthony G Doufas
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California
| | - Meltem Yilmaz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark H Stein
- Department of Anesthesiology, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Megan L Krajewski
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Management, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mandeep Singh
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Toronto Sleep and Pulmonary Centre, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lukas Pichler
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care & Pain Management, Weill Cornell Medical College and Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.,Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Satya Krishna Ramachandran
- Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Frances Chung
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Sousa GC, Cruz FF, Heil LB, Sobrinho CJS, Saddy F, Knibel FP, Pereira JB, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M, Silva PL, Rocco PRM. Intraoperative immunomodulatory effects of sevoflurane versus total intravenous anesthesia with propofol in bariatric surgery (the OBESITA trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial. Trials 2019; 20:300. [PMID: 31138279 PMCID: PMC6540380 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3399-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Obesity is associated with a chronic systemic inflammatory process. Volatile or intravenous anesthetic agents may modulate immune function, and may do so differentially in obesity. However, no study has evaluated whether these potential immunomodulatory effects differ according to type of anesthesia in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Methods/design The OBESITA trial is a prospective, nonblinded, single-center, randomized, controlled clinical pilot trial. The trial will include 48 patients with a body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2, scheduled for laparoscopic bariatric surgery using sleeve or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass technique, who will be allocated 1:1 to undergo general inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane or total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol. The primary endpoint is the difference in plasma interleukin (IL)-6 levels when comparing the two anesthetic agents. Blood samples will be collected prior to anesthesia induction (baseline), immediately after anesthetic induction, and before endotracheal extubation. Levels of other proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, neutrophil chemotaxis, macrophage differentiation, phagocytosis, and occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications will also be evaluated. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first randomized clinical trial designed to compare the effects of two different anesthetics on immunomodulation in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Our hypothesis is that anesthesia with sevoflurane will result in a weaker proinflammatory response compared to anesthesia with propofol, with lower circulating levels of IL-6 and other proinflammatory mediators, and increased macrophage differentiation into the M2 phenotype in adipose tissue. Trial registration Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, RBR-77kfj5. Registered on 25 July 2018. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3399-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giselle Carvalho de Sousa
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G1-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brazil.,Department of Anesthesiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Ferreira Cruz
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G1-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brazil
| | - Luciana Boavista Heil
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G1-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brazil
| | | | - Felipe Saddy
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G1-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brazil.,Institute D'Or of Research and Teaching, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Marcus J Schultz
- Department of Intensive Care and Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Paolo Pelosi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcelo Gama de Abreu
- Pulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Pedro Leme Silva
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G1-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brazil
| | - Patricia Rieken Macedo Rocco
- Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, 373, Bloco G1-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-902, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Heil LBB, Silva PL, Pelosi P, Rocco PRM. Immunomodulatory effects of anesthetics in obese patients. World J Crit Care Med 2017; 6:140-152. [PMID: 28828299 PMCID: PMC5547428 DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v6.i3.140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 04/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Anesthesia and surgery have an impact on inflammatory responses, which influences perioperative homeostasis. Inhalational and intravenous anesthesia can alter immune-system homeostasis through multiple processes that include activation of immune cells (such as monocytes, neutrophils, and specific tissue macrophages) with release of pro- or anti-inflammatory interleukins, upregulation of cell adhesion molecules, and overproduction of oxidative radicals. The response depends on the timing of anesthesia, anesthetic agents used, and mechanisms involved in the development of inflammation or immunosuppression. Obese patients are at increased risk for chronic diseases and may have the metabolic syndrome, which features insulin resistance and chronic low-grade inflammation. Evidence has shown that obesity has adverse impacts on surgical outcome, and that immune cells play an important role in this process. Understanding the effects of anesthetics on immune-system cells in obese patients is important to support proper selection of anesthetic agents, which may affect postoperative outcomes. This review article aims to integrate current knowledge regarding the effects of commonly used anesthetic agents on the lungs and immune response with the underlying immunology of obesity. Additionally, it identifies knowledge gaps for future research to guide optimal selection of anesthetic agents for obese patients from an immunomodulatory standpoint.
Collapse
|
10
|
Peng K, Liu HY, Wu SR, Liu H, Zhang ZC, Ji FH. Does Propofol Anesthesia Lead to Less Postoperative Pain Compared With Inhalational Anesthesia?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2017; 123:846-58. [PMID: 27636574 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000001504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many studies have compared propofol-based anesthesia with inhalational anesthesia. Results from several studies have shown improved postoperative analgesia after propofol anesthesia, but other studies showed contradictory results. There are no large prospective studies that compare postoperative pain after propofol versus inhalational anesthesia. This meta-analysis was designed to focus on this question. METHODS A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials that compared propofol-based anesthesia with volatile agents-based anesthesia in adults undergoing surgery was conducted. Published data were pooled for the meta-analysis with Review Manager (ie, RevMan). The main outcomes included postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesics, and time to first analgesia. RESULTS Thirty-nine clinical trials with a combined subject population of 4520 patients came within the purview of this meta-analysis. The investigated volatile agents included isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane. Compared with inhalational anesthetics, the propofol use was associated with a reduced postoperative pain intensity at rest at 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 12 hours (mean difference in pain scores, 30 minutes, -0.48 [visual analog scale, 0-10]; 99% confidence interval [CI], -1.07 to 0.12, P = 0.04) and reduced morphine-equivalent consumption 0 to 24 hours postoperatively (mean difference in morphine-equivalent consumption, -2.68 mg; 99% CI, -6.17 to 0.82; P = 0.05). Fewer patients required postoperative rescue analgesics during 0 to 24 hours after surgery under propofol anesthesia (risk ratio, 0.87; 99% CI, 0.74-1.03; P = 0.04). In addition, patients anesthetized with propofol required administration of postoperative analgesia later than those anesthetized with volatiles (mean difference in time to first analgesic administration, 6.12 minutes; 99% CI, 0.02-12.21; P = 0.01). Considering that Z statistic in RevMan 5.3 does not perform optimally in highly heterogeneous samples among groups or many combinations of groups with small sample sizes, a P value of <.01 was considered statistically significant. On the basis of this threshold, none of the aforementioned results are statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The current results are affected by substantial heterogeneity, which makes it difficult to predict significant differences in postoperative pain control between propofol anesthesia and inhalational anesthesia. Further large, randomized controlled trials are needed to corroborate these results and to detect differences (if any) between propofol and inhalational anesthesia on postoperative pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke Peng
- From the *Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China; †Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, California; and ‡Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Herling SF, Dreijer B, Wrist Lam G, Thomsen T, Møller AM. Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 4:CD011387. [PMID: 28374886 PMCID: PMC6478279 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011387.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid implementation of robotic transabdominal surgery has resulted in the need for re-evaluation of the most suitable form of anaesthesia. The overall objective of anaesthesia is to minimize perioperative risk and discomfort for patients both during and after surgery. Anaesthesia for patients undergoing robotic assisted surgery is different from anaesthesia for patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery; new anaesthetic concerns accompany robotic assisted surgery. OBJECTIVES To assess outcomes related to the choice of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) or inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic gynaecological, urological or gastroenterological surgery. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016 Issue 5), Ovid MEDLINE (1946 to May 2016), Embase via OvidSP (1982 to May 2016), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) via EBSCOhost (1982 to May 2016) and the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Web of Science (1956 to May 2016). We also searched the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) Registry and Clinical trials gov for ongoing trials (May 2016). SELECTION CRITERIA We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adults, aged 18 years and older, of both genders, treated with transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic gynaecological, urological or gastroenterological surgery and focusing on outcomes of TIVA or inhalational anaesthesia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures of Cochrane. Study findings were not suitable for meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS We included three single-centre, two-arm RCTs involving 170 participants. We found one ongoing trial. All included participants were male and were undergoing radical robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP). The men were between 50 and 75 years of age and met criteria for American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification scores (ASA) I, ll and III.We found evidence showing no clinically meaningful differences in postoperative pain between the two types of anaesthetics (mean difference (MD) in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at one to six hours was -2.20 (95% confidence interval (CI) -10.62 to 6.22; P = 0.61) in a sample of 62 participants from one study. Low-quality evidence suggests that propofol reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) over the short term (one to six hours after surgery) after RALRP compared with inhalational anaesthesia (sevoflurane, desflurane) (MD -1.70, 95% CI -2.59 to -0.81; P = 0.0002).We found low-quality evidence suggesting that propofol may prevent an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) after pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning compared with sevoflurane (MD -3.90, 95% CI -6.34 to -1.46; P = 0.002) with increased IOP from baseline to 30 minutes in steep Trendelenburg. However, it is unclear whether this surrogate outcome translates directly to clinical avoidance of ocular complications during surgery. No studies addressed the secondary outcomes of adverse effects, all-cause mortality, respiratory or circulatory complications, cognitive dysfunction, length of stay or costs. Overall the quality of evidence was low to very low, as all studies were small, single-centre trials providing unclear descriptions of methods. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS It is unclear which anaesthetic technique is superior - TIVA or inhalational - for transabdominal robotic assisted surgery in urology, gynaecology and gastroenterology, as existing evidence is scarce, is of low quality and has been generated from exclusively male patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy.An ongoing trial, which includes participants of both genders with a focus on quality of recovery, might have an impact on future evidence related to this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Forsyth Herling
- Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of CopenhagenDepartment of AnaesthesiologyHerlev Ringvej 75HerlevDenmark2730
| | - Bjørn Dreijer
- Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of CopenhagenDepartment of AnaesthesiologyHerlev Ringvej 75HerlevDenmark2730
| | - Gitte Wrist Lam
- Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of CopenhagenDepartment of UrologyHerlev ringvejHerlevDenmark2710
| | - Thordis Thomsen
- Rigshospitalet, The Abdominal CentreDepartment of Nursing ResearchBlegdamsvej 9CopenhagenDenmark2200
| | - Ann Merete Møller
- Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of CopenhagenThe Cochrane Anaesthesia, Critical and Emergency Care GroupHerlev RingvejHerlevDenmark2730
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ohshita N, Kanazumi M, Tsuji K, Yoshida H, Morita S, Momota Y, Tsutsumi YM. Anesthetic Management of a Patient With Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. Anesth Prog 2016; 63:204-207. [PMID: 27973938 DOI: 10.2344/16-00003.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe the case of a 37-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) 4 years earlier and was scheduled to undergo removal of synovial chondromatosis in the temporomandibular joint. EDS is a heritable connective tissue disorder and has 6 types. In this case, the patient was classified into EDS hypermobility type. The major clinical feature of this type is joint hypermobility. The patient had sprain or subluxation of the elbows and ankles and dislocation of the knees. Anticipated problems during general anesthesia would be affected by the disease type. For this patient, extra attention was directed to positional injury-induced neuropathy and articular luxation, cutaneous injuries, injuries related to intubation and ventilation, and postoperative pain. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, remifentanil, and rocuronium and maintained with oxygen-air-desflurane, propofol, remifentanil, fentanyl, and rocuronium. In this case, the patient was safely managed without adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naohiro Ohshita
- Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kaname Tsuji
- First Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Yoshida
- First Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shosuke Morita
- First Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Momota
- Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasuo M Tsutsumi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to describe an evidence-based drug strategy applicable to any obese patient, rather than to present one standard 'ideal' anaesthetic drug combination. The ultimate choice of specific drugs in any given situation will depend upon clinician experience, patient specifics, and drug availability. The fundamental principle in anaesthesia for the obese patient is to use the shortest acting, least fat soluble agents to ensure rapid recovery to safe levels of alertness and mobility. RECENT FINDINGS No new drugs have been introduced over the past few years, but we have seen an introduction of enhanced recovery after surgery-based protocols into bariatric surgery. Our understanding of how obesity affects pharmacokinetics/dynamics of our drugs is improving, with new and better use of established drugs. Allometric scaling is being tested in the different pharmacokinetic/dynamic models used in target controlled infusion devices, with improved performance as a result. Obstructive sleep apnoea has a significant impact upon outcome and utilization of clinical resources, including critical care beds. If an improved drug dosing strategy will reduce this impact, then this would be a step forward. SUMMARY This review introduces newer findings to help us use anaesthetic and analgesic drugs more safely in the morbidly obese. However, there remain many areas of uncertainty with a lack of consensus on many issues.
Collapse
|
14
|
Longer Immediate Recovery Time After Anesthesia Increases Risk of Respiratory Complications After Laparotomy for Bariatric Surgery: a Randomized Clinical Trial and a Cohort Study. Obes Surg 2015; 25:2205-12. [DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1855-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
15
|
Postoperative recovery after anesthesia in morbidly obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth 2015; 62:907-17. [PMID: 26001751 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-015-0405-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Obese patients present a challenge to safe general anesthesia because of impaired cardiopulmonary physiology and increased risks of aspiration and acute upper airway obstruction. Since studies are lacking regarding the postoperative effects on recovery from general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of recovery outcomes in morbidly obese patients who had undergone general anesthesia. SOURCE We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE™, Cochrane, and Scopus™ databases for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the outcome of anesthesia with desflurane, sevoflurane, isoflurane, or propofol in morbidly obese patients. Using a random effects model, we conducted meta-analyses to assess recovery times (eye opening, hand squeezing, tracheal extubation, and stating name or birth date), time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), and the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS We reviewed results for 11 trials and found that patients given desflurane took less time: to respond to commands to open their eyes (weighted mean difference [WMD] -3.10 min; 95% confidence interval (CI): -5.13 to -1.08), to squeeze the investigator's hand (WMD -7.83 min; 95% CI: -8.81 to -6.84), to be prepared for tracheal extubation (WMD -3.88 min; 95% CI: -7.42 to -0.34), and to state their name (WMD -7.15 min; 95% CI: -11.00 to -3.30). We did not find significant differences in PACU discharge times, PONV, or the PACU analgesic requirement. CONCLUSION Postoperative recovery was significantly faster after desflurane than after sevoflurane, isoflurane, or propofol anesthesia in obese patients. No clinically relevant differences were observed regarding PACU discharge time, incidence of PONV, or postoperative pain scores. The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42014009480).
Collapse
|
16
|
Chidambaran V, Sadhasivam S, Diepstraten J, Esslinger H, Cox S, Schnell BM, Samuels P, Inge T, Vinks AA, Knibbe CA. Evaluation of propofol anesthesia in morbidly obese children and adolescents. BMC Anesthesiol 2013; 13:8. [PMID: 23602008 PMCID: PMC3644256 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2012] [Accepted: 04/16/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor characterization of propofol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the morbidly obese (MO) pediatric population poses dosing challenges. This study was conducted to evaluate propofol total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in this population. METHODS After IRB approval, a prospective study was conducted in 20 MO children and adolescents undergoing laparoscopic surgery under clinically titrated propofol TIVA. Propofol doses/infusion rates, hemodynamic variables, times to induction and emergence, and postoperative occurrence of respiratory adverse events (RAE) were recorded, along with intraoperative blinded Bispectral Index/BIS and postoperative Ramsay sedation scores (RSS). Study subjects completed awareness questionnaires on postoperative days 1 and 3. Propofol concentrations were obtained at predetermined intra- and post-operative time points. RESULTS Study subjects ranged 9 - 18 years (age) and 97 - 99.9% (BMI for age percentiles). Average percentage variability of hemodynamic parameters from baseline was ≈ 20%. Patients had consistently below target BIS values (BIS < 40 for >90% of maintenance phase), delayed emergence (25.8 ± 22 minutes), increased somnolence (RSS ≥ 4) in the first 30 minutes of recovery from anesthesia and 30% incidence of postoperative RAE, the odds for which increased by 14% per unit increase in BMI (p ≤ 0.05). Mean propofol concentration was 6.2 mg/L during maintenance and 1.8 mg/L during emergence from anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate clinical overestimation of propofol requirements and highlight the challenges of clinically titrated propofol TIVA in MO adolescents. In this setting, it may be advantageous to titrate propofol to targeted BIS levels until more accurate weight-appropriate dosing regimens are developed, to minimize relative overdosing and its consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vidya Chidambaran
- Department of Anesthesia and Paediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 2001, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Senthilkumar Sadhasivam
- Department of Anesthesia and Paediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 2001, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jeroen Diepstraten
- Division of Pharmacology, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Hope Esslinger
- Department of Anesthesia, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Shareen Cox
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Beverly M Schnell
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Paul Samuels
- Department of Anesthesia and Paediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 2001, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Thomas Inge
- Division of Paediatric Surgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Alexander A Vinks
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Department of Paediatrics, Cincinnati Childrens Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Catherijne A Knibbe
- Division of Pharmacology, Leiden/Amsterdam Center for Drug Research, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
JAKOBSSON J. Desflurane: a clinical update of a third-generation inhaled anaesthetic. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56:420-32. [PMID: 22188283 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02600.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/02/2011] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Available volatile anaesthetics are safe and efficacious; however, their varying pharmacology provides small but potentially clinically important differences. Desflurane is one of the third-generation inhaled anaesthetics. It is the halogenated inhaled anaesthetic with the lowest blood and tissue solubilities, which promotes its rapid equilibration and its rapid elimination following cessation of administration at the end of anaesthesia. The low fat solubility of desflurane provides pharmacological benefits, especially in overweight patients and in longer procedures by reducing slow compartment accumulation. A decade of clinical use has provided evidence for desflurane's safe and efficacious use as a general anaesthetic. Its benefits include rapid and predictable emergence, and early recovery. In addition, the use of desflurane promotes early and predictable extubation, and the ability to rapidly transfer patients from the operating theatre to the recovery area, which has a positive impact on patient turnover. Desflurane also increases the likelihood of patients, including obese patients, recovering their protective airway reflexes and awakening to a degree sufficient to minimise the stay in the high dependency recovery area. The potential impact of the rapid early recovery from desflurane anaesthesia on intermediate and late recovery and resumption of activities of daily living requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. JAKOBSSON
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care; Institution for Physiology and Pharmacology; Karolinska Institute; Danderyds University Hospital; Stockholm; Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
The search for an ideal inhalational general anesthetic agent continues. Desflurane, which was recently introduced in the Indian market, possesses favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and is closer to the definition of an ideal agent. It offers the advantage of precise control over depth of anesthesia along with a rapid, predictable, and clear-headed recovery with minimal postoperative sequelae, making it a valuable anesthetic agent for maintenance in adults and pediatric patients in surgeries of all durations. The agent has advantages when used in extremes of age and in the obese. Its use may increase the direct costs of providing anesthetic care. Methods or techniques, such as low-flow anesthesia, to reduce the overall cost and along with minimal environmental implications must be followed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mukul Chandra Kapoor
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Pushpanjali Crosslay Hospital, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Mahesh Vakamudi
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Corrie KR, Chillistone S, Hardman JG. The Effect of Obesity and Anesthetic Maintenance Regimen on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications. Anesth Analg 2011; 113:4-6. [DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31821e9932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|