Objectives. To examine the effects of replicating a bundled package of evidence-informed interventions on social determinants, HIV health outcomes, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for 697 Black cisgender and transgender women with HIV across 12 US sites from 2021 to 2023. Methods. Women participated in a minimum of 2 interventions. We collected self-reported HRQoL and social determinants via interview at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. We collected retention in care and viral suppression via medical chart review. We examined effects by gender identity and type and number of bundled interventions received. Results. In the 12-month postenrollment period, 85.0% of women reached viral suppression and 74.3% were retained in care. Social determinants and HRQoL improved over time. Transgender women had significantly lower odds of retention in care compared with cisgender women (adjusted odds ratio = 0.85; 95% confidence interval = 0.77, 0.93) but an overall higher physical HRQoL score (46.8 vs 40.8). Viral suppression and mental HRQoL did not differ by gender identity. Conclusions. Using a bundled intervention is a promising approach to reach and provide culturally relevant care for Black women with HIV. (Am J Public Health. 2025;115(S1):S46-S56. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308019).

General practice-based care for Australian children is facing low levels of clinical guideline adherence particularly in three key areas: asthma, type 1 diabetes and antibiotic use. We offer an implementation science-informed position paper, providing a broad overview of how we aim to address this issue. This is the co-designed National Paediatric Applied Research Translation Initiative (N-PARTI), a bespoke, three-phased research solution by deploying mixed methods, simulation and scale-up of evidence into practice.

Background: Despite significant prevention efforts, the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in intensive care units (ICUs) is rising at an alarming rate. CLABSI contributes to increased morbidity, mortality, prolonged hospital stays and elevated healthcare costs. This study aimed to determine the incidence rate of CLABSI, compliance with the central venous catheter (CVC) care bundle and risk factors associated with CLABSI among ICU patients. Method: This prospective observational study was conducted in one university hospital and two public hospitals in Malaysia between October 2022 to January 2023. Adult ICU patients (aged > 18 years) with CVC and admitted to the ICU for more than 48 h were included in this study. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical diagnosis, CVC details, compliance with CVC care bundle and microbiological results. All data analyses were performed using SPSS version 23. Results: A total of 862 patients with 997 CVCs met the inclusion criteria, contributing to 4330 central line (CL) days and 18 CLABSI cases. The overall incidence rate of CLABSI was 4.16 per 1000 CL days. The average of overall compliance with CVC care bundle components was 65%. The predominant causative microorganisms isolated from CLABSI episodes were Gram-negative bacteria (78.3%), followed by Gram-positive bacteria (17.4%) and Candida spp. (2.0%). Multivariate analysis identified prolonged ICU stay (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.994; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.092-3.009), undergoing surgery (AOR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.468-5.830) and having had multiple catheters (AOR: 3.167, 95% CI: 1.519-9.313) as significant risk factors for CLABSI. Conclusions: The findings underscore the importance of robust surveillance, embedded infection-control and -prevention initiatives, and strict adherence to the CVC care bundle to prevent CLABSI in ICUs. Targeted interventions addressing identified risk factors are crucial to improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

The benefits of acute stroke unit care, with nurses as central figures, are well-documented. As care bundles gain traction to enhance evidence-based nursing care, this review explores their development and adaptation in a setting where stroke care is integrated into general neurology. It also highlights key elements for reinforcing competence and interdisciplinary support.

Most evidenced based acute stroke unit recommendations focus on hyperacute medical management. In comparison, the literature on decision-making for selecting and evaluating key components of nursing surveillance to support specialized stroke care in geographically smaller settings is sparse although the benefits of nursing care bundles is emerging. Well-structured care bundles, grounded in robust evidence and supported by thorough documentation and effective implementation strategies, provide a clear framework for nursing care, facilitate continuous monitoring, and are useful for enhancing practices especially in smaller stroke units that lack the resources of more comprehensive state-of-the-art units. Tailoring stroke nursing care bundles to local contexts requires an adaptable approach.

The emergency department (ED) is an important safety net for children experiencing mental and behavioral health crises and can serve as a navigational hub for families seeking support for these concerns.

To evaluate the outcomes of a novel mental health care bundle on child well-being, satisfaction with care, and health system metrics.

Nonrandomized trial of 2 pediatric EDs in Alberta, Canada. Children younger than 18 years with mental and behavioral health presentations were enrolled before implementation (preimplementation: January 2020 to January 2021), at implementation onset (run-in: February 2021 to June 2021), and during bundle delivery (implementation: July 2021 to June 2022).

The bundle involved risk stratification, standardized mental health assessments, and provision of an urgent follow-up appointment after the visit, if required.

The primary outcome, child well-being 30 days after the ED visit, was assessed using the Stirling Children's Wellbeing Scale (children aged <14 years) or Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (children aged 14-17 years). Change in well-being between the preimplementation and implementation periods was examined using interrupted time-series analysis and multivariable modeling. Changes in health system metrics (hospitalization, ED length of stay [LOS], and revisits) and care satisfaction were also examined.

A total of 1412 patients (median [IQR] age, 13 [11-15] years), with 715 enrolled preimplementation (390 [54.5%] female; 55 [7.7%] First Nations, Inuit, or Métis; 46 [6.4%] South, Southcentral, or Southeast Asian; and 501 [70.1%] White) and 697 enrolled at implementation (357 [51.2%] female; 51 [7.3%] First Nations, Inuit, or Métis; 39 [5.6%] South, Southcentral, or Southeast Asian; and 511 [73.3%] White) were included in the analysis. There were no differences between study periods in well-being. Reduced well-being z scores were associated with mood disorder diagnosis (standardized mean difference, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.26 to -0.02) and nonbinary gender identity (standardized mean difference, -0.41; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.19). The implementation period involved fewer hospitalizations (difference in hospitalizations, -6.9; 95% CI, -10.4 to -3.4) and longer ED LOS (1.1 hours; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.4 hours). There were no differences between study periods in ED revisits or care satisfaction.

In this study, the delivery of a care bundle was not associated with higher child well-being 30 days after an ED visit. Hospitalizations did decrease during bundle delivery, but ED LOS did not. These health system findings may have been affected by broader changes in patient volumes and flow processes that occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, which took place as the study was conducted.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04292379.

Integrating process improvement tools into healthcare has shown promising results, yet the application of "training within industry" (TWI) still needs to be explored in this context. This study focuses on implementing job instruction (JI), one of the three components of TWI, within a large breakthrough series collaborative (BTS) in a middle-income country.

We evaluated the deployment of JI during a nationwide initiative aimed at reducing three critical healthcare-associated infections (HAIs)-central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI)-across 189 Brazilian public intensive care units (ICUs). Our quality improvement (QI) project outlines the integration of JI to enhance the reliability of care bundles and empower frontline teams to reduce variation, one fundamental condition to maintain ongoing improvements.

The implementation strategy included structured JI training for the hub's leaders, which facilitated the gradual adoption and customization of JI and visual management techniques into daily ICU care. We detailed the four stages of JI training, the content of each session, and how they were incorporated into the existing BTS framework alongside visual management tools. The mean compliance to prevention bundles exceeded 90%, and the project results reached an overall reduction of 44%, 52%, and 54% for CLABSI, VAP, and CAUTI, respectively.

Our findings suggest that JI can be seamlessly integrated into routine QI activities. This structure promotes consistency in carrying out each aspect of care bundles, preventing HAI and strengthening patient safety.

This project aimed to develop an evidence-based nursing care bundle after gastrostomy feeding tube insertion and implement it into clinical practice using the Knowledge to Action (KTA) framework.

This mixed-method design project was conducted in a university hospital between December 2021 and June 2022. The project was carried out in four phases: (1) development of an evidence-based care bundle, (2) education for care bundle training, (3) implementation of the care bundle, (4) evaluation of the care bundle. Nurses' compliance with bundles was measured using All-or-None measurement. The analysis of the qualitative interview conducted was performed using the content analysis method of Graneheim and Lundman.

The developed Sezer gastrostomy care bundle consists of three parameters (peristomal area care, tube feeding, and medication administration through the feeding tube) and a total of 14 elements to be applied by nurses under these parameters. Compliance rates for peristomal area care, tube feeding, and medication administration through feeding tube parameters were 100%, 98.66%, and 98.66%, respectively. Two themes and six subthemes emerged: (1) reflection of using the Sezer gastrostomy care bundle on nursing care and (2) adoption of Sezer gastrostomy care bundle.

The gastrostomy care bundle was developed in accordance with the Institute of Healthcare Improvement's recommendations. The KTA framework provided an appropriate structure to transform evidence into practice, meticulously address barriers, evaluate outcomes, and ensure sustainability. The project found that nurses complied with all its parameters. Studies evaluating the effect of the gastrostomy care bundle on patient outcomes are recommended.

To review the evidence that supports the implementation of goal-directed care bundle protocols to improve outcomes from neurocritical conditions, and of the possible advantage of specific over generalized protocols.

Articles from January 1, 2023 to July 31, 2024 were searched to evaluate the effectiveness of standardized management in neurological emergencies. The use of care bundles and standardized protocols with time- and target-related metrics has shown benefit in patients with acute stroke and traumatic brain injury.

A goal-directed care protocol to guide standard management implemented by a multidisciplinary team can improve outcomes from neurological emergencies. However, implementation challenges need to be addressed before wide adoption of protocolized care for maximum benefit to populations.

Cardiac surgery is a major contributor to acute kidney injury (AKI); approximately 22% of patients who undergo cardiac surgery develop AKI, and among them, 2% will require renal replacement therapy (RRT). AKI is also associated with heightened risks of mortality and morbidity, longer intensive care stays, and increased treatment costs. Due to the challenges of treating AKI, prevention through the use of care bundles is suggested as an effective approach. This review aimed to assess the impact of care bundles on kidney outcomes, mortality, and hospital stay for cardiac patients in critical care.

PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched up to November 2024. Inclusion criteria were studies on individuals with cardiac diseases receiving critical care, that used AKI care bundle as the intervention, and reported outcomes related to AKI, mortality, and other kidney-related events. We used the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool 2 and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for quality assessment. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Seven studies on total 5045 subjects, including five observational and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The implementation of care bundles significantly reduced the incidence of all-stage AKI (OR: 0.78; 95%CI: 0.61-0.99) and moderate-severe AKI (OR: 0.56; 95%CI: 0.43-0.72). Also, the implementation of care bundle increased the incidence of persistent renal dysfunction after 30 days by 2.39 times. However, there were no significant changes in RRT, major adverse kidney events, or mortality between the groups. The mean quality assessment score for observational studies was 7.2 out of ten, while there were noted concerns in the risk of bias assessment of the RCTs.

The application of care bundles in patients, including those undergoing cardiac surgeries as well as non-cardiac critical illness, appears to be effective in reducing AKI, particularly in moderate and severe stages. However, given the inclusion of non-cardiac patients in some studies, the observed effect may not be solely attributable to cardiac surgery cases. Future large-scale RCTs focusing specifically on cardiac surgery patients are recommended to clarify the impact of care bundles within this subgroup.

CRD42024498972.

This study investigated the implementation of the ABCDEF bundle and the factors associated with its implementation according to national income levels.

This study is cross-sectional research. We conducted a secondary analysis of an international 1-day point-prevalence study that investigated the implementation of the ABCDEF bundle in critically ill patients. All patients admitted to the ICU were eligible. This study was conducted across 135 ICUs in 54 countries, including data from 664 patients. Outcomes were categorized according to the income level of the country (high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries) in which each ICU was located. A multilevel generalized linear model was developed to identify the factors associated with ABCDEF bundle implementation for each income level.

We identified 664 patients in 79 high-income countries, 278 in 26 middle-income countries, and 287 in 30 low-income countries ICUs. Implementation rates of the ABCDEF bundle were low for all income levels but varied. Few individuals completed the entire bundle on the survey date. Common factors associated with the implementation among all income levels were a multidisciplinary team approach for Element A (pain) and mechanical ventilation use for Element C (sedation), which were also associated with lower Element E (mobility). The existence of a protocol was frequently identified as a promoting factor associated with ABCDEF bundle implementation. The associated factors varied by income level; for example, dedicated intensivists were only identified in high-income countries, but not in middle-income countries or low-income countries.

The overall low ABCDEF bundle implementation rates necessitate action. As factors associated with its implementation vary according to national income level, tailored strategies are essential for improving ICU care quality.

NA.

Peripherally-inserted venous catheters (PIVC) are essential for cancer patients to receive treatment. Phlebitis is a major complication of PIVC. Currently, nurses' assessment of phlebitis mainly involves visual inspection. However, the latest literature suggests palpation for tenderness to promote the early detection of phlebitis.

This project evaluated the effectiveness of a bundle approach to increase nurses' compliance with PIVC site assessment to promote early detection of phlebitis (grade 2 and above).

The JBI Evidence Implementation Framework was used to conduct this project in a 28-bed hematology-oncology ward in a Singapore hospital. The bundle approach used in this project consisted of a training presentation, medical mannequin, and phlebitis scale card. The rate of nurses' compliance with best practice for PIVC site assessment was measured at 1 month and 6 months post-implementation. The incidence of phlebitis was monitored up until 12 months post-implementation.

Baseline data indicated that only 18.75% (3 out of 16) nurses palpated for tenderness when assessing for phlebitis. Data at 1 month and 6 months post-implementation reported sustained high compliance rates of 85.71% (24 out of 28) and 89.29% (25 out of 28), respectively. Late detection of phlebitis was reduced by 66% (from three cases to one case) at 6 months post-implementation, and no patients required invasive interventions.

The bundle approach used in this project facilitated early detection of phlebitis following the inclusion of palpation into nurses' assessment for phlebitis.

http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A204.

There is significant variation in HCC management across different centers with poor adherence to evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as assessed in prior studies. In Australia, quality indicators (QIs) have recently been proposed by a multidisciplinary group of experts to help provide a framework to assess and monitor the quality of HCC care. In this review, we discuss the many areas where real-world practice deviates from evidence-based medicine, the role that QI sets play in addressing this gap, and the similarities and differences between Australian QIs and other leading treatment guidelines and QI sets from around the world. We focus on the utility of QI sets to identify opportunities for targeted improvement in the real-world clinical environment. We conclude with a discussion about the formation of a national clinical quality registry as a long-term measure to facilitate continual improvements in patient care within and across sites in order to optimize patient outcomes.

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common type of hospital-acquired infection and affects up to a third of patients following surgical procedures. It is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. In the United Kingdom alone, it is estimated to add another £30 million to the cost of adult cardiac surgery. Although generic guidance for SSI prevention exists, this is not specific to adult cardiac surgery. Furthermore, many of the risk factors for SSI are prevalent within the cardiac surgery population. Despite this, there is currently no standard of care for SSI prevention in adults undergoing cardiac surgery throughout the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods of care, with variations in practice existing throughout from risk stratification, decontamination strategies and surveillance.

Primary objective: to assess the clinical effectiveness of pre-, intra-, and postoperative interventions in the prevention of cardiac SSI.

(i) to evaluate the effects of SSI prevention interventions on morbidity, mortality, and resource use; (ii) to evaluate the effects of SSI prevention care bundles on morbidity, mortality, and resource use.

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid, from inception) and Embase (Ovid, from inception) on 31 May 2021.

gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were also searched for ongoing or unpublished trials on 21 May 2021. No language restrictions were imposed.

We included RCTs evaluating interventions to reduce SSI in adults (≥ 18 years of age) who have undergone any cardiac surgery.

We followed the methods as per our published Cochrane protocol. Our primary outcome was surgical site infection. Our secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, reoperation for SSI, hospital length of stay, hospital readmissions for SSI, healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness, quality of life (QoL), and adverse effects. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

A total of 118 studies involving 51,854 participants were included. Twenty-two interventions to reduce SSI in adults undergoing cardiac surgery were identified. The risk of bias was judged to be high in the majority of studies. There was heterogeneity in the study populations and interventions; consequently, meta-analysis was not appropriate for many of the comparisons and these are presented as narrative summaries. We focused our reporting of findings on four comparisons deemed to be of great clinical relevance by all review authors. Decolonisation versus no decolonisation Pooled data from three studies (n = 1564) using preoperative topical oral/nasal decontamination in all patients demonstrated an uncertain direction of treatment effect in relation to total SSI (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.36; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). A single study reported that decolonisation likely results in little to no difference in superficial SSI (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.15; moderate-certainty evidence) and a reduction in deep SSI (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.77; high-certainty evidence). The evidence on all-cause mortality from three studies (n = 1564) is very uncertain (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.84; I2 = 49%; very low-certainty evidence). A single study (n = 954) demonstrated that decolonisation may result in little to no difference in hospital readmission for SSI (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.45; low-certainty evidence). A single study (n = 954) reported one case of temporary discolouration of teeth in the decolonisation arm (low-certainty-evidence. Reoperation for SSI was not reported. Tight glucose control versus standard glucose control Pooled data from seven studies (n = 880) showed that tight glucose control may reduce total SSI, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.85; I2 = 29%; numbers need to treat to benefit (NNTB) = 13; very-low certainty evidence). Pooled data from seven studies (n = 3334) showed tight glucose control may reduce all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). Based on four studies (n = 2793), there may be little to no difference in episodes of hypoglycaemia between tight control vs. standard control, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 2.12, 95% CI 0.51 to 8.76; I2 = 72%; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported superficial/deep SSI, reoperation for SSI, or hospital readmission for SSI. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus standard dressings NPWT was assessed in two studies (n = 144) and it may reduce total SSI, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.97; I2 = 0%; NNTB = 10; very low-certainty evidence). A single study (n = 80) reported reoperation for SSI. The relative effect could not be estimated. The certainty of evidence was judged to be very low. No studies reported superficial/deep SSI, all-cause mortality, hospital readmission for SSI, or adverse effects. Topical antimicrobials versus no topical antimicrobials Five studies (n = 5382) evaluated topical gentamicin sponge, which may reduce total SSI (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.84; I2 = 48%; NNTB = 32), superficial SSI (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.98; I2 = 69%), and deep SSI (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; I2 = 5%; low-certainty evidence. Four studies (n = 4662) demonstrated that topical gentamicin sponge may result in little to no difference in all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.42; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). Reoperation for SSI, hospital readmission for SSI, and adverse effects were not reported in any included studies.

This review provides the broadest and most recent review of the current evidence base for interventions to reduce SSI in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. Twenty-one interventions were identified across the perioperative period. Evidence is of low to very low certainty primarily due to significant heterogeneity in how interventions were implemented and the definitions of SSI used. Knowledge gaps have been identified across a number of practices that should represent key areas for future research. Efforts to standardise SSI outcome reporting are warranted.

Enteral nutrition for stroke patients in China presents major shortcomings. This aspect of care involves multiple components, and poor implementation of any one of them may affect the patients' enteral nutrition. Most current studies only confirm the effectiveness of the application of single interventions and lack any scientific evaluation of the overall ensemble of enteral nutrition interventions in stroke patients. This study focuses on evaluating the overall effectiveness of a care bundles for the management of enteral nutrition in stroke patients by targeting multiple simultaneous interventions.

This study is to be conducted over 10 periods in the stroke patient wards of eight hospitals across China. As the trial progresses, each hospital begins by receiving the control group care and then shifts to the intervention group care. The point at which each hospital shifts care is randomised. During this time, the control group implements its usual care, while the intervention group implements an evidence-based care bundles for enteral nutrition management in stroke patients. The primary indicator in this study is feeding intolerance; indicators for the evaluation of nutritional status, gastrointestinal complications, and disease prognosis are also included.

We anticipate that the care bundles developed by pooling this evidence will be manifestly more beneficial than harmful and will be worthy of replication. Hence, we chose a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial to validate the application of these interventions. This study will provide experience and reference on how to promote the clinical translation of evidence-based evidence and standardise enteral nutrition care management in stroke patients.

ChiCTR2300067930. Registered on January 31, 2023.

Background: Dialysis-associated events such as bloodstream infections represent serious complications for hemodialysis patients, with the potential to increase morbidity and mortality. Aims: To assess the impact of implementing a comprehensive bundle of evidence-based practice on reducing dialysis event rates among catheter dialysis patients at Prince Mansour Military Hospital Dialysis Center. Participants and Methods: The study enrolled 111 hemodialysis participants. A comprehensive dialysis event prevention bundle consisting of 6 key components was implemented. Results: Implementation of the dialysis event prevention bundle showed a significant decrease in IV antimicrobial start (p = 0.003), positive blood culture (p = 0.039), and inflammation at the vascular access site eliminated (p = 0.004). There was a positive correlation between IV antimicrobial start and both patients' age (p = 0.005) and the permanent catheter site (p = 0.002). Positive blood culture was significantly correlated with comorbidities (p = 0.000) and patients' age (p = 0.320). A positive correlation between pus, redness, or increased swelling at the vascular access site with comorbidities (p = 0.034), patients' age (p = 0.021), and the permanent catheter site (p = 0.002) was observed. Staff compliance with the dialysis event prevention bundle components has improved regarding hemodialysis catheter disconnection, catheter exit site care, and routine disinfection. Conclusions: Implementation of a comprehensive dialysis event prevention bundle can effectively reduce dialysis event rates and enhance patient safety.

Worldwide polycrises continue to challenge the World Health Organization's proposed 2030 sustainable development goals. Continuity of brain care bundles helps attain these goals by sustaining brain health over successive generations. Factors representing social drivers of health must incorporate transdisciplinary care into equitable intervention choices. Drivers are more effectively addressed by combining maternal and pediatric assessments to address morbidity and mortality across each lifespan. Care bundles comprise at least three evidenced-based interventions collectively implemented during a clinical experience to achieve a desired outcome. Synergy among stakeholders prioritize communication, responsibility, compliance and trust when choosing bundles in response to changing clinical conditions. A prenatal transdisciplinary model continues after birth with infant and family-centered developmental care practices through discharge to supplement essential skin-to-skin contact. Fetal-neonatal neurology training encourages participation in this model of brain health care to more effectively choose neurodiagnostic and neuroprotective options. Shared clinical decisions evaluate interventions from conception through the first 1000 days. At least eighty percent of brain connectivity will have been completed during this first critical/sensitive period of neuroplasticity. The developmental origins of health and disease concept offers neurology subspecialists a life-course perspective when choosing brain health strategies. Toxic stressor interplay from reproductive and pregnancy diseases and adversities potentially impairs embryonic, fetal and neonatal brain development. Continued exposures throughout maturation and aging worsen outcome risks, particularly during adolescence and reproductive senescence. Intragenerational and transgenerational use of care bundles will guide neuromonitoring and neuroprotection choices that strengthen preventive neurology strategies.

Sepsis is the second leading cause of maternal death in the U.S. For racial and ethnic minoritized birthing people, especially those who are Black and living in underserved communities, labor and postpartum are particularly vulnerable risk periods. To reduce sepsis-related morbidity and mortality and promote maternal health equity, community co-led, and co-designed interventions are urgently needed. In this commentary, we introduce the design and goals of our EnCoRe MoMS study as an exemplar for employing community based participatory research principals iteratively throughout the research process and integrated across all study aims. We also highlight our early lessons learned and recommendations for best practices. Our novel model and ongoing work have implications for scaling academic-community research partnerships for other causes of severe maternal morbidity and maternal health equity nationally.

Health care-associated infections (HAIs) are a major threat to patient safety and quality care. However, they are avoidable by implementing evidence-based infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. This review evaluated the evidence of the effectiveness of IPC interventions in reducing rates of HAIs in health care settings in Africa.

We searched several databases: CENTRAL, EMBASE, PUBMED, CINAHL, WHO IRIS, and AJOL for primary studies reporting rates of the 4 most frequent HAIs: surgical site infections, central line--associated bloodstream infections, catheter-associated urinary tract infections, ventilator-associated pneumoniae, and increase in hand hygiene compliance. Two reviewers appraised the studies and PRISMA guidelines were followed.

Out of 4,624 studies identified from databases and additional sources, 15 studies were finally included in the review. The majority of studies were of pre- and post-test study design. All the studies implemented a combination of interventions and not as stand-alone components. Across all included studies, an improvement was reported in at least 1 primary outcome.

Our review highlights the potential of IPC interventions in reducing HAIs and improving compliance with hand hygiene in health care facilities in Africa. For future research, we recommend more pragmatic study designs with improved methodological rigor.

Nosocomial infection has significant consequences in health care, both at the individual level due to increased morbidity and mortality, and at the organizational level due to increased costs. Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is the most common nosocomial infection, and is associated with high excess mortality, frequent use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials and increased length of stay. This review explores the preventative strategies that have been examined in non-ventilator HAP (NV-HAP). The management of aspiration risk, interventions for oral hygiene, role of mobilization and physiotherapy, modification of environmental factors, and vaccination are discussed. Many of these interventions are low risk, acceptable to patients and have good cost-benefit ratios. However, the evidence base for prevention of NV-HAP is weak. This review identifies the lack of a unified research definition, under-recruitment to studies, and variation in intervention and outcome measures as limitations in the existing literature. Given that the core risk factors for acquisition of NV-HAP are increasing, there is an urgent need for research to address the prevention of NV-HAP. This review calls for a unified definition of NV-HAP, and identification of a core outcome set for studies in NV-HAP, and suggests future directions for research in NV-HAP. Improving care for people with NV-HAP will reduce morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs significantly.

To explore how parents experienced their child with delirium and how parents viewed our delirium management bundle.

We conducted a qualitative exploratory descriptive study using semi-structured individual or dyad interviews.

Twelve semi-structured interviews with 16 parents of 12 critically ill children diagnosed with delirium in a paediatric intensive care unit were conducted from October 2022 to January 2023 and analysed through a reflexive thematic analysis.

We generated five themes: (1) knowing that something is very wrong, (2) observing manifest changes in the child, (3) experiencing fear of long-term consequences, (4) adding insight to the bundle, and (5) family engagement.

The parents in our study were able to observe subtle and manifest changes in their child with delirium. This caused fear of lasting impact. The parents regarded most of the interventions in the delirium management bundle as relevant but needed individualization in the application. The parents requested more information regarding delirium and a higher level of parent engagement in the care of their child during delirium.

This paper contributes to understanding how parents might experience delirium in their critically ill child, how our delirium management bundle was received by the parents, and their suggestions for improvement. Our study deals with critically ill children with delirium, their parents, and staff working to prevent and manage paediatric delirium (PD) in the paediatric intensive care unit.

The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research guidelines were used to ensure the transparency of our reporting.

No patient or public contribution to the research design. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL COMMUNITY?: - It increases awareness of the parent's perspective on PD in critically ill children. - It shows how PD might affect parents, causing negative emotions such as distress, frustration, and fear of permanent damage. - It shows that the parents in our study, in addition to the care bundle, requested more information on delirium and more involvement in the care of their delirious child.

Pregnancy care can improve maternal pregnancy outcomes. Cluster nursing, an evidence-based, patient-centered model, enhances pregnancy care, can provide patients with high-quality nursing services, has been widely used in clinical practice in recent years. However, most previous studies evaluated cluster nursing program only for a single clinical scenario. In this study, we developed and implemented a antenatal cluster care program for various prenatal issues faced by puerpera to analyze its application effect.

This is a historical before and after control study. 89 expectant mothers who had their prenatal information files registered in the outpatient department of a grade III, level A hospital from June 2020 to September 2021 were finally enrolled in observation group, and received prenatal cluster management. Another set of 89 expectant mothers from January 2019 to December 2019 were included in the control group and received traditional routine prenatal management. The effect of cluster nursing management on maternal delivery and postpartum rehabilitation was evaluated and compared between the two groups.

Compared with the control group, the observation group had a significantly higher natural delivery rate, better neonatal prognosis, higher rates of exclusive breastfeeding, lower incidence of postpartum complications, shorter postpartum hospital stay, better postpartum health status, and higher satisfaction with nursing services. Compared with before intervention, the SAS and SDS scores of the observation group showed significant improvement after intervention.

Antenatal cluster care is beneficial to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes, and can have positive effects on natural pregnancy and breastfeeding, while improving the multimedia health education ability of medical care and emphasizing the importance of social support.

Numerous interventions for pressure injury prevention have been developed, including care bundles.

To systematically review the effectiveness of pressure injury prevention care bundles on pressure injury prevalence, incidence, and hospital-acquired pressure injury rate in hospitalised patients.

The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (via PubMed), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and two registries were searched (from 2009 to September 2023).

Randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies with a comparison group published in English after 2008 were included. Studies reporting on the frequency of pressure injuries where the number of patients was not the numerator or denominator, or where the denominator was not reported, and single subgroups of hospitalised patients were excluded. Educational programmes targeting healthcare professionals and bundles targeting specific types of pressure injuries were excluded.

Bundles with ≥3 components directed towards patients and implemented in ≥2 hospital services were included.

Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessments were undertaken independently by two researchers. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted. The certainty of the body of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

Nine studies (seven non-randomised with historical controls; two randomised) conducted in eight countries were included. There were four to eight bundle components; most were core, and only a few were discretionary. Various strategies were used prior to (six studies), during (five studies) and after (two studies) implementation to embed the bundles. The pooled risk ratio for pressure injury prevalence (five non-randomised studies) was 0.55 (95 % confidence intervals 0.29-1.03), and for hospital-acquired pressure injury rate (five non-randomised studies) it was 0.31 (95 % confidence intervals 0.12-0.83). All non-randomised studies were at high risk of bias, with very low certainty of evidence. In the two randomised studies, the care bundles had non-significant effects on hospital-acquired pressure injury incidence density, but data could not be pooled.

Whilst some studies showed decreases in pressure injuries, this evidence was very low certainty. The potential benefits of adding emerging evidence-based components to bundles should be considered. Future effectiveness studies should include contemporaneous controls and the development of a comprehensive, theory and evidence-informed implementation plan.

PROSPERO CRD42023423058.

Pressure injury prevention care bundles decrease hospital-acquired pressure injuries, but the certainty of this evidence is very low.

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is the most devastating form of stroke and a major cause of disability. Clinical trials of individual therapies have failed to definitively establish a specific beneficial treatment. However, clinical trials of introducing care bundles, with multiple therapies provided in parallel, appear to clearly reduce morbidity and mortality. Currently, not enough patients receive these interventions in the acute phase.

We convened an expert group to discuss best practices in ICH and to develop recommendations for bundled care that can be delivered in all settings that treat acute ICH, with a focus on European healthcare systems.

In this consensus paper, we argue for widespread implementation of formalised care bundles in ICH, including specific metrics for time to treatment and criteria for the consideration of neurosurgical therapy.

There is an extraordinary opportunity to improve clinical care and clinical outcomes in this devastating disease. Substantial evidence already exists for a range of therapies that can and should be implemented now.

Pressure ulcers (PUs) represent a burden to the health economy and patients alike. Despite national and international guidelines regarding the management of risk, the incidence and prevalence across England remains high. Detecting early the risk of PUs is paramount, and requires using a valid risk assessment tool alongside clinical judgement and management of associated risk factors. There is a need to implement prevention strategies. Introducing care bundles for pressure ulcers, for example SKIN, SSKIN and most recently aSSKINg, is designed to guide clinicians and reduce variations in care. This article presents a review of the evidence on compliance with guidelines, frameworks, pathways or care bundles within primary and secondary care settings. This article focuses on the literature review that was conducted to inform a subsequent clinical audit of compliance with the aSSKINg framework in a Community NHS Foundation Trust in the South East of England.

Blunt chest injury is associated with significant adverse health outcomes. A chest injury care bundle (ChIP) was developed for patients with blunt chest injury presenting to the emergency department. ChIP implementation resulted in increased health service use, decreased unplanned Intensive Care Unit admissions and non-invasive ventilation use. In this paper, we report on the financial implications of implementing ChIP and quantify costs/savings.

This was a controlled pre-and post-test study with two intervention and two non-intervention sites. The primary outcome measure was the treatment cost of hospital admission. Costs are reported in Australian dollars (AUD). A generalised linear model (GLM) estimated patient episode treatment costs at ChIP intervention and non-intervention sites. Because healthcare cost data were positive-skewed, a gamma distribution and log-link function were applied.

A total of 1705 patients were included in the cost analysis. The interaction (Phase x Treatment) was positive but insignificant (p = 0.45). The incremental cost per patient episode at ChIP intervention sites was estimated at $964 (95 % CI, -966 - 2895). The very wide confidence intervals reflect substantial differences in cost changes between individual sites Conclusions: The point estimate of the cost of the ChIP care bundle indicated an appreciable increase compared to standard care, but there is considerable variability between sites, rendering the finding statistically non-significant. The impact on short- and longer-term costs requires further quantification.

Despite national pediatric postcardiac arrest care (PCAC) guidelines to improve neurological outcomes and survival, there are limited studies describing PCAC delivery in pediatric institutions. This study aimed to describe PCAC delivery in centers belonging to a resuscitation quality collaborative.

An institutional review board-approved REDCap survey was distributed electronically to the lead resuscitation investigator at each institution in the international Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Improvement Collaborative. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. A chi-square test was used to compare categorical data.

Twenty-four of 47 centers (51%) completed the survey. Most respondents (58%) belonged to large centers (>1,000 annual pediatric intensive care unit admissions). Sixty-seven percent of centers reported no specific process to initiate PCAC with the other third employing order sets, paper forms, or institutional guidelines. Common PCAC targets included temperature (96%), age-based blood pressure (88%), and glucose (75%). Most PCAC included electroencephalogram (75%), but neuroimaging was only included at 46% of centers. Duration of PCAC was either tailored to clinical improvement and neurological examination (54%) or time-based (45%). Only 25% of centers reported having a mechanism for evaluating PCAC adherence. Common barriers to effective PCAC implementation included lack of time and limited training opportunities.

There is wide variation in PCAC delivery among surveyed pediatric institutions despite national guidelines to standardize and implement PCAC.

The objective of this scoping review was to survey the literature on the use of AI/ML applications in analyzing inpatient EHR data to identify bundles of care (groupings of interventions). If evidence suggested AI/ML models could determine bundles, the review aimed to explore whether implementing these interventions as bundles reduced practice pattern variance and positively impacted patient care outcomes for inpatients with T2DM. Six databases were searched for articles published from January 1, 2000, to January 1, 2024. Nine studies met criteria and were summarized by aims, outcome measures, clinical or practice implications, AI/ML model types, study variables, and AI/ML model outcomes. A variety of AI/ML models were used. Multiple data sources were leveraged to train the models, resulting in varying impacts on practice patterns and outcomes. Studies included aims across 4 thematic areas to address: therapeutic patterns of care, analysis of treatment pathways and their constraints, dashboard development for clinical decision support, and medication optimization and prescription pattern mining. Multiple disparate data sources (i.e., prescription payment data) were leveraged outside of those traditionally available within EHR databases. Notably missing was the use of holistic multidisciplinary data (i.e., nursing and ancillary) to train AI/ML models. AI/ML can assist in identifying the appropriateness of specific interventions to manage diabetic care and support adherence to efficacious treatment pathways if the appropriate data are incorporated into AI/ML design. Additional data sources beyond the EHR are needed to provide more complete data to develop AI/ML models that effectively discern meaningful clinical patterns. Further study is needed to better address nursing care using AI/ML to support effective inpatient diabetes management.

An algorithmic strategy for anatomical vs. functional testing in suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (Anatomical vs. Stress teSting decIsion Support Tool; ASSIST) is associated with better outcomes than random selection. However, in the real world, this decision is rarely random. We explored the agreement between a provider-driven vs. simulated algorithmic approach to cardiac testing and its association with outcomes across multinational cohorts.

In two cohorts of functional vs. anatomical testing in a US hospital health system [Yale; 2013-2023; n = 130 196 (97.0%) vs. n = 4020 (3.0%), respectively], and the UK Biobank [n = 3320 (85.1%) vs. n = 581 (14.9%), respectively], we examined outcomes stratified by agreement between the real-world and ASSIST-recommended strategies. Younger age, female sex, Black race, and diabetes history were independently associated with lower odds of ASSIST-aligned testing. Over a median of 4.9 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.4-7.1) and 5.4 (IQR: 2.6-8.8) years, referral to the ASSIST-recommended strategy was associated with a lower risk of acute myocardial infarction or death (hazard ratioadjusted: 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.85, P < 0.001 and 0.74 [95% CI 0.60-0.90], P = 0.003, respectively), an effect that remained significant across years, test types, and risk profiles. In post hoc analyses of anatomical-first testing in the Prospective Multicentre Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial, alignment with ASSIST was independently associated with a 17% and 30% higher risk of detecting CAD in any vessel or the left main artery/proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, respectively.

In cohorts where historical practices largely favour functional testing, alignment with an algorithmic approach to cardiac testing defined by ASSIST was associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes. This highlights the potential utility of a data-driven approach in the diagnostic management of CAD.

The failed or partial implementation of clinical practices negatively impacts patient safety and increases systemic inefficiencies. Implementation of sepsis screening guidelines has been undertaken in many settings with mixed results. Without a theoretical understanding of what leads to successful implementation, improving implementation will continue to be ad hoc or intuitive. This study proposes a programme theory for how and why the successful implementation of sepsis screening guidelines can occur.

A rapid realist review was conducted to develop a focused programme theory for the implementation of sepsis screening guidelines. An independent two-reviewer approach was used to iteratively extract and synthesise context and mechanism data. Theoretical context-mechanism-outcome propositions were refined and validated by clinicians using a focus group and individual realist interviews. Implementation resources and clinical reasoning were differentiated in articulating mechanisms.

Eighteen articles were included in the rapid review. The theoretical domains framework was identified as the salient substantive theory informing the programme theory. The theory consisted of five main middle-range propositions. Three promoting mechanisms included positive belief about the benefits of the protocol, belief in the legitimacy of using the protocol and trust within the clinical team. Two inhibiting mechanisms included pessimism about the protocol being beneficial and pessimism about the team. Successful implementation was defined as achieving fidelity and sustained use of the intervention. Two intermediate outcomes, acceptability and feasibility of the intervention, and adoption, were necessary to achieve before successful implementation.

This rapid realist review synthesised key information from the literature and clinician feedback to develop a theory-based approach to clinical implementation of sepsis screening. The programme theory presents knowledge users with an outline of how and why clinical interventions lead to successful implementation and could be applied in other clinical areas to improve quality and safety.

Clinical pharmacy quality indicators are often non-uniform and measure individual activities not linked to outcomes.

To define a consensus agreed pharmaceutical care bundle and patient outcome measures across an entire state health service.

A four-round modified-Delphi approach with state Directors of Pharmacy was performed (n = 25). They were asked to rate on a 5-point Likert scale the relevance and measurability of 32 inpatient clinical pharmacy quality indicators and outcome measures. They also ranked clinical pharmacy activities in order from perceived most to least beneficial. Based upon these results, pharmaceutical care bundles consisting of multiple clinical pharmacy activities were formed, and relevance and measurability assessed.

Response rate ranged from 40 to 60%. Twenty-six individual clinical pharmacy quality indicators reached consensus. The top ranked clinical pharmacy quality indicator was 'proportion of patients where a pharmacist documents an accurate list of medicines during admission'. There were nine pharmaceutical care bundles formed consisting between 3 and 7 activities. Only one pharmaceutical care bundle reached consensus: medication history, adverse drug reaction/allergy documentation, admission and discharge medication reconciliation, medication review, provision of medicines education and provision of a medication list on discharge. Sixteen outcome measures reached consensus. The top ranked were hospital acquired complications, readmission due to medication misadventure and unplanned readmission within 10 days.

Consensus has been reached on one pharmaceutical care bundle and sixteen outcomes to monitor clinical pharmacy service delivery. The next step is to measure the extent of pharmaceutical care bundle delivery and the link to patient outcomes.

Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) represents a constellation of evidence-based peri-operative methods aimed to reduce the physiological and psychological stress patients experience after cardiac surgery, with the primary objective of providing an expedited recovery to pre-operative functional status. The method involves pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative interventions as well as direct patient engagement to be successful. Numerous publications in regard to the benefits of enhanced recovery have been presented, including decreased post-operative complications, shortened length of stay, decreased overall healthcare costs, and higher patient satisfaction. Implementing an ERACS program undeniably requires a culture change, a methodical shift in the approach of these patients that ultimately allows the team to achieve the aforementioned goals; therefore, team-building, planning, and anticipation of obstacles should be expected.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to lessen surgical insult, promote recovery, and improve postoperative clinical outcomes across a number of specialty operations. A core tenet of ERAS involves the provision of protocolized evidence-based perioperative interventions. Given both the growing enthusiasm for applying ERAS principles to cardiac surgery and the broad scope of relevant interventions, an international, multidisciplinary expert panel was assembled to derive a list of potential program elements, review the literature, and provide a statement regarding clinical practice for each topic area. This article summarizes those consensus statements and their accompanying evidence. These results provide the foundation for best practice for the management of the adult patient undergoing cardiac surgery.

Rapid start of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been associated with improvement in several HIV-related outcomes in clinical trials as well as demonstration projects, but how regional and contextual differences may affect the effectiveness of this intervention necessitates further study. In this study of a large, urban, Southern US clinic-based retrospective cohort, we identified 544 patients with a new diagnosis of HIV during 2016 to 2019 and compared HIV care continuum outcomes for the first 12 months of care before and after rapid start implementation. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event curves were used to summarize time to virologic suppression, and stepwise Cox, linear, and logistic regression models were used to create multivariate models to evaluate the association between rapid start and time to virologic suppression, medication adherence, and retention in care and sustained virologic suppression, respectively. We found that rapid start was significantly associated with improved medication adherence scores (+15.37 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.36-21.39, P < .01) and retention in care (adjusted odds ratio = 1.51, 95% CI 1.05-2.19, P = .03). Time to virologic suppression (median 2.46 months before, 2.56 months after rapid start) and sustained virologic suppression were not associated with rapid start in our setting. Though rapid start was associated with improved medication adherence and retention in care, more support may be needed to achieve the same outcomes seen in other studies and sustained over the entire HIV care continuum, especially in settings with significant patient and systemic barriers to care such as unstable housing, lack of Medicaid expansion, and frequent coverage interruptions.

Stroke clinical guidelines recommend care processes that optimize patient outcomes and minimize hospital-acquired complications. However, audits and surveys illustrate that recommended care is not always consistently or thoroughly implemented. This paper outlines the methods for implementing and evaluating a new bundle of care. Screen-Clean-Hydrate bundles together recommendations from the Australian Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management and supplements these with evidence-informed best practice from the literature for: swallow screening within 4 h of presentation to hospital (Screen); oral health assessment and delivery of oral care (Clean); and hydration assessment and management (Hydrate). The study is a pre-post Type 2 hybrid effectiveness/implementation design with an embedded process evaluation, which will be conducted in two acute stroke units in a capital city of Australia. The integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (iPARIHS) framework will be used to guide study design, conduct, and evaluation. Clinical effectiveness will be measured by rates of hospital-acquired complications and proxy measures of cost (length of stay, procedure costs) for 60 patient participants pre- and postimplementation. Implementation outcomes will focus on acceptability, feasibility, uptake and fidelity, and identification of barriers and enablers to implementation through staff interviews, medical record audits, and researcher field notes. Due to its design as a hybrid effectiveness/implementation study, once completed, the study will provide information on both intervention and implementation effectiveness, including details of successful and unsuccessful multidisciplinary implementation strategies. This will inform a larger multisite effectiveness/implementation trial for future upscale, leading to improved compliance with stroke guidelines and therefore stroke outcomes.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the second most common healthcare-associated infection, with prevention being a high-priority goal for all healthcare organizations. Although routine surveillance and standardized prevention protocols have long been used, patient engagement is an additional intervention that should be considered and may be beneficial in SSI prevention.

To determine if the development of a standardized patient education discharge plan for management of a surgical site and/or surgical drain would contribute to a reduction in SSI rates in inpatients undergoing colorectal, plastic, or general surgery.

A preintervention/postintervention design was used. Before intervention, patients and surgeons were surveyed regarding various discharge practices related to surgical incision/drain care. The intervention consisted of implementing a standardized discharge plan including standardized education and patient discharge kits. After implementation, patients were surveyed regarding discharge practices. Patient survey responses and SSI rates were compared between the preintervention and postintervention time frames.

Rates of SSIs decreased across all three surgical specialties during the project period: colorectal SSIs decreased from 3.2% to 2.7%, plastics from 1.2% to 0.5%, and general from 0.86% to 0.33%. Improvements were also realized in patient survey responses to various aspects of surgical incision/drain care.

Patient engagement may be an important strategy to integrate with SSI evidence-based care bundles. Active engagement of surgical patients perioperatively has the potential to improve the patient experience, which ultimately can result in improved healthcare outcomes for this population.

We recently reported the first part of a study testing the impact of data literacy training on "assessing pain, spontaneous awakening and breathing trials, choice of analgesia and sedation, delirium monitoring/management, early exercise/mobility, and family and patient empowerment" [ABCDEF [A-F]) compliance. The purpose of the current study, part 2, was to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation approach by surveying clinical staff to examine staff knowledge, skill, motivation, and organizational resources.

The Clark and Estes Gap Analysis framework was used to study knowledge, motivation, and organization (KMO) influences. Assumed influences identified in the literature were used to design the A-F bundle implementation strategies. The influences were validated against a survey distributed to the ICU interprofessional team.

Single-center study was conducted in eight adult ICUs in a quaternary academic medical center.

Interprofessional ICU clinical team.

A quantitative survey was sent to 386 participants to evaluate the implementation design postimplementation. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to understand the relationship between the KMO influences and the questions posed to validate the influence. Descriptive statistics were used to identify strengths needed to sustain performance and weaknesses that required improvement to increase A-F bundle adherence.

The survey received an 83% response rate. The exploratory factor analysis confirmed that 38 of 42 questions had a strong relationship to the KMO influences, validating the survey's utility in evaluating the effectiveness of implementation design. A total of 12 KMO influences were identified, 8 were categorized as a strength and 4 as a weakness of the implementation.

Our study used an evidence-based gap analysis framework to demonstrate key implementation approaches needed to increase A-F bundle compliance. The following drivers were recommended as essential methods required for successful protocol implementation: data literacy training and performance monitoring, organizational support, value proposition, multidisciplinary collaboration, and interprofessional teamwork activities. We believe the learning generated in this two-part study is applicable to implementation design beyond the A-F bundle.

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a major cause of mortality among pediatric oncology patients in resource-limited settings. Effective, innovative strategies are needed to improve care and survival. In a pediatric oncology unit in Mexico, we retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for mortality related to BSI and the results of using a care-bundle intervention. The care-bundle consisted of a swift clinical evaluation, initial fluid-resuscitation support, obtaining blood cultures, and administration of effective empirical antibiotic therapy for suspected BSI. The outcomes of patients who received the care-bundle during a 12-month period were compared with those of patients treated with standard care during the 12 months preceding its implementation. The primary outcomes were BSI diagnosis, choice of antibiotics, and mortality. Of the 261 suspected BSIs treated with standard care, 33 (12.6%) infections were confirmed, and of the 308 treated with the care-bundle, 67 (21.7%) BSIs were confirmed. Thus, after implementation of the care-bundle, significantly more BSIs were diagnosed ( P =0.004), and BSI-related mortality was significantly reduced by 22.2% ( P = 0.035). Surgical resection and mechanical ventilation support were independently associated with BSI-related mortality, and receiving effective initial empirical antibiotic therapy was protective against mortality (odds ratio, 0.013; 95% CI: 0.002-0.105; P =0.001), which comprising cefepime plus amikacin or meropenem in 44 (80.0%) of the cases alive. Consistent use of a care-bundle with initial fluid resuscitation, obtaining a blood culture, and administering effective antibiotics to children with cancer and suspected BSI can decrease mortality.

Adequate brain swelling resolution prior to cranioplasty (CP) is an important yet loosely defined issue. Despite efforts to balance timely CP and patient safety, heterogeneous study methodologies have led to conflicting results. This study aims to standardize this issue through quantifying degree of brain swelling resolution using a proposed Visual CP Scale.

The proposed Visual CP Scale is validated through a 2-pronged approach. The first prong involves a national survey in Taiwan, where neurosurgeons were surveyed to determine what constitutes a patient's readiness for CP. The second prong involves a large retrospective cohort, where the correlations between timing, degree of brain swelling resolution, and post-CP complication rates, are evaluated.

In the national Taiwan CP Survey, 124 out of 772 neurosurgeons (17.2%) completed the survey. Respondents who chose higher grades on the Visual CP Scale preferred later CP timings. In the retrospective data, 378 out of 770 (49.1%) patients had pre-CP brain images, allowing for the utilization of the Visual CP Scale. A Visual CP Scale score of greater than or equal to 4 was associated with fewer complications after CP.

The timing of CP should be determined by the degree of brain swelling resolution, not vice versa. The proposed Visual CP Scale offers an objective method for assessing brain swelling resolution, making it an adjuvant tool for clinical decision-making and future research related to CP.

The quality of postoperative pain management is often poor. A "bundle," a small set of evidence-based interventions, is associated with improved outcomes in different settings. We assessed whether staff caring for surgical patients could implement a "Perioperative Pain Management Bundle" and whether this would be associated with improved multidimensional pain-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

"PAIN OUT," a perioperative pain registry, offers tools for auditing pain-related PROs and obtaining information about perioperative pain management during the first 24 hours after surgery. Staff from 10 hospitals in Serbia used this methodology to collect data at baseline. They then implemented the "Perioperative Pain Management Bundle" into the clinical routine and collected another round of data. The bundle consists of 4 treatment elements: (1) a full daily dose of 1 to 2 nonopioid analgesics (eg, paracetamol and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), (2) at least 1 type of local/regional anesthesia, (3) pain assessment by staff, and (4) offering patients information about pain management. The primary endpoint was a multidimensional pain composite score (PCS), evaluating pain intensity, interference, and side effects that was compared between patients who received the full bundle versus not.

Implementation of the complete bundle was associated with a significant reduction in the PCS ( P < 0.001, small-medium effect size [ES]). When each treatment element was evaluated independently, nonopioid analgesics were associated with a higher PCS (ie, poorer outcome, and negligible ES), and the other elements were associated with a lower PCS (all negligible small ES). Individual PROs were consistently better in patients receiving the full bundle compared with 0 to 3 elements. The PCS was not associated with the surgical discipline.

We report findings from using a bundle approach for perioperative pain management in patients undergoing mixed surgical procedures. Future work will seek strategies to improve the effect.