To evaluate the effects of individualized PEEP on pulmonary function, cerebral blood flow, and postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.

100 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery at our hospital between August 2021 and May 2023 were randomized into two groups: the DP group (optimal PEEP group oriented to driving pressure) and the Cdyn group (optimal PEEP group oriented to pulmonary compliance). Anesthesia was induced in both groups with 0.3 mg/kg of remizolam + 0.15 mg/kg of CIS atracurium + 0.5 ug/kg of sufentanil. Lung ultrasound score (LUS), peak and plateau airway pressures (PEAK, PLAT), oxygenation index (OI), driving pressure (DP), and pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cdyn) were measured at different time points. Cerebral blood flow and cognitive function were also assessed. T0: before induction of anesthesia; T1: before postoperative extubation of the tracheal tube; T2: 1 h after extubation; T3: on the third postoperative day; T4: 5 min after determining the optimal PEEP; T5: 1 h after the establishment of pneumoperitoneum; T6: 2 h after the establishment of the pneumoperitoneum; T7: 20 min at the end of pneumoperitoneum.

There were no significant differences in general information between the two groups, P > 0.05. Compared with the DP group, the Cdyn group had lower LUS at T3, higher PEAK at T5, T6, and T7, lower PLAT and OI at T6 and T7, lower DP at T4, T6, and T7, and lower Cdyn at T6 and T7, P < 0.05. The Cdyn group had lower cerebral blood flow at T4 and T6, P < 0.05. The Cdyn group had higher cognitive function at stage T3 as assessed by MMSE, P < 0.05.

PEEP guided by lung compliance improves pulmonary function, cerebral blood flow, and cognitive function, offering clinical benefits.

The significance of the Recruitment to Inflation (R/I) ratio in identifying PEEP recruiters in patients undergoing ultra-protective lung ventilation during venovenous ECMO is not well established.

To compare the concordance of the R/I ratio and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) in determining optimum PEEP settings in severe ARDS patients on ECMO and ventilated with very low tidal volumes.

Initially, a low-flow insufflation was performed to detect and measure the airway opening pressure (AOP). Subsequently, the R/I ratio was calculated from PEEP 15-5 cmH2O, followed by a decremental PEEP trial (20-6 cmH2O in 2 cmH2O steps) monitored by EIT. The optimum EIT-based PEEP was defined as the intersection of the collapse and overdistension curves.

Among 54 ECMO patients (tidal volume: 4.8 [3.0-6.0] mL/kg), 13 (24%) exhibited an airway opening pressure (AOP) of 11 (8-14) cmH2O. The cohort's median R/I ratio was 0.43 (0.28-0.61). A tertile-based analysis of the R/I ratio (≤ 0.34; 0.34-0.54; > 0.54) revealed median optimum EIT-based PEEP of 8 [8-10], 10 [8-14], and 14 [12-16] cmH2O, respectively. The R/I ratio demonstrated weak inverse correlations with lung overdistension (R2 = 0.19) and positive correlations with lung collapse (R2 = 0.26) measured by EIT (p < 0.01).

The R/I ratio is feasible during ultra-protective ventilation and provides valuable indications for guiding PEEP titration. Specifically, an R/I ratio > 0.34 may help identify patients likely to benefit from further individualized PEEP optimization using EIT. In contrast, when the R/I ratio is ≤ 0.34, a moderate PEEP level (8-10 cmH₂O) may suffice.

Lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a valuable bedside decision-making tool, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic, with applications in diagnosing pneumonia, managing fluid, and monitoring interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ultimately improving patient outcomes. Its repeatability, environmental safety, and reduced radiation exposure make it ideal for vulnerable populations and resource-limited settings. However, challenges such as inadequate documentation and a lack of standardized reporting formats limit its widespread adoption. The evolution of technology offers different possibilities, and improvements in software open up a range of possibilities, but this contrasts with the lack of postgraduate and undergraduate training and formal accreditation. This review addresses the impact of lung ultrasound through the course of air-liquid ratio impairment, crossing different clinical scenarios and exploring the challenges and opportunities for the implementation of lung ultrasound in the post-COVID era.

The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on intracranial pressure (ICP) dynamics in patients with acute brain injury (ABI) remains controversial. PEEP can benefit oxygenation by promoting alveolar recruitment, but its influence on ICP is complex. The primary aims of this study were to investigate 1) how lung recruitability influences oxygenation and 2) how lung recruitability and regional gas distribution, measured via recruitment-to-inflation (RI) ratio and electrical impedance tomography (EIT), affect ICP in response to PEEP changes in critically ill patients in their early phase of ABI.

Ten mechanically ventilated ABI patients were included. Pressure reactivity index (PRx) was estimated. Using RI manoeuvre and EIT, lung recruitability and gas distribution were assessed in response to a standardised PEEP change (from high to low levels, with a delta of 10 cmH2O). Changes in ICP (ΔICP) were calculated between high and low PEEP. Lung inhomogeneity indices (global inhomogeneity index [GI] and local inhomogeneity index [LI]) were derived from EIT. Correlations between ventilatory variables and ICP were analysed.

Blood oxygenation significantly decreased, going from high (14 [IQR: 12-15] cmH₂O) to low (4 [IQR: 2-5] cmH₂O) PEEP. Reducing PEEP significantly increased ICP (from 9 [IQR: 5-13] to 12 [IQR: 8-16] mmHg, p < 0.01), while cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) improved (from 71 [IQR:67-83] to 75 [IQR: 70-84] mmHg, p = 0.03) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased (from 79 [IQR: 69-95] to 84 [IQR: 76-99] mmHg, p < 0.01). The RI ratio correlated significantly with ΔICP (rho = 0.87, p < 0.01), as did Vrec% (proportion of recruited volume, rho = 0.65) and GI (rho = 0.5). LI did not correlate with ΔICP. PRx was 0.30 [IQR: 0.12-0.42], indicating a deranged cerebral autoregulation.

Patients with a higher potential for lung recruitability had a more beneficial effect of PEEP on oxygenation. These effects should be interpreted cautiously, given that lung recruitability and global inhomogeneity of gas distribution significantly influenced the intracranial response to PEEP in ABI patients. As indicated by MAP and CPP, PEEP may impact systemic haemodynamics and cerebral perfusion when cerebral autoregulation is deranged. These findings underscore the importance of multimodal (i.e. respiratory, cerebral and haemodynamics) monitoring for optimising ventilation strategies in ABI patients and provide a framework for future research. Trial registration Registration number: NCT05363085, Date of registration: May 2022.

To analyse the effects on respiratory function, lung volume and the regional distribution of ventilation and perfusion of routine postural repositioning in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Prospective descriptive physiological study. We evaluated gas-exchange, lung mechanics, and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) determined end-expiratory lung impedance and regional ventilation and perfusion distribution in five body positions: supine-baseline (S1); first lateralisation at 30° (L1); second supine position (S2), second contralateral lateralisation (L2) and third final supine position (S3). To evaluate the effects of lateral repositioning we compared S1 with S2 and with the changes during L1 and L2.

We included 32 patients. The lateralisation sequence was well tolerated. When comparing S1 with S3 respiratory system compliance increased by 7 % (p = 0.021), the partial pressure to inspired oxygen fraction ratio (PaO2/FiO2) by 16 % (p = 0.06) and dead-space decreased by 5 % (p = 0.09). During lateralisation, haemodynamic parameters and PaO2/FiO2 did not change, while dead-space and PaCO2 presented small non-significant increases. Although with great inter-individual variability, end-expiratory lung impedance increased in the non-dependent 163 ± 123 ml and dependent lung 69 ± 119 ml, both p < 0.009). Regional ventilation decreased in the non-dependent and increased in the dependent lung, while regional perfusion decreased in the dependent lung, especially in dorsal regions.

Postural changes are well tolerated, result in improved lung mechanics and have a positive effect on gas exchange. Lateralisation does not result in a decrease in lung volume in the dependent lung.

Postural repositioning can be safely performed in ICU patients to foster its known benefits. To the known beneficial effects on the prevention of pressure wounds, postural changes can improve regional end-expiratory lung volume (i.e., the functional volume of the lung). Regional changes vary among patients and extended monitoring options such as EIT can help to individualise this useful therapeutic intervention.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients, and mechanical ventilation (MV) plays a critical role in its management. One of the key parameters of MV is the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which helps to maintain an adequate lung functional volume. However, the optimal level of PEEP remains controversial. The classical approach in clinical trials for identifying the optimal PEEP has been to compare "high" and "low" levels in a dichotomous manner. High PEEP can improve lung compliance and significantly enhance oxygenation but has been inconclusive in hard clinical outcomes such as mortality and duration of MV. This discrepancy could be related to the fact that inappropriately high or low PEEP levels may adversely affect other organs, such as the heart, brain, and kidneys, which could counteract its potential beneficial effects on the lung. Patients with ARDS often develop acute kidney injury, which is an independent marker of mortality. Three primary mechanisms have been proposed to explain lung-kidney crosstalk during MV: gas exchange abnormalities, such as hypoxemia and hypercapnia; remote biotrauma; and hemodynamic changes, including reduced venous return and cardiac output. As PEEP levels increase, lung volume expands to a variable extent depending on mechanical response. This dynamic underlies two potential mechanisms that could impair venous return, potentially leading to splanchnic and renal congestion. First, increasing PEEP may enhance lung aeration, particularly in highly recruitable lungs, where previously collapsed alveoli reopen, increasing lung volume and pleural pressure, leading to vena cava compression, which can contribute to systemic venous congestion and abdominal organ impairment function. Second, in lungs with low recruitability, PEEP elevation may induce minimal changes in lung volume while increasing airway pressure, resulting in alveolar overdistension, vascular compression, and increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Therefore, we propose that high PEEP settings can contribute to renal congestion, potentially impairing renal function. This review underscores the need for further rigorous research to validate these perspectives and explore strategies for optimizing PEEP settings while minimizing adverse renal effects.

There are several approaches to select the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), resulting in different PEEP levels. The impact of different PEEP settings may extend beyond respiratory mechanics, affecting pulmonary hemodynamics.

To compare PEEP levels obtained with three titration strategies-(i) highest respiratory system compliance (CRS), (ii) electrical impedance tomography (EIT) crossing point; (iii) positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL)-in terms of regional respiratory mechanics and pulmonary hemodynamics.

Experimental studies in two porcine models of acute lung injury: (I) bilateral injury induced in both lungs, generating a highly recruitable model (n = 37); (II) asymmetrical injury, generating a poorly recruitable model (n = 13). In all experiments, a decremental PEEP titration was performed monitoring PL, EIT (collapse, overdistention, and regional ventilation), respiratory mechanics, and pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics.

PEEP titration methods resulted in different levels of median optimal PEEP in bilateral lung injury: 14(12-14) cmH2O for CRS, 11(10-12) cmH2O for EIT, and 8(8-10) cmH2O for PL, p < 0.001. Differences were less pronounced in asymmetrical lung injury. PEEP had a quadratic U-shape relationship with pulmonary artery pressure (R2 = 0.94, p < 0.001), right-ventricular systolic transmural pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance. Minimum values of pulmonary vascular resistance were found around individualized PEEP, when ventilation distribution and pulmonary circulation were simultaneously optimized.

In porcine models of acute lung injury with variable lung recruitability, both low and high levels of PEEP can impair pulmonary hemodynamics. Optimized ventilation and hemodynamics can be obtained simultaneously at PEEP levels individualized based on respiratory mechanics, especially by EIT and esophageal pressure.

To summarize the rationale and concepts for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting with electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and the effects of EIT-based PEEP setting on cardiopulmonary function.

EIT allows patient-specific and regional assessment of PEEP effects on recruitability and overdistension, including its impact on ventilation-perfusion (V̇/Q) mismatch. The overdistension and collapse (OD-CL) method is the most used EIT-based approach for PEEP setting. In the RECRUIT study of 108 COVID-19 ARDS patients, the PEEP level corresponding to the OD-CL crossing point showed low overdistension and collapse (below 10% and 5%, respectively) regardless of recruitability. In a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), it was shown that at this crossing point, respiratory mechanics (compliance, ΔP) were consistent, with adequate preload, lower right ventricular afterload, normal cardiac output, and sufficient gas exchange. A recent meta-analysis found that EIT based PEEP setting improved lung mechanics and potentially outcomes in ARDS patients. EIT thus provides critical insights beyond respiratory mechanics and oxygenation for individualized PEEP optimization. EIT-based methods for PEEP setting during assisted ventilation have also been proposed.

EIT is a valuable technique to guide individualized PEEP setting utilizing cardiopulmonary information that is not captured by respiratory mechanics and oxygenation response alone.

Assessing and quantifying recruitability are important for characterizing ARDS severity and for reducing or preventing the atelectrauma caused by the cyclic opening and closing of pulmonary units. Over the years, several methods for recruitment assessment have been developed, grouped into three main approaches: 1) Quantitative CT Scanning: This method accurately measures the amount of atelectatic lung tissue that regains aeration; 2) Regional Gas Volume Measurement: Based on anatomical markers, this approach assesses gas volume within a specified lung region; 3) Compliance-Based Gas Volume Measurement: This technique compares actual gas volume at a given pressure to expected values, assuming respiratory system compliance is constant within the explored pressure range. Additional methods, such as lung ultrasonography and electrical impedance variation, have also been explored. This paper details the distribution of opening and closing pressures throughout the lung parenchyma, which underpin the concept of recruitability. The distribution of recruitable regions corresponds to atelectasis distribution, with the pressure needed for recruitment varying according to whether the atelectasis is "loose" or "sticky." We also discuss the effects of different PEEP levels on preventing atelectrauma, the importance of keeping some lung areas closed throughout the respiratory cycle, and briefly cover the roles of sigh ventilation, prone positioning, and the closed lung approach.

In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) under mechanical ventilation, the change in pressure slope during a low-flow insufflation indicates a global airway opening pressure (AOP) needed to reopen closed airways and may be used for titration of positive end-expiratory pressure.

To understand 1) if airways open homogeneously inside the lungs or significant regional AOP variations exist; 2) whether the pattern of the pressure slope change during low-flow insufflation can indicate the presence of regional AOP variations.

Using electrical impedance tomography, we recorded low-flow insufflation maneuvers (< 10 L/min) starting from end-expiratory positive pressure 0-5 cmH2O. We measured global (AOPglobal) and regional AOPs from pressure-impedance curves in the four different lung quadrants, and compared AOPglobal with the highest quadrantal AOP (AOPhighest). We categorized the slope change of the low-flow inflation pressure-time curve into three patterns: no change, progressive change, abrupt change.

Among the 36 patients analyzed, 9 (25%) had AOPglobal ≥ 5 cmH2O whereas 19 (53%) exhibited regional AOPhighest ≥ 5 cmH2O. AOPglobal was on average similar to AOP of the upper right quadrant (P = 0.182) but was lower than AOPs of the other three quadrants (P < 0.01 of each). AOPglobal was significantly lower than AOPhighest: 3.0 [2.0-4.3] vs. 5.0 [2.8-8.3] cmH2O, P < 0.001. AOP was higher in the dependent than the non-dependent ventilated lung (4.0 [2.0-6.3] vs. 3.0 [2.0-5.0] cmH2O, P < 0.001). Seventeen (47%) patients exhibited a 'progressive change' pattern in the pressure-time curve. These patients had a larger difference between AOPhighest and AOPglobal (3.0 [2.0-4.0] cmH2O with a maximum of 8 cmH2O) compared to the other two patterns: 1.0 [0-1.0] cmH2O in 'no change' , P < 0.001 and 1.0 [0-2.0] cmH2O in 'abrupt change' , P = 0.003.

AOPglobal mostly reflects the lowest opening pressure in the lung and frequently underestimates the highest regional AOP in mechanically ventilated patients with AHRF. A progressive slope change during the low-flow pressure-time curve indicates the presence of several and higher regional AOPs.

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05825534 (registered, April 24th, 2023), retrospectively registered.

Assessing the respiratory system of a patient receiving mechanical ventilation is complex. We provide an overview of an approach at the bedside underpinned by physiology. We discuss the importance of distinguishing between extensive and intensive ventilatory variables. We outline methods to evaluate both passive patients and those making spontaneous respiratory efforts during assisted ventilation. We believe a comprehensive assessment can influence setting mechanical ventilatory support to achieve lung and diaphragm protective ventilation.

Conventional mechanical ventilation has adverse impacts on the hemodynamics of elderly, hypertensive ICU patients. Limited studies have addressed ways to ameliorate these negative effects. This study aimed to determine whether heliox ventilation could improve the hemodynamics, especially microcirculation, of elderly, hypertensive patients undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Thirty-eight patients, over the age of 65 with essential hypertension who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation treatment, were divided into two groups: a control group of nitrogen‑oxygen ventilation (n = 19) and an experimental group of heliox ventilation (n = 19). The control group received conventional room air ventilation and the experimental group adopted the innovative, closed heliox ventilation technique. Changes in blood pressure, heart rate (HR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2), regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2), lactic acid (Lac) and airway pressure were measured at 0,1,2,3 h under volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) mode throughout the study. Sublingual microcirculation parameters were additionally measured at 0 h and 3 h of ventilation treatment.

SpO2 in both groups increased after 1 h of ventilation compared with 0 h (p < 0.001), subsequently remaining stable. Compared with the control group, the experimental group showed a decrease in airway pressure and Lac, while blood pressure, ScvO2, and rSO2 increased (p < 0.05). Moreover, the sublingual microcirculation indexes in the experimental group improved compared with the control group (p < 0.05).

Heliox ventilation improves blood pressure and microcirculation in elderly hypertensive patients and may resolve the limitations of traditional nitrogen‑oxygen ventilation.

This trial was registered. The Chinese trial registration number is ChiCTR2100043945. The date of registration is 6-3-2021.

Quantification of pulmonary edema in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by chest computed tomography (CT) scan has not been validated in routine diagnostics due to its complexity and time-consuming nature. Therefore, the single-indicator transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) technique to measure extravascular lung water (EVLW) has been used in the clinical setting. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have now enabled CT images of inhomogeneous lungs to be segmented automatically by an intensive care physician with no prior radiology training within a relatively short time. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of data validating the quantification of pulmonary edema using automated lung segmentation on CT compared with TPTD.

A retrospective study (January 2016 to December 2021) analyzed patients with ARDS, admitted to the intensive care unit of the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University Hospital Mannheim, who underwent a chest CT scan and hemodynamic monitoring using TPTD at the same time. Pulmonary edema was estimated using manually and automated lung segmentation on CT and then compared to the pulmonary edema calculated from EVLW determined using TPTD.

145 comparative measurements of pulmonary edema with TPTD and CT were included in the study. Estimating pulmonary edema using either automated lung segmentation on CT or TPTD showed a low bias overall (- 104 ml) but wide levels of agreement (upper: 936 ml, lower: - 1144 ml). In 13% of the analyzed CT scans, the agreement between the segmentation of the AI algorithm and a dedicated investigator was poor. Manual segmentation and automated segmentation adjusted for contrast agent did not improve the agreement levels.

Automated lung segmentation on CT can be considered an unbiased but imprecise measurement of pulmonary edema in mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS.

During laparoscopic surgery, the role of PEEP to improve outcome is controversial. Mechanistically, PEEP benefits depend on the extent of alveolar recruitment, which prevents ventilator-induced lung injury by reducing lung dynamic strain. The hypotheses of this study were that pneumoperitoneum-induced aeration loss and PEEP-induced recruitment are inter-individually variable, and that the recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I) can identify patients who benefit from PEEP in terms of strain reduction.

Sequential study.

Operating room.

Seventeen ASA I-III patients receiving robot-assisted prostatectomy during Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum.

Patients underwent end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and respiratory/lung/chest wall mechanics (esophageal manometry and inspiratory/expiratory occlusions) assessment at PEEP = 0 cmH2O before and after pneumoperitoneum, at PEEP = 4 and 12 cmH2O during pneumoperitoneum. Pneumoperitoneum-induced derecruitment and PEEP-induced recruitment were assessed through a simplified method based on multiple pressure-volume curve. Dynamic and static strain changes were evaluated. R/I between 12 and 4 cmH2O was assessed from EELV. Inter-individual variability was rated with the ratio of standard deviation to mean (CoV).

Pneumoperitoneum reduced EELV by (median [IqR]) 410 mL [80-770] (p < 0.001) and increased dynamic strain by 0.04 [0.01-0.07] (p < 0.001), with high inter-individual variability (CoV = 70% and 88%, respectively). Compared to PEEP = 4 cmH2O, PEEP = 12 cmH2O yielded variable amount of recruitment (139 mL [96-366] CoV = 101%), causing different extent of dynamic strain reduction (median decrease 0.02 [0.01-0.04], p = 0.002; CoV = 86%) and static strain increases (median increase 0.05 [0.04-0.07], p = 0.01, CoV = 33%). R/I (1.73 [0.58-3.35]) estimated the decrease in dynamic strain (p ≤0.001, r = -0.90) and the increase in static strain (p = 0.009, r = -0.73) induced by PEEP, while PEEP-induced changes in respiratory and lung mechanics did not.

Trendelenburg pneumoperitoneum yields variable derecruitment: PEEP capability to revert these phenomena varies significantly among individuals. High R/I identifies patients in whom higher PEEP mostly reduces dynamic strain with limited static strain increases, potentially allowing individualized settings.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) necessitates personalized treatment strategies due to its heterogeneity, aiming to mitigate Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury (VILI). Advanced monitoring techniques, including imaging, driving pressure, transpulmonary pressure, and mechanical power, present potential avenues for tailored interventions.

To review some of the most important techniques for achieving greater personalization of mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients as evaluated in randomized clinical trials, by analyzing their effect on three clinically relevant aspects: mortality, ventilator-free days, and gas exchange.

Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) involving adult ARDS patients undergoing personalized ventilation adjustments. Outcomes were mortality (primary end-point), ventilator-free days, and oxygenation improvement.

Among 493 identified studies, 13 RCTs (n = 1255) met inclusion criteria. No personalized ventilation strategy demonstrated superior outcomes compared to traditional protocols. Meta-analysis revealed no significant reduction in mortality with image-guided (RR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.70-1.11), driving pressure-guided (RR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.29-1.30), or transpulmonary pressure-guided (RR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.58-1.24) strategies. Ventilator-free days and oxygenation outcomes showed no significant differences.

Our study does not support the superiority of personalized ventilation techniques over traditional protocols in ARDS patients. Further research is needed to standardize ventilation strategies and determine their impact on mechanical ventilation outcomes.

Efficacy of inhaled therapy such as Nitric Oxide (iNO) during mechanical ventilation may depend on airway patency. We hypothesized that airway closure and lung collapse, countered by positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), influence iNO efficacy. This could support the role of an adequate PEEP titration for inhalation therapy. The main aim of this study was to assess the effect of iNO with PEEP set above or below the airway opening pressure (AOP) generated by airway closure, on hemodynamics and gas exchange in swine models of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Fourteen pigs randomly underwent either bilateral or asymmetrical two-hit model of lung injury. Airway closure and lung collapse were measured with electrical impedance tomography as well as ventilation/perfusion ratio (V/Q). After AOP detection, the effect of iNO (10ppm) was studied with PEEP set randomly above or below regional AOP. Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and gas-exchange were recorded.

All pigs presented airway closure (AOP > 0.5cmH2O) after injury. In bilateral injury, iNO was associated with an improved mean pulmonary pressure from 49 ± 8 to 42 ± 7mmHg; (p = 0.003), and ventilation/perfusion matching, caused by a reduction in pixels with low V/Q and shunt from 16%[IQR:13-19] to 9%[IQR:4-12] (p = 0.03) only at PEEP set above AOP. iNO had no effect on hemodynamics or gas exchange for PEEP below AOP (low V/Q 25%[IQR:16-30] to 23%[IQR:14-27]; p = 0.68). In asymmetrical injury, iNO improved pulmonary hemodynamics and ventilation/perfusion matching independently from the PEEP set. iNO was associated with improved oxygenation in all cases.

In an animal model of bilateral lung injury, PEEP level relative to AOP markedly influences iNO efficacy on pulmonary hemodynamics and ventilation/perfusion match, independently of oxygenation.

Improvements in oxygenation and lung mechanics with prone position (PP) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are inconstant. The objectives of the study were (i) to identify baseline variables, including the recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I), associated with a positive response to PP in terms of oxygenation (improvement of the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure over the inspired oxygen fraction (PaO2/FiO2) ≥ 20 mmHg) and lung mechanics; (ii) to evaluate whether the response to the previous PP session is associated with the response to the next session.

In this prospective, observational, single-center study in patients who underwent PP for ARDS due to COVID-19, respiratory variables were assessed just before PP and at the end of the session. Respiratory variables included mechanical ventilation settings and respiratory mechanics variables, including R/I, an estimate of the potential for lung recruitment compared to lung overinflation.

In 50 patients, 201 PP sessions lasting 19 ± 3 h were evaluated. Neuromuscular blockades were used in 116 (58%) sessions. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased from 109 ± 31 mmHg to 165 ± 65 mmHg, with an increase ≥ 20 mmHg in 142 (71%) sessions. In a mixed effect logistic regression, only pre-PP PaO2/FiO2 (OR 1.12 (95% CI [1.01-1.24])/every decrease of 10 mmHg, p = 0.034) in a first model and improvement in oxygenation at the previous PP session (OR 3.69 (95% CI [1.27-10.72]), p = 0.017) in a second model were associated with an improvement in oxygenation with PP. The R/I ratio (n = 156 sessions) was 0.53 (0.30-0.76), separating lower- and higher-recruiters. Whereas PaO2/FiO2 improved to the same level in both subgroups, driving pressure and respiratory system compliance improved only in higher-recruiters (from 14 ± 4 to 12 ± 4 cmH2O, p = 0.027, and from 34 ± 11 to 38 ± 13 mL/cmH2O, respectively, p = 0.014).

A lower PaO2/FiO2 at baseline and a positive O2-response at the previous PP session are associated with a PP-induced improvement in oxygenation. In higher-recruiters, lung mechanics improved along with oxygenation. Benefits of PP could thus be greater in these patients.

The optimal strategy for positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration in the management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients remains unclear. Current guidelines emphasize the importance of a careful risk-benefit assessment for PEEP titration in terms of cardiopulmonary function in these patients. Over the last few decades, the primary goal of PEEP usage has shifted from merely improving oxygenation to emphasizing lung protection, with a growing focus on the individual pattern of lung injury, lung and chest wall mechanics, and the hemodynamic consequences of PEEP. In moderate-to-severe ARDS patients, prone positioning (PP) is recommended as part of a lung protective ventilation strategy to reduce mortality. However, the physiologic changes in respiratory mechanics and hemodynamics during PP may require careful re-assessment of the ventilation strategy, including PEEP. For the most severe ARDS patients with refractory gas exchange impairment, where lung protective ventilation is not possible, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) facilitates gas exchange and allows for a "lung rest" strategy using "ultraprotective" ventilation. Consequently, the importance of lung recruitment to improve oxygenation and homogenize ventilation with adequate PEEP may differ in severe ARDS patients treated with V-V ECMO compared to those managed conservatively. This review discusses PEEP management in severe ARDS patients and the implications of management with PP or V-V ECMO with respect to respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic function.

Even though much progress has been made to improve clinical outcomes, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a significant cause of acute respiratory failure. Protective mechanical ventilation is the backbone of supportive care for these patients; however, there are still many unresolved issues in its setting. The primary goal of mechanical ventilation is to improve oxygenation and ventilation. The use of positive pressure, especially positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), is mandatory in this approach. However, PEEP is a double-edged sword. How to safely set positive end-inspiratory pressure has long been elusive to clinicians. We hereby propose a pressure-volume curve measurement-based method to assess whether injured lungs are recruitable in order to set an appropriate PEEP. For the most severe form of ARDS, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is considered as the salvage therapy. However, the high level of medical resources required and associated complications make its use in patients with severe ARDS controversial. Our proposed protocol also attempts to propose how to improve patient outcomes by balancing the possible overuse of resources with minimizing patient harm due to dangerous ventilator settings. A recruitment-potential-oriented evaluation-based protocol can effectively stabilize hypoxemic conditions quickly and screen out truly serious patients.

The recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I) has been recently proposed to bedside assess response to PEEP. The impact of PEEP on ventilator-induced lung injury depends on the extent of dynamic strain reduction. We hypothesized that R/I may reflect the potential for lung recruitment (i.e. recruitability) and, consequently, estimate the impact of PEEP on dynamic lung strain, both assessed through computed tomography scan.

Fourteen lung-damaged pigs (lipopolysaccharide infusion) underwent ventilation at low (5 cmH2O) and high PEEP (i.e., PEEP generating a plateau pressure of 28-30 cmH2O). R/I was measured through a one-breath derecruitment maneuver from high to low PEEP. PEEP-induced changes in dynamic lung strain, difference in nonaerated lung tissue weight (tissue recruitment) and amount of gas entering previously nonaerated lung units (gas recruitment) were assessed through computed tomography scan. Tissue and gas recruitment were normalized to the weight and gas volume of previously ventilated lung areas at low PEEP (normalized-tissue recruitment and normalized-gas recruitment, respectively).

Between high (median [interquartile range] 20 cmH2O [18-21]) and low PEEP, median R/I was 1.08 [0.88-1.82], indicating high lung recruitability. Compared to low PEEP, tissue and gas recruitment at high PEEP were 246 g [182-288] and 385 ml [318-668], respectively. R/I was linearly related to normalized-gas recruitment (r = 0.90; [95% CI 0.71 to 0.97) and normalized-tissue recruitment (r = 0.69; [95% CI 0.25 to 0.89]). Dynamic lung strain was 0.37 [0.29-0.44] at high PEEP and 0.59 [0.46-0.80] at low PEEP (p < 0.001). R/I was significantly related to PEEP-induced reduction in dynamic (r = - 0.93; [95% CI - 0.78 to - 0.98]) and global lung strain (r = - 0.57; [95% CI - 0.05 to - 0.84]). No correlation was found between R/I and and PEEP-induced changes in static lung strain (r = 0.34; [95% CI - 0.23 to 0.74]).

In a highly recruitable ARDS model, R/I reflects the potential for lung recruitment and well estimates the extent of PEEP-induced reduction in dynamic lung strain.

In acute respiratory distress syndrome, the role of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury is controversial. Randomized trials comparing higher versus lower PEEP strategies failed to demonstrate a clinical benefit. This may depend on the inter-individually variable potential for lung recruitment (i.e. recruitability), which would warrant PEEP individualization to balance alveolar recruitment and the unavoidable baby lung overinflation produced by high pressure. Many techniques have been used to assess recruitability, including lung imaging, multiple pressure-volume curves and lung volume measurement. The Recruitment-to-Inflation ratio (R/I) has been recently proposed to bedside assess recruitability without additional equipment. R/I assessment is a simplified technique based on the multiple pressure-volume curve concept: it is measured by monitoring respiratory mechanics and exhaled tidal volume during a 10-cmH2O one-breath derecruitment maneuver after a short high-PEEP test. R/I scales recruited volume to respiratory system compliance, and normalizes recruitment to a proxy of actual lung size. With modest R/I (<0.3-0.4), setting low PEEP (5-8 cmH2O) may be advisable; with R/I>0.6-0.7, high PEEP (≥15 cmH2O) can be considered, provided that airway and/or transpulmonary plateau pressure do not exceed safety limits. In case of intermediate R/I (≈0.5), a more granular assessment of recruitability may be needed. This could be accomplished with advanced monitoring tools, like sequential lung volume measurement with granular R/I assessment or electrical impedance tomography monitoring during a decremental PEEP trial. In this review, we discuss R/I rationale, applications and limits, providing insights on its clinical use for PEEP selection in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Normally aerated lung tissue on computed tomography (CT) is correlated with static respiratory system compliance (Crs) at zero end-expiratory pressure. In clinical practice, however, patients with acute respiratory failure are often managed using elevated PEEP levels. No study has validated the relationship between lung volume and tissue and Crs at the applied positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Therefore, this study aimed to demonstrate the relationship between lung volume and tissue on CT and Crs during the application of PEEP for the clinical management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19. Additionally, as a secondary outcome, the study aimed to evaluate the relationship between CT characteristics and Crs, considering recruitability using the recruitment-to-inflation ratio (R/I ratio). We analyzed the CT and respiratory mechanics data of 30 patients with COVID-19 who were mechanically ventilated. The CT images were acquired during mechanical ventilation at PEEP level of 15 cmH2O and were quantitatively analyzed using Synapse Vincent system version 6.4 (Fujifilm Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Recruitability was stratified into two groups, high and low recruitability, based on the median R/I ratio of our study population. Thirty patients were included in the analysis with the median R/I ratio of 0.71. A significant correlation was observed between Crs at the applied PEEP (median 15 [interquartile range (IQR) 12.2, 15.8]) and the normally aerated lung volume (r = 0.70 [95% CI 0.46-0.85], P < 0.001) and tissue (r = 0.70 [95% CI 0.46-0.85], P < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression revealed that recruitability (Coefficient = - 390.9 [95% CI - 725.0 to - 56.8], P = 0.024) and Crs (Coefficient = 48.9 [95% CI 32.6-65.2], P < 0.001) were significantly associated with normally aerated lung volume (R-squared: 0.58). In this study, Crs at the applied PEEP was significantly correlated with normally aerated lung volume and tissue on CT. Moreover, recruitability indicated by the R/I ratio and Crs were significantly associated with the normally aerated lung volume. This research underscores the significance of Crs at the applied PEEP as a bedside-measurable parameter and sheds new light on the link between recruitability and normally aerated lung.

Rationale: It is unknown whether preventing overdistention or collapse is more important when titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Objectives: To compare PEEP targeting minimal overdistention or minimal collapse or using a compromise between collapse and overdistention in a randomized trial and to assess the impact on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, inflammation, and hemodynamics. Methods: In a porcine model of ARDS, lung collapse and overdistention were estimated using electrical impedance tomography during a decremental PEEP titration. Pigs were randomized to three groups and ventilated for 12 hours: PEEP set at ⩽3% of overdistention (low overdistention), ⩽3% of collapse (low collapse), and the crossing point of collapse and overdistention. Measurements and Main Results: Thirty-six pigs (12 per group) were included. Median (interquartile range) values of PEEP were 7 (6-8), 11 (10-11), and 15 (12-16) cm H2O in the three groups (P < 0.001). With low overdistension, 6 (50%) pigs died, whereas survival was 100% in both other groups. Cause of death was hemodynamic in nature, with high transpulmonary vascular gradient and high epinephrine requirements. Compared with the other groups, pigs surviving with low overdistension had worse respiratory mechanics and gas exchange during the entire protocol. Minimal differences existed between crossing-point and low-collapse animals in physiological parameters, but postmortem alveolar density was more homogeneous in the crossing-point group. Inflammatory markers were not significantly different. Conclusions: PEEP to minimize overdistention resulted in high mortality in an animal model of ARDS. Minimizing collapse or choosing a compromise between collapse and overdistention may result in less lung injury, with potential benefits of the compromise approach.

This review explores lung recruitment monitoring, covering techniques, challenges, and future perspectives.

Various methodologies, including respiratory system mechanics evaluation, arterial bold gases (ABGs) analysis, lung imaging, and esophageal pressure (Pes) measurement are employed to assess lung recruitment. In support to ABGs analysis, the assessment of respiratory mechanics with hysteresis and recruitment-to-inflation ratio has the potential to evaluate lung recruitment and enhance mechanical ventilation setting. Lung imaging tools, such as computed tomography scanning, lung ultrasound, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) confirm their utility in following lung recruitment with the advantage of radiation-free and repeatable application at the bedside for sonography and EIT. Pes enables the assessment of dorsal lung tendency to collapse through end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure. Despite their value, these methodologies may require an elevated expertise in their application and data interpretation. However, the information obtained by these methods may be conveyed to build machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms aimed at improving the clinical decision-making process.

Monitoring lung recruitment is a crucial component of managing patients with severe lung conditions, within the framework of a personalized ventilatory strategy. Although challenges persist, emerging technologies offer promise for a personalized approach to care in the future.

Recent advances on cardiorespiratory monitoring applied in ARDS patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation and noninvasive ventilatory support are available in the literature and may have potential prognostic implication in ARDS treatment.

The measurement of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry is a valid, low-cost, noninvasive alternative for assessing arterial oxygenation. Caution must be taken in patients with darker skin pigmentation, who may experience a greater incidence of occult hypoxemia. Dead space surrogates, which are easy to calculate, have important prognostic implications. The mechanical power, which can be automatically computed by intensive care ventilators, is an important parameter correlated with ventilator-induced lung injury and outcome. In patients undergoing noninvasive ventilatory support, the use of esophageal pressure can measure inspiratory effort, avoiding possible delays in endotracheal intubation. Fluid responsiveness can also be evaluated using dynamic indices in patients ventilated at low tidal volumes (< 8 mL/kg). In patients ventilated at high levels of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), the PEEP test represents a valid alternative to passive leg raising. There is growing evidence on alternative parameters for evaluating fluid responsiveness, such as central venous oxygen saturation variations, inferior vena cava diameter variations and capillary refill time.

Careful cardiorespiratory monitoring in patients affected by ARDS is crucial to improve prognosis and to tailor treatment via mechanical ventilatory support.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of an alveolar recruitment maneuver (RM) leads to a significant increase in static lung compliance (Cstat) and an improvement in gas exchange in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Material and Methods: A clinical prospective intervention study was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups according to their body mass index (BMI): normal-weight (group I) and pre-obese and obese grade I (group II). Lung mechanics were monitored (Cstat, dynamic compliance-Cdin, peak pressure-Ppeak, plateau pressure-Pplat, driving pressure-DP) alongside gas exchange, and hemodynamic changes (heart rate-HR, mean arterial pressure-MAP) at six time points: T1 (induction of anesthesia), T2 (formation of pneumoperitoneum), T3 (RM with a PEEP of 5 cm H2O), T4 (RM with a PEEP of 7 cm H2O), T5 (desufflation), and T6 (RM at the end). The RM was performed by increasing the peak pressure by +5 cm of H2O at an equal inspiration-to-expiration ratio (I/E = 1:1) and applying a PEEP of 5 and 7 cm of H2O. Results: Out of 96 patients, 33 belonged to group I and 63 to group II. An increase in Cstat values occurred after all three RMs. At each time point, the Cstat value was measured higher in group I than in group II. A higher increase in Cstat was observed in group II after the second and third RM. Cstat values were higher at the end of the surgical procedure compared to values after the induction of anesthesia. The RM led to a significant increase in PaO2 in both groups without changes in HR or MAP. Conclusions: During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the application of RM leads to a significant increase in Cstat and an improvement in gas exchange. The prevention of atelectasis during anesthesia should be initiated immediately after the induction of anesthesia, using protective mechanical ventilation and RM.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is systematically associated with decreased respiratory system compliance (CRS). It remains unclear whether transportation to the referral ECMO center, changes in ventilatory mode or settings to achieve ultra-protective ventilation, or the natural evolution of ARDS drives this change in respiratory mechanics. Herein, we assessed the precise moment when CRS decreases after ECMO cannulation and identified factors associated with decreased CRS.

To rule out the effect of transportation and the different modes of ventilation on CRS, we conducted a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study from January 2013 to May 2020, on 22 patients with severe ARDS requiring on-site ECMO and ventilated in pressure-controlled mode to achieve ultra-protective ventilation. CRS was assessed at different time points ranging from 12 h before ECMO cannulation to 72 h after ECMO cannulation. The primary outcome was the relative change in CRS between 3 h before and 3 h after ECMO cannulation. The secondary outcomes included variables associated with the relative changes in CRS within the first 3 h after ECMO cannulation and the relative changes in CRS at each time point.

CRS decreased within the first 3 h after ECMO cannulation (-28.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -38.8 to -17.9, P<0.001), while the decrease was mild before and after these first 3 h after ECMO cannulation. To achieve ultra-protective ventilation, respiratory rate decreased in the mean by -13 breaths/min (95% CI: -15 to -11) and driving pressure by -8.3 cmH2O (95% CI: -11.2 to -5.3), resulting in decreased tidal volume by -3.3 mL/kg of predicted body weight (95% CI: -3.9 to -2.6) as compared to before ECMO cannulation (P <0.001 for all). Plateau pressure reduction, driving pressure reduction, and tidal volume reduction were significantly associated with decreased CRS after ECMO cannulation, whereas neither respiratory rate, positive end-expiratory pressure, inspired fraction of oxygen, fluid balance, nor mean airway pressure was associated with decreased CRS.

Decreased driving pressure resulting in lower tidal volume to achieve ultra-protective ventilation after ECMO cannulation was associated with a marked decrease in CRS in ARDS patients with on-site ECMO cannulation.

Severe acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a major issue in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Standard oxygen therapy is the first-line therapy for ARF in the less severe cases. However, respiratory supports may be delivered in more severe clinical condition. In cases with life-threatening ARF, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) will be required. Noninvasive strategies such as high-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) by either face mask or helmet might cover the gap between standard oxygen and IMV. The objective of all the supporting measures for ARF is to gain time for the antimicrobial treatment to cure the pneumonia. There is uncertainty regarding which patients with severe CAP are most likely to benefit from each noninvasive support strategy. HFNT may be the first-line approach in the majority of patients. While NIV may be relatively contraindicated in patients with excessive secretions, facial hair/structure resulting in air leaks or poor compliance, NIV may be preferable in those with increased work of breathing, respiratory muscle fatigue, and congestive heart failure, in which the positive pressure of NIV may positively impact hemodynamics. A trial of NIV might be considered for select patients with hypoxemic ARF if there are no contraindications, with close monitoring by an experienced clinical team who can intubate patients promptly if they deteriorate. In such cases, individual clinician judgement is key to choose NIV, interface, and settings. Due to the paucity of studies addressing IMV in this population, the protective mechanical ventilation strategies recommended by guidelines for acute respiratory distress syndrome can be reasonably applied in patients with severe CAP.

Hypoxemic respiratory failure is one of the leading causes of mortality in intensive care. Frequent assessment of individual physiological characteristics and delivery of personalized mechanical ventilation (MV) settings is a constant challenge for clinicians caring for these patients. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a radiation-free bedside monitoring device that is able to assess regional lung ventilation and changes in aeration. With real-time tomographic functional images of the lungs obtained through a thoracic belt, clinicians can visualize and estimate the distribution of ventilation at different ventilation settings or following procedures such as prone positioning. Several studies have evaluated the performance of EIT to monitor the effects of different MV settings in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, allowing more personalized MV. For instance, EIT could help clinicians find the positive end-expiratory pressure that represents a compromise between recruitment and overdistension and assess the effect of prone positioning on ventilation distribution. The clinical impact of the personalization of MV remains to be explored. Despite inherent limitations such as limited spatial resolution, EIT also offers a unique noninvasive bedside assessment of regional ventilation changes in the ICU. This technology offers the possibility of a continuous, operator-free diagnosis and real-time detection of common problems during MV. This review provides an overview of the functioning of EIT, its main indices, and its performance in monitoring patients with acute respiratory failure. Future perspectives for use in intensive care are also addressed.

Prone positioning (PP) homogenizes ventilation distribution and may limit ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The static and dynamic components of ventilation that may cause VILI have been aggregated in mechanical power, considered a unifying driver of VILI. PP may affect mechanical power components differently due to changes in respiratory mechanics; however, the effects of PP on lung mechanical power components are unclear. This study aimed to compare the following parameters during supine positioning (SP) and PP: lung total elastic power and its components (elastic static power and elastic dynamic power) and these variables normalized to end-expiratory lung volume (EELV).

This prospective physiologic study included 55 patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Lung total elastic power and its static and dynamic components were compared during SP and PP using an esophageal pressure-guided ventilation strategy. In SP, the esophageal pressure-guided ventilation strategy was further compared with an oxygenation-guided ventilation strategy defined as baseline SP. The primary endpoint was the effect of PP on lung total elastic power non-normalized and normalized to EELV. Secondary endpoints were the effects of PP and ventilation strategies on lung elastic static and dynamic power components non-normalized and normalized to EELV, respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and hemodynamic parameters.

Lung total elastic power (median [interquartile range]) was lower during PP compared with SP (6.7 [4.9-10.6] versus 11.0 [6.6-14.8] J/min; P < 0.001) non-normalized and normalized to EELV (3.2 [2.1-5.0] versus 5.3 [3.3-7.5] J/min/L; P < 0.001). Comparing PP with SP, transpulmonary pressures and EELV did not significantly differ despite lower positive end-expiratory pressure and plateau airway pressure, thereby reducing non-normalized and normalized lung elastic static power in PP. PP improved gas exchange, cardiac output, and increased oxygen delivery compared with SP.

In patients with moderate to severe ARDS, PP reduced lung total elastic and elastic static power compared with SP regardless of EELV normalization because comparable transpulmonary pressures and EELV were achieved at lower airway pressures. This resulted in improved gas exchange, hemodynamics, and oxygen delivery.

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00017449). Registered June 27, 2019. https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00017449.

Driving pressure (∆P) is a core therapeutic component of mechanical ventilation (MV). Varying levels of ∆P have been employed during MV depending on the type of underlying pathology and severity of injury. However, ∆P levels have also been shown to closely impact hard endpoints such as mortality. Considering this, conducting an in-depth review of ∆P as a unique, outcome-impacting therapeutic modality is extremely important. There is a need to understand the subtleties involved in making sure ∆P levels are optimized to enhance outcomes and minimize harm. We performed this narrative review to further explore the various uses of ∆P, the different parameters that can affect its use, and how outcomes vary in different patient populations at different pressure levels. To better utilize ∆P in MV-requiring patients, additional large-scale clinical studies are needed.

Determining the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) setting remains a central yet debated issue in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).The 'best compliance' strategy set the PEEP to coincide with the peak respiratory system compliance (or 2 cmH 2 O higher) during a decremental PEEP trial, but evidence is conflicting.

The physiological rationale that best compliance is always representative of functional residual capacity and recruitment has raised serious concerns about its efficacy and safety, due to its association with increased 28-day all-cause mortality in a randomized clinical trial in ARDS patients.Moreover, compliance measurement was shown to underestimate the effects of overdistension, and neglect intra-tidal recruitment, airway closure, and the interaction between lung and chest wall mechanics, especially in obese patients. In response to these concerns, alternative approaches such as recruitment-to-inflation ratio, the nitrogen wash-in/wash-out technique, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) are gaining attention to assess recruitment and overdistention more reliably and precisely.

The traditional 'best compliance' strategy for determining optimal PEEP settings in ARDS carries risks and overlooks some key physiological aspects. The advent of new technologies and methods presents more reliable strategies to assess recruitment and overdistention, facilitating personalized approaches to PEEP optimization.