Cardiac arrest in the emergency department (ED) is a rare event. Prior studies have used dedicated cardiac arrest registries, but few have leveraged "big data" from electronic healthcare vendors to analyze trends in the care of patients excluded from registries.

This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients in the ED with cardiac arrest from Epic Cosmos, a database with 277 million patients. Patients with ICD-10 codes corresponding to cardiac arrest in the ED were included. Outcomes included the incidence of cardiac arrest, mortality, code length, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Data were compared using odds ratio with 95 % confidence intervals (CI).

Among 196,834,283 ED visits from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023, there were 429,917 (0.22 %) cardiac arrests and 197,233 (45.88 %) patients who died in the ED. The incidence of cardiac arrest (0.26 %) and death in the ED (55.70 %) peaked in 2020. Cardiac arrest was more common in male and older patients, between 00:00-05:59, on weekends, and in the South (p < 0.001). The median code length was 10-20 min. Only 0.29 % of cardiac arrest patients received ECMO. Compared to 2016, the odds of a code length > 90 min and ECMO in 2023 were 1.43 (95 % CI 1.32-1.54) and 3.58 (95 % CI 2.41-5.31) times greater, respectively.

Although cardiac arrest in the ED is a rare event, almost half of patients die in the ED. The use of ECMO after cardiac arrest is increasing but remains low. Further research is needed to mitigate these differences in care.

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is frequently considered and implemented to help manage patients with cardiogenic shock from acute poisoning. However, utilization of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acutely poisoned patients is largely unknown.

We conducted a retrospective study analyzing the epidemiologic, clinical characteristics and survival of acutely poisoned patients placed on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Adult cases in the United States were included after a systematic search of the registry between January 1, 2003, and November 30, 2019. Study outcomes included survival to discharge, time to cannulation, and changes in metabolic, hemodynamic, and ventilatory parameters stratified by survival.

One hundred and seventeen cases were included in the analysis after excluding 216 non-poisoning-related cases. Their median age was 34 years and 69.2% were male. Opioids (45.3%) were most commonly implicated, followed by neurologic drugs (e.g., antidepressants, antiepileptics) (14.5%) and smoke inhalation (13.7%); 23 patients (19.7%) had a pre-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiac arrest. The median time from admission to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was 47 h with a median duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support of 146.5 h. Survivors were cannulated significantly earlier than non-survivors (25 h versus 123 h; P = 0.02). Eighty-four patients (71.2%) survived to hospital discharge. Clinical parameters (hemodynamic, metabolic, and ventilatory) improved with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, but no statistically significant difference was noted between survivors and non-survivors.

Our study showed that veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was infrequently utilized for poisoning-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Opioids were the most frequently reported exposure among the cases in which indirect lung injury may have occurred from aspiration. Although no specific clinical parameters were associated with survival, early initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve clinical outcomes.

The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory respiratory failure due to poisoning was associated with a clinically significant survival benefit compared to other respiratory diagnoses requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

COVID-19 can cause severe acute respiratory distress syndrome or myocardial dysfunction requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Whether comorbidities or sociodemographic factors influence outcomes in these patients is unclear.

Adult patients from the National Inpatient Sample dataset with COVID-19 pneumonia or non-COVID-19 pneumonia who underwent ECMO between 2016 and 2021 were included. Cohorts were matched in a 1:5 ratio using propensity scores. The primary outcome of interest was inpatient mortality; secondary outcomes included length of stay, total hospitalization costs, need for dialysis, rate of vascular complications, and discharge disposition.

Weighted patient groups (COVID-19 pneumonia, 5680 patients; non-COVID-19 pneumonia, 430 patients) were identified. Mean (SD) age was 46.0 (11.2) years in the COVID-19 group, 45.1 (12.5) years in the non-COVID-19 group. After matching, unweighted groups (COVID-19 pneumonia, 1136 patients; non-COVID-19 pneumonia, 86 patients) were compared. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had higher mortality risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.98; 95% CI, 1.11-3.53; P = .02), longer stays (38.0 vs 28.5 days, P < .001), higher costs ($1 278 270 vs $967 866, P = .002), and less likelihood of discharge home (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.85; P = .02) than patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia. Vascular complication rate (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.27-2.26; P = .64) and need for dialysis (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.49-2.08; P = .97) did not differ between groups.

Among patients undergoing ECMO, those with COVID-19 pneumonia had worse outcomes than those with non-COVID-19 pneumonia after adjustment for sociodemographic factors and comorbidities.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for COVID-19 was thoroughly assessed during the first pandemic wave, but data on subsequent waves are limited. We aimed to investigate in-hospital and 6-month survival of patients with COVID-19 supported with ECMO from the second pandemic wave (Sept 15, 2020) until the end of the pandemic (March 21, 2023, announced by WHO).

EuroECMO-COVID is a prospective, observational study including adults (aged ≥16 years) requiring ECMO respiratory support for COVID-19 from 98 centres in 21 countries. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes between in-hospital survivors and non-survivors. Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regressions were used to investigate factors linked to in-hospital mortality. 6-month survival and overall patient status were determined via patient contact or chart review. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04366921, and is complete.

We included 3860 patients (2687 [69·7%] were male and 1169 [30·3%] were female; median age 51 years [SD 11]) from 98 centres in 21 countries. In-hospital mortality was 55·9% (n=2158), with 81·2% (n=1752) deaths occurring during ECMO support. More non-survivors had diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and renal failure, and required more pre-ECMO inotropes and vasopressors compared with survivors. Median support duration was 18 days (IQR 10-31) for both groups. Factors linked to in-hospital mortality included older age, pre-ECMO renal failure, pre-ECMO vasopressors use, longer time from intubation to ECMO initiation, and complications, including neurological events, sepsis, bowel ischaemia, renal failure, and bleeding. Of the 1702 (44·1%) in-hospital survivors, 99·7% (n=1697) were alive at 6 months follow-up. Many patients at 6 months follow-up had dyspnoea (501 [32·0%] of 1568 patients), cardiac (122 [7·8%] of 1568 patients), or neurocognitive (168 [10·7%] of 1567 patients) symptoms.

Our data for patients undergoing ECMO support for respiratory distress from the second COVID-19 wave onwards confirmed most findings from the first wave regarding patient characteristics and factors correlated to in-hospital mortality. Nevertheless, in-hospital mortality was higher than during the initial pandemic wave while 6-month post-discharge survival remained favourable (99·7%). Persisting post-discharge symptoms confirmed the need for post-ECMO patient follow-up programmes.

None.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a clinical syndrome of acute hypoxic respiratory failure caused by diffuse lung inflammation and edema. ARDS can be precipitated by intrapulmonary factors or extrapulmonary factors, which can lead to severe hypoxemia. Patients suffering from ARDS have high mortality rates, including a 28-day mortality rate of 34.8% and an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 40.0%. The pathophysiology of ARDS is complex and involves the activation and dysregulation of multiple overlapping and interacting pathways of systemic inflammation and coagulation, including the respiratory system, circulatory system, and immune system. In general, the treatment of inflammatory injuries is a coordinated process that involves the downregulation of proinflammatory pathways and the upregulation of anti-inflammatory pathways. Given the complexity of the underlying disease, treatment needs to be tailored to the problem. Hence, we discuss the pathogenesis and treatment methods of affected organs, including 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-related pneumonia, drowning, trauma, blood transfusion, severe acute pancreatitis, and sepsis. This review is intended to provide a new perspective concerning ARDS and offer novel insight into future therapeutic interventions.

As the field of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) continues to advance and resuscitation protocols are being refined, older adults patients previously not considered for MCS are now being supported. MCS devices can broadly be classified based on the duration of support into temporary or durable devices. Although mortality is higher in the older adults, carefully selected patients, MCS support can be valuable and lead to excellent recovery. Age itself should not preclude patients from being candidates for MCS because we must not restrict the progress of science in medicine for any age.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) is increasingly used in the treatment of severe respiratory failure. Despite a significant increase in the worldwide use of extracorporeal lung assist devices recirculation remains a common complication and is associated with a reduced effectiveness of ECMO support and increased hemolysis. In this observational study we aimed to investigate the impact of cannula configuration and extracorporeal flow on recirculation.

An observational retrospective study was performed, which included all patients, who received V-V ECMO and recirculation measurements at the University Medical Center Freiburg between August 2021 and June 2023. Recirculation and extracorporeal flow were determined using ultrasonic indicator dilution technology. Patients were divided into subgroups according to their type of cannulation (dual lumen single-site vs. bifemoral vs. femoro-jugular).

A total of 215 recirculation measurements in 47 patients were performed. Dual lumen single-site cannulation was associated with significantly lower recirculation rates (8.7% [0.0; 12.0]) compared to single lumen dual-site cannulation (femoro-jugular: 17.6% [0.0; 25.8]; bifemoral: 27.9% ± 13.4%). In addition, a positive linear correlation was observed between extracorporeal flow and recirculation in all subgroups. Recirculation increased significantly with rising extracorporeal flow in all subgroups.

Recirculation is a common complication in V-V ECMO and can lead to a reduction of ECMO effectiveness. Particular attention should be paid to optimal positioning of the cannulas in patients with more than one cannula. The ultrasonic indicator dilution method is a simple and quick method for measuring recirculation in V-V ECMO and can be used at an early stage if effectiveness decreases.

This review traces the evolution of centrifugal blood pumps in mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems. Initially met with concerns over blood damage and thrombus formation, centrifugal pumps have become crucial components in ventricular assist devices (VADs) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) due to their simplified drive mechanisms and adaptability. This paper outlines three generations of centrifugal pump development: first-generation pumps with sealing components, second-generation pumps utilizing pivot bearings, and third-generation pumps employing contactless bearings. Each iteration addressed previous limitations, particularly regarding thrombus formation and durability. Current regulatory challenges surrounding the duration of pump use in MCS are examined, highlighting the discrepancy between approved usage times and clinical needs. This paper notes ongoing efforts to extend approved use periods, citing examples of pumps cleared for extended use in various jurisdictions. This historical perspective provides insights into the technological advancements that have enhanced the safety, efficacy, and durability of centrifugal blood pumps in MCS applications.

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving technique in the armamentarium of critical care medicine. It involves extracorporeal blood circulation outside the body, providing temporary respiratory support while allowing the lungs to heal. Traditionally, patients undergoing ECMO require sedation to minimize discomfort and facilitate mechanical ventilation. The "awake ECMO" concept emerged as a promising strategy to mitigate sedation-related complications and facilitate early mobilization in critically ill patients. In this article, we describe the potential advantages of awake ECMO and its role in preserving respiratory muscle function, enhancing rehabilitation prospects, and improving patient outcomes.

VV ECMO is increasingly used as a rescue strategy for hypercarbic and hypoxic respiratory failure refractory to conventional management, and more than 14,000 patients with COVID-19 related respiratory failure have been supported with VV ECMO to date. One of the known complications of VV ECMO support is the development of cannula-associated deep vein thromboses (CaDVT). The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of CaDVT in COVID-19 patients supported with VV ECMO as compared to non-COVID-19 patients. We hypothesized that due to the hypercoagulable state and longer duration of VV ECMO support required for patients with COVID-19, a higher incidence of CaDVT would be observed in these patients.

This is a single center, retrospective observational study. About 291 non-trauma adult patients who were cannulated for VV ECMO and managed at our institution from January 1, 2014 to January 10, 2022 were included. The primary outcome was the presence of CaDVT 24 h after decannulation in COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 patients. Our secondary outcome was continued presence of DVT on follow up imaging. CaDVT were defined as venous thrombi detected at prior cannulation sites.

Both groups had a high incidence of CaDVT. There was no significant difference in the incidence of CaDVT in COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients (95% vs 88%, p = 0.13). Patients with COVID-19 had an increased incidence of persistent CaDVT on repeat imaging (78% vs 56%, p = 0.03).

Given the high number of post-decannulation CaDVT in both groups, routine screening should be a part of post ECMO care in both populations. Repeat venous duplex ultrasound should be performed to assess for the need for ongoing treatment given the high incidence of CaDVT that persisted on repeat duplex scans.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can support patients with severe cardiorespiratory failure presenting with hypoxia who would otherwise have not survived. Patient selection for ECMO is challenging and relies on the integration of physiological variables with an assessment of reversibility of the underlying condition or suitability for transplantation. In this review, we focus on patients with cardiorespiratory disease who may present with severe hypoxia. We will discuss the indications and contraindications for ECMO; the evidence for ECMO, which is limited to a small number of clinical trials and registry data; the complications of ECMO; expanding technologies and indications; the development of a multidisciplinary ECMO network; and future research. The aim is to increase knowledge of this important area for respiratory physicians.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been ongoing for over 3 years, during which numerous clinical and experimental studies have been conducted. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the survival probability and complications of COVID-19 patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

We searched the databases by using Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome-Study Design (PICOS). We conducted a search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases to retrieve studies published until December 10, 2022. A random-effects meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and assessed the studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score. The results were presented as pooled morbidity with 95% confidence intervals.

The study was conducted on 19 studies that enrolled a total of 1494 patients, and the results showed a pooled survival probability of 66.0%. The pooled morbidity for intracranial hemorrhage was 8.7%, intracranial thrombosis 7.0%, pneumothorax 9.0%, pulmonary embolism 11.0%, pulmonary hemorrhage 9.0%, heart failure 14.0%, liver failure 13.0%, renal injury 44.0%, gastrointestinal hemorrhage 6.0%, gastrointestinal ischemia 6.0% and venous thrombosis 31.0%.

This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies focused on the survival probability and complications of COVID-19 patients undergoing ECMO, which are significant in evaluating the use of ECMO in COVID-19 patients and provide a basis for further research.

Our study was registered on PROSPERO with registration number CRD42022382555.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS) may require veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO). The aim of this study was to provide data on patient selection and outcome in a nationwide cohort study of patients with COVID-19 associated ARDS supported with V-V ECMO.

We identified all patients with COVID-19, who were supported with V-V ECMO in Denmark from March 10, 2020, to December 31, 2021, and retrieved data on patients who were referred to- and accepted for ECMO, demographics, outcome data, and complications. Risk factors for mortality were analysed using multivariate Cox regression analysis.

During the study period, 1836 patients were admitted to Danish intensive care units (ICUs). In the same period, there were 197 enquiries for ECMO of whom 118 patients were considered eligible. Overall, 71 patients were cannulated for ECMO; three patients were cannulated for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) due to right sided heart failure and 68 patients were cannulated for V-V ECMO. Two patients accepted for V-V ECMO died during cannulation. The median age was 55 years (IQR 45-60) and 66% were males. The median duration of ECMO support was 13 days (IQR 7-21), mechanical ventilation median 26 days (IQR 14-42), ICU stay median 34 days (IQR 17-46), and length of hospital stay median 41 days (IQR 25-56). Ninety-day mortality was 43%. Age of 60 years or more was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Pre-existing hypertension was associated with a decreased risk of mortality.

A nationwide, Danish cohort study of 68 COVID-19 patients supported with V-V ECMO, showed a 90-day survival of 43%, which is in accordance with reports from comparable cohorts. Age of 60 years or more was associated with an increased risk of mortality. Pre-existing hypertension was associated with a decreased risk of mortality.

Patients in critical condition who require mechanical ventilation experience intricate interactions between their respiratory and cardiovascular systems. These complex interactions are crucial for clinicians to understand as they can significantly influence therapeutic decisions and patient outcomes. A deep understanding of heart-lung interactions is essential, particularly under the stress of mechanical ventilation, where the right ventricle plays a pivotal role and often becomes a primary concern. Positive pressure ventilation, commonly used in mechanical ventilation, impacts right and left ventricular pre- and afterload as well as ventricular interplay. The right ventricle is especially susceptible to these changes, and its function can be critically affected, leading to complications such as right heart failure. Clinicians must be adept at recognizing and managing these interactions to optimize patient care. This perspective will analyze this matter comprehensively, covering the pathophysiology of these interactions, the monitoring of heart-lung dynamics using the latest methods (including ECHO), and management and treatment strategies for related conditions. In particular, the analysis will delve into the efficacy and limitations of various treatment modalities, including pharmaceutical interventions, nuanced ventilator management strategies, and advanced devices such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Each approach will be examined for its impact on optimizing right ventricular function, mitigating complications, and ultimately improving patient outcomes in the context of mechanical ventilation.

In recent years, dexamethasone (Dex) has been used to treat acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with COVID-19 and achieved promising outcomes. Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support for patients with ARDS has increased significantly worldwide. However, it remains unknown whether Dex could improve the efficiency of VV ECMO to reduce lung injury. Here, we investigate the combined efficiency of VV ECMO and Dex in rats with acute lung injury (ALI).

We established VV ECMO in oleic acid (OA)-treated ALI rats and administered Dex. We conducted HE staining and evaluated lung and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid cytokines to assess lung injury and inflammation. Furthermore, we investigated the activation of Hippo/YAP signalling in alveolar epithelial type II cell (AT2)-mediated alveolar epithelial repair using quantitative PCR, Western blotting and immunofluorescence. In vitro, the human alveolar epithelial cell line A549 was used to investigate the key role of YAP in alveolar epithelial cell differentiation.

VV ECMO combined with Dex alleviated OA-induced lung injury and pulmonary inflammation. Pulmonary oedema and exudation were significantly alleviated, and the lung and BAL levels of IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α were significantly reduced compared with those observed with ECMO alone. In addition, VV ECMO combined with Dex treatment protected alveolar epithelial cells by activating Hippo/YAP signalling. In vitro, Dex promoted YAP expression and alveolar epithelial cell differentiation, whereas YAP knockdown inhibited YAP-mediated differentiation.

Our findings suggest that adjuvant Dex treatment during VV ECMO could alleviate ALI and pulmonary inflammation by activating the Hippo/YAP signalling pathway, which promoted alveolar regeneration and AT2 differentiation.

To describe echocardiographic findings among mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome, comparing those with and without venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support.

Single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Intensive care unit (ICU) of a quaternary academic center.

Patients with COVID-19 admitted between March 2020 and June 2021 receiving mechanical ventilation, with an echocardiogram within 72 hours of admission.

Admission and follow-up echocardiograms during ICU stay.

Patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings were analyzed. Mortality odds ratio (OR) for right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction and acute cor pulmonale (ACP) was calculated.

Among 242 patients, 145 (60%) received VV ECMO. Median (IQR) PaO2/FiO2 was 76 (65-95) and 98 (85-140) in ECMO and non-ECMO patients, respectively (p ≤ 0.001). Initial echocardiograms showed no significant differences in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (10% v 15 %, p = 0.31) and RV systolic dysfunction (38% v. 27%, p = 0.27) between ECMO and non-ECMO patients. ACP was more frequent in the ECMO group at baseline (41% v. 26 %, p = 0.02). During the ICU stay, patients on ECMO exhibited a higher prevalence of RV systolic dysfunction (55% v 34%, p = 0.001) and ACP (51% v 26%, p = 0.002). RV systolic dysfunction (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.09-3.63) and ACP (OR 2.95; 95% CI 1.55-5.62) on the follow-up echocardiograms were associated with higher odds of ICU mortality.

The prevalence of echocardiographic abnormalities, in particular RV dysfunction, was frequent among patients with COVID-19 receiving VV ECMO support and was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Patients who survive critical illness navigate arduous and disparate recovery pathways that include referrals and participation in community-based rehabilitation services. Examining rehabilitation pathways during recovery is crucial to understanding the relationship on patient-centered outcomes. Furthermore, an understanding of social determinants of health (SDOH) in relation to outcomes and rehabilitation use will help ensure equitable access for future care. Therefore, there is a need to define and understand patient care pathways, specifically rehabilitation after discharge, through a SDOH lens after surviving a critical illness to improve long-term outcomes.

MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection (Clarivate), the CINAHL, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database.

A systematic review of the literature was completed examining literature from inception to March 2024. Articles were included if post-hospital rehabilitation utilization was reported in adult patients who survived critical illness. Discharge disposition was examined as a proxy for rehabilitation pathways. Patients were grouped by patient diagnosis for grouped analysis and reporting of data. Two independent researchers reviewed manuscripts for inclusion and data were extracted by one reviewer using Covidence. Both reviewers used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess risk of bias.

Of 72 articles included, only four articles reported detailed rehabilitation utilization. The majority of the studies included were cohort studies (91.7%) with most articles using a retrospective design (56.9%). The most common patient population was acute respiratory diagnoses (51.4%). Most patients were discharged directly home from the hospital (75.4%). Race/ethnicity was the most frequently reported SDOH (43.1%) followed by insurance status (13.9%) and education (13.9%).

The small number of articles describing rehabilitative utilization allows for limited understanding of rehabilitation pathways following critical illness. The reporting of detailed rehabilitation utilization and SDOH are limited in the literature but may play a vital role in the recovery and outcomes of survivors of critical illness.

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) has a long history in the management of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The objectives of this review are to summarize the rationale and evidence for ECLS in ARDS including its role in reducing ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), suggest best practice management strategies during ECLS, and identify areas that require additional research to better inform patient care.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) has become an essential lifesaving intervention for individuals with severe cardiovascular and respiratory failure. Its application is expanding across several therapeutic contexts, surpassing conventional indications. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly stressed worldwide health systems to manage acute respiratory failure. ECMO has been employed as a vital intervention, particularly for patients with severe COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ECMO is applicable throughout pregnancy. The principal indications for ECMO in pregnant women align with those in the general population. However, pregnancy complicates issues, necessitating consideration of both mother's and infant's well-being. Patients with systemic rheumatic diseases are prone to experience life-threatening complications. While a majority of these patients respond to immunosuppressive drugs, a small percentage suffer organ failure and may benefit from ECMO as a bridge to recovery. The article addresses coagulation therapies, highlighting the necessity of precise anticoagulation to avert both bleeding and thrombosis, particularly in patients requiring extended ECMO support. Additionally, the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in ECMO patients are summarized, including the influence of the ECMO circuit on drug metabolism. Survey-based research offers valuable insights into ECMO use, procedures, and challenges. The paper evaluates current survey-based research and ECMO guidelines, highlighting clinical practice, training, and resource availability discrepancies across ECMO centers globally. Particular focus is placed on the rehabilitation requirements of ECMO survivors, acknowledging the importance of early mobilization and post-discharge care in improving long-term outcomes and quality of life.

The complex care of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires a high level of collaboration between multiple medical specialties and allied health professionals. Effective and timely communication between team members is imperative in ensuring patient safety. The COVID-19 pandemic posed unique challenges in the care of patients on ECMO. Communication between team members was complicated by social distancing recommendations, increased patient volume, and staff turnover. In this article, we describe a hybrid approach to rounds that allowed team members to attend virtually or in-person to improve team communication. Weekly hybrid ECMO rounds were held to discuss patient cases and work collectively to establish patient centered goals for the following week. Critical care and surgical consultants, registered nurse ECMO specialists, RNs, perfusionists, respiratory therapists, physical and occupational therapists, pharmacists, ethics committee members, and patient family members were invited to attend hybrid ECMO rounds. After eight months of rounds, medical care team members were asked to provide feedback regarding the rounds format, strengths, and weaknesses. The most frequently identified strengths were improved multidisciplinary communication and continuity of care. This article demonstrates that hybrid virtual and in-person patient rounds are a feasible way for ECMO programs to improve team communication and overall patient care.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is increasingly being used to support patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and cardiogenic shock. During the COVID-19 pandemic, consensus guidance recommended extracorporeal life support for patients with COVID-19-related cardiopulmonary disease refractory to optimal conventional therapy, prompting a substantial expansion in the use of this support modality. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was particularly integral to the bridging of COVID-19 patients to heart or lung transplantation. Limited human and physical resources precluded widespread utilization of mechanical support during the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitating careful patient selection and optimal management by expert healthcare teams for judicious extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use. This review outlines the evidence supporting the use of extracorporeal life support in COVID-19, describes the practice and outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19-related respiratory failure and cardiogenic shock, and proposes lessons learned for the implementation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to transplantation in future public health emergencies.

Clinical outcomes for patients with severe acute respiratory failure caused by different variants of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are incompletely understood. Clinical characteristics, pre-ECMO management, and hospital mortality at 90 days for adults with COVID-19 who received venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) at North American centers during waves predominated by Delta (August 16 to December 12, 2021) and Omicron (January 31 to May 31, 2022) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants were compared in a competing risks framework. One thousand seven hundred and sixty-six patients (1,580 Delta, 186 Omicron) received VV-ECMO for COVID-19 during the Delta- and Omicron-predominant waves in North American centers. In the unadjusted competing risks model, no significant difference was observed in risk of hospital mortality at 90 days between patients during the Delta- versus Omicron-predominant wave (subhazard ratio [sHR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.19), but patients supported with VV-ECMO during the Omicron-predominant wave had a significantly lower adjusted risk of hospital mortality at 90 days (subhazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.99). Patients receiving VV-ECMO during the Omicron-predominant wave had a similar unadjusted risk of hospital mortality at 90 days, but a significantly lower adjusted risk of hospital mortality at 90 days than those receiving VV-ECMO during the Delta-predominant wave.

The prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) among polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is significantly higher than in the general population. However, the mechanisms underlying this remain obscure. This study aimed to explore the mechanisms by identifying the genetic signature of SARS-CoV-2 infection in PCOS. In the present study, a total of 27 common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected for subsequent analyses. Functional analyses showed that immunity and hormone-related pathways collectively participated in the development and progression of PCOS and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Under these, 7 significant hub genes were identified, including S100A9, MMP9, TLR2, THBD, ITGB2, ICAM1, and CD86 by using the algorithm in Cytoscape. Furthermore, hub gene expression was confirmed in the validation set, PCOS clinical samples, and mouse model. Immune microenvironment analysis with the CIBERSORTx database demonstrated that the hub genes were significantly correlated with T cells, dendritic cells, mast cells, B cells, NK cells, and eosinophils and positively correlated with immune scores. Among the hub genes, S100A9, MMP9, THBD, ITGB2, CD86, and ICAM1 demonstrated potential as possible diagnostic markers for COVID-19 and PCOS. In addition, we established the interaction networks of ovary-specific genes, transcription factors, miRNAs, drugs, and chemical compounds with hub genes with NetworkAnalyst. This work uncovered the common pathogenesis and genetic signature of PCOS and SARS-CoV-2 infection, which might provide a theoretical basis and innovative ideas for further mechanistic research and drug discovery of the comorbidity of the two diseases.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become an important life support technique during lung transplantation. We aimed to develop a rat model for lung transplantation using venoarterial (VA) ECMO support.

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 400 to 450 g were used in this study. ECMO circuits were created by obtaining venous access from the femoral vein with subsequent extracorporeal oxygen exchange, which was then returned to the circulatory system through the left carotid artery (ie, VA-ECMO). Simultaneously, the donor lungs were retrieved and immersed in cold, low-potassium dextran lung preservation solution. Orthotopic left lung transplantation supported by VA-ECMO was performed. Thereafter, a respiratory failure rat model was constructed using ventilation with a hypoxic and hypercapnic gas mixture, consisting of 6% oxygen, 8% carbon dioxide, and 86% nitrogen, before lung transplantation. Similarly, left lung transplantation supported by VA-ECMO was performed in rats with respiratory failure. Arterial blood gas levels were measured at designated time points throughout the experiment.

We found that VA-ECMO provided sufficient oxygenation and carbon dioxide removal to allow for smooth left lung transplantation in healthy rats and those with respiratory failure.

We established a rat model for lung transplantation using VA-ECMO. Left lung transplantation using VA-ECMO support is also feasible and safe in rat models of respiratory failure. These models provide efficient and economical models for translational medicine for lung transplantation using ECMO. Moreover, it will be invaluable to evaluate the physiological and pathophysiological roles of ECMO during lung transplantation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been widely used as a life support for different kinds of acute cardiopulmonary dysfunction. The present study aimed at presenting the global trend of the top 100 cited original studies related to ECMO.

Bibliometric analysis was the primary methodology for this study. Literature data were collected from Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). Indicators were analyzed and visualized by Excel and VOSviewer, the study design, study population, study topic, journal impact factor (IF), Category Rank and Category Quartile, author, country, journal and keywords were included.

The top 100 cited articles were published between 1979 and 2021. With 19 publications, 2020 was the most prolific year. High-income countries or regions, such as the United States of America (USA), France and Canada owned a majority of the articles. Seventeen studies were randomized trials, 52 were finished in single center, and 53 focused on adults. The 100 articles were documented by 31 different journals. The journals were well recognized, with a mean IF2022 of 28.77, a median of 8.8, and a range of 1.6-168.9. The major diseases were viral infection of respiratory system, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or respiratory failure, pulmonary hypertension of infants, heart failure/cardiogenic shock, diaphragmatic hernia and cardiac arrest. Specifically, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) accounted for 72.7% of viral infections. The disease spectrum changed from congenital cardiopulmonary dysfunction to cardiac arrest, ARDS and cardiopulmonary failure, and to severe COVID infection cases. Another fresh hotspot is immune dysfunction.

This bibliometric analysis identified 100 most frequently cited original studies on ECMO and described their characteristics, which may help with further investigations.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) stands as a primary cause of mortality among critically ill patients. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly employed in the rescue therapy of ARDS patients. However, the current status of research in the field of ECMO-assisted ARDS remains unclear.

This research aims to categorize and evaluate the literature regarding Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), offering a comprehensive analysis of bibliometric properties, research hotspots, and developmental trends within the domain of ECMO-assisted ARDS.

A literature search was conducted for ECMO-assisted support for patients with ARDS in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database from 2014 to 2024. We employed visualization tools such as CiteSpace and VOSviewer to explore and assess connections among nations, institutions, researchers, and co-cited journals, authors, references, and keywords.

This study included 1739 publications. The United States leads in publication volume with Columbia University at the forefront of ECMO research. Intensive Care Medicine has been identified as the most cited journal in this field. Alain Combes from France stands out as a key contributor, particularly in his 2018 publication in the New England Journal of Medicine, which is the most cited work in the discipline. Furthermore, keyword analysis identified three distinct research phases: examining complications associated with ECMO therapy, exploring optimal strategies for mechanical ventilation under ECMO support, and compiling insights into the application of ECMO in treating COVID-19 patients and in the development of predictive models for patient outcomes.

Using bibliometric visualization techniques, this study revealed significant progress in the use of ECMO for treating ARDS respiratory support, evaluated the impact of these findings, and outlined potential areas for future studies.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a vital intervention for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), yet its efficacy with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unknown. This study compared the long-term mortality rates of patients receiving ECMO for COVID-19 with those experiencing other respiratory disease-associated ARDS.

This retrospective cohort study included adults with ARDS receiving ECMO for respiratory disease (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19) based on information collected from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea from February 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6 months and 1 year post-ECMO initiation.

Data from 3094 patients with COVID-19 (N = 1095) and non-COVID-19 respiratory disease-associated ARDS (N = 1999) who received ECMO support were analyzed. Despite a higher Charlson Comorbidity index in the non-COVID group, patients with COVID-19 had higher cumulative mortality rates at 6 months and 1 year post-ECMO initiation compared to those with non-COVID-19 respiratory diseases, after adjusting for confounders. Patients with COVID-19 also experienced longer intensive care unit stays, higher hospitalization costs, longer ECMO and mechanical ventilation durations, and lower intensity coverage.

Patients with COVID-19 requiring ECMO showed higher mortality rates, possibly due to its distinct long-lasting and potentially fatal consequences compared to other respiratory illnesses.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was a cataclysmic event that infected over 772 million and killed over 6.9 million people worldwide. The pandemic pushed hospitals and society to their limits and resulted in incredibly severe respiratory disease in millions of people. This severe respiratory disease often necessitated maximum medical therapy, including the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. While our understanding of COVID-19 and its treatment continue to evolve, we review the current evidence to guide the care of patients with severe COVID-19 infection.

Race-conscious research identifies health disparities with 1) rigorous and responsible data collection, 2) intentionality and considered analyses, and 3) interpretation of results that advance health equity. Individual registries must overcome specific challenges to promote race-conscious research, and this paper describes ways to achieve this with a focus on the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry. This article reviews ELSO registry publications that studied race with outcomes to consider whether research outputs align with race-conscious concepts and describe the direction of associations reported. Studies were identified via secondary analysis of a comprehensive scoping review on ECMO disparities. Of 32 multicenter publications, two (6%) studied race as the primary objective. Statistical analyses, confounder adjustment, and inclusive, antibiased language were inconsistently used. Only two (6%) papers explicitly discussed mechanistic drivers of inequity such as structural racism, and five (16%) discussed race variable limitations or acknowledged unmeasured confounders. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry publications demonstrated more adverse ECMO outcomes for underrepresented/minoritized populations than non-ELSO studies. With the objective to promote race-conscious ELSO registry research outputs, we provide a comprehensive understanding of race variable limitations, suggest reasoned retrospective analytic approaches, offer ways to interpret results that advance health equity, and recommend practice modifications for data collection.

Regardless of the type, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires the use of large intravascular cannulas and results in multiple abnormalities including non-physiologic blood flow, hemodynamic perturbation, rapid changes in blood oxygen and carbon dioxide levels, coagulation abnormalities, and a significant systemic inflammatory response. Among other sequelae, neurologic complications are an important source of mortality and long-term morbidity. The frequency of neurologic complications varies and is likely underreported due to the high mortality rate. Neurologic complications in patients supported by ECMO include ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, hypoxic brain injury, intracranial hemorrhage, and brain death. In addition to the disease process that necessitates ECMO, cannulation strategies and physiologic disturbances influence neurologic outcomes in this high-risk population. For example, the overall documented rate of neurologic complications in the venovenous ECMO population is lower, but a higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage exists. Meanwhile, in the venoarterial ECMO population, ischemia and global hypoperfusion seem to compose a higher percentage of neurologic complications. In what follows, the literature is reviewed to discuss the pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, and outcomes related to short-term neurologic complications in patients supported by ECMO.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a significant increase in the use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) as a bridge to transplantation versus recovery. Unlike other etiologies of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), utilization of V-V ECMO in COVID-19 has been associated with longer duration of ECMO support requirements. Our team sought to evaluate outcomes associated with prolonged duration of ECMO support in this patient population.

Single-center retrospective review of patients who were placed on ECMO due to COVID-19 associated ARDS. Specifically examining outcomes-transplant free survival, mortality and discharge rates-of patients requiring V-V ECMO support for greater than 50 days.

The median age of the cohort was 48 years and 13 patients (72%) were males. The median duration of ECMO support was 84 days (IQR 55-106). 11 patients (61%) had right ventricular dysfunction and 13 patients (72%) had pneumothoraces. There was a 33% percent (n = 6) mortality rate within cohort. One patient continues to require ECMO support at time of abstract submission. 11 patients (61%) patients were discharged, of which 3 patients required a lung transplant.

Prolonged V-V ECMO can be associated with comparable outcomes to conventional V-V ECMO runs that are relatively shorter in duration. With availability of device and staffing, prolonged ECMO runs can potentially be justified in a highly selected patient population.

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), a viral infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, was first reported in China in December 2019 and has since become a global pandemic. COVID-19 is a multisystem disease with respiratory symptoms as the main presentation. There is growing awareness of the adverse prognostic impact of cardiovascular involvement caused by COVID-19. We report a case of a patient on hemodialysis with COVID-19 who developed cardiopulmonary failure and was successfully weaned off veno-arterial-venous (VAV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A 54-year-old man was brought to our intensive care unit (ICU) with respiratory failure due to COVID-19, which had been diagnosed based on antigen testing results. Three days prior, he had started taking dexamethasone orally, but his respiratory distress had worsened two days prior, and he was referred to our hospital. He had a history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic heart failure, and end-stage renal disease. He was found to have circulatory shock and severe hypoxemia, and computed tomography (CT) showed ground-glass opacities throughout the lung fields. Hypoxemia persisted after ventilation. The ventilation settings for this patient were volume control ventilation, fraction of inspiratory oxygen 100%, tidal volume 360 ml, respiratory rate 22 breaths per minute, and positive end-expiratory pressure 15 mmHg. Therefore, veno-venous ECMO (VV-ECMO) was initiated. Echocardiography showed right ventricular free-wall motion disorder, which was judged to be a complication of cardiogenic shock due to septic cardiomyopathy. The patient was switched to VAV-ECMO, after which his circulatory and respiratory insufficiency gradually improved. He was switched to VV-ECMO on day 7 of hospitalization and weaned off ECMO on day 15 of hospitalization. The patient was fully weaned off the ventilator on day 37 of hospitalization and discharged from the ICU on day 38 of hospitalization. COVID-19 can cause cardiomyopathy, a rare cardiovascular disorder that can lead to cardiogenic shock; however, the cardiac and pulmonary symptoms may not occur simultaneously. Therefore, switching to VAV-ECMO after VV-ECMO was introduced; however, it is important to note that the mortality rate associated with this procedure is high.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an advanced medical technology that is used to treat respiratory and heart failure. The U.S. military has used ECMO in the care of combat casualties during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom as well as in the treatment of patients during the recent Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic. However, few Military Health System personnel have training and experience in the use of ECMO therapy. To address this dearth of expertise, we developed and evaluated an accelerated ECMO course for military medical personnel.

To compare the efficacy of an accelerated ECMO course for Military Health System critical care teams.

Seventeen teams, each consisting of a physician and nurse, underwent a 5-h accelerated ECMO course. Similar to our previous live-tissue ECMO training program (phases I and II), each team watched prerecorded ECMO training lectures. Subjects then practiced priming the ECMO circuit, cannulating ECMO, initiating ECMO, and correcting common complications on an ECMO simulation model. An added component to this phase III project included transportation and telemedicine consultation availability. Training success was evaluated via knowledge and confidence assessments, and observation of each team attempting to initiate ECMO on a Yorkshire swine patient model, transport the patient model, and troubleshoot complications with the support of telemedicine consultation when desired.

Seventeen teams successfully completed the course. All seventeen teams (100%) successfully placed the swine on veno-arterial ECMO. Of those, 15 teams successfully transitioned to veno-arterial-venous ECMO. The knowledge assessments of physicians and nurses increased by 12.2% from pretest (mean of 62.1%, SD 10.4%) to posttest (mean of 74.4%, SD 8.2%), P < .0001; their confidence assessments increased by 41.1% from pretest (mean of 20.1%, SD 11.8%) to posttest (mean of 61.2%, SD 18.6%).

An abbreviated 1-day lecture and hands-on task-trainer-based ECMO course resulted in a high rate of successful skill demonstration and improvement of physicians' and nurses' knowledge assessments and confidence levels, similar to our previous live-tissue training program. When compared to our previous studies, the addition of telemedicine and patient transportation to this study did not affect the duration or performance of procedures.

Extracorporeal life support, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), is a potentially life-saving adjunct to therapy in patients experiencing pulmonary and/or cardiac failure. The U.S. DoD has only one ECMO center, in San Antonio, Texas. In this study, we aimed to analyze outcomes at this center in order to determine whether they are on par with those reported elsewhere in the literature.

In this observational study, we analyzed data from patients treated with ECMO at the only DoD ECMO center between September 2012 and April 2020. The primary outcome was survival to discharge, and secondary outcomes were discharge disposition and incidence of complications.

One hundred and forty-three patients were studied, with a 70.6% rate of survival to discharge. Of the patients who survived, 32.7% were discharged home; 32.7% were discharged to a rehabilitation facility; and 33.7% were transferred to another hospital, 29.4% of whom were transferred to lung transplant centers. One patient left against medical advice. Incidence of ECMO-related complications were as follows: 64 patients (44.7%) experienced hemorrhagic complications, 80 (55.9%) had renal complications, 61 (42.6%) experienced cardiac complications, 39 (27.3%) had pulmonary complications, and 5 patients (3.5%) experienced limb ischemia. We found that these outcomes were comparable to those reported in the literature.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be an efficacious adjunct in management of critically ill patients who require pulmonary and/or cardiac support. This single-center observational study demonstrated that the DoD's only ECMO center has outcomes comparable with the reported data in Extracorporeal Life Support Organization's registry.

Mortality for patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for COVID-19 increased over the course of the pandemic. We investigated the association between immunomodulators and mortality for patients receiving ECMO for COVID-19.

We retrospectively analysed the Extracorporeal Life Support Organisation registry from 1 January, 2020, through 31 December, 2021, to compare the outcomes of patients who received no immunomodulators, only corticosteroids, only other immunomodulators (selective interleukin blockers, janus-kinase inhibitors, convalescent plasma, and intravenous immunoglobulin), and a combination of corticosteroids and other immunomodulators administered either before or during ECMO. We used Cox regression models to estimate survival time until 90 days. We estimated the propensity score of receiving different immunomodulators using multinomial regression, and incorporated these scores into the regression models.

We included 7181 patients in the final analysis; 6169 patients received immunomodulators either before or during ECMO. The 90-day survival was 58.1% (95%-CI 55.1-61.2%) for patients receiving no immunomodulators, 50.7% (95%-CI 49.0-52.5%) for those receiving only corticosteroids, 62.2% (95%-CI 57.4-67.0%) for those receiving other immunomodulators, and 48.5% (95%-CI 46.7-50.4%) for those receiving corticosteroids and other immunomodulators. Compared to patients without immunomodulators, patients receiving either corticosteroids alone (HR: 1.13, 95%-CI 1.01-1.28) or with other immunomodulators (HR: 1.21, 95%-CI: 1.07-1.54) had significantly shorter survival time, while patients receiving only other immunomodulators had significantly longer survival time (HR: 0.79, 95%-CI: 0.66-0.96). The receipt of immunomodulators (across all three groups) was associated with an increase in secondary infections.

In this cohort study, we found that immunomodulators, in particular corticosteroids, were associated with significantly higher mortality amongst patients receiving ECMO for COVID-19, after adjusting for potential confounding variables and propensity score. In addition, patients receiving corticosteroids with or without other immunomodulators had longer ECMO runs, which has potential implications for resource allocation. While residual confounding likely remains, further studies are required to evaluate the timing of immunomodulators and better understand the possible mechanisms behind this association, including secondary infections.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) represents an important but limited treatment for patients with severe COVID-19. We assessed the effects of an educational intervention on a person's ECMO care preference and examined whether patients and providers had similar ECMO preferences.

In the Video+Survey group, patients watched an educational video about ECMO's purpose, benefits, and risks followed by an assessment of ECMO knowledge and care preferences in seven scenarios varying by hypothetical patient age, function, and comorbidities. Patients in the Survey Only group and providers didn't watch the video. Logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of agreement for each ECMO scenario between the two patient groups and then between all patients and providers.

Video+Survey patients were more likely (64% vs. 17%; p = 0.02) to correctly answer all ECMO knowledge questions than Survey Only patients. Patients in both groups agreed that ECMO should be considered across all hypothetical scenarios, with predicted agreement above 65%. In adjusted analyses, patients and providers had similar predicted agreement for ECMO consideration across six of the seven scenarios, but patients showed greater preference (84% vs. 41%, p = 0.003) for the scenario of a functionally dependent 65-year-old with comorbidities than providers.

An educational video increased a person's ECMO knowledge but did not change their ECMO preferences. Clinicians were less likely than patients to recommend ECMO for older adults, so advanced care planning discussion between patients and providers about treatment options in critically ill patients with COVID-19 is critical.

Obesity causes significant difficulties in successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and may interfere with patient outcomes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced an increased number of obese patients supported with ECMO in our intensive care unit due to severe illness in this population.

We designed a single-center retrospective study to identify prognostic factors for 180-day survival in obese critical COVID-19 patients receiving venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO). We included adult critical COVID-19 patients on VV-ECMO, who were obese and overweight (according to the World Health Organization) and admitted to a tertiary hospital's intensive care unit from April 1, 2020, to May 31, 2022. Univariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess differences in 180-day mortality.

Forty-one patients were included. The median age was 55 (IQR 45-60) years, and 70.7% of the patients were male. The median body mass index (BMI) was 36 (IQR 31-42.5) kg/m2; 39% of patients had a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2. The participants had 3 (IQR 1.5-4) days of mechanical ventilation prior to ECMO, and 63.4% were weaned from VV-ECMO support after a median of 19 (IQR 10-34) days. The median ICU length of stay was 31.9 (IQR 17.5-44.5) days. The duration of mechanical ventilation was 30 (IQR 19-49.5) days. The 180-day mortality rate was 41.5%. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a higher BMI was associated with greater 180-day survival (OR 1.157 [1.038-1.291], p = 0.009). Younger age, female sex, less invasive ventilation time before ECMO, and fewer complications at the time of ECMO cannulation were associated with greater 180-day survival [OR 0.858 (0.774-0.953), p 0.004; OR 0.074 (0.008-0.650), p 0.019; OR 0.612 (0.401-0.933), p 0.022; OR 0.13 (0.03-0.740), p 0.022), respectively].

In this retrospective cohort of critical COVID-19 obese adult patients supported by VV-ECMO, a higher BMI, younger age, and female sex were associated with greater 180-day survival. A shorter invasive ventilation time before ECMO and fewer complications at ECMO cannulation were also associated with increased survival.

The number of severe cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been decreasing since the emergence of the Omicron variant at the end of 2021. COVID-19 has become a common infectious disease in Japan and was downgraded to a category five infectious disease on May 8, 2023. This study aimed to compare the impact of diabetes mellitus on in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients since COVID-19 became a common infectious disease.

We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from an advanced critical care center in Osaka, Japan. The study included 1,381 patients of COVID-19 admitted to the center between March 1, 2020, and May 7, 2023, before COVID-19 became a category five infectious disease in Japan. Individuals younger than 18 years and pregnant women were excluded. We divided the patients into two groups: pre- and post-Omicron epidemic groups. The primary endpoint of the study was the in-hospital mortality, and the prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus was compared between the groups.

The Kaplan-Meier curve showed a significantly lower rate of in-hospital mortality in the post-Omicron epidemic group than in the pre-Omicron epidemic group. The hazard ratio (HR) was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.36-2.50; p < 0.0001). Patients with diabetes mellitus had higher in-hospital mortality in both the pre- and post-Omicron epidemic groups; their HRs were 1.39 (95% CI, 1.21-1.59; p < 0.0001) and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.15-1.83; p = 0.0012), respectively. Diabetes mellitus had no significant interaction effect on the association between the post-Omicron epidemic and in-hospital mortality (p for interaction = 0.2154).

Diabetes mellitus may continue contributing to COVID-19 in-hospital mortality in the future, as the Omicron sub-strain may still be prevalent.

Surface modification using zwitterionic 2-methacryloyloxyethylphosphorylcholine (MPC) polymers is one of the most reasonable ways to prepare medical devices that can suppress undesired biological reactions such as blood coagulation. Usable MPC polymers are hydrophilic and water soluble, and their surface modification strategy involves exploiting the copolymer structures by adding physical or chemical bonding moieties. In this study, we developed copolymers composed of MPC, hydrophobic anchoring moiety, and chemical cross-linking unit to clarify the role of hydrophobic interactions in achieving biocompatible and long-term stable coatings. The four kinds of MPC copolymers with cross-linking units, such as 3-methacryloxypropyl trimethoxysilane (MPTMSi), and four different hydrophobic anchoring moieties, such as 3-(methacryloyloxy)propyltris(trimethylsiloxy)silane (MPTSSi) named as PMMMSi, n-butyl methacrylate (BMA) as PMBSi, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate (EHMA) as PMESi, and lauryl methacrylate as PMLSi, were synthesized and coated on polydimethylsiloxane, polypropylene (PP), and polymethyl pentene. These copolymers were uniformly coated on the substrate materials PP and poly(methyl pentene) (PMP), to achieve hydrophilic and electrically neutral coatings. The results of the antibiofouling test showed that PMBSi repelled the adsorption of fluorescence-labeled bovine serum albumin the most, whereas PMLSi repelled it the least. Notably, all four copolymers suppressed platelet adhesion similarly. The variations in protein adsorption quantities among the four copolymer coatings were attributed to their distinct swelling behaviors in aqueous environments. Further investigations, including 3D scanning force microscopy and neutron reflectivity measurements, revealed that the PMLSi coating exhibited a higher water intake under aqueous conditions in comparison to the other coatings. Consequently, all copolymer coatings effectively prevented the invasion of platelets but the proteins penetrated the PMLSi network. Subsequently, the dynamic stability required to induce shear stress was evaluated using a circulation system. The results demonstrated that the PMMMSi and PMLSi coatings on PMP and PP exhibited exceptional platelet repellency and maintained high stability during circulation. This study highlights the potential of hydrophobic moieties to improve hemocompatibility and stability, offering potential applications in medical devices.