|
1
|
Abu-Aiada J, Quint E, Dykman D, Czeiger D, Shaked G. Effectiveness of a two-tiered trauma team activation system at a level I trauma center. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024; 50:2265-2272. [PMID: 39196389 PMCID: PMC11599413 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02644-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many trauma patients who are transported to our level I trauma center have minor injuries that do not require full trauma team activation (FTTA). Thus, we implemented a two-tiered TTA system categorizing patients into red and yellow code alerts, indicating FTTA and Limited TTA (LTTA) requirements, respectively. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of this triage tool by evaluating its diagnostic parameters (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), undertriage and overtriage) and comparing injury severity between the two groups. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a Level I trauma center. Characteristics compared between the red and yellow code groups included demographics, injury severity, treatments, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Calculating the diagnostic parameters was based on Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the need for life-saving surgery or procedures. RESULTS Significant differences in injury severity indicators were observed between the two groups. Patients in the red code group had a higher ISS and New Injury Severity Score (NISS), a lower Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and probability of survival. They had a longer hospital LOS, a higher Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission rate and required more emergency operations. The Sensitivity of the triage tool was 85.2%, specificity was 55.6%, PPV was 74.2%, NPV was 71.5%, undertriage was 14.7%, and overtriage was 25.7%. CONCLUSION The two-tiered TTA system effectively distinguish between patients with major trauma who need FTTA and patients with minor trauma who can be managed by LTTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamela Abu-Aiada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
| | - Elchanan Quint
- Department of General Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben- Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Daniel Dykman
- Trauma Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - David Czeiger
- Department of General Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben- Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Gad Shaked
- Department of General Surgery, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben- Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
- Trauma Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Rakhunde SA, Mankar S, Joshi N, Agrawal PP, Harkare VV. Staged Limb Reconstruction Using Ilizarov Fixator in an Infected Tibia Nonunion: A Case Report. Cureus 2024; 16:e67112. [PMID: 39310599 PMCID: PMC11416067 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Road traffic accidents are responsible for most lower limb compound fractures. Such fractures have to be treated immediately with utmost care and precision. Patients are sometimes inadequately treated with traditional practices which causes further disability to the patient and makes it more difficult for the orthopedic surgeon. This case report highlights the meticulous planning and management of a distal tibia-fibula-infected nonunion which was initially mal-treated by an unqualified practitioner following trauma on multiple occasions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shrikrishna A Rakhunde
- Orthopedics, N. K. P. Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, IND
| | - Sushil Mankar
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, N. K. P. Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, IND
| | - Nilesh Joshi
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, N. K. P. Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, IND
| | - Pallav P Agrawal
- Orthopedics and Traumatology, N. K. P. Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, IND
| | - Vismay V Harkare
- Orthopedics, N. K. P. Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, IND
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Aarsland MA, Weber C, Enoksen CH, Dalen I, Tjosevik KE, Oord P, Thorsen K. Characteristics and demography of low energy fall injuries in patients > 60 years of age: a population-based analysis over a decade with focus on undertriage. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024; 50:995-1001. [PMID: 38324199 PMCID: PMC11249550 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02465-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing group of elderly patients is admitted after low energy falls. Several studies have shown that this patient group tends to be severely injured and is often undertriaged. METHODS Patients > 60 years with low energy fall (< 1 m) as mechanism of injury were identified from the Stavanger University Hospital trauma registry. The study period was between 01.01.11 and 31.12.20. Patient and injury variables as well as clinical outcome were described. Undertriage was defined as patients with a major trauma, i.e., Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, without trauma team activation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-squared test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. RESULTS Over the 10-year study period, 388 patients > 60 years with low energy fall as mechanism of injury were identified. Median age was 78 years (IQR 68-86), and 53% were males. The location of major injury was head injury in 41% of the patients, lower extremities in 19%, and thoracic injuries in 10%. Thirty-day mortality was 13%. Fifty percent were discharged to home, 31% to nursing home, 9% in hospital mortality, and the remaining 10% were transferred to other hospitals or rehabilitation facilities. Ninety patients had major trauma, and the undertriage was 48% (95% confidence interval, 38 to 58%). CONCLUSIONS Patients aged > 60 years with low energy falls are dominated by head injuries, and the 30-day mortality is 13%. Patients with major trauma are undertriaged in half the cases mandating increased awareness of this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martine A Aarsland
- Section for Traumatology; Surgical Clinic, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway.
| | - Clemens Weber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Quality and Health Technology, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Cathrine H Enoksen
- Section for Traumatology; Surgical Clinic, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Ingvild Dalen
- Department of Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kjell Egil Tjosevik
- Section for Traumatology; Surgical Clinic, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Pieter Oord
- Section for Traumatology; Surgical Clinic, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, PO Box 8100, N-4068, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kenneth Thorsen
- Section for Traumatology; Surgical Clinic, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Andrews T, Meadley B, Gabbe B, Beck B, Dicker B, Cameron P. Review article: Pre-hospital trauma guidelines and access to lifesaving interventions in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. Emerg Med Australas 2024; 36:197-205. [PMID: 38253461 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
The centralisation of trauma services in western countries has led to an improvement in patient outcomes. Effective trauma systems include a pre-hospital trauma system. Delivery of high-level pre-hospital trauma care must include identification of potential major trauma patients, access and correct application of lifesaving interventions (LSIs) and timely transport to definitive care. Globally, many nations endorse nationwide pre-hospital major trauma triage guidelines, to ensure a universal approach to patient care. This paper examined clinical guidelines from all 10 EMS in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. All relevant trauma guidelines were included, and key information was extracted. Authors compared major trauma triage criteria, all LSI included in guidelines, and guidelines for transport to definitive care. The identification of major trauma patients varied between all 10 EMS, with no universal criteria. The most common approach to trauma triage included a three-step assessment process: physiological criteria, identified injuries and mechanism of injury. Disparity between physiological criteria, injuries and mechanism was found when comparing guidelines. All 10 EMS had fundamental LSI included in their trauma guidelines. Fundamental LSI included haemorrhage control (arterial tourniquets, pelvic binders), non-invasive airway management (face mask ventilation, supraglottic airway devices) and pleural wall needle decompression. Variation in more advanced LSI was evident between EMS. Optimising trauma triage guidelines is an important aspect of a robust and evidence driven trauma system. The lack of consensus in trauma triage identified in the present study makes benchmarking and comparison of trauma systems difficult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Andrews
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Clinical Operations, Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ben Meadley
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Clinical Operations, Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda Gabbe
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ben Beck
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bridget Dicker
- Clinical Audit and Research, Hato Hone St John New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
- Paramedicine Department, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Peter Cameron
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Yolcu S, Sener K, Tapsiz H, Ozer AI, Avci A. Revised Trauma Score and CRAMS better predicted mortality in high-energy-trauma patients than Early-Warning Score. Ir J Med Sci 2022:10.1007/s11845-022-03208-2. [PMID: 36336767 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-03208-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trauma is one of the common reasons for emergency department (ED) presentations. Specifically, severe-trauma patients often present with mortal complications, including traumatic shock or respiratory or multiorgan failure/dysfunction, and these situations cause high-mortality risk. Scoring systems in the triage of trauma patients can help determine the injury's severity and the patient's prognosis. AIM In this study, we aimed to compare Early-Warning Score (EWS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), and CRAMS to predict the severity and prognosis of damage among high-energy-trauma patients. METHODS This retrospective study included adult high-energy-trauma patients (> 18 years of age) assessed in our emergency department (ED) from April 1, 2020, to September 31, 2020. We included a total of 177 high-energy-trauma patients in the study. We compared the effectiveness of EWS; RTS; and circulation, respiration, abdomen, motor, and speech (CRAMS) in predicting mortality. The primary outcome of this study was mortality. RESULTS We included 67 females and 110 males with a mean age of 39.2 in our study. Of those patients, 6 died during ICU hospitalization and 104 were discharged from the ward. RTS (AUC: 0.978, CI: 0.945-0.994, p < 0.001) and CRAMS (AUC: 0.978, CI: 0.944-0.994, p < 0.001) had the same AUC values, but the AUC value of EWS (AUC: 0.966, CI: 0.927-0.987, p < 0.001) was lower. Sensitivity of EWS was 93.1 (CI: 77.2-99.2%), and sensitivity of RTS was 96.55 (CI: 82.2-99.9) and CRAMS' sensivity was 96.55% (CI: 82.2-99.9). RTS showed the highest specivity level (96.62%, CI: 92.3-98.9). CONCLUSION In conclusion, RTS and CRAMS better predicted mortality in high-energy-trauma patients than EWS.
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Kang BH, Jung K, Kim S, Youn SH, Song SY, Huh Y, Chang HJ. Accuracy and influencing factors of the Field Triage Decision Scheme for adult trauma patients at a level-1 trauma center in Korea. BMC Emerg Med 2022; 22:101. [PMID: 35672707 PMCID: PMC9172086 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-022-00637-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the accuracy of the prehospital Field Triage Decision Scheme, which has recently been applied in the Korean trauma system, and the factors associated with severe injury and prognosis at a regional trauma center in Korea. METHODS From 2016 to 2018, prehospital data of injured patients were obtained from the emergency medical services of the national fire agency and matched with trauma outcomes at our institution. Severe injury (Injury Severity Score > 15), overtriage/undertriage rate, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were reviewed according to the triage protocol steps. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify influencing factors in the field triage. RESULTS Of the 2438 patients reviewed, 853 (35.0%) were severely injured. The protocol accuracy was as follows: step 1, 72.3%; step 2, 65.0%; step 3, 66.2%; step 1 or 2, 70.2%; and step 1, 2, or 3, 66.4%. Odds ratios (OR) (95% confidence interval [CIfor systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg (3.535 [1.920-6.509]; p < 0.001), altered mental status (17.924 [8.980-35.777]; p < 0.001), and pedestrian injuries (2.473 [1.339-4.570], p = 0.04) were significantly associated with 24-h mortality. Penetrating torso injuries (7.108 [4.108-12.300]; p < 0.001); two or more proximal long bone fractures (4.134 [2.316-7.377]); p < 0.001); crushed, degloved, and mangled extremities (8.477 [4.068-17.663]; p < 0.001); amputation proximal to the wrist or ankle (42.964 [5.764-320.278]; p < 0.001); and fall from height (2.141 [1.497-3.062]; p < 0.001) were associated with 24-h surgical intervention. CONCLUSION The Korean field triage protocol is not yet accurate, with only some factors reflecting injury severity, making reevaluation necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byung Hee Kang
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Korea.,Gyeonggi South Regional Trauma Center, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Kyoungwon Jung
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Korea.,Gyeonggi South Regional Trauma Center, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Sora Kim
- Gyeonggi South Regional Trauma Center, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - So Hyun Youn
- Gyeonggi South Regional Trauma Center, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Seo Young Song
- Gyeonggi South Regional Trauma Center, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea
| | - Yo Huh
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon, 16499, Korea. .,Gyeonggi South Regional Trauma Center, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea.
| | - Hyuk-Jae Chang
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Bhaumik S, Hannun M, Dymond C, DeSanto K, Barrett W, Wallis LA, Mould-Millman NK. Prehospital triage tools across the world: a scoping review of the published literature. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2022; 30:32. [PMID: 35477474 PMCID: PMC9044621 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-022-01019-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate triage of the undifferentiated patient is a critical task in prehospital emergency care. However, there is a paucity of literature synthesizing currently available prehospital triage tools. This scoping review aims to identify published tools used for prehospital triage globally and describe their performance characteristics. METHODS A comprehensive search was performed of primary literature in English-language journals from 2009 to 2019. Papers included focused on emergency medical services (EMS) triage of single patients. Two blinded reviewers and a third adjudicator performed independent title and abstract screening and subsequent full-text reviews. RESULTS Of 1521 unique articles, 55 (3.6%) were included in the final synthesis. The majority of prehospital triage tools focused on stroke (n = 19; 35%), trauma (19; 35%), and general undifferentiated patients (15; 27%). All studies were performed in high income countries, with the majority in North America (23, 42%) and Europe (22, 40%). 4 (7%) articles focused on the pediatric population. General triage tools aggregate prehospital vital signs, mental status assessments, history, exam, and anticipated resource need, to categorize patients by level of acuity. Studies assessed the tools' ability to accurately predict emergency department triage assignment, hospitalization and short-term mortality. Stroke triage tools promote rapid identification of patients with acute large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke to trigger timely transport to diagnostically- and therapeutically-capable hospitals. Studies evaluated tools' diagnostic performance, impact on tissue plasminogen activator administration rates, and correlation with in-hospital stroke scales. Trauma triage tools identify patients that require immediate transport to trauma centers with emergency surgery capability. Studies evaluated tools' prediction of trauma center need, under-triage and over-triage rates for major trauma, and survival to discharge. CONCLUSIONS The published literature on prehospital triage tools predominantly derive from high-income health systems and mostly focus on adult stroke and trauma populations. Most studies sought to further simplify existing triage tools without sacrificing triage accuracy, or assessed the predictive capability of the triage tool. There was no clear 'gold-standard' singular prehospital triage tool for acute undifferentiated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smitha Bhaumik
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, 777 Bannock St, Denver, CO 80204 USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, 12631 E. 17th Ave, Room 2612, MS C326, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Merhej Hannun
- Department of Family Medicine, Reading Hospital – Tower Health, 420 South 5th Avenue, West Reading, PA 19611 USA
| | - Chelsea Dymond
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence St Joseph Hospital, 2700 Dolbeer St, Eureka, CA 95501 USA
| | - Kristen DeSanto
- Strauss Health Sciences Library, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12950 E. Montview Blvd., Mail Stop A003, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
| | - Whitney Barrett
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, 1 University of New Mexico, MSC11 6025, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
| | - Lee A. Wallis
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, F51 Old Main Building, Observatory, Cape Town, 7935 South Africa
| | - Nee-Kofi Mould-Millman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, 12631 E. 17th Ave, Room 2612, MS C326, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, F51 Old Main Building, Observatory, Cape Town, 7935 South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Li W, Mok G, Nolan B. Pre-hospital trauma triage: Outcomes of interfacility transferred trauma patients meeting pre-hospital triage criteria. TRAUMA-ENGLAND 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/14604086211064447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Introduction In Ontario, Canada, paramedics use the Field Trauma Triage Standard to identify patients at risk for severe injury. These triage criteria encompass physiologic, anatomic, mechanism of injury, and special considerations to identify patients that should be transported directly to a trauma center. Patients meeting any one of these criteria mandate direct transfer to a trauma center. This study evaluated whether severely injured trauma patients that underwent an interfacility transfer met these triage criteria. The secondary objective was to assess the impact of failed triage application on in-hospital mortality. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of interfacility trauma transfers to an adult trauma center over a 3-year period that were either admitted to the intensive care unit, received an operation within 4 h of arrival, or died within 48 h of arrival. Data were abstracted from the hospital’s trauma registry and chart review of electronic medical records. Frequency of patients meeting pre-hospital triage criteria and which specific criteria were collected. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of missed pre-hospital triage on in-hospital mortality. Results There were 1008 interfacility patients during the study period, of which 340 patients met inclusion criteria; 78.5% ( n = 267) of interfacility transports had met at least one triage criteria. Most frequent criteria met were: Glasgow Coma Scale <14 (42.4%), high risk motor-vehicle collision (22.1%), and systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg (19.4%). When adjusted for injury severity score and age, patients who met triage criteria were not at increased odds of death (OR 2.38, 95% CI: 0.87–6.46) compared to interfacility patients that did not meet criteria. Conclusion: A majority of critically injured interfacility transfers met initial trauma triage criteria. These patients are at high risk for preventable morbidity and mortality. This study indicates the need to understand the barriers to pre-hospital adherence to trauma triage guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winny Li
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Garrick Mok
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Brodie Nolan
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Secondary overtriage in a pediatric level one trauma center. J Pediatr Surg 2021; 56:2337-2341. [PMID: 33972088 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.03.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have explored under- and overtriage, and the means by which to optimize these rates. Few have examined secondary overtriage (SO), or the unnecessary transfer of minimally injured patients to higher level trauma centers. We sought to determine the incidence and impact of SO in our pediatric level one trauma center. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of all trauma activations at our institution from 2015 through 2017. SO was defined as transferred patients who required neither PICU admission nor an operation, with ISS ≤ 9 and LOS ≤ 24 h. We compared SO patients against all trauma activation transfers, and against similar non-transferred patients. RESULTS We identified 1789 trauma activations, including 766 (42.8%) transfers. Of the transfers, 335 (43.7%) met criteria for SO. Compared to other transfers, SO patients had a shorter mean travel distance (52.9 v 58.1 mi; p = 0.02). Compared to similar patients transported from the trauma scene, SO patients were more likely to be admitted (52.2% v 29.2%; p < 0.001), with longer inpatient stay and greater hospital charges. CONCLUSIONS SO represents an underrecognized burden to trauma centers which could be minimized to improve resource allocation. Future research should evaluate trauma activation criteria for transferred pediatric patients.
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Yilmaz S, Ak R, Hokenek NM, Yilmaz E, Tataroglu O. Comparison of trauma scores and total prehospital time in the prediction of clinical course in a plane crash: Does timing matter? Am J Emerg Med 2021; 50:301-308. [PMID: 34425323 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate how the total prehospital time (TPT), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) affect the outcome of plane crash victims from anatomical, physiological and psychological perspectives. The accuracy or strength of these scores and TPT in predicting hospitalization and surgery, sequelae development and psychiatric complications [permanent temporary disability (PoTDs)] and PTSD can allow medical professionals to direct and prioritize management efforts of the victims of mass casualties in general. METHODS The study was designed as a single-center retrospective study. By examining the records of victims of a plane crash transferred to the ED, AIS, ISS, TRISS and TPT were calculated on admission. The clinical severity of the patients was determined by a joint decision of five clinicians. The performances of the trauma scores on hospitalization, surgery, PTSD and PoTDs were compared. The study data were analyzed via the Mann-Whitney U test and descriptive statistical methods. Pearson's chi-square test was used for the comparison of qualitative data, and ROC analyses were employed to determine cutoff levels. RESULTS The AIS, ISS, and TRISS scores of the victims with an indication for hospitalization, calculated on admission to the ED, were significantly higher than those of the other victims (p = 0.001). In addition, TPT, AIS, ISS, and TRISS scores were significantly higher in hospitalized patients than in outpatients (p < 0.05). The cutoff levels for AIS and ISS were ≥ 1.50 and ≥ 4.50, respectively, while they were ≥ 123.5 min for TPT with regard to hospitalization decisions. The AIS, ISS, and TRISS scores calculated on admission for the patients who underwent surgery were significantly higher than those who did not (p = 0.001). Cutoff levels for AIS and ISS were ≥ 2.50 and ≥ 11.50, respectively, while they were ≥ 135.5 min for TPT with respect to the decision to operate on the victims. CONCLUSIONS It is expected that everyone who practices medicine be equipped to handle multiple casualties. As the number of people involved in mass casualties increases, diagnostic tools, workups such as laboratory and radiological studies, and prognostic markers such as trauma scores should be simpler and more user-friendly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarper Yilmaz
- University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Rohat Ak
- University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nihat Mujdat Hokenek
- University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Erdal Yilmaz
- University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Tataroglu
- University of Health Sciences, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Gianola S, Castellini G, Biffi A, Porcu G, Fabbri A, Ruggieri MP, Stocchetti N, Napoletano A, Coclite D, D'Angelo D, Fauci AJ, Iacorossi L, Latina R, Salomone K, Gupta S, Iannone P, Chiara O. Accuracy of pre-hospital triage tools for major trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis and net clinical benefit. World J Emerg Surg 2021; 16:31. [PMID: 34112209 PMCID: PMC8193906 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-021-00372-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We conducted a systematic review to evaluate and compare the accuracy of pre-hospital triage tools for major trauma in the context of the development of the Italian National Institute of Health guidelines on major trauma integrated management. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were searched up to November 2019 for studies investigating pre-hospital triage tools. The ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve and net clinical benefit for all selected triage tools were performed. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Certainty of the evidence was judged with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS We found 15 observational studies of 13 triage tools for adults and 11 for children. In adults, according to the ROC curve and the net clinical benefit, the most reliable tool was the Northern French Alps Trauma System (TRENAU), adopting injury severity score (ISS) > 15 as reference (sensitivity (Sn), 0.92; specificity (Sp), 0.41; 1 study; sample size, 2572; high certainty of the evidence). When mortality as reference was considered, the pre-hospital triage tool with the best net clinical benefit trajectory was the New Trauma Score (NTS) < 18 (Sn, 0.82; Sp, 0.86; 1 study; sample size, 1001; moderate certainty of the evidence). In children, high variability among all triage tools for sensitivity and specificity was found. CONCLUSION Sensitivity and specificity varied across all available pre-hospital trauma triage tools. TRENAU and NTS are the best accurate triage tools for adults, whereas in the pediatric area a large variability prevents any firm conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Gianola
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| | - Greta Castellini
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
| | - Annalisa Biffi
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gloria Porcu
- National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Fabbri
- Emergency Department, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | | | - Nino Stocchetti
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Cà Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonello Napoletano
- Centro Eccellenza Clinica Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Coclite
- Centro Eccellenza Clinica Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela D'Angelo
- Centro Eccellenza Clinica Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Alice Josephine Fauci
- Centro Eccellenza Clinica Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Iacorossi
- Centro Eccellenza Clinica Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Latina
- Centro Eccellenza Clinica Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Katia Salomone
- Centro Eccellenza Clinica Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Shailvi Gupta
- Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland, Baltimora, MD, USA
| | - Primiano Iannone
- Centro Eccellenza Clinica Qualità e Sicurezza delle Cure, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Osvaldo Chiara
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, University of Milan, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore, Milan, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Development and internal validation of China mortality prediction model in trauma based on ICD-10-CM lexicon: CMPMIT-ICD10. Chin Med J (Engl) 2021; 134:532-538. [PMID: 33560666 PMCID: PMC7929565 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Models to predict mortality in trauma play an important role in outcome prediction and severity adjustment, which informs trauma quality assessment and research. Hospitals in China typically use the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) to describe injury. However, there is no suitable prediction model for China. This study attempts to develop a new mortality prediction model based on the ICD-10-CM lexicon and a Chinese database. Methods: This retrospective study extracted the data of all trauma patients admitted to the Beijing Red Cross Emergency Center, from January 2012 to July 2018 (n = 40,205). We used relevant predictive variables to establish a prediction model following logistic regression analysis. The performance of the model was assessed based on discrimination and calibration. The bootstrapping method was used for internal validation and adjustment of model performance. Results: Sex, age, new region-severity codes, comorbidities, traumatic shock, and coma were finally included in the new model as key predictors of mortality. Among them, coma and traumatic shock had the highest scores in the model. The discrimination and calibration of this model were significant, and the internal validation performance was good. The values of the area under the curve and Brier score for the new model were 0.9640 and 0.0177, respectively; after adjustment of the bootstrapping method, they were 0.9630 and 0.0178, respectively. Conclusions: The new model (China Mortality Prediction Model in Trauma based on the ICD-10-CM lexicon) showed great discrimination and calibration, and performed well in internal validation; it should be further verified externally.
Collapse
|
|
13
|
[Emergency intervention rate in the emergency room depending on the alerting criteria : Prospective data analysis of a supraregional trauma center]. Unfallchirurg 2021; 124:909-915. [PMID: 33538851 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-020-00948-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Trauma team alert (TTA) to the emergency room (ER) takes place in the event of disturbed vital signs or serious injuries (A criteria) or after a dangerous accident (B criteria). Due to low specificity and limited personnel resources, TTA is questioned for B criteria. The consequences would be an increase in undertriage and thus endangering patients. Due to the lack of data it is unclear whether adapted ER teams would be a solution to the problem.The aim of the study was to describe ER patients according to the TTA criteria and to collect the corresponding emergency intervention rates in ER.Over 1 year, all TTAs of a supraregional trauma center were prospectively recorded, categorized according to TTA criteria (A, B and NULL criteria) and compared descriptively. NULL criteria were TTAs for which neither A nor B criteria were met. Treatment data were documented according to the TraumaRegister DGU® standard form. Emergency interventions were intubation, chest tube, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, transfusion, coagulation substitution, external pelvic stabilization and surgical hemostasis.The TTA due to A, B and NULL criteria were performed in 19.5%, 51.2% and 29.3%, respectively. The mean injury severity (ISS ± standard deviation) was 20.6 ± 21.3 for A criteria, significantly higher than for B criteria (8.0 ± 7.1) and NULL criteria (5.6 ± 8.2). The emergency intervention rate for A , B and NULL criteria was 75%, 6% and 2.1%, respectively.Differentiation according to the TTA criteria results in patient collectives with different injury severity and emergency intervention rates. This result justifies considerations to adjust team composition based on TTA criteria, as long as it is ensured that critical conditions can be identified and remedied by adapted teams.
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Ageron FX, Coats TJ, Darioli V, Roberts I. Validation of the BATT score for prehospital risk stratification of traumatic haemorrhagic death: usefulness for tranexamic acid treatment criteria. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2021; 29:6. [PMID: 33407716 PMCID: PMC7789642 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00827-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tranexamic acid reduces surgical blood loss and reduces deaths from bleeding in trauma patients. Tranexamic acid must be given urgently, preferably by paramedics at the scene of the injury or in the ambulance. We developed a simple score (Bleeding Audit Triage Trauma score) to predict death from bleeding. METHODS We conducted an external validation of the BATT score using data from the UK Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2018. We evaluated the impact of tranexamic acid treatment thresholds in trauma patients. RESULTS We included 104,862 trauma patients with an injury severity score of 9 or above. Tranexamic acid was administered to 9915 (9%) patients. Of these 5185 (52%) received prehospital tranexamic acid. The BATT score had good accuracy (Brier score = 6%) and good discrimination (C-statistic 0.90; 95% CI 0.89-0.91). Calibration in the large showed no substantial difference between predicted and observed death due to bleeding (1.15% versus 1.16%, P = 0.81). Pre-hospital tranexamic acid treatment of trauma patients with a BATT score of 2 or more would avoid 210 bleeding deaths by treating 61,598 patients instead of avoiding 55 deaths by treating 9915 as currently. CONCLUSION The BATT score identifies trauma patient at risk of significant haemorrhage. A score of 2 or more would be an appropriate threshold for pre-hospital tranexamic acid treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francois-Xavier Ageron
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT UK
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Vincent Darioli
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ian Roberts
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Dahine J, Hébert PC, Ziegler D, Chenail N, Ferrari N, Hébert R. Practices in Triage and Transfer of Critically Ill Patients: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Selection Criteria. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:e1147-e1157. [PMID: 32858530 PMCID: PMC7493782 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000004624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify and appraise articles describing criteria used to prioritize or withhold a critical care admission. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, Medline, EBM Reviews, and CINAHL Complete databases. Gray literature searches and a manual review of references were also performed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. STUDY SELECTION We sought all articles and abstracts of original research as well as local, provincial, or national policies on the topic of ICU resource allocation. We excluded studies whose population of interest was neonatal, pediatric, trauma, or noncritically ill. Screening of 6,633 citations was conducted. DATA EXTRACTION Triage and/or transport criteria were extracted, based on type of article, methodology, publication year, and country. An appraisal scale was developed to assess the quality of identified articles. We also developed a robustness score to further appraise the robustness of the evidence supporting each criterion. Finally, all criteria were extracted, evaluated, and grouped by theme. DATA SYNTHESIS One-hundred twenty-nine articles were included. These were mainly original research (34%), guidelines (26%), and reviews (21%). Among them, we identified 200 unique triage and transport criteria. Most articles highlighted an exclusion (71%) rather than a prioritization mechanism (17%). Very few articles pertained to transport of critically ill patients (4%). Criteria were classified in one of four emerging themes: patient, condition, physician, and context. The majority of criteria used were nonspecific. No study prospectively evaluated the implementation of its cited criteria. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review identified 200 criteria classified within four themes that may be included when devising triage programs including the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. We identified significant knowledge gaps where research would assist in improving existing triage criteria and guidelines, aiming to decrease arbitrary decisions and variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Dahine
- Département de médecine spécialisée, Centre intégré de santé et services sociaux de Laval (CISSS de Laval), Hôpital Cité-de-la-Santé, Université de Montréal, Laval, QC, Canada
| | - Paul C. Hébert
- Département de médecine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal et Centre de Recherche, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Daniela Ziegler
- Bibliothèque, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Nicolay Ferrari
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Réjean Hébert
- Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Giuseppe G, Ilaria M, Federico D, Alessandro C, Simona G, Nazerian P, Marco B, Stefano G. Severe thoracic or abdominal injury in major trauma patients can safely be ruled out by "Valutazione Integrata Bed Side" evaluation without total body CT scan. Ir J Med Sci 2020; 190:799-805. [PMID: 32888166 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02351-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the initial assessment of trauma patients, the severity of injury is very often not immediately recognizable. In trauma centers, a total body CT (TBCT) scan is routinely used to evaluate this kind of patients, even if it is burdened with health risk, economical costs, and logistical difficulties. AIM We investigated the use of a clinical guide to establish a safe alternative to this routine practice. METHODS We enrolled retrospectively 438 patients referring to the Emergency Department of Careggi University Hospital in Florence (Italy) over a 1-year period from 2014 to 2015, with the evidence of trauma and high-priority triage codes and then subjected to TBCT. We created a tool called VIBS ("Valutazione Integrata Bed Side") (from the Italian translation of "Bed Side Integrated Evaluation") which included all clinical, laboratory, and diagnostic data acquired bedside during the primary survey. Every VIBS profile was dichotomized in negative or positive if there was at least one altered item. We performed an analysis of correlation between VIBS and TBCT to determine sensibility, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value and likelihood ratio of VIBS. RESULTS Sensibility of VIBS in the prediction of positive CT scan was 100% and specificity was 31.7%. Positive and negative predictive value (95% C.I.) was 44.3 (38.8-49.5) and 100 (94.0-99.9). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 1.464 and 0. Failure rate resulted in 0% and efficiency was 20.54%. CONCLUSIONS VIBS can safely rule out severe thoracic or abdominal injuries. This approach could limit the use of TBCT in one-fifth of suspected major trauma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melara Ilaria
- Emergency Medicine Fellowship Program, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Coppa Alessandro
- Department of Emergency Medicine, S.Giuseppe Hospital, Empoli, Italy
| | | | | | - Bartolini Marco
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
ISS alone, is not sufficient to correctly assign patients post hoc to trauma team requirement. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020; 48:383-392. [PMID: 32556366 PMCID: PMC8825400 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01410-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Purpose An injury severity score (ISS) ≥ 16 alone, is commonly used post hoc to define the correct activation of a trauma team. However, abnormal vital functions and the requirement of life-saving procedures may also have a role in defining trauma team requirement post hoc. The aim of this study was to describe their prevalence and mortality in severely injured patients and to estimate their potential additional value in the definition of trauma team requirement as compared to the definition based on ISS alone. Methods Retrospective analysis of a trauma registry including patients with trauma team activation from the years 2009 until 2015, who were 16 years of age or older and were brought to the trauma center directly from the scene. Patients were divided into a group with an ISS ≥ 16 vs. ISS < 16. For analysis a predefined list of abnormal vital functions and life-saving interventions was used. Results 58,723 patients were included in the study (N = 32,653 with ISS ≥ 16; N = 26,070 with ISS < 16). From the total number of patients that required life-saving procedures or presented with abnormal vital functions 29.1% were found in the ISS < 16 group. From the ISS < 16 group, 36.7% of patients required life-saving procedures or presented with abnormal vital signs. The mortality of those was 8.1%. Conclusions Defining the true requirement of trauma team activation post hoc by using ISS ≥ 16 alone does miss a considerable number of subjects who require life-saving interventions or present with abnormal vital functions. Therefore, life-saving interventions and abnormal vital functions should be included in the definitions for trauma team requirement. Further studies have to evaluate, which life-saving procedures and abnormal vital functions are most relevant.
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Choi KK, Jang MJ, Lee MA, Lee GJ, Yoo B, Park Y, Lee JN. The Suitability of the CdC field Triage for Korean Trauma Care. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND INJURY 2020. [DOI: 10.20408/jti.2020.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
|
19
|
Waydhas C, Trentzsch H, Hardcastle TC, Jensen KO. Survey on worldwide trauma team activation requirement. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020; 47:1569-1580. [PMID: 32123951 PMCID: PMC8476357 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01334-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Trauma team activation (TTA) is thought to be essential for advanced and specialized care of very severely injured patients. However, non-specific TTA criteria may result in overtriage that consumes valuable resources or endanger patients in need of TTA secondary to undertriage. Consequently, criterion standard definitions to calculate the accuracy of the various TTA protocols are required for research and quality assurance purposes. Recently, several groups suggested a list of conditions when a trauma team is considered to be essential in the initial care in the emergency room. The objective of the survey was to post hoc identify trauma-related conditions that are thought to require a specialized trauma team that may be widely accepted, independent from the country’s income level. Methods A set of questions was developed, centered around the level of agreement with the proposed post hoc criteria to define adequate trauma team activation. The participants gave feedback before they answered the survey to improve the quality of the questions. The finalized survey was conducted using an online tool and a word form. The income per capita of a country was rated according to the World Bank Country and Lending groups. Results The return rate was 76% with a total of 37 countries participating. The agreement with the proposed criteria to define post hoc correct requirements for trauma team activation was more than 75% for 12 of the 20 criteria. The rate of disagreement was low and varied between zero and 13%. The level of agreement was independent from the country’s level of income. Conclusions The agreement on criteria to post hoc define correct requirements for trauma team activation appears high and it may be concluded that the proposed criteria could be useful for most countries, independent from their level of income. Nevertheless, more discussions on an international level appear to be warranted to achieve a full consensus to define a universal set of criteria that will allow for quality assessment of over- and undertriage of trauma team activation as well as for the validation of field triage criteria for the most severely injured patients worldwide. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00068-020-01334-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Waydhas
- Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany. .,Medical Faculty of the University Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| | - Heiko Trentzsch
- Institut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement (INM), Klinikum Der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Schillerstr. 53, 80336, Minich, Germany.,Committee On Emergency Medicine, Intensive Care and Trauma Management (Sektion NIS) of the German Trauma Society, Berlin, Germany
| | - Timothy C Hardcastle
- Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Mayville and University of Kwa Zulu Natal, 800 Vusi Mzimela Rd, Congella, 4058, South Africa
| | - Kai Oliver Jensen
- Klinik für Traumatologie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
van Rein EAJ, van der Sluijs R, Voskens FJ, Lansink KWW, Houwert RM, Lichtveld RA, de Jongh MA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Champion HR, Beeres FJP, Leenen LPH, van Heijl M. Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Prehospital Triage of Trauma Patients. JAMA Surg 2020; 154:421-429. [PMID: 30725101 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Importance Prehospital trauma triage protocols are used worldwide to get the right patient to the right hospital and thereby improve the chance of survival and avert lifelong disabilities. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma set target levels for undertriage rates of less than 5%. None of the existing triage protocols has been able to achieve this target in isolation. Objective To develop and validate a new prehospital trauma triage protocol to improve current triage rates. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter cohort study, all patients with trauma who were 16 years and older and transported to a trauma center in 2 different regions of the Netherlands were included in the analysis. Data were collected from January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2014, in the Central Netherlands region for the design data cohort and from January 1 through December 31, 2015, in the Brabant region for the validation cohort. Data were analyzed from May 3, 2017, through July 19, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures A new prediction model was developed in the Central Netherlands region based on prehospital predictors associated with severe injury. Severe injury was defined as an Injury Severity Score greater than 15. A full-model strategy with penalized maximum likelihood estimation was used to construct a model with 8 predictors that were chosen based on clinical reasoning. Accuracy of the developed prediction model was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. The model was externally validated in the Brabant region. Results Using data from 4950 patients with trauma from the Central Netherlands region for the design data set (58.3% male; mean [SD] age, 47 [21] years) and 6859 patients for the validation Brabant region (52.2% male; mean [SD] age, 51 [22] years), the following 8 significant predictors were selected for the prediction model: age; systolic blood pressure; Glasgow Coma Scale score; mechanism criteria; penetrating injury to the head, thorax, or abdomen; signs and/or symptoms of head or neck injury; expected injury in the Abbreviated Injury Scale thorax region; and expected injury in 2 or more Abbreviated Injury Scale regions. The prediction model showed a C statistic of 0.823 (95% CI, 0.813-0.832) and good calibration. The cutoff point with a minimum specificity of 50.0% (95% CI, 49.3%-50.7%) led to a sensitivity of 88.8% (95% CI, 87.5%-90.0%). External validation showed a C statistic of 0.831 (95% CI, 0.814-0.848) and adequate calibration. Conclusions and Relevance The new prehospital trauma triage prediction model may lower undertriage rates to approximately 10% with an overtriage rate of 50%. The next step should be to implement this prediction model with the use of a mobile app for emergency medical services professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline A J van Rein
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier van der Sluijs
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J Voskens
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Koen W W Lansink
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.,Utrecht Traumacenter, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R Marijn Houwert
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Utrecht Traumacenter, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob A Lichtveld
- Regional Ambulance Facility Utrecht, Utrecht Regional Ambulance Service, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mariska A de Jongh
- Network Emergency Care Brabant, Brabant Trauma Registry, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | | | - Howard R Champion
- SimQuest Solutions Inc, Annapolis, Maryland.,Section of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Frank J P Beeres
- Department of Traumatology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Voskens FJ, van Rein EAJ, van der Sluijs R, Houwert RM, Lichtveld RA, Verleisdonk EJ, Segers M, van Olden G, Dijkgraaf M, Leenen LPH, van Heijl M. Accuracy of Prehospital Triage in Selecting Severely Injured Trauma Patients. JAMA Surg 2019; 153:322-327. [PMID: 29094144 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance A major component of trauma care is adequate prehospital triage. To optimize the prehospital triage system, it is essential to gain insight in the quality of prehospital triage of the entire trauma system. Objective To prospectively evaluate the quality of the field triage system to identify severely injured adult trauma patients. Design, Setting, and Participants Prehospital and hospital data of all adult trauma patients during 2012 to 2014 transported with the highest priority by emergency medical services professionals to 10 hospitals in Central Netherlands were prospectively collected. Prehospital data collected by the emergency medical services professionals were matched to hospital data collected in the trauma registry. An Injury Severity Score of 16 or more was used to determine severe injury. Main Outcomes and Measures The quality and diagnostic accuracy of the field triage protocol and compliance of emergency medical services professionals to the protocol. Results A total of 4950 trauma patients were evaluated of which 436 (8.8%) patients were severely injured. The undertriage rate based on actual destination facility was 21.6% (95% CI, 18.0-25.7) with an overtriage rate of 30.6% (95% CI, 29.3-32.0). Analysis of the protocol itself, regardless of destination facility, resulted in an undertriage of 63.8% (95% CI, 59.2-68.1) and overtriage of 7.4% (95% CI, 6.7-8.2). The compliance to the field triage trauma protocol was 73% for patients with a level 1 indication. Conclusions and Relevance More than 20% of the patients with severe injuries were not transported to a level I trauma center. These patients are at risk for preventable morbidity and mortality. This finding indicates the need for improvement of the prehospital triage protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank J Voskens
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Eveline A J van Rein
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Roderick M Houwert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Utrecht Trauma Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Robert Anton Lichtveld
- Regional Ambulance Facility Utrecht, Regionale Ambulance Voorziening Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Egbert J Verleisdonk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht/Zeist/Doorn, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel Segers
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Ger van Olden
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel Dijkgraaf
- Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Gang MC, Hong KJ, Shin SD, Song KJ, Ro YS, Kim TH, Park JH, Jeong J. New prehospital scoring system for traumatic brain injury to predict mortality and severe disability using motor Glasgow Coma Scale, hypotension, and hypoxia: a nationwide observational study. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2019; 6:152-159. [PMID: 31261485 PMCID: PMC6614045 DOI: 10.15441/ceem.18.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 08/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Assessing the severity of injury and predicting outcomes are essential in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the respiratory rate and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) are difficult to use in the prehospital setting. This investigation aimed to develop a new prehospital trauma score for TBI (NTS-TBI) to predict mortality and disability. METHODS We used a nationwide trauma database on severe trauma cases transported by fire departments across Korea in 2013 and 2015. NTS-TBI model 1 used systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation <90% measured via pulse oximeter, and motor component of GCS. Model 2 comprised variables of model 1 and age >65 years. We assessed discriminative power via area under the curve (AUC) value for in-hospital mortality and disability defined according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale with scores of 2 or 3. We then compared AUC values of NTS-TBI with those of RTS. RESULTS In total, 3,642 patients were enrolled. AUC values of NTS-TBI models 1 and 2 for mortality were 0.833 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.815 to 0.852) and 0.852 (95% CI, 0.835 to 0.869), respectively, while AUC values for disability were 0.772 (95% CI, 0.749 to 0.796) and 0.784 (95% CI, 0.761 to 0.807), respectively. AUC values of NTS-TBI model 2 for mortality and disability were higher than those of RTS (0.819 and 0.761, respectively) (P<0.01). CONCLUSION Our NTS-TBI model using systolic blood pressure, motor component of GCS, oxygen saturation, and age was feasible for prehospital care and showed outstanding discriminative power for mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Chul Gang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki Jeong Hong
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Do Shin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoung Jun Song
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Sun Ro
- Laboratory of Emergency Medical Services, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Han Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Ho Park
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Jeong
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Maliziola C, Frigerio S, Lanzarone S, Barale A, Berardino M, Clari M. Sensitivity and specificity of trauma team activation protocol criteria in an Italian trauma center: A retrospective observational study. Int Emerg Nurs 2019; 44:20-24. [PMID: 30824337 DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2018] [Revised: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The trauma team (TT) model could reduce mortality, morbidity, and duration of hospital stay, costs, and complications. To avoid over- or undertriage for trauma team activation, robust criteria have to be chosen. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a TT activation protocol for major trauma patients to predict the need for emergency treatment. METHODS A retrospective observational study was carried out in the Emergency Department (ED) of a major Italian trauma center. Patients with trauma or burns who accessed the ED in 2015 with a triage red or yellow priority treatment code were included, while pediatric patients were excluded. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values were calculated for each TT activation criteria and the aggregated criteria. RESULTS Data from 240 patients were collected: 40.42% of patients had a congruent triage while 50% were overtriaged and 9.58% undertriaged. A correct triage led to a lower hospital stay (p < 0.01), while undertriage was not associated with patients' death (p = 0.16). All criteria had a specificity higher than 95%, a total sensitivity of 80.83% and a total positive predictive value of 43.49%. CONCLUSION This study highlighted that the TT activation criteria had high specificity and sensitivity, while the positive predictive value of the criteria was lower. Mechanisms of injury criteria were less specific and sensitive in detecting the TT activation correctly. As nurses play a pivotal role in the triage of traumatized patients and the TT, reduction of under- and overtriage is essential to improve the patients' health outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Simona Frigerio
- Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
| | - Salvatore Lanzarone
- Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
| | - Alessandra Barale
- Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
| | - Maurizio Berardino
- Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
24
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trauma team activation (TTA) represents a considerable expenditure of trauma centre resources. It is mainly triggered by field triage criteria. The overall quality of the criteria may be evaluated based on the rate of over- and undertriage. However, there is no gold standard that defines which adult patients truly require a trauma team. The objective of this study was to develop consensus-based criteria defining the necessity for a trauma team. METHODS A consensus group was formed by trauma specialists experienced in emergency and trauma care with a specific interest in field triage and having previously participated in guideline development. A literature search was conducted to identify criteria that have already been used or suggested. The initial list of criteria was discussed in two Delphi round and two consensus conferences. The entire process of discussion and voting was highly standardized and extensively documented, resulting in a final list of criteria. RESULTS Initially 95 criteria were identified. This was subsequently reduced to 20 final criteria to appropriately indicate the requirement for attendance of a trauma team. The criteria address aspects related to injury severity, admission to an intensive care unit, death within 24 h, need for specified invasive procedures, need for surgical and/or interventional radiological procedures, and abnormal vital signs within a defined time period. CONCLUSIONS The selected criteria may be applied as a tool for research and quality control concerning TTA. However, future studies are necessary to further evaluate for possible redundancy in criteria that may allow for further reduction in criteria.
Collapse
|
|
25
|
The role of emergency medical service providers in the decision-making process of prehospital trauma triage. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2018; 46:131-146. [PMID: 30238385 PMCID: PMC7026224 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-1006-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 10/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Severely injured patients should be treated at higher-level trauma centres, to improve chances of survival and avert life-long disabilities. Emergency medical service (EMS) providers must try to determine injury severity on-scene, using a prehospital trauma triage protocol, and decide the most appropriate type of trauma centre. The objective of this study is to investigate the role of EMS provider judgment in the prehospital triage process of trauma patients, by analysing the compliance rate to the protocol and administering a questionnaire among EMS providers. METHODS All trauma patients transported to a trauma centre in two different regions of the Netherlands were analysed. Compliance rate was based on the number of patients meeting the triage criteria and transported to the corresponding level trauma centre. The questionnaire was administered among EMS providers. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data. RESULTS For adult patients, the compliance rate to the level I criteria of the triage protocol was 72% in Central Netherlands and 42% in Brabant. For paediatric patients, this was 63% and 38% in Central Netherlands and Brabant, respectively. The judgment on injury severity was mostly based on the injury-type criteria. Additionally, the distance to a level I trauma centre influenced the decision for destination facility in the Brabant region. CONCLUSION The compliance rate varied between regions. Improvement of prehospital trauma triage depends on the accuracy of the protocol and compliance rate. A new protocol, including EMS provider judgment, might be the key to improvement in the prehospital trauma triage quality.
Collapse
|
|
26
|
A Comparison Between Differently Skilled Prehospital Emergency Care Providers in Major-Incident Triage in South Africa. Prehosp Disaster Med 2018; 33:575-580. [PMID: 30156169 DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x18000699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
IntroductionMajor-incident triage ensures effective emergency care and utilization of resources. Prehospital emergency care providers are often the first medical professionals to arrive at any major incident and should be competent in primary triage. However, various factors (including level of training) influence their triage performance.Hypothesis/ProblemThe aim of this study was to determine the difference in major-incident triage performance between different training levels of prehospital emergency care providers in South Africa utilizing the Triage Sieve algorithm. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study involving differently trained prehospital providers: Advanced Life Support (ALS); Intermediate Life Support (ILS); and Basic Life Support (BLS). Participants wrote a validated 20-question pre-test before completing major-incident training. Two post-tests were also completed: a 20-question written test and a three-question face-to-face evaluation. Outcomes measured were triage accuracy and duration of triage. The effect of level of training, gender, age, previous major-incident training, and duration of service were determined. RESULTS A total of 129 prehospital providers participated. The mean age was 33.4 years and 65 (50.4%) were male. Most (n=87; 67.4%) were BLS providers. The overall correct triage score pre-training was 53.9% (95% CI, 51.98 to 55.83), over-triage 31.4% (95% CI, 29.66 to 33.2), and under-triage 13.8% (95% CI, 12.55 to 12.22). Post-training, the overall correct triage score increased to 63.6% (95% CI, 61.72 to 65.44), over-triage decreased to 17.9% (95% CI, 16.47 to 19.43), and under-triage increased to 17.8% (95% CI, 16.40 to 19.36). The ALS providers had both the highest likelihood of a correct triage score post-training (odds ratio 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96-1.53) and the shortest duration of triage (median three seconds, interquartile range two to seven seconds; P=.034). Participants with prior major-incident training performed better (P=.001). CONCLUSION Accuracy of major-incident triage across all levels of prehospital providers in South Africa is less than optimal with non-significant differences post-major-incident training. Prior major-incident training played a significant role in triage accuracy indicating that training should be an ongoing process. Although ALS providers were the quickest to complete triage, this difference was not clinically significant. The BLS and ILS providers with major-incident training can thus be utilized for primary major-incident triage allowing ALS providers to focus on more clinical roles. AlenyoAN, SmithWP, McCaulM, Van HovingDJ. A comparison between differently skilled prehospital emergency care providers in major-incident triage in South Africa. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(6):575-580.
Collapse
|
|
27
|
van Rein EAJ, van der Sluijs R, Raaijmaakers AMR, Leenen LPH, van Heijl M. Compliance to prehospital trauma triage protocols worldwide: A systematic review. Injury 2018; 49:1373-1380. [PMID: 30135040 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/01/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Emergency medical services (EMS) providers must determine the injury severity on-scene, using a prehospital trauma triage protocol, and decide on the most appropriate hospital destination for the patient. Many severely injured patients are not transported to higher-level trauma centres. An accurate triage protocol is the base of prehospital trauma triage; however, ultimately the quality is dependent on the destination decision by the EMS provider. The aim of this systematic review is to describe compliance to triage protocols and evaluate compliance to the different categories of triage protocols. METHODS An extensive search of MEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane library was performed to identify all studies, published before May 2018, describing compliance to triage protocols in a trauma system. The search terms were a combination of synonyms for 'compliance,' 'trauma,' and 'triage'. RESULTS After selection, 11 articles were included. The studies showed a variety in compliance rates, ranging from 21% to 93% for triage protocols, and 41% to 94% for the different categories. The compliance rate was highest for the criterion: penetrating injury. The category of the protocol with the lowest compliance rate was: vital signs. Compliance rates were lower for elderly patients, compared to adults under the age of 55. The methodological quality of most studies was poor. One study with good methodological quality showed that the triage protocol identified only a minority of severely injured patients, but many of whom were transported to higher-level trauma centres. CONCLUSIONS The compliance rate ranged from 21% to 94%. Prehospital trauma triage effectiveness could be increased with an accurate triage protocol and improved compliance rates. EMS provider judgment could lower the undertriage rate, especially for severely injured patients meeting none of the criteria. Future research should focus on the improvement of triage protocols and the compliance rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rogier van der Sluijs
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Traumatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht/Zeist/Doorn, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
|
28
|
van Rein EA, van der Sluijs R, Houwert RM, Gunning AC, Lichtveld RA, Leenen LP, van Heijl M. Effectiveness of prehospital trauma triage systems in selecting severely injured patients: Is comparative analysis possible? Am J Emerg Med 2018; 36:1060-1069. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
|
|
29
|
Granström A, Strömmer L, Schandl A, Östlund A. A criteria-directed protocol for in-hospital triage of trauma patients. Eur J Emerg Med 2018; 25:25-31. [PMID: 27043772 PMCID: PMC5753828 DOI: 10.1097/mej.0000000000000397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To better match hospital resources to patients' needs of trauma care, a protocol for facilitating in-hospital triage decisions was implemented at a Swedish level I trauma centre. In the protocol, physiological parameters, anatomical injuries and mechanism of injury were documented, and used to activate full or limited trauma team response. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the criteria-directed protocol to determine in-hospital trauma triage in an emergency department. METHODS Level of triage and triage rates were compared before and after implementation of the protocol. Overtriage and undertriage were assessed with injury severity score higher than 15 as the cutoff for defining major trauma. Medical records for undertriaged patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS In 2011, 78% of 1408 trauma team activations required full trauma response, with an overtriage rate of 74% and an undertriage rate of 7%. In 2013, after protocol implementation, 58% of 1466 trauma team activations required full trauma response. Overtriage was reduced to 52% and undertriage was increased to 10%. However, there were no preventable deaths in the undertriaged patients. CONCLUSION A criteria-directed protocol for use in the emergency department was efficient in reducing overtriage rates without risking undertriaged patients' safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Granström
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Services and Intensive Care Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology
| | - Lovisa Strömmer
- Department of Clinical Science, Division of Surgery, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Insitutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Schandl
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Services and Intensive Care Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology
| | - Anders Östlund
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Surgical Services and Intensive Care Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Injury severity in polytrauma patients is underestimated using the injury severity score: a single-center correlation study in air rescue. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017; 45:83-89. [PMID: 29234837 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-017-0888-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 12/07/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prehospital estimation of injury severity is essential for prehospital therapy, deciding on the destination hospital and the associated emergency room care. The aim of this study was to compare prehospital estimates of the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) by emergency physicians with the values of AIS and ISS of injury severity determined at the conclusion of diagnostics. METHODS In this prospective study, the ISS was determined prehospital by emergency physicians. The validated AIS and ISS were analyzed based on final diagnoses. A Bland-Altman plot was used in analyzing the agreement between two different assays as well as sensitivity and specificity were determined. Confidence intervals were calculated for a Wilson score. Significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS The prehospital ISS was estimated at 26.0 ± 13.0 and was 34.7 ± 16.3 (p < 0.001) after in-hospital validation. In addition, most of the AIS subgroups were significantly higher in the final calculation than preclinically estimated (p < 0.05). When analyzing subgroups of trauma patients (ISS < 16 vs. ISS ≥ 16), we were able to demonstrate a sensitivity of > 90% to identify a multiple-trauma patient. Diagnosing a higher injury severity group (ISS ≥ 25), sensitivity dropped to 61.1%. The Bland-Altman plot demonstrates that injury severity is underestimated in higher injury levels. CONCLUSION Multiple-trauma patients can be identified using the ISS. Anatomic scores might be used for transport decisions; however, an accurate estimation of the injury severity should also be based on other criteria such as patient status, mechanism of injury, and other triage criteria.
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Briet JP, Houwert RM, Smeeing DPJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, Verleisdonk EJ, Leenen LPH, Hietbrink F. Differences in Classification Between Mono- and Polytrauma and Low- and High-Energy Trauma Patients With an Ankle Fracture: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Foot Ankle Surg 2017. [PMID: 28633779 DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Although fracture type and treatment options for ankle fractures are well defined, the differences between mono- and polytrauma patients and low- and high-energy trauma have not been addressed. The aim of the present study was to compare the fracture type and trauma mechanism between mono- and polytrauma and low- and high-energy trauma patients with an ankle fracture. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study. Fractures were classified according to the Lauge-Hansen classification and a descriptive classification. High-energy trauma (HET) was defined using triage criteria. All other patients were classified as having experienced low-energy trauma (LET). The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the injury severity score (ISS). Monotrauma patients were defined as patients with an ISS of 4 to 11 with an isolated ankle fracture or an ankle fracture with a minor contusion or laceration. Polytrauma patients were defined as patients with an ISS of ≥16 with ≥2 body regions involved. Patients with an ISS from 12 to 15 were excluded. A total of 96 patients were eligible for analysis. Of the 96 patients, 62 had experienced monotrauma and 34 had experienced polytrauma. A significant difference was found between the mono- and polytrauma patients in the Lauge-Hansen classification (p < .001). Monotrauma patients had a high incidence of an isolated supination external rotation injury. Supination adduction and pronation abduction injuries were more often observed in polytrauma patients. The same pattern was observed for ankle fractures after HET compared with LET (p < .001), because all pronation abduction and supination adduction injuries were observed after a HET mechanism. The results of the present study indicate that polytrauma patients sustain different types of ankle fractures than patients with an isolated ankle fracture. This difference likely results from the high-energy transfer associated with polytrauma, because pronation abduction and supination adduction injuries were only observed after HET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Paul Briet
- PhD Candidate, Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Scientific Staff Member, Clinical Research Unit, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Egbert Jan Verleisdonk
- Orthopedic Trauma Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Professor in Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeon, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
Oteir AO, Smith K, Stoelwinder JU, Cox S, Middleton JW, Jennings PA. The epidemiology of pre-hospital potential spinal cord injuries in Victoria, Australia: a six year retrospective cohort study. Inj Epidemiol 2016; 3:25. [PMID: 27747560 PMCID: PMC5065940 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-016-0089-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 09/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (TSCI) is relatively uncommon, yet a devastating and costly condition. Despite the human and social impacts, studies describing patients with potential TSCI in the pre-hospital setting are scarce. This paper aims to describe the epidemiology of patients potentially at risk of or suspected to have a TSCI by paramedics, with a view to providing a better understanding of factors associated with potential TSCI. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients managed and transported by Ambulance Victoria (AV) between 01 January 2007 and 31 December 2012 who, based on meeting pre-hospital triage protocols and criteria for spinal clearance, paramedic suspicion or spinal immobilisation, were classified to be at risk of or suspected to have a TSCI. Data was extracted from the AV data warehouse, including demographic details, trauma aetiology, paramedic assessment, management and other event characteristics. RESULTS A total of 106,059cases were included in the study, representing 2.3 % of all emergency transports by AV. Subjects had a median age of 51 years (interquartile range; 29-78) and 52.4 % were males (95 % CI 52-52.7). Males were significantly younger than females (M: 43 years [26-65] vs. F: 64 years [36-84], p =0.001). Falls and traffic accidents were the leading causes of injuries, comprising 46.9 and 39.4 % of cases, respectively. Other causes included accidents due to sport, animals, industrial work and diving, as well as violence and hanging. 29.9 % of patients were transported to a Major Trauma Service (MTS). A proportion of 48.8 % of the study population met the Pre-hospital Major Trauma criteria. CONCLUSION This is the first study to describe the epidemiology of potential TSCI in Australia and is based on a large, state-wide sample. It provides background knowledge and a baseline for future research, as well as a reference point for future in policy. Falling and traffic related injuries were the leading causes of potential SCI. Future research is required to identify the proportion of confirmed TSCI among the potentials and factors associated with TSCI in prehospital settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala'a O Oteir
- Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Building 3, 270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Karen Smith
- Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Johannes U Stoelwinder
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shelley Cox
- Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James W Middleton
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St Leonards and Sydney Medical School-Northern, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul A Jennings
- Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Monash University, Building 3, 270 Ferntree Gully Road, Notting Hill, VIC, 3168, Australia. .,Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Emergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Kuo SCH, Kuo PJ, Hsu SY, Rau CS, Chen YC, Hsieh HY, Hsieh CH. The use of the reverse shock index to identify high-risk trauma patients in addition to the criteria for trauma team activation: a cross-sectional study based on a trauma registry system. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e011072. [PMID: 27329440 PMCID: PMC4916635 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2016] [Revised: 05/26/2016] [Accepted: 05/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The presentation of decrease blood pressure with tachycardia is usually an indicator of significant blood loss. In this study, we used the reverse shock index (RSI), a ratio of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to heart rate (HR), to evaluate the haemodynamic status of trauma patients. As an SBP lower than the HR (RSI<1) may indicate haemodynamic instability, the objective of this study was to assess whether RSI<1 can help to identify high-risk patients with potential shock and poor outcome, even though these patients do not yet meet the criteria for multidisciplinary trauma team activation (TTA). DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS We retrospectively reviewed the data of 20 106 patients obtained from the trauma registry system of a level I trauma centre for trauma admissions from January 2009 through December 2014. Patients for whom a trauma team was not activated (regular patients) and who had RSI<1 were compared with regular patients with RSI≥1. The ORs of the associated conditions and injuries were calculated with 95% CIs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES In-hospital mortality. RESULTS Among regular patients with RSI<1, significantly more patients had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥25 (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.62; p<0.001) and the mortality rate was also higher (2.1% vs 0.5%; OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.10 to 7.08; p<0.001) than in regular patients with RSI≥1. The intensive care unit length of stay was longer in regular patients with RSI<1 than in regular patients with RSI≥1. CONCLUSIONS Among patients who did not reach the criteria for TTA, RSI<1 indicates a potentially worse outcome and a requirement for more attention and aggressive care in the emergency department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spencer C H Kuo
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Pao-Jen Kuo
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shiun-Yuan Hsu
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Shyuan Rau
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chun Chen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Yun Hsieh
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Hua Hsieh
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Ferree S, Houwert RM, van Laarhoven JJEM, Smeeing DPJ, Leenen LPH, Hietbrink F. Tertiary survey in polytrauma patients should be an ongoing process. Injury 2016; 47:792-6. [PMID: 26699429 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Revised: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 11/22/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Due to prioritisation in the initial trauma care, non-life threatening injuries can be overlooked or temporally neglected. Polytrauma patients in particular might be at risk for delayed diagnosed injuries (DDI). Studies that solely focus on DDI in polytrauma patients are not available. Therefore the aim of this study was to analyze DDI and determine risk factors associated with DDI in polytrauma patients. METHODS In this single centre retrospective cohort study, patients were considered polytrauma when the Injury Severity Score was ≥ 16 as a result of injury in at least 2 body regions. Adult polytrauma patients admitted from 2007 until 2012 were identified. Hospital charts were reviewed to identify DDI. RESULTS 1416 polytrauma patients were analyzed of which 12% had DDI. Most DDI were found during initial hospital admission after tertiary survey (63%). Extremities were the most affected regions for all types of DDI (78%) with the highest intervention rate (35%). Most prevalent DDI were fractures of the hand (54%) and foot (38%). In 2% of all patients a DDI was found after discharge, consisting mainly of injuries other than a fracture. High energy trauma mechanism (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7), abdominal injury (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1) and extremity injuries found during initial assessment (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.6-3.3) were independent risk factors for DDI. CONCLUSION In polytrauma patients, most DDI were found during hospital admission but after tertiary survey. This demonstrates that the tertiary survey should be an ongoing process and thus repeated daily in polytrauma patients. Most frequent DDI were extremity injuries, especially injuries of the hand and foot.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Ferree
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Diederik P J Smeeing
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Luke P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Falco Hietbrink
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Terrible triad injury (TTI), one of the main patterns of complex elbow instability, is difficult to treat and yields conflicting surgical results. We analyzed prospectively a series of patient affected by TTI and treated according to the current diagnostic and surgical protocols to investigate whether their application allow to obtain more predictable outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed 26 patients with a mean age of 52 years. Preoperative X-rays and CT were performed; all patients were operated by the same elbow surgeon and underwent the same surgical and rehabilitation treatment. Final functional outcome was assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Quick-Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand-score (Q-DASH) and the modified-American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (m-Ases). A radiographic evaluation was also performed. RESULTS Mean follow-up was 31 months. At final evaluation, mean flexion, extension, supination and pronation were 137°, 10°, 77° and 79°, respectively; mean MEPS, m-ASES and Q-DASH scores were respectively 96, 91 and 8 points. Complications observed after first surgery were: elbow stiffness in 5 cases, mild posterolateral instability in 3 cases, chronic subluxation in 1 case. Radiographic evaluation showed secondary arthritis in 9 cases, symptomatic HO in 3 cases and late hardware displacement in 2 cases. Six out of 26 patient underwent reoperation with final satisfactory results. CONCLUSION The current diagnostic and therapeutic protocols allow obtaining satisfactory clinical outcomes in majority of cases but a high number of major and minor unpredictable complications persist yet. In this series, low compliance, obesity, and extensive soft elbow tissue damage caused by high-energy trauma represented negative prognostic factors unrelated to surgery. On the other hand, the strict application of current algorithms by an expert elbow surgeon appears to improve clinical results by reducing the influence of other avoidable negative prognostic factors well known in current literature, such as the incomplete recognition of injuries, delayed treatment, inadequate treatment of bony and ligamentous injuries, prolonged immobilization and, last but not least, the surgeon's inexperience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, Case series, Treatment study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Giannicola
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Piergiorgio Calella
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Piccioli
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Scacchi
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Gumina
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
36
|
Bouzat P, Ageron FX, Brun J, Levrat A, Berthet M, Rancurel E, Thouret JM, Thony F, Arvieux C, Payen JF. A regional trauma system to optimize the pre-hospital triage of trauma patients. CRITICAL CARE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CRITICAL CARE FORUM 2015; 19:111. [PMID: 25887150 PMCID: PMC4403891 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0835-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pre-hospital triage is a key element in a trauma system that aims to admit patients to the most suitable trauma center, and may decrease intra-hospital mortality. We evaluated the performance of a pre-hospital procedure in a regional trauma system through measurements of the quality of pre-hospital medical assessment and the efficacy of a triage protocol. METHODS Our regional trauma system included 13 hospitals categorized as Level I, II or III trauma centers according to their technical facilities. Each patient was graded A, B or C by an emergency physician, according to the seriousness of their injuries at presentation on scene. The triage was performed according to this grading and the categorization of centers. This study is a registry analysis of a three-year period (2009 to 2011). RESULTS Of the 3,428 studied patients, 2,572 were graded using the pre-hospital grading system (Graded group). The pre-hospital gradation was closely related with injury severity score (ISS) and intra-hospital mortality rate. The triage protocol had a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90% to 93%) and a specificity of 41% (95% CI 39% to 44%) to predict adequate admission of patients with ISS more than 15. A total of 856 patients were not graded at the scene (Non-graded group). Undertriage rate was significantly reduced in the Graded group compared with the Non-graded group, with a relative risk of 0.47 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.56) according to the definition of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (P <0.001). Where adjusted for trauma severity, the expected mortality rate at discharge from hospital was higher than observed mortality, with a difference of +2.0% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.6%; P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a regional trauma system with a pre-hospital triage procedure was effective in detecting severe trauma patients and in lowering the rate of pre-hospital undertriage. A beneficial effect on outcome of such an organization is suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Bouzat
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Grenoble University Hospital, Hôpital Albert Michallon, BP 217, F-38043, Grenoble, France. .,Grenoble Alps University, F-38000, Grenoble, France.
| | | | - Julien Brun
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Grenoble University Hospital, Hôpital Albert Michallon, BP 217, F-38043, Grenoble, France.
| | - Albrice Levrat
- Department of Critical Care, Annecy Hospital, F-74000, Annecy, France.
| | - Marion Berthet
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Grenoble University Hospital, Hôpital Albert Michallon, BP 217, F-38043, Grenoble, France.
| | - Elisabeth Rancurel
- Emergency Medical Service, Grenoble University Hospital, Hôpital Albert Michallon, BP 217, F-38043, Grenoble, France.
| | - Jean-Marc Thouret
- Department of Critical Care, Chambery Hospital, F-73000, Chambery, France.
| | - Frederic Thony
- Department of Medical Imaging, Grenoble University Hospital, Hôpital Albert Michallon, BP 217, F-38043, Grenoble, France.
| | - Catherine Arvieux
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Grenoble University Hospital, Hôpital Albert Michallon, BP 217, F-38043, Grenoble, France.
| | - Jean-François Payen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Grenoble University Hospital, Hôpital Albert Michallon, BP 217, F-38043, Grenoble, France. .,Grenoble Alps University, F-38000, Grenoble, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
37
|
van Laarhoven JJEM, van Lammeren GW, Houwert RM, van Laarhoven CJHCM, Hietbrink F, Leenen LPH, Verleisdonk EJMM. Isolated hip fracture care in an inclusive trauma system: A trauma system wide evaluation. Injury 2015; 46:1042-6. [PMID: 25769200 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2014] [Accepted: 02/17/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Elderly patients with a hip fracture represent a large proportion of the trauma population; however, little is known about outcome differences between different levels of trauma care for these patients. The aim of this study is to analyse the outcome of trauma care in patients with a hip fracture within our inclusive trauma system. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective cohort study. Data were collected from the electronic patient documentation of patients, with an isolated hip fracture (aged ≥ 60), admitted to a level I or level II trauma centre between January 2008 and December 2012. Main outcomes were time to operative treatment, complications, mortality, and secondary surgical intervention rate. RESULTS A total of 204 (level I) and 1425 (level II) patients were admitted. Significantly more ASA4 patients, by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, were treated at the level I trauma centre. At the level II trauma centre, median time to surgical treatment was shorter (0 days; IQR 0-1 vs 1 day; IQR 1-2; P < 0.001), which was mainly influenced by postponement due to lack of operation room availability (14%, n = 28) and co-morbidities (13%, n = 26) present at the level I trauma centre. At the level II trauma centre, hospital stay was shorter (9 vs 11 days; P < 0.001) and the complication rate was lower (41%; n = 590 vs 53%; n = 108; P = 0.002), as was mortality (4%; n = 54 vs 7%; n = 15; P = 0.018). Secondary surgical intervention was performed less often at the level II trauma centre (6%; n = 91 vs 12%; n = 24; P = 0.005). However, no differences in secondary surgical procedures due to inadequate postoperative outcome or implant failure were observed. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE The clinical pathway and the large volume of patients at the level II centre resulted in earlier surgical intervention, lower overall complication and mortality rate, and a shorter length of stay. Therefore, the elderly patient with a hip fracture should ideally be treated in the large-volume level II hospital with a pre-established clinical pathway. However, complex patients requiring specific care that can only be provided at the level I trauma centre may be treated there with similar operative results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - G W van Lammeren
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R M Houwert
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Trauma Care Central Netherlands, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - F Hietbrink
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - L P H Leenen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
38
|
Hornez E, Maurin O, Mayet A, Monchal T, Gonzalez F, Kerebel D. French pre-hospital trauma triage criteria: Does the “pre-hospital resuscitation” criterion provide additional benefit in triage? World J Crit Care Med 2014; 3:68-73. [PMID: 25379459 PMCID: PMC4221188 DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i3.68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2014] [Revised: 06/21/2014] [Accepted: 07/29/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the performance of the specific French Vittel “Pre-Hospital (PH) resuscitation” criteria in selecting polytrauma patients during the pre-hospital stage and its potential to increase the positive predictive value (PPV) of pre-hospital trauma triage.
METHODS: This was a monocentric prospective cohort study of injured adults transported by emergency medical service to a trauma center. Patients who met any of the field trauma triage criteria were considered “triage positive”. Hospital data was statistically linked to pre-hospital records. The primary outcome of defining a “major trauma patient” was Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16.
RESULTS: There were a total of 200 injured patients evaluated over a 2 years period who met at least 1 triage criterion. The number of false positives was 64 patients (ISS < 16). The PPV was 68%. The sensitivity and the negative predictive value could not be evaluated in this study since it only included patients with positive Vittel criteria. The criterion of “PH resuscitation” was present for 64 patients (32%), but 10 of them had an ISS < 16. This was statistically significant in correlation with the severity of the trauma in univariate analysis (OR = 7.2; P = 0.005; 95%CI: 1.6-31.6). However, despite this correlation the overall PPV was not significantly increased by the use of the criterion “PH resuscitation” (68% vs 67.8%).
CONCLUSION: The criterion of “pre-hospital resuscitation” was statistically significant with the severity of the trauma, but did not increase the PPV. The use of “pre-hospital resuscitation” criterion could be re-considered if these results are confirmed by larger studies.
Collapse
|