Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Pediatr. Jun 9, 2026; 15(2): 118424
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i2.118424
Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i2.118424
Table 1 Rome IV criteria
| Rome IV criteria for pediatric functional constipation |
| From infants to 4-year-old children |
| A child with FC must have 1 month of at least 2 of the following or 2 or fewer stooling a week and a history of |
| Excessive stool retention |
| Painful or hard stooling |
| Large-diameter stools |
| Large fecal mass in the rectum |
| In children trained in the toilet, additional points are added to the criteria |
| At least one episode per week of stool incontinence after being trained in toileting |
| History of large-diameter stools that may obstruct the toilet |
Table 2 Demographic data and family status, n (%)
| Data | Functional constipation (n = 43) | Non-functional constipation (n = 232) | P valve |
| Age, month (mean ± SD) | 30.1 ± 11.9 | 21.2 ± 12.2 | < 0.001a |
| Male | 19 (44.2) | 102 (44.0) | 1.000 |
| Body weight, kg (mean ± SD) | 12.8 ± 3.8 | 11.3 ± 3.2 | 0.009a |
| Single family | 17 (39.6) | 77 (33.2) | 0.484 |
| Main caregiver: Mother | 30 (69.8) | 153 (66.0) | 0.507 |
| Main caregiver educational level | 0.248 | ||
| Mandatory | 14 (32.56) | 95 (40.96) | |
| Bechalor | 26 (60.47) | 108 (46.55) | |
| > Bechalor | 3 (6.98) | 29 (12.50) | |
| Family status | 0.794 | ||
| Together | 38 (88.4) | 207 (89.2) | |
| Separated | 5 (11.6) | 25 (10.8) | |
| Family income | 0.186 | ||
| Low income (< 30000 baht/month) | 16 (37.2) | 113 (48.7) | |
| First-degree relative with a history of constipation | 12 (27.9) | 29 (12.5) | 0.017a |
Table 3 Results from the questionnaire on bowel habits in the Rome IV criteria, n (%)
| Description | Total (n = 275) | Functional constipation (n = 43) | Non-functional constipation (n = 232) |
| Bristol stool chart | 275 (100) | ||
| 1-2 (hard) | 25 (9.1) | 21 (48.8) | 4 (1.7) |
| 3-5 (normal) | 215 (78.2) | 14 (32.6) | 201 (86.6) |
| 6-7 (loose/liquid) | 35 (12.7) | 8 (18.6) | 27 (11.6) |
| Defecation frequency | 275 (100) | ||
| < 3 × /week | 7 (2.5) | 5 (11.6) | 2 (0.9) |
| 3-6 × /week | 75 (27.3) | 24 (55.8) | 51 (22) |
| Daily | 118 (43) | 10 (23.3) | 108 (46.6) |
| 2-3 × /day | 71 (25.8) | 4 (9.3) | 67 (28.9) |
| > 3 × /day | 4 (1.5) | 0 | 4 (1.7) |
| Stool consistency | 275 (100) | ||
| Hard | 25 (9.1) | 21 (48.8) | 4 (1.7) |
| Normal | 146 (53.1) | 12 (27.9) | 134 (57.8) |
| Soft | 65 (23.6) | 2 (4.7) | 63 (27.2) |
| Mucous | 4 (1.5) | 0 | 4 (1.7) |
| Liquid | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alternating mucous and liquid | 35 (12.7) | 8 (18.6) | 27 (11.6) |
| Painful defecation | 266 (100) | ||
| Yes | 45 (16.9) | 32 (76.2) | 13 (5.8) |
| No | 221 (83) | 10 (23.8) | 211 (94.2) |
| Large diameter stool | 275 (100) | ||
| Yes | 35 (12.7) | 30 (70) | 5 (2.2) |
| No | 240 (87.3) | 13 (30.2) | 227 (97.8) |
| Withholding behavior | 263 (100) | ||
| Never | 220 (83.7) | 12 (32.4) | 208 (92) |
| 1-3 times/month | 24 (9.1) | 13 (35.1) | 11 (4.9) |
| > 1 time/week | 19 (7.2) | 12 (32.4) | 7 (3.1) |
| Fecal incontinence | 91 (100) | ||
| Never | 66 (72.5) | 11 (50) | 55 (79.7) |
| < 1 time/month | 16 (17.6) | 5 (22.7) | 11 (16.0) |
| 1-3 times/month | 8 (8.8) | 5 (22.7) | 3 (4.4) |
| > 1 time/week | 1 (1.1) | 1 (4.6) | 0 |
| Stools obstruct the toilet | 91 (100) | ||
| Yes | 3 (3.3) | 2 (9.1) | 1 (6.5) |
| No | 88 (96.7) | 20 (90.9) | 68 (98.6) |
Table 4 Screening characteristics of the Bristol stool chart compared to Rome IV functional constipation
| Parameter | Result | 95%CI |
| Sensitivity (%) | 48.8 | 33.3-64.5 |
| Specificity (%) | 98.3 | 95.6-99.5 |
| Positive predictive value (%) | 84 | 63.9-95.5 |
| Negative predictive value (%) | 91.2 | 87.0-94.4 |
| Positive likelihood ratio | 28.3 | 10.2-78.4 |
| Negative likelihood ratio | 0.5 | 0.4-0.7 |
- Citation: Ounboontham K, Ngoenmak T. Evaluating the role of the Bristol stool chart in diagnosing functional constipation in pediatric populations. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(2): 118424
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i2/118424.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v15.i2.118424