Published online Jun 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v15.i2.118424
Revised: February 9, 2026
Accepted: March 16, 2026
Published online: June 9, 2026
Processing time: 128 Days and 1.3 Hours
Functional constipation (FC) is a common condition among children worldwide. Although the Rome IV criteria are diagnostic standard, evaluating infants and toddlers can be challenging. The Bristol stool chart (BSC) is a simple tool for describing stool consistency, but its diagnostic accuracy in young children is uncertain.
To compare the diagnostic performance of the BSC and Rome IV criteria in chil
A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2025 to October 2025 among children aged 6 months to 4 years attending well-child visits at the Hospital. Parents completed validated Thai versions of the Rome IV questionnaire and the BSC. FC was diagnosed using the Rome IV criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the BSC were calculated.
Among 275 children enrolled, 43 (15.6%) met the Rome IV criteria for FC. The FC group had a significantly higher mean age than the non-FC group (30.1 ± 11.9 months vs 21.2 ± 12.2 months, P < 0.001). A family history of constipation was associated with increased FC prevalence (P = 0.017). On the BSC, stool types 1-2 indicated constipation. Compared with the Rome IV criteria, the BSC demon
The BSC shows high specificity but low sensitivity in young children; stool types 1-2 support FC and are best used to confirm diagnosis alongside the Rome IV criteria.
Core Tip: Stool assessment tools are essential for evaluating pediatric constipation. The Bristol stool chart (BSC) is widely used but has limitations when applied to young children. BSC use should be integrated with clinical judgment and other diagnostic criteria, such as the Rome IV criteria. The BSC exhibits the highest accuracy when classifying stools at the extremes. BSC types 1-2 may serve as supportive indicators for confirming functional constipation.