Published online Sep 9, 2026. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.119386
Revised: February 7, 2026
Accepted: March 17, 2026
Published online: September 9, 2026
Processing time: 186 Days and 16.8 Hours
Neonatal heart rate (HR) is an important parameter in the evaluation of newborn health and viability in the immediate postnatal period.
To evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and clinical applicability of emerging non-contact and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted HR monitoring technologies in neonates compared to conventional electrocardiography (ECG)-based systems.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases from January 2013 through June 2025 following PRISMA guidelines.
The analysis revealed a progressive shift from contact-based ECG and pulse oximetry to camera-based photoplethysmography, thermal imaging, and AI-enhanced multimodal systems. These newer methods demonstrated a strong correlation with ECG readings, rapid signal acquisition, and improved robustness against motion and lighting variability.
Emerging non-contact, AI-assisted HR monitoring technologies offer accurate, safe, and efficient alternatives for neonatal care, supporting faster clinical decisions and improved outcomes. Future multicenter studies are required to validate accuracy and confirm clinical utility before routine clinical implementation.
Core Tip: Electrocardiography (ECG) remains the reference standard for neonatal heart rate (HR) measurement, providing the fastest and most accurate detection during resuscitation. Limitations include electrode placement delays, skin fragility, and motion artifacts. Existing contact-based methods such as auscultation, palpation, and pulse oximetry are widely used but have limitations such as reduced reliability and dependency on perfusion, especially in preterm or unstable neonates. Emerging non-contact and artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced technologies, including camera-based photoplethysmography, thermal imaging, Doppler, and multimodal AI systems, demonstrate promising accuracy compared with ECG,with faster signal acquisition and improved robustness against motion and lighting variability. This systematic review (2013 –2025) highlights the shift toward safe, contact-free, real-time HR monitoring while noting limited evidence during critical neonatal resuscitation scenarios.