Background/Objectives: Small bowel tumors (SBTs) encompass a diverse range of tumor types, with benign tumors being the most prevalent. However, the incidence of malignant SBTs is increasing, particularly small bowel adenocarcinoma; this poses a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and radiologists due to the varied and nonspecific clinical and radiological presentations associated with SBTs. In fact, SBTs can present differently in emergencies, often mimicking inflammatory diseases or manifesting as complications such as intussusception, small bowel obstruction (SBO), intestinal ischemia, perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding, or metastatic disease. These tumors can remain asymptomatic for extended periods. Methods: We present a pictorial review on the role of imaging in evaluating SBTs, focusing on the emergency setting where diagnosis can be incidental. We also include some representative cases that may be useful for radiologists and residents in clinical practice. Results: Despite these challenges, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is usually the best modality to use in emergencies for evaluating SBTs, and in some cases, a diagnosis can be made incidentally. However, when possible, multimodal imaging through cross-sectional imaging remains crucial for the non-invasive diagnosis of SBTs in stable patients, as endoscopic procedures may also be impractical. A complementary CT study with distension using negative oral contrast media, such as water, polyethylene glycol, or mannitol solutions, can improve the characterization of SBTs and rule out multiple SBT locations, particularly in small bowel neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and gastrointestinal tumor (GIST) localization. Positive water-soluble iodine-based oral contrast, such as Gastrografin (GGF), can be used to evaluate and monitor the intestinal lumen during the nonsurgical management of small bowel obstruction (SBO) or in suspected cases of small bowel perforations or the presence of fistulas. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) can aid in improving the characterization of SBTs through a multiplanar and multisequence study. Positron emission tomography combined with CT is generally an essential modality in evaluating metastatic disease and staging and assessing tumor prognosis, but it has limitations for indolent lymphoma and small NETs. Conclusions: Therefore, the integration of multiple imaging modalities can improve patient management and provide a preoperative risk assessment with prognostic and predictive indicators. In the future, radiomics could potentially serve as a "virtual biopsy" for SBTs, allowing for better diagnosis and more personalized management in precision medicine.

This article extends on the use of transabdominal intestinal ultrasound in diagnosing pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Some of the more essential features used in assessing bowel inflammation, such as hyperemia and wall thickness on ultrasound, are expanded upon from the publication on imaging and endoscopic tools in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) affect over 4.9 million individuals worldwide. Colonoscopy (CS) is the gold-standard technique for diagnosis. The remissive-recurrent pattern of evolution raises the need for non-invasive techniques to monitor disease activity. This review aims to present the advantages of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) in managing IBDs. Our search was conducted on the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane (CENTRAL) databases, selecting original studies comparing IUS with other imaging and invasive monitoring methods. Our search yielded 8654 results, of which 107 met the inclusion criteria. Increased bowel wall thickness (BWT) and colour Doppler signal (CDS) are discriminative for disease activity. IUS can predict disease outcomes and detect response to treatment or postoperative recurrence. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and elastography help differentiate fibrotic from inflammatory stenoses. The difficult rectal assessment limits the use of IUS in ulcerative colitis (UC). Transmural healing may develop as a therapeutic target as it is associated with better outcomes. Patients are compliant with this technique, and its results correlate well with CS and other imaging methods. In conclusion, IUS proves to be essential in assessing IBD activity and treatment response, predicting outcomes and detecting complications. CEUS and elastography are researched to improve the diagnostic values of IUS.