Baik UB, Bayome M, Han KH, Park JH, Jung MH, Kook YA. Evaluation of factors affecting the success rate of orthodontic mini-implants by survival analysis. World J Stomatol 2013; 2(3): 56-61 [DOI: 10.5321/wjs.v2.i3.56]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Dr. Yoon-Ah Kook, Department of Orthodontics, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-Dong, Seocho-Gu, Seoul 137-701, South Korea. kook190036@yahoo.com
Research Domain of This Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Article-Type of This Article
Brief Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Stomatol. Aug 20, 2013; 2(3): 56-61 Published online Aug 20, 2013. doi: 10.5321/wjs.v2.i3.56
Table 1 Mini-implants’ success and failure rates, and ORs statistics by host variables n (%)
Variables
Success
Failure
Total
P-value
OR (95%CI)
Gender
0.231
Male
96 (84.96)
17 (15.04)
113
Female
252 (89.36)
30 (10.64)
282
0.762 (0.354, 1.274)
Jaw
0.019
Maxilla
199 (91.71)
18 (8.29)
217
Mandible
149 (83.71)
29 (16.29)
178
2.152 (1.151, 4.021)
R/L side
0.877
Left
117 (88.50)
23 (11.50)
200
Right
171 (87.69)
24 (12.31)
195
1.080 (0.587, 1.986)
Age
0.973
< 20
106 (87.60)
15 (12.40)
121
20-30
204 (88.31)
27 (11.69)
231
0.935 (0.477, 1.834)
> 30
38 (88.37)
5 (11.63)
43
0.930 (0.316, 2.732)
Gingival tissue
< 0.001
AG
165 (94.29)
10 (5.71)
175
0.367 (0.163, 3.204)
MGJ
109 (85.83)
18 (14.17)
127
2.724 (1.212, 6.124)
MM
73 (79.35)
19 (20.65)
92
4.294 (1.903, 9.689)
1.576 (0.775, 3.204)
Table 2 Distribution of mini-implants according to gingival tissue type at the placement site in maxilla and mandible n (%)
Mandible
Maxilla
P-value
Total
Failed
Total
Failed
Attached gingiva
34 (19.1)
4 (11.8)
141 (65.3)
6 (4.3)
Mucogingival junction
78 (43.8)
11 (14.1)
49 (22.7)
7 (14.3)
< 0.001
Mucous membrane
66 (37.1)
14 (21.2)
26 (12.0)
5 (19.2)
Table 3 Independent comparison of failure rate between maxilla and mandible according to gingival tissue type n (%)
Variables
Success
Failure
Total
P-value
OR (95%CI)
Attached gingiva
0.105
Maxilla
135 (95.74)
6 (4.26)
141
Mandible
30 (88.24)
4 (11.76)
34
3.000 (0.797, 11.293)
Mucogingival junction
1
Maxilla
42 (85.71)
7 (14.29)
49
Mandible
67 (85.90)
11 (14.10)
78
0.985 (0.354, 2.740)
Mucous membrane
1
Maxilla
21 (80.77)
5 (19.23)
26
Mandible
52 (78.79)
14 (21.21)
66
1.131 (0.362, 3.535)
Table 4 Regression analysis of factors affecting the failure rate of min-implants
Beta
SE
Wald
P-value
Exp (B)
95%CI of Exp (B)
Gender
0.444
0.124
12.744
< 0.001
1.559
1.222-1.989
Jaw
0.107
0.109
0.956
0.358
1.113
0.898-1.378
R/L Side
-0.031
0.107
0.085
0.771
0.969
0.785-1.196
Age
-0.027
0.084
0.101
0.751
0.974
0.826-1.148
Gingival tissue
0.162
0.069
5.512
0.012
1.176
1.027-1.347
Citation: Baik UB, Bayome M, Han KH, Park JH, Jung MH, Kook YA. Evaluation of factors affecting the success rate of orthodontic mini-implants by survival analysis. World J Stomatol 2013; 2(3): 56-61