|
1
|
van Overdam KA, Missotten T, Spielberg LH. Updated cannulation technique for tissue plasminogen activator injection into peripapillary retinal vein for central retinal vein occlusion. Acta Ophthalmol 2015; 93:739-44. [PMID: 26310993 DOI: 10.1111/aos.12830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2015] [Accepted: 07/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To update the surgical technique in which a vitrectomy is performed and a retinal branch vein is cannulated and infused with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (RTPA) to treat central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in patients who present with very low visual acuity (VA). METHODS Twelve consecutive patients (12 eyes) with CRVO and low VA (logMAR >1.00) at presentation were treated using this method. RESULTS Cannulation of a peripapillary retinal vein and stable injection of RTPA was successfully performed without surgery-related complications in all 12 eyes. At 12 months after surgery, 8 of the 12 patients (67%) experienced at least one line of improvement in best corrected visual acuity; 6 of the 12 (50%) improved ≥5 lines and 2 (17%) improved ≥8 lines. After additional grid laser and/or subconjunctival or intravitreal corticosteroids, the mean decrease in central foveal thickness was 260 μm, and the mean total macular volume decreased from 12.10 mm(3) to 9.24 mm(3) . Four patients received panretinal photocoagulation to treat either iris neovascularization (n = 2) or neovascularization of the retina and/or disc (n = 2). CONCLUSION Administration of RTPA via a peripapillary vein using this updated technique provides an alternative or additional treatment option for patients with very low VA after CRVO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koen A. van Overdam
- The Rotterdam Eye Hospital; Rotterdam the Netherlands
- The Rotterdam Ophthalmic Institute; Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - Tom Missotten
- The Rotterdam Eye Hospital; Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Increased expression of angiogenic and inflammatory proteins in the vitreous of patients with ischemic central retinal vein occlusion. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0126859. [PMID: 25978399 PMCID: PMC4433200 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2014] [Accepted: 04/08/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a common disease characterized by a disrupted retinal blood supply and a high risk of subsequent vision loss due to retinal edema and neovascular disease. This study was designed to assess the concentrations of selected signaling proteins in the vitreous and blood of patients with ischemic CRVO. Methods Vitreous and blood samples were collected from patients undergoing surgery for ischemic CRVO (radial optic neurotomy (RON), n = 13), epiretinal gliosis or macular hole (control group, n = 13). Concentrations of 40 different proteins were determined by an ELISA-type antibody microarray. Results Expression of proteins enriched in the vitreous (CCL2, IGFBP2, MMP10, HGF, TNFRSF11B (OPG)) was localized by immunohistochemistry in eyes of patients with severe ischemic CRVO followed by secondary glaucoma. Vitreal expression levels were higher in CRVO patients than in the control group (CRVO / control; p < 0.05) for ADIPOQ (13.6), ANGPT2 (20.5), CCL2 (MCP1) (3.2), HGF (4.7), IFNG (13.9), IGFBP1 (14.7), IGFBP2 (1.8), IGFBP3 (4.1), IGFBP4 (1.7), IL6 (10.8), LEP (3.4), MMP3 (4.3), MMP9 (3.6), MMP10 (5.4), PPBP (CXCL7 or NAP2) (11.8), TIMP4 (3.8), and VEGFA (85.3). In CRVO patients, vitreal levels of CCL2 (4.2), HGF (23.3), IGFBP2 (1.23), MMP10 (2.47), TNFRSF11B (2.96), and VEGFA (29.2) were higher than the blood levels (vitreous / blood, p < 0.05). Expression of CCL2, IGFBP2, MMP10, HGF, and TNFRSF11B was preferentially localized to the retina and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Conclusion Proteins related to hypoxia, angiogenesis, and inflammation were significantly elevated in the vitreous of CRVO patients. Moreover, some markers known to indicate atherosclerosis may be related to a basic vascular disease underlying RVO. This would imply that local therapeutic targeting might not be sufficient for a long term therapy in a systemic disease but hypothetically reduce local changes as an initial therapeutic approach.
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Keren S, Loewenstein A, Coscas G. Pathogenesis, prevention, diagnosis and management of retinal vein occlusion. World J Ophthalmol 2014; 4:92-112. [DOI: 10.5318/wjo.v4.i4.92] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2014] [Revised: 08/26/2014] [Accepted: 09/17/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second vascular retinal cause of visual loss and defined by the occlusion of a retinal vein. It is divided into branch retinal vein occlusion or central retinal vein occlusion, depending on the location of occlusion. RVO has severe medical, financial and social implications on the patients. The diagnosis of the disease is easier nowadays with the use of spectral domain optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography. The treatment options for RVO have changed dramatically over the past few years with the introduction of the intravitreal injections of dexamethasone (Ozurdex), bevacizumab (Avastin), ranibizumab (Lucentis) and aflibercept (EYLEA), along with the panretinal laser photocoagulation, abandoning former treatment modalities and surgical solution. This manuscript is a review of current literature about RVO with emphasize on the pathophysiology, risk factors and prevention, diagnosis and sub-group categorization and treatments including medical and surgical. Since no official guidelines are available for the treatment of RVO patients, and considering the latest developments in the treatment options, and the variety of follow-up and treatment modalities, this manuscript aims to provide tools and knowledge to guide the physician in treating RVO patients, based on the latest publications from the literature and on several of the patients characteristics.
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Braithwaite T, Nanji AA, Lindsley K, Greenberg PB, Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD007325. [PMID: 24788977 PMCID: PMC4292843 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007325.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a relatively common retinal vascular disorder in which macular oedema may develop, with a consequent reduction in visual acuity. Until recently there has been no treatment of proven benefit, but growing evidence supports the use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. OBJECTIVES To investigate the effectiveness and safety of anti-VEGF therapies for the treatment of macular oedema secondary to CRVO. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 10), Ovid MEDLINE (January 1950 to October 2013), EMBASE (January 1980 to October 2013), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to October 2013), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (January 1937 to October 2013), OpenGrey, OpenSIGLE (January 1950 to October 2013), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en) and Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S). There were no language or date restrictions in the electronic search for trials. The electronic databases and clinical trials registers were last searched on 29th October 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intravitreal anti-VEGF agents of any dose or duration to sham injection or no treatment. We focused on studies that included individuals of any age or gender and a minimum of six months follow-up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with a gain in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline of greater than or equal to 15 letters (3 lines) on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of participants with a loss of 15 letters or more of BCVA, the mean change from baseline BCVA, the mean change in central retinal thickness (CRT), the number and type of complications or adverse outcomes, and the number of additional interventions administered. Where available, we also presented quality of life and economic data. MAIN RESULTS We found six RCTs that met the inclusion criteria after independent and duplicate review of the search results. These RCTs included 937 participants and compared outcomes at six months to sham injection for four anti-VEGF agents: aflibercept (VEGF Trap-Eye, Eylea), bevacizumab (Avastin), pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) and ranibizumab (Lucentis). Three trials were conducted in Norway, Sweden and the USA, and three trials were multicentre, one including centres in the USA, Canada, India, Israel, Argentina and Columbia, a second including centres in the USA, Australia, France, Germany, Israel, and Spain, and a third including centres in Austria, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Australia, Japan, Singapore and South Korea. We performed meta-analysis on three key visual outcomes, using data from up to six trials. High-quality evidence from six trials revealed that participants receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment were 2.71 times more likely to gain at least 15 letters of visual acuity at six months compared to participants treated with sham injections (risk ratio (RR) 2.71; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.10 to 3.49). High-quality evidence from five trials suggested anti-VEGF treatment was associated with an 80% lower risk of losing at least 15 letters of visual acuity at six months compared to sham injection (RR 0.20; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.34). Moderate-quality evidence from three trials (481 participants) revealed that the mean reduction from baseline to six months in central retinal thickness was 267.4 µm (95% CI 211.4 µm to 323.4 µm) greater in participants treated with anti-VEGF than in participants treated with sham. The meta-analyses demonstrate that treatment with anti-VEGF is associated with a clinically meaningful gain in vision at six months. One trial demonstrated sustained benefit at 12 months compared to sham. No significant ocular or systemic safety concerns were identified in this time period. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Compared to no treatment, repeated intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents in eyes with CRVO macular oedema improved visual outcomes at six months. All agents were relatively well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse effects in the short term. Future trials should address the relative efficacy and safety of the anti-VEGF agents and other treatments, including intravitreal corticosteroids, for longer-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kristina Lindsley
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthDepartment of Epidemiology615 North Wolfe Street, W5010BaltimoreMarylandUSA21205
| | - Paul B Greenberg
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityDivision of OphthalmologyProvidenceRhode IslandUSA02908
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a sight-threatening retinal vascular disorder associated with macular edema and neovascularization. Until recently, the standard of care for branch RVO-associated macular edema was grid laser photocoagulation and observation for central RVO-associated macular edema. Neovascularization was treated with scatter laser photocoagulation. The purpose of this article is to review recent findings that have changed our treatments of RVO. RECENT FINDINGS The recent development of intravitreal pharmacotherapy has demonstrated benefit with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and corticosteroids for the treatment of RVO-associated macular edema. The intravitreal use of FDA-approved ranibizumab (Lucentis) and a sustained release dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex), along with off-label bevacizumab (Avastin) and preservative-free triamcinolone, has significantly expanded our treatment options and replaced standard of care for treatment of RVO-associated macular edema. Whereas anti-VEGF agents can also induce rapid regression of neovascularization, scatter laser photocoagulation remains the standard of care to prevent neovascular complications. SUMMARY Intravitreal pharmacotherapy has revolutionized our treatment of retinal vascular diseases, including RVO. Although these intravitreal agents are effective, our understanding of their specific indications and long-term roles is still evolving. Furthermore, until the underlying occlusive pathophysiology of RVO can be addressed, our treatments will be limited to temporizing therapies against a chronic disease.
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Hahn P, Mruthyunjaya P, Fekrat S. Central Retinal Vein Occlusion. Retina 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4557-0737-9.00054-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
|
|
8
|
La Spina C, De Benedetto U, Parodi MB, Coscas G, Bandello F. Practical management of retinal vein occlusions. Ophthalmol Ther 2012; 1:3. [PMID: 25135583 PMCID: PMC4108135 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-012-0003-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common cause of visual impairment due to retinal disease after diabetic retinopathy. Nowadays, the introduction of new, powerful diagnostic tools, such as spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and the widespread diffusion of intravitreal drugs, such as vascular endothelial grow factor inhibitors or implantable steroids, have dramatically changed the management and prognosis of RVO. The authors aim to summarize and review the main clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of this condition. The authors conducted a review of the most relevant clinical trials and observational studies published within the last 30 years using a keyword search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents, and Cochrane Library. Furthermore, for all treatments discussed, the level of evidence supporting its use, as per the US Preventive Task Force Ranking System, is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo La Spina
- Department of Ophthalmology, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto De Benedetto
- Department of Ophthalmology, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Battaglia Parodi
- Department of Ophthalmology, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriel Coscas
- Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil, Service Universitaire d’ophtalmologie, Créteil, France
| | - Francesco Bandello
- Department of Ophthalmology, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, University Vita-Salute, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
Retinal vein occlusion: beyond the acute event. Surv Ophthalmol 2011; 56:281-99. [PMID: 21601903 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2010] [Revised: 11/30/2010] [Accepted: 11/30/2010] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Retinal vein occlusion is a major cause of vision loss. We provide an overview of the clinical features, pathogenesis, natural history, and management of both branch retinal vein occlusion and central retinal vein occlusion. Several recent multicenter randomized clinical trials have been completed which have changed the approach to this disorder. Management of retinal vein occlusions can be directed at the underlying etiology or the resulting sequelae. Options include surgical intervention, laser photocoagulation, intravitreal pharmacotherapy, and sustained drug delivery devices.
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Coscas G, Loewenstein A, Augustin A, Bandello F, Battaglia Parodi M, Lanzetta P, Monés J, de Smet M, Soubrane G, Staurenghi G. Management of retinal vein occlusion--consensus document. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 226:4-28. [PMID: 21577038 DOI: 10.1159/000327391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) can have severe consequences for the people affected by the disease, including visual loss with costly social repercussions. Currently, there is no European consensus with regard to the management of RVO. Following a careful review of the medical literature as well as the data from several clinical trials, a collaborative group of retina specialists put forth practical recommendations based on the best available scientific evidence for the clinical approach to RVO. Taking into consideration the recent advances in diagnostic tools and management options, the present document aims to provide the European ophthalmologists with guidelines for clinical practice to the benefit of their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Coscas
- Hôpital Intercommunal de Créteil, Service Universitaire d'Ophtalmologie, Créteil, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Braithwaite T, Nanji AA, Greenberg PB. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD007325. [PMID: 20927757 PMCID: PMC4302326 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd007325.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a common retinal vascular disorder in which macular edema (ME) may develop, with a consequent reduction in visual acuity. The visual prognosis in CRVO-ME is poor in a substantial proportion of patients, especially those with the ischemic subtype, and until recently there has been no treatment of proven benefit. Macular grid laser treatment is ineffective, and whilst a few recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest short-term gains in visual acuity with intravitreal steroids for patients with non-ischemic CRVO-ME, there is no established treatment for ischemic CRVO-ME. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have been used to treat ME resulting from a variety of causes and may represent a treatment option for CRVO-ME. OBJECTIVES To investigate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of CRVO-ME. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 8), MEDLINE (January 1950 to August 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to August 2010), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to August 2010), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (January 1937 to August 2010), OpenSIGLE (January 1950 to August 2010), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com) and ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov). There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 10 August 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered RCTs that compared intravitreal anti-VEGF agents of any dose or duration to sham injection or no treatment. We focused on studies that included individuals of any age or gender with unilateral or bilateral disease and a minimum of six months follow up. Secondarily, we considered non-randomized studies with the same criteria, but did not conduct a separate electronic search for these. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS We found two RCTs that met the inclusion criteria after independent and duplicate review of the search results. These RCTs utilized different anti-VEGF agents which cannot be assumed to be directly comparable. We, therefore, performed no meta-analysis. Evidence from these trials and from other non-randomized case series is summarized in this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Ranibizumab and pegaptanib sodium have shown promise in the short-term treatment of non-ischemic CRVO-ME. However, effectiveness and safety data from larger RCTs with follow up beyond six months are not yet available. There are no RCT data on anti-VEGF agents in ischemic CRVO-ME. The use of anti-VEGF agents to treat this condition therefore remains experimental.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Afshan A Nanji
- Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul B Greenberg
- Division of Ophthalmology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
The Central Retinal Vein Bypass Study: A Trial of Laser-induced Chorioretinal Venous Anastomosis for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion. Ophthalmology 2010; 117:954-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2009] [Revised: 10/09/2009] [Accepted: 10/13/2009] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
|
14
|
Liu GT, Volpe NJ, Galetta SL. Vision loss. Neuroophthalmology 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-1-4160-2311-1.00004-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
|
15
|
COMPARISON OF SURGICAL TREATMENTS FOR CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION; RON VS. CANNULATION OF TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR INTO THE RETINAL VEIN. Retina 2009; 29:1167-74. [DOI: 10.1097/iae.0b013e3181a46a5e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
|
16
|
Ultrastructural analysis of the lamina cribrosa after radial optic neurotomy. Ann Anat 2009; 191:267-72. [PMID: 19450956 DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2009.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2009] [Accepted: 02/12/2009] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Radial optic neurotomy (RON) has been proposed for alleviation of the "scleral outlet compartment syndrome" at the level of the lamina cribrosa, which is thought to play a pathoetiologic role in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). The aim of this study has been to analyze the ultrastructural alterations of the lamina cribrosa after RON to gain new insights in the underlying pathomechanical factors. Fifteen donor eyes underwent a standardized open-sky-vitrectomy and RON after removal of the anterior eye segment for keratoplasty. Using a microvitreoretinal blade, a radial incision was performed on the nasal hemisphere of the optic nerve head radial to the optic disc and parallel to the nerve fibre layer. The lamina cribrosa and the surrounding scleral ring were then prepared for light microscopy, scanning (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Ultrastructural analysis demonstrated that in 60% (n=9) of the evaluated cases the scleral ring was dissected completely and in 40% (n=6) only partially. The adjacent neuronal tissue to the dissection area showed only minimal injury. The central retinal vessels were not injured in all cases. Only complete incision of the circular ring of collagen fibrils surrounding the lamina cribrosa via RON resulted in effective relaxation of the scleral outlet and was achieved in 60% of all eyes under standardized conditions. In all cases the adjacent tissue showed only minimal injury. The high rate of incomplete dissection of the scleral outlet may be an explanation for the variable outcome seen in different studies on RON.
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Opremcak EM. Radial optic neurotomy. Ophthalmology 2008; 115:1638-9; author reply 1639. [PMID: 18762083 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2008] [Accepted: 03/18/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
|
18
|
Abstract
The treatment of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is still a subject of debate. Medical therapy efforts, as well as retinal laser photocoagulation, have mostly dealt with management of the sequelae of CRVO, and have shown limited success in improving visual acuity. The unsatisfactory results of such therapeutic efforts led to the development of new treatment strategies focused on the surgical treatment of the occluded retinal vein. The purpose of this review is to summarize the outcomes of commonly reported surgical treatment strategies and to review different opinions on the various surgical approaches to the treatment of CRVO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilufer Berker
- Department of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Ulucanlar Eye Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Differentialdiagnose und Therapie retinaler Gefäßverschlüsse. SPEKTRUM DER AUGENHEILKUNDE 2007. [DOI: 10.1007/s00717-007-0197-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
|
20
|
Abstract
The range of therapeutic options for the treatment of retinal vein occlusions has been decisively extended by three new surgical methods: radial optic neurotomy (RON) and retinal endovascular lysis (REVL) for central retinal vein occlusion, and arteriovenous dissection (AVD/sheathotomy) for branch retinal vein occlusion. None of those methods has been tested in randomised studies meeting the requirements of evidence-based medicine. It is therefore difficult to assess the relative values of the individual procedures and determine in what precise circumstances each is indicated. The difficulties are compounded further by the use of these techniques in association with new and promising intravitreally injected drugs (e.g. steroids and angioinhibitors), which makes it even more difficult to assess the real efficacy of the surgical methods. In this paper we discuss the three different surgical methods and try to evaluate their clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Feltgen
- Universitätsaugenklinik Freiburg, Killianstrasse 5, 79106, Freiburg, Deutschland.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|