Published online Mar 27, 2018. doi: 10.5313/wja.v7.i1.1
Peer-review started: December 5, 2017
First decision: December 18, 2017
Revised: December 24, 2017
Accepted: January 16, 2018
Article in press: January 16, 2018
Published online: March 27, 2018
Processing time: 157 Days and 10.9 Hours
To determine if video laryngoscopy (VL) has significantly impacted management of difficult airways by decreasing the rate of awake fiberoptic intubation (FOI).
Anesthetic records of 3723 patients who underwent general anesthesia at Rush University Medical Center were reviewed over a 2-mo period prior to the introduction of VLs in 2009 (“pre-VL” group) and over the same 2-mo period after the introduction of VLs in 2012 (“post-VL” group). Patient records with predicted difficult airways based on pre-operative airway examination were analyzed. The primary outcome was rate of awake FOI.
To control for possible factors that may influence the FOI rate, a logistic regression was performed with these factors included as covariates. The rate of awake FOI was 13.1% in pre-VL group compared to 9.0% in post-VL group. Although this decrease was not statistically significant individually (P = 0.1768), it showed a trend toward significance when covariates were accounted for (P = 0.0910). Several factors predicting a higher likelihood of awake FOI were found to be statistically significant: Morbid obesity (larger BMI P = 0.0154, OR = 1.5 per 10 point BMI increase), male gender (P = 0.0026, OR = 3.0) and a higher el-Ganzouri airway score (P = 0.0007, OR = 1.5). Although VLs were seen to be used to intubate 51% of predicted difficult airways, the rate of awake FOI has not significantly changed.
Although VL may continue to grow in popularity, the most difficult airways are still managed using awake FOI.
Core tip: This study shows that the introduction of video laryngoscopes has not significantly impacted the management of predicted difficult airways in the operating room; specifically, that the rate of awake fiberoptic intubation (FOI), the previous gold standard for intubating a predicted difficult airway, has not decreased. Although video laryngoscopy (VL) has clear advantages compared to direct laryngocscopy and has been proven to have increased in popularity in the operating room for non-difficult airways, we postulate that the anesthesiologist’s assessment of the ability to mask ventilate is likely a key factor in the choice of awake FOI vs VL.