BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Feb 18, 2026; 17(2): 112889
Published online Feb 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i2.112889
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the study participants, n (%)/mean ± SD
VariablesAll participants (n = 44)Fixation groups
Grafting subgroups
Graft-less group (n = 21)
Graft-augmented group (n = 23)
P value
NVBG subgroup (n = 12)
VBG subgroup (n = 11)
P value
Age (years)28.9 ± 6.626.3 ± 5.531.4 ± 6.70.009a30.2 ± 6.632.6 ± 6.90.4
Gender
Male40 (90.9)20 (95.2)20 (87)12 (100)8 (72.7)
Female4 (9.1)1 (4.8)3 (13)0.60 (0)3 (27.3)0.09
Affected side
Right26 (59.1)12 (57.1)14 (60.9)6 (50)8 (72.7)
Left18 (40.9)9 (42.9)9 (39.1)0.36 (50)3 (27.3)0.06
Dominance
Non-dominant16 (36.4)9 (42.9)7 (30.4)4 (33.3)3 (27.3)
Dominant28 (63.6)12 (57.1)16 (69.6)0.48 (66.7)8 (72.7)1.00
Previous traumatic event23 (52.3)9 (42.9)14 (60.9)0.28 (66.7)6 (54.5)0.6
SNU duration (month)13.5 ± 6.613.1 ± 6.713.8 ± 6.60.714.8 ± 5.412.7 ± 7.80.4
SNU duration
< 1 year21 (47.7)11 (52.4)10 (43.5)2 (16.7)8 (72.7)
≥ 1 year23 (52.3)10 (47.6)13 (56.5)0.510 (83.3)3 (27.3)0.01a
Fracture type
Cystic31 (70.5)15 (71.4)16 (69.6)6 (50)10 (90.9)
Linear13 (29.5)6 (28.6)7 (30.4)0.86 (50)1 (9.1)0.03a
Bone resorption
< 5 mm22 (50)14 (66.7)8 (34.8)7 (58.3)1 (9.1)
≥ 5 mm22 (50)7 (33.3)15 (65.2)0.03a5 (41.7)10 (90.9)0.01a
Nonunion site
Waist23 (52.3)14 (66.7)9 (39.1)8 (66.7)1 (9.1)
Proximal pole21 (47.7)7 (33.3)14 (60.9)0.064 (33.3)10 (90.9)0.005a
Smoking23 (52.3)11 (52.4)12 (52.17)0.979 (75)3 (27.3)0.11
Table 2 Clinical and radiological outcomes following scaphoid nonunion management, n (%)/mean ± SD
Clinical and radiological findings
All participants (n = 44)
Fixation groups
Grafting subgroups
Graft-less group (n = 21)
Graft-augmented group (n = 23)
P value
NVBG subgroup (n = 12)
VBG subgroup (n = 11)
P value
Operative time (minutes)83.2 ± 35.947.6 ± 8.3115.8 ± 11.8< 0.001a112.08 ± 15.3120.00 ± 3.80.1
Surgical approachDorsal (n = 25), volar (n = 7), mini-dorsal (n = 12)Mini-dorsal (n = 12), dorsal (n = 9)Dorsal (n = 16), volar (n = 7)Dorsal (n = 5), volar (n = 7)Dorsal (n = 11)
Follow-up duration (month)27.52 ± 3.128.0 ± 3.327.08 ± 2.90.327.9 ± 3.126.18 ± 2.70.3
Radiological findings
Healing
Nonunion8 (18.2)5 (23.8)3 (13)0.31 (8.3)2 (18.2)0.5
Union36 (81.8)16 (76.2)20 (87)11 (91.7)9 (81.8)
Healing time (weeks)14.1 ± 2.5 (n = 36)16.2 ± 2 (n = 16)12.5 ± 1.4 (n = 20)< 0.001a12.2 ± 1.25 (n = 11)13 ± 1.6 (n = 9)0.2
Clinical findings
Flexion ROM (°)72.05 ± 6.473.5 ± 7.770.6 ± 4.50.170.8 ± 5.170.4 ± 4.10.8
Extension ROM (°)63.75 ± 8.764.04 ± 10.263.4 ± 7.20.863.7 ± 6.463.2 ± 8.40.8
Total ROM (°)135.8 ± 14137.6 ± 17134.1 ± 10.90.4134.5 ± 10.9133.6 ± 11.40.8
Radial deviation (°)13.86 ± 3.815.5 ± 3.812.3 ± 3.10.004a13.4 ± 2.411.09 ± 3.40.07
Ulnar deviation (°)26.18 ± 6.830.9 ± 5.721.8 ± 4.6< 0.001a22.5 ± 4.821.2 ± 4.40.5
VAS
Median (min-max)0 (0-3), 0.48 ± 0.90 (0-3), 0.38 ± 0.860 (0-3), 0.56 ± 10.50 (0-2), 0.16 ± 0.570 (0-3), 1 ± 1.20.5
Grip strength (kg)44.56 ± 7.746.3 ± 7.0443.02 ± 8.150.145.4 ± 3.140.4 ± 11.00.1
Grip strength ratio (%)88.38 ± 5.991.3 ± 4.685.6 ± 5.7< 0.001a86.2 ± 5.285.1 ± 6.40.6
MMW score90.8 ± 8.794.3 ± 8.287.6 ± 8.10.01a90.4 ± 7.584.5 ± 7.80.08
Table 3 Wrist function outcomes according to capsulotomy design, mean ± SD
Outcome variables
L-shaped capsulotomy (mini-dorsal approach) (n = 12)
Z-shaped capsulotomy (dorsal approach) (n = 25)
P value
Flexion ROM (°)73.75 ± 7.7 (60-80)71.6 ± 6 (55-80)0.33
Extension ROM (°)63.75 ± 12 (45-80)64.2 ± 7.4 (50-80)0.71
Total ROM (°)137.5 ± 19.4 (110-160)135.8 ± 12 (115-160)0.52
Radial deviation (°)15 ± 4.2 (8-20)13.5 ± 3.8 (7-20)0.29
Ulnar deviation (°)29.9 ± 6.3 (20-35)25.2 ± 6.9 (17-36)0.07
VAS, median (min-max)0 (0-3), 0.5 ± 10 (0-3), 0.48 ± 0.90.9
Grip strength (kg)47.79 ± 3.6 (40-52.5)42.96 ± 9.5 (20-53)0.16
Grip strength ratio (%)91.21 ± 5 (78.7-97.22)87.92 ± 5.9 (71.9-97)0.05
Table 4 Summary of case series reporting graft-less and graft-augmented fixation for scaphoid nonunion
Ref.
n (M:F)
Age (years)
Site
NU-duration
Approach
Follow-up
Clinical results
Healing time
Union rate/judgement
Graft-less fixation of scaphoid nonunion
Tada et al[14], 2021, retrospective study19 (19:0)29.2Waist/PP/distal pole14.8 weeksOpen (volar/dorsal)NRNR3.7 months17/19 (89.4%); X-ray, CT
Belloti et al[6], 2020, prospective study12 (NR)R: 27-40Waist/PP> 6 monthsPC (volar/dorsal)6 monthsFlexion: 59.1°, extension: 48.7°; DASH: 6.99, PWRE: 7.97NR12/12 (100%); X-ray
Gurger et al[9], 2018, retrospective study12 (10:2)27Waist/PP7.6 monthsPC (volar)4.5 monthsFlexion: 68°, extension: 66°; MMW: Excellent (n = 8) and good (n = 3)3.8 months11/12 (91.6%); X-ray, CT
Cha et al[8], 2017, retrospective study15 (15:0)28.9 ± 6.2Waist10.8 monthsPC (volar)12 monthsFlexion: 69°, extension: 68°; DASH: 7 ± 3.95.5 months15/15 (100%); X-ray, CT
Somerson et al[13], 2015, retrospective study14 (13:1)21.1 ± 10.6Waist/PP> 6 monthsPC (volar/dorsal)NRFlexion: 73°, extension: 66°; DASH: 10.24.4 months12/14 (85.7%); X-ray
Hegazy[10], 2015, case series21 (17:4)23Waist6.8 monthsPC (volar)25 monthsFlexion: 74°, extension: 75°; DASH: 84 months21/21 (100%); X-ray, CT
Capo et al[7], 2012, retrospective study12 (11:1)24Waist8.7 monthsPC (volar/dorsal)35 monthsFlexion: 71°, extension: 66°; DASH: 64 months11/12 (91.6%); X-ray
Mahmoud and Koptan[11], 2011, prospective study27 (26:1)28.3Waist18.2 monthsPC (volar)24.6 monthsFlexion: 65.7°, extension: 60.7°; MMW: Excellent (n = 25) and good (n = 2)2.9 months27/27 (100%); X-ray, CT
Slade et al[12], 2003, prospective study15 (14:1)20Waist/PP9 monthsPC (dorsal) 35 monthsFlexion: 61°, extension: 49°; MMW: Excellent (n = 12) and good (n = 3)3.5 months15/15 (100%); X-ray
Graft-augmented fixation of scaphoid nonunion
Zondervan et al[27], 2024, retrospective8 (8:0)R: 16-28Waist/PP13 monthsCancellous DR BG (dorsal)88.9 monthsFlexion-extension arc: 143.7° ± 13.9°; median DASH: 2.912 weeks85.7%; X-ray
Bhat et al[21], 2023, retrospective38 (36:2)28.7 ± 7.9Waist/PP/distal pole18.7 ± 4.9 weeksCancellous DR BG (volar)22.2 monthsClinical outcome: NR; complications: Screw prominence (n = 1), grade 1 SNAC (n = 1)15.7 ± 3 weeks100%; X-ray
Ma et al[23], 2023, retrospective study21 (18:3)29.8 (R:18-46)Waist/PP38.3 monthsIC BG (volar)30.6 monthsFlexion-extension arc: 118° ± 46°; PRWE: 14 ± 11, VAS: 3 ± 1, grip strength: 83% ± 26%2.7 months (R: 2-4)100%; X-ray
Schäfer et al[26], 2023, retrospective study16 (16:0)29 (R: 18-41)Waist/PP17 months (R: 6-60)IC NVBG (volar/dorsal)54 monthsFlexion: 55°, extension: 50.1°; DASH: 2.36, grip strength: 99% (R: 72%-134%)12.9 weeks (R: 11-15)73%; X-ray, CT
Papatheodorou et al[25], 2021, retrospective study64 (45:19)27 (R: 19-42)PP23 months (R: 12-47)DR VBG (dorsal)32 months (R: 24-56)Extension: 70°, flexion: 47°; MMW: 86, grip strength: 83%; complications: Persistent nonunion (n = 8), fibrous union (n = 1)12 weeks55/64 (86%); X-ray, CT
Manako et al[24], 2023, retrospective study5 (5:0)Med: 30; R: 18-41Waist/PP≥ 6 monthsZaidemberg’s DR VBG (volar/dorsal)Med: 24 months; R: 8-30 monthsMMW score: 95 points (R: 75-100)4.25 months4/5 (80%); X-ray
Keller et al[22], 2020, retrospective study37 (36:1)26.2Waist/PP51 monthsMFC VG (volar ± dorsal assisted)16 monthsFlexion: 44° ± 16°, extension: 50° ± 15°; DASH: 19, PRWE: 30; grip strength: 44 kg, VAS: 5; complications: Hardware irritation necessitated implant removal (n = 4), late infection (n = 1), venous bleeding (n = 1), postoperative boutonniere-like deformity of thumb MCPJ (n = 1), delayed wound healing of volar approach (n = 1)16 weeks (R: 12-22)95%; X-ray, CT
Table 5 Comparative studies evaluating graft-less vs graft-augmented fixation in scaphoid nonunion treatment
Ref.
Technique
Fixation device
Follow-up period
UR
HT
Clinical results
Complications
Graft-less vs graft-augmented fixation approaches for scaphoid nonunion
Current studyMini-open screw fixation vs open curettage-grafting and screw fixationScrew27.52 ± 3.1 monthsGraft-less fixation: 76.2%; fixation with BG: 87%Graft-less fixation: 16.2 ± 2 weeks; fixation with BG: 12.5 ± 1.4 weeks (P < 0.001)Graft-less fixation: Radial and ulnar tilt were greater (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, respectively). The grip strength ratio was also higher (P < 0.001). The MMW score was significantly better (P = 0.01). No relevant difference was noted between both groups regarding all other clinical outcomesNonunion: 5 patients (23.8%) after graft-less fixation and 3 patients (13%) with BG utilization. Graft-less group: Superficial wound infection (n = 1). Graft-augmented fixation: Mechanical radial sided wrist pain (n = 1)
Zengin N et al[20], 2023, retrospectivePC screw fixation (n = 16) vs open curettage-grafting and screw fixation (n = 17)Screw12 monthsCRIF: 12/16 (75%); ORIF: 15/17 (88%) (P = 0.34)CRIF: 11.8 weeks (8-17 weeks); ORIF: 12.5 weeks (9-17 weeks) (P = 0.41)No statistically significant difference between both groups regarding postoperative flexion, extension ROMs, grip strength, and DASH scoreNonunion: 4 patients (25%) in the CRIF group and 2 patients (11%) in ORIF group
Zhong et al[28], 2023, retrospectiveORIF (group A) vs PC fixation (group B) vs PC fixation and PRP injection (group C)Screw12 monthsGrade III SNU: No significant difference among the three groups (P = 0.52). URs were 90.9%, 100%, and 100%, respectively; grade IV SNU: UR was lower in group B than other groups. URs were 90%, 71.4%, and 90.9%, respectivelyNRGrade III SNU: No significant differences in VAS and MMW among the three groups. Grade IV SNU: Groups A and C had significantly lower VAS score and significantly higher MMW score, compared to group B. However, there was no significant difference between groups A and CGrade III SNU: Nonunion in 9% of patients of group A. Grade IV SNU: Nonunion in 10%, 28.6%, and 9% of groups A, B, and C, respectively
Atilgan et al[19], 2022, retrospectivePC screw fixation (n = 19) vs NVBG and screw fixation (n = 24)ScrewCRIF: 18.9 ± 1.8 months; ORIF: 16 ± 1.95 monthsCRIF: 84.2% (n = 16); ORIF: 87.5% (n = 21)CRIF: 17.19 ± 2.19 months; ORIF: 14.14 ± 1.82 months (P < 0.001)MMW score: No statistically significant difference (P = 0.930). VAS score: Statistically significantly higher after CRIF than in ORIF (P = 0.012)Nonunion: Three patients (15.7%) in the CRIF group, and 3 (12.5%) in the ORIF group
RCTs comparing employment of VBGs vs NVBGs in fixation of scaphoid nonunion
Fan et al[42], 2023DR pedicled VBG (n = 20) vs IC NVBG (n = 18)K-wiresOne yearVBG: 19/20; NVBG: 16/18HT was similar (VBG: 16 ± 22 weeks; NVBG: 17 ± 33 weeks)There were no significant differences between the two groups in ROM, grip strength or functional scoresNonunion: VBG group (3/20) following K-wire migration, and NVBG group (2/18)
Caporrino et al[41], 2014DR VBG (n = 35) vs DR NVBG (n = 38)K-wiresVBG: 29.4 months; NVBG: 28.6 monthsNo significant difference in UR (88% for VBG vs 80% for NVBG; P = 0.312)VBG: Bony union was earlier by 12 days compared to NVBG (P = 0.002)VBG group: Ulnar deviation was lower (P = 0.003), and radial deviation as well (P = 0.064). No significant differences were found for the remaining clinical outcomesNonunion rate in VBG group (11%) and NVBG group (20%)
Goyal et al[35], 2013DR NVBG (n = 42) vs IC NVBG (n = 46)Herbert screwGroup 1: 4.8 years; group 2: 5.2 yearsNo significant difference in UR (87.1% vs 86.5%)Group 1: 4.2 months; group 2: 4.5 monthsNo significant difference regarding ROM, functional scores. Mean pain VAS scores were significantly different (group 2: 7.1, group 1: 4.2)Iliac NVBG (local): Local hematoma required drainage (n = 1). Chronic pain for 3 months (n = 6); ASIS avulsion fracture (n = 1); nonunion in group 1 (12.8%), and group 2 (13.5%). Both groups (last visit): Tenderness over anatomical snuffbox in group 1 (n = 5), and group 2 (n = 6); degenerative changes in group 1 (n = 15), and group 2 (n = 14)
Ribak et al[40], 2010DR VBG (n = 46) vs DR NVBG (n = 40)Three K-wiresVBG: 24.4 months; NVBG: 21.7 monthsHigher UR after VBG (89% vs 72%; P = 0.024). PP nonunion: Slightly higher UR with VBGs (90% vs 69%; P = 0.09)VBG: Significantly earlier healing compared to NVBG (9.7 weeks vs 12 weeks; P = 0.0001)VBG: Significantly higher functional outcome scores (P = 0.007)Nonunion: 5/46 (11%) in VBG group and 11/40 (28%) in NVBG group
Braga-Silva et al[36], 2008DR VBG (n = 35) vs IC NVBG (n = 45)K-wires or screws2.8 ± 1.4 yearsUnion occurred in all NVBG group and 32/35 of the VBG group (P = 0.135)NVBG: 8.89 ± 2.26 months; VBG: 7.97 ± 3.06 monthsThere was no significant difference with respect to ROM or grip strength between the two groupsNonunion in 3/35 (8.5%) of the VBG group with graft osteonecrosis