Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2025; 16(9): 110386
Published online Sep 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i9.110386
Published online Sep 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i9.110386
Table 1 Subject demographics of Novation, Alteon, and aggregate antioxidant groups, n (%)
Novation (n = 461) | Alteon (n = 989) | Aggregate antioxidant (n = 39964) | Novation vs aggregate, P value | Alteon vs aggregate, P value | |
Age - mean (SD) | 72.55 (5.92) | 74.01 (6.43) | 72.92 (6.30) | 0.21 | < 0.0001 |
Follow-up (months) - mean (SD) | 33.07 (8.59) | 14.84 (8.20) | 53.21 (24.01) | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 |
Sex | 0.12 | 0.30 | |||
Female | 291 (63.26) | 572 (57.84) | 23722 (59.54) | - | - |
Male | 169 (36.74) | 417 (42.16) | 16121 (40.46) | - | - |
Unknown | 1 | 0 | 121 | - | - |
Charlson index – mean (SD) | 2.89 (0.91) | 3.18 (1.16) | 3.00 (1.09) | 0.01 | < 0.0001 |
Primary OA diagnosis | 0.40 | < 0.0001 | |||
Yes | 439 (95.85) | 838 (88.68) | 37305 (94.88) | - | - |
No | 19 (4.15) | 107 (11.32) | 2014 (5.12) | - | - |
Unknown | 3 | 44 | 645 | - | - |
Table 2 Revision rate and reason for revision rates for Novation, Alteon, and aggregate antioxidant groups, n (%)
Revisions | Novation (n = 461) | Alteon (n = 989) | Aggregate antioxidant (n = 39964) | Novation vs aggregate, P value | Alteon vs aggregate, P value |
All-cause | 4 (0.87) | 18 (1.82) | 986 (2.47) | 0.02 | 0.23 |
Fracture (including periprosthetic fracture) | 2 (0.43) | 6 (0.61) | 247 (0.62) | 0.99 | 0.99 |
Infection | 0 (0.00) | 6 (0.61) | 205 (0.51) | 0.18 | 0.86 |
Aseptic loosening | 0 (0.00) | 2 (0.20) | 116 (0.29) | 0.65 | 0.99 |
Instability | 0 (0.00) | 3 (0.30) | 248 (0.62) | 0.12 | 0.30 |
Mechanical complications | 0 (0.00) | 2 (0.20) | 101 (0.25) | 0.63 | 0.33 |
Hematoma or wound complications | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.10) | 24 (0.06) | 0.99 | 0.46 |
Wear | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 3 (0.01) | 0.99 | 0.99 |
Pain | 0 (0.00) | 2 (0.20) | 80 (0.20) | 0.99 | 0.99 |
Revisions for all other reasons | 2 (0.43) | 1 (0.10) | 229 (0.57) | 0.19 | 0.05 |
Table 3 Cumulative percent revision rates for Novation, Alteon, and aggregate antioxidant liner groups
Novation (n = 461) | Alteon (n = 989) | Aggregate antioxidant (n = 39964) | |
Years to Revision | Cumulative Percent Revision% [95%CI] (Number at risk) | ||
0 | 0.10% [0.00-0.19] (460) | 0.25% [0.12-0.37] (989) | 0.25% [0.20-0.30] (39843) |
1 | 0.71% [0.01-1.40] (443) | 1.79% [0.97-2.60] (584) | 1.82% [1.69-1.95] (37561) |
2 | 0.83% [0.02-1.64] (394) | 2.09% [1.13-3.03] (162) | 2.12% [1.98-2.27] (35337) |
3 | 0.91% [0.02-1.79] (186) | 2.27% [1.23-3.31] (2) | 2.31% [2.16-2.46] (27951) |
Table 4 Hazard ratios for statistical comparison of survivorship
Comparison | Hazard ratio | Confidence interval | P value |
Novation vs aggregate antioxidant | 0.389 | 0.146-1.04 | 0.060 |
Alteon vs aggregate antioxidant | 0.982 | 0.615-1.567 | 0.940 |
- Citation: Jones K, Muehlmann AM, Melvin SM, Oral E, Penrose CT. Short-term survivorship of antioxidant highly cross-linked polyethylene liners in total hip arthroplasty reported in American Joint Replacement Registry. World J Orthop 2025; 16(9): 110386
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i9/110386.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i9.110386