Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2025; 16(4): 104452
Published online Apr 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i4.104452
Table 1 Description of included studies
Studies
Cases
Mean age (year)
Female gender (%)
Type
Anesthesia
Surgical approach
Intervention group
Control group
Follow-up
Barrington et al[15], 201956475/13421666/6761.4/63.3Retrospective studyUnclearTKA1000 mg of intravenous acetaminophen1000 mg of oral acetaminophenUnclear
O'Neal et al[8], 201757/5868/6744/55RCTSpinal anesthesiaTKA1000 mg of intravenous acetaminophen1000 mg of oral acetaminophen1 month
Suarez et al[11], 201852/5266.6/67.328/26RCTSpinal anesthesiaTKA4000 mg of intravenous acetaminophen4000 mg of oral acetaminophen6 weeks
Hickman et al[10], 2018245/24167/6757.1/61.4RCTGeneral or spinal anesthesiaTKA1000 mg of intravenous acetaminophen2500 mg of oral acetaminophen8 weeks
Yu et al[12], 2020318/52766/6570/73Retrospective studySpinal anesthesiaTKA1000 mg of intravenous acetaminophen1000 mg of oral acetaminophenUnclear
Politi et al[13], 201763/5766/6945/40RCTGeneral anesthesiaTHA and TKA1000 mg of intravenous acetaminophen1000 mg of oral acetaminophen2 months
Westrich et al[14], 201977/7763/6564/55RCTSpinal anesthesiaTHA1000 mg of intravenous acetaminophen1000 mg of oral acetaminophenUnclear
Table 2 The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scale
Quality assessment for non-RCT
Barrington
Yu
A clearly stated aim22
Inclusion of consecutive patients22
Prospective of data collection22
Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study22
Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint11
A follow-up period appropriate to the aims of study11
Less than 5% loss to follow-up00
Prospective calculation of the sample size22
An adequate control group22
Contemporary groups22
Baseline equivalence of groups22
Adequate statistical analyses22
Total score2020