Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2025; 16(10): 110009
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110009
Published online Oct 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110009
Table 1 Benefits of multivesicular particles (DepoFoam bupivacaine®) based medications
| Benefits |
| High drug-loading capacity combined with controlled release, resulting in enhanced analgesic efficacy |
| Uniform and lengthy medication liberation |
| Increased encapsulation yield |
| Structural stability |
| Inferior exposure and toxicity in another location |
| Negligible negative complications |
| Greater medication half-life |
| Biocompatibility for medication liberation into frail zones (e.g. epidural, intrathecal) |
Table 2 Contraindications to the use of Zynrelef®
| Contraindications |
| Individuals with proven hypersensitivity to local anesthetics and NSAIDs |
| Individuals with a history of asthma, urticaria, or allergic reaction related to aspirin or other NSAIDs |
| Individuals receiving obstetric paracervical block anesthesia |
| Individuals experiencing coronary bypass surgery |
Table 3 Main studies performed on liposome-based formulations (DepoFoam bupivacaine®, DepoDur®, Exparel®, Zynrelef®) in postoperative pain management in orthopedic surgery
| Study | Ref. | Number of patients (n), type of study | Treatment vs comparison | Results |
| DepoFoam bupivacaine® (a slow-release liposomal bupivacaine-based analgesic) | ||||
| Bunionectomy | Golf et al[9] | n = 216. Randomized, multicenter, double-blind phase 3 clinical study | Individuals received placebo (n = 96) or DepoFoam bupivacaine® 120 mg (n = 97) via wound infiltration before wound closure | The area under the curve for NRS scores was substantially less in individuals treated with DepoFoam bupivacaine® vs individuals receiving placebo at 24 h and 36 h. More individuals treated with DepoFoam bupivacaine® avoided the use of opioid ‘rescue’ medication during the first 24 h and were pain-free (NRS ≤ 1) at 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, and 48 h |
| DepoDur® (DepoFoam mixed with morphine) | ||||
| THA | Viscusi et al[10] | n = 200. Patients scheduled to undergo THA were randomized to receive a single dose of 15 mg, 20 mg, or 25 mg EREM or placebo | 15 mg, 20 mg, or 25 mg DepoDur® (single dose, epidural injection) vs saline | All EREM dosages diminished the mean fentanyl usage vs placebo (510 µg vs 2091 µg) and delayed the median time to first dose of fentanyl (21.3 h vs 3.6 h). All EREM cohorts had substantially improved pain control at rest for up to 48 h post-surgery compared with placebo. More EREM-treated individuals rated their pain control as good or very good compared with placebo (at 24 h: 90% vs 65%; at 48 h: 83% vs 67%). No supplementary analgesia was required in 25% of EREM-treated individuals and 2% of placebo-treated individuals at 48 h |
| Exparel® (bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension) | ||||
| TKA | Malige et al[11] | n = 100. Prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Each patient received an iPACK block utilizing ropivacaine and was additionally randomized to receive an ACB with Exparel® or ropivacaine | Liposomal bupivacaine 20 mL with 5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine in ACB and 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine in iPACK (local anesthetic infiltration of the interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior knee capsule) block vs 25 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine in ACB and 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine in iPACK block prior to TKA | The Exparel® cohort had a lower hospital length of stay compared to the control cohort (36.3 h vs 49.7 h). Individuals in the Exparel® cohort experienced an improvement in NRS pain score at all postsurgical time points. These individuals also utilized a lower level of inpatient opioids (40.9 MME/day vs 47.3 MME/day) but a similar amount of outpatient opioids (33.4 MME/day vs 32.1 MME/day). Additionally, the Exparel® group showed increased improvements in all Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index sub scores and total scores at most timepoints compared with the control cohort |
| Zynrelef® (liposome preparation of bupivacaine/meloxicam) | ||||
| Bunionectomy | Viscusi et al[12] | n = 412. EPOCH 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active-controlled phase III study in subjects undergoing a primary unilateral, distal, first metatarsal bunionectomy in which subjects received either a single intraoperative dose of HTX-011, immediate-release bupivacaine HCl or saline placebo | Zynrelef® PR 60/1.8 mg vs bupivacaine HCl by 0.5%. 50 mg via wound infiltration before wound closure | Zynrelef® PR diminished pain intensity by 18% compared to bupivacaine HCl. Opioid consumption was reduced by 37% in the bupivacaine/meloxicam cohort vs 25% in the bupivacaine HCl cohort |
- Citation: Rodriguez-Merchan EC, De Andres-Ares J, Delgado-Martinez AD, Ribbans WJ. Nanotechnology for pain management in orthopedic surgery. World J Orthop 2025; 16(10): 110009
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i10/110009.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i10.110009
