Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2022; 13(10): 932-939
Published online Oct 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i10.932
Published online Oct 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i10.932
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the treatment and control groups
Group | Sex, M/F | Age (yr) | BMI in kg/m2 | Educational level, illiterate/primary school/senior high school/ junior college/college and university | Surgical limb, L/R |
Treatment, n = 40 | 6/34 | 67.28 ± 5.51 | 24.44 ± 2.37 | 2/1/23/12/2/0 | 22/18 |
Control, n = 40 | 10/30 | 69.07 ± 6.54 | 24.92 ± 2.24 | 0/1/26/11/0/2 | 25/15 |
χ2/t | 1.250 | 1.332 | 1.020 | 6.227 | 0.464 |
P value | 0.264 | 0.187 | 0.310 | 0.285 | 0.496 |
Table 2 Comparison of visual analog scale scores between the two groups
Group | -3rd d | 3rd d | 7th d | 14th d |
Treatment, n = 40 | 6.75 ± 0.92 | 5.30 ± 0.79 | 2.57 ± 0.84 | 0.80 ± 0.93 |
Control, n = 40 | 6.60 ± 0.84 | 5.65 ± 0.80 | 4.00 ± 0.85 | 2.70 ± 1.04 |
t | 0.758 | 1.965 | 7.536 | 8.563 |
P value | 0.451 | 0.053 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Comparison of skin temperature between the two groups (°C)
Group | -3rd d | 3rd d | 7th d | 14th d |
Treatment, n = 40 | 37.34 ± 0.28 | 37.21 ± 0.26 | 36.93 ± 0.21 | 36.63 ± 0.31 |
Control, n = 40 | 37.29 ± 0.34 | 37.24 ± 0.32 | 37.09 ± 0.27 | 36.94 ± 0.32 |
t | 0.755 | 0.422 | 2.968 | 4.423 |
P value | 0.452 | 0.674 | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Comparison of lower limb swelling between the two groups
Group | t | P value | ||
Treatment, n = 40 | Control, n = 40 | |||
Upper circumference in cm | ||||
-3 d | 53.35 ± 4.94 | 51.83 ± 4.34 | 1.461 | 0.148 |
3 d | 52.83 ± 4.91 | 51.51 ± 4.29 | 1.274 | 0.206 |
7 d | 48.32 ± 4.57 | 50.53 ± 3.97 | 2.315 | 0.023 |
14 d | 45.68 ± 4.69 | 47.96 ± 3.89 | 2.374 | 0.020 |
Lower circumference in cm | ||||
-3 d | 39.59 ± 3.58 | 38.16 ± 3.78 | 1.734 | 0.087 |
3 d | 38.96 ± 3.55 | 37.50 ± 3.85 | 1.768 | 0.081 |
7 d | 36.71 ± 2.95 | 39.21 ± 6.86 | 2.121 | 0.037 |
14 d | 34.96 ± 2.96 | 36.70 ± 4.35 | 2.095 | 0.039 |
Table 5 Comparison of knee range of motion and knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score between the two groups of patients
Group | Knee range of motion in degrees | KOOS score | ||
-3rd d | 14th d | -3rd d | 14th d | |
Treatment, n = 40 | 95.23 ± 2.11 | 115.32 ± 2.12 | 65.83 ± 1.39 | 85.52 ± 0.82 |
Control, n = 40 | 95.14 ± 2.24 | 113.34 ± 2.16 | 65.73 ± 1.33 | 80.32 ± 1.13 |
t | 0.185 | 4.138 | 0.329 | 23.556 |
P value | 0.854 | 0.000 | 0.743 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Xing L, Xu HR, Wang QL, Kong H, Zhang H, Tian J, Ding Y, Yang RX, Zhang L, Jiang B. Traditional Chinese medicine ointment combined with tuina therapy in treatment of pain and swelling after total knee arthroplasty. World J Orthop 2022; 13(10): 932-939
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v13/i10/932.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v13.i10.932