Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2026; 17(4): 114757
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.114757
Published online Apr 18, 2026. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.114757
Figure 1 Transmalleolar approach with lateral malleolar osteotomy.
A: Lateral malleolar osteotomy with preserved periosteal blood supply; B: Posterior retraction of the fibula with a Hohmann retractor providing exposure to the ankle and subtalar joints.
Figure 2 Joint surface preparation.
A: Saw preparation of the inner aspect of the fibula and the lateral tibia at the syndesmosis level to create fresh, bleeding bone surfaces; B: Multiple drill holes created in the talus to enhance biological healing potential.
Figure 3 Tibiotalocalcaneal nailing procedure.
A: Guide wire insertion through calcaneus across subtalar and ankle joints into tibia; B: Retrograde intramedullary nail insertion following standard technique.
Figure 4 Biologic augmentation preparation.
A: Bone marrow aspirate using Jamshidi needle; B: Allograft preparation; C: Bone marrow aspirate mixed with allograft chips.
Figure 5
Biologic graft insertion and impaction.
Figure 6 Fibular reduction and fixation.
A: Anteroposterior radiographic view showing fibular reduction with cannulated wires; B: Lateral radiographic view with cannulated wires; C: Anteroposterior radiographic view showing screw insertion; D: Lateral radiographic view showing screw placement; E: Final clinical image showing two screws inserted from fibula creating the “trap door” construct.
- Citation: Elalfy MM, Embaby OM, Abulaban OA, Aladl AN, Abdelrazek M, Youssef K, Abushal MH, Kassab F. Transmalleolar tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with biologic augmentation and fibular preservation for chronic Charcot ankle arthropathy: A retrospective cohort study. World J Orthop 2026; 17(4): 114757
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v17/i4/114757.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v17.i4.114757
