Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2025; 16(3): 101841
Published online Mar 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.101841
Figure 1
Figure 1 Quality assessment using Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool for non-randomized clinical trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Flow chart of the literature search.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Forest plot and leave-one-out test for International Knee Documentation Committee score. A: Forest plot for International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score change outcome; B: Leave-one-out test for IKDC score change outcome.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Forest plot for lysholm Score and modified cincinnati score change outcome. A: Forest plot for Lysholm Score change outcome; B: Forest plot for modified cincinnati score change outcome.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Forest plot and leave-one-out test for postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. A: Forest plot for postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score outcome; B: Leave-one-out test for postoperative AOFAS score outcome.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Forest plot and leave-one-out test for postoperative Foot and Ankle Disability Index score. A: Forest plot for postoperative Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) score outcome; B: Leave-one-out test for postoperative FADI score outcome.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Forest plot for postoperative single-hop test score and postoperative triple-hop test score. A: Forest plot for postoperative single-hop test score outcome; B: Forest plot for postoperative triple-hop test score outcome.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Forest plot. A: Forest plot for postoperative thigh circumferences at 10 cm proximal to upper patellar bone in the injury side versus the healthy contralateral side; B: Forest plot for postoperative thigh circumferences at 20 cm proximal to upper patellar bone in the injury side versus the contralateral healthy side.