Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of the Gamma3 nail vs Gamma3U-blade system in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures

doi:10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.285

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 15, Issue 3

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (1272)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

746

Figures (1-5)

157

Sum=953

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

Download

201

Sum=274

Mar 18, 2024 (publication date) through Nov 25, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (1)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Orthop. Mar 18, 2024; 15(3): 285-292
Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.285

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Study selection. TAD: Tip-apex distance.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Literature selection process: Six English literature and one Chinese literature were included in the study.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Risk of bias summary: Review author’s judgements about each risk of bias item.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 4 Risk of bias graph.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 5 Comparison of the Gamma3 and U blade clinical data. A: Meta-analysis of operative time between gamama3 nail and Ublade; B: Meta-analysis of tip-apex distance indicators between gamama3 nail and Ublade; C: Meta-analysis of Harris hip score indicators between gamama3 nail and Ublade; D: Meta-analysis of union time indicators between gamama3 nail and Ublade.

Citation: Wu X, Gao B. Meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy of the Gamma3 nail vs Gamma3U-blade system in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. World J Orthop 2024; 15(3): 285-292
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v15/i3/285.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i3.285