Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Orthop. Jul 18, 2025; 16(7): 107950
Published online Jul 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.107950
Published online Jul 18, 2025. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.107950
Comparative efficacy of cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in unstable intertrochanteric fractures: A meta-analysis
Ahmed Mohamed Yousif Mohamed, Nujud Mohamed, Department of Orthopaedic, Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi 92510, United Arab Emirates
Monzir Salih, Saint Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, St Luke’s Hospital, Dublin D06 HH36, Ireland
Mugahid Mohamed, Maysara Elsiddig, Mazin Abdelsalam, Basil Elhag, Department of General Surgery, Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi 92510, United Arab Emirates
Ayman E Abbas, Department of Plastic Surgery, Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi 92510, United Arab Emirates
Moaz Osama Omar, Faculty of Medicine, Ras al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras al-Khaimah 11172, United Arab Emirates
Souzan Hassan Eisa Ahmed, Deena Omar, Department of Emergency, Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi 92510, United Arab Emirates
Samah Ahmed, Duaa Mohamed, Faculty of Medicine, Gezira University, Wad Medani 9GQH+GWW, Sudan
Co-first authors: Ahmed Mohamed Yousif Mohamed and Monzir Salih.
Author contributions: Yousif Mohamed AM and Salih M jointly led the meta-analysis, conceptualized the study, designed the research methodology, and developed the search strategy. They supervised the systematic review process, conducted data extraction, performed statistical analysis and synthesis, and prepared the initial manuscript draft; Mohamed M, Abbas AE, Elsiddig M, Abdelsalam M, and Ahmed S executed the comprehensive literature search, screened and selected studies, extracted relevant data, and cross-validated the data for accuracy; Omar MO, Elhag B, and Mohamed N managed reference organization, manuscript formatting, and the preparation of figures and tables; Omar D, Ahmed S, and Mohamed D interpreted the results, conducted quality assessments, provided critical methodological revisions, and drafted the introduction and discussion sections, while also contributing to the quality assessment of included studies; All authors participated in reviewing, editing, and approving the final version of the manuscript for publication.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The authors have read the PRISMA 2009 Checklist, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the PRISMA 2009 Checklist.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Duaa Mohamed, Faculty of Medicine, Gezira University, University of Gezira St, Wad Medani 9GQH+GWW, Sudan. duaatom3@gmail.com
Received: April 2, 2025
Revised: April 18, 2025
Accepted: May 27, 2025
Published online: July 18, 2025
Processing time: 107 Days and 3.7 Hours
Revised: April 18, 2025
Accepted: May 27, 2025
Published online: July 18, 2025
Processing time: 107 Days and 3.7 Hours
Core Tip
Core Tip: This meta-analysis compares cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty (CBHA) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. CBHA enables earlier weight-bearing and reduces prosthetic loosening but results in greater blood loss and longer operative times than PFNA. Both approaches show similar functional recovery, hospital stays, and complication rates (refracture/thrombosis). The choice between CBHA (optimal for early mobilization) and PFNA (preferred for minimal invasiveness) should be individualized based on patient factors. Prospective studies are needed to refine selection criteria.