Published online Nov 18, 2023. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i11.800
Peer-review started: August 25, 2023
First decision: September 28, 2023
Revised: October 11, 2023
Accepted: October 30, 2023
Article in press: October 30, 2023
Published online: November 18, 2023
Processing time: 82 Days and 9.4 Hours
Recent advances in artificial intelligence and deep learning has spurred innovations in medical imaging modalities, resulting in enhanced visualisation possibilities. Additionally, there is a growing interest in the automation of regular diagnostic procedures alongside orthopedic measurements.
So far, no reliable and automated method has been developed for measuring angles of foot bones in significant deformities of the big toe from radiographs according to AOFAS. Likewise, there is no system for automated preoperative decision-making.
The aim of our research was to develop a robust automated method for measuring angles of hallux valgus on radiographs according to AOFAS guidelines, to determine the accuracy of this method, to compare it against expert clinician measurements, and to develop a preoperative decision-making systems.
The bones which are necessary to determine the angles of hallux valgus, obtained on anteroposterior weight-bearing feet radiograms were segmented by a U-Net. The bone axes were determined, and then the reference points for determining the hallux valgus angles (HVA) and intermetatarsal angles (IMA) were found. The interclass correlation coefficient and standard error for single measurements were used to calculate the agreement between manual and automatic measure
The key foot bones were segmented from anteroposterior feet radiograms by the U-Net neural network with high accuracy (average Sørensen–Dice index larger than 97%). Such a precise segmentation enabled the accurate determination of bone axes and the required reference points. Excellent agreement was achieved between manual and automated measurements of both angles. For HVA, absolute agreement interclass correlation coefficient (AA-ICC) and consistency ICC (C-ICC) were 0.97, and standard error of measurement (SEM) was 0.32. For IMA, AA-ICC was 0.75, C-ICC was 0.89, and SEM was 0.21. The proposed hallux valgus treatments based on HVA and IMA measured automatically correlated well with those proposed by orthopedic surgeons performing manual angle measurements.
The proposed artificial intelligence powered automation for evaluating angles of hallux valgus through deep learning is a precise, yielding measurements akin to those conducted manually by experienced clinicians. This offers promising clinical applications such as facilitating the automated determination of angles of hallux valgus from X-ray images, categorizing the extent of deformity, and recommending a specific protocol for corrective surgery.
Future research will focus on automating the measurements of remaining angles and parameters of forefoot deformation along its greater clinical implementation to further enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes.