Published online Nov 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i11.842
Peer-review started: May 12, 2021
First decision: July 28, 2021
Revised: August 8, 2021
Accepted: September 29, 2021
Article in press: September 29, 2021
Published online: November 18, 2021
Processing time: 187 Days and 14.1 Hours
Difference in screening between two hospital trust which were merging.
Developing a uniform policy for screening and managing methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prosthetic joint infection (PJI).
Eradication therapy is not universally effective. The reasons for this are multifactorial including dose strength and compliance.
All patients who underwent total hip and knee arthroplasty between December 2009 and December 2019 were identified. Patients who were also identified as positive for MRSA in the preoperative evaluation. After recording the confirmation of the eradication treatment prescription, all the processes were reviewed retrospectively. The results of each MRSA-positive patient were compared with the results of two MRSA-negative patients who had the same consultant, were of the same age, and had the same surgery.
Screening identified 42 knee and 32 hip arthroplasty patients as MRSA positive, 84 MRSA negative knee and 64 hip patients were reviewed. Patients were matched with medical co-morbidities in each group. Mean follow up was 5 years. PJI was identified in 4/32 (12.5%) of total hip replacements MRSA positive and 3/42 (7%) of total knee replacements patients. All patients had PJI within one year of surgery.
MRSA positive patients are given eradication therapy routinely. However, no confirmation of eradication is sought. Patients who have MRSA colonisation pre-operatively, in our study had a significantly increased risk of PJI, when compared to negative patients. We would recommend establishing true eradication after treatment prior to arthroplasty.
Further research needs to be performed into eradication therapy and strategy and also for those patients who do not respond to eradication therapy.