Published online Dec 18, 2019. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i12.434
Peer-review started: June 11, 2019
First decision: July 30, 2019
Revised: August 27, 2019
Accepted: September 13, 2019
Article in press: September 13, 2019
Published online: December 18, 2019
Processing time: 184 Days and 5.9 Hours
Clopidogrel is a widely prescribed drug that inhibits platelet aggregation and, therefore, prevents thromboembolic events such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Clopidogrel acts by binding on the P2Y12 purinergic receptor on the platelet surface. Purinergic receptors also play an important role in bone homeostasis, and P2Y12, in particular, is expressed in osteoblasts and osteoclasts as well. The exact role of the P2Y12 receptor and the effect of clopidogrel treatment in bone metabolism have not been elucidated. The few existing studies demonstrate contrasting results, with some of them indicating a negative impact on bone turnover. The effect of clopidogrel treatment in bone healing has not yet been studied.
The presence of a drug that may negatively affect bone healing during the perioperative period when dealing with skeletal surgery raised our concerns and motivated us to conduct this study.
The main objective of the present study was to evaluate bone healing during continuous perioperative clopidogrel treatment.
Our study used the well-described critical sized calvarial defect model. Sixteen male New Zealand rabbits were used and randomly divided into two groups; an experimental group taking clopidogrel 3 mg/kg/d per os and a control group taking the vehicle alone. The treatment began 1 wk before the surgical procedures and continued for 6 wk postoperatively. Surgical procedures were conducted to create two circular bony defects on the cranium of every animal. After a 6-wk postoperative period, the animals were euthanized, and postmortem radiographical and histological evaluation was conducted. Radiological evaluation was conducted using a five grade qualitative scale. Histological evaluation included measurements of the percentages of the defect regeneration, bridging and bone density.
The postoperative period was uneventful and without any complication for all animals. The radiological examination showed that the clopidogrel group had a statistically significant improved radiographic score in bone bridging and union. The histomorphometric analyses also revealed significantly greater percentage of bone regeneration and bridging in the clopidogrel group than in the control group. However, bone density was not statistically different between the groups.
The present study results indicate that continuous perioperative clopidogrel treatment does not impair bone healing; instead, it promotes new bone formation. This finding is important when dealing with skeletal surgery in patients who use this drug chronically for cardiovascular indications.
Future research may involve evaluation of the effect of other antiplatelet drugs of the same category, such as ticagrelor or prasugrel, and at different dosing and treatment duration. Moreover, further research is needed in order to evaluate if our findings have useful implications in bone healing improvement such as topically drug releasing vehicles or drug eluting orthopedic implants.