Chatzivasiliadis M, Konstantinou P, Koulalis D, Kostretzis L, Gkantsinikoudis N, Chaniotakis C, Gkoumousian K, Kapetanakis S. Laminectomy alone vs laminectomy with posterior fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis: The role of instability. World J Orthop 2026; 17(2): 113932 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i2.113932]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Panagiotis Konstantinou, MD, Chief Physician, Department of Orthopaedic II, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Gennimatas”, Ethnikis Aminis 41, Thessaloniki 54635, Kentrikí Makedonía, Greece. pkonsb@auth.gr
Research Domain of This Article
Orthopedics
Article-Type of This Article
Minireviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Feb 18, 2026 (publication date) through Feb 4, 2026
Times Cited of This Article
Times Cited (0)
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Orthopedics
ISSN
2218-5836
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Chatzivasiliadis M, Konstantinou P, Koulalis D, Kostretzis L, Gkantsinikoudis N, Chaniotakis C, Gkoumousian K, Kapetanakis S. Laminectomy alone vs laminectomy with posterior fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis: The role of instability. World J Orthop 2026; 17(2): 113932 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v17.i2.113932]
Mikail Chatzivasiliadis, Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis, Constantinos Chaniotakis, Krikor Gkoumousian, Stylianos Kapetanakis, Department of Spine and Deformities, European Interbalkan Medical Center, Thessaloniki 57001, Kentrikí Makedonía, Greece
Panagiotis Konstantinou, Department of Orthopaedic II, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Gennimatas”, Thessaloniki 54635, Kentrikí Makedonía, Greece
Dimitrios Koulalis, Department of Orthopaedic I, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 11527, Attikí, Greece
Lazaros Kostretzis, Department of Orthopaedics, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Kentrikí Makedonía, Greece
Stylianos Kapetanakis, Department of Orthopedics, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki 54124, Kentrikí Makedonía, Greece
Author contributions: Chatzivasiliadis M drafted the original manuscript; Konstantinou P, Koulalis D, Kostretzis L, Gkantsinikoudis N, Chaniotakis C, Gkoumousian K, and Kapetanakis S contributed to study design and data acquisition; Koulalis D, Kostretzis L, Gkantsinikoudis N, and Kapetanakis S performed the data analysis and interpretation. All authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Panagiotis Konstantinou, MD, Chief Physician, Department of Orthopaedic II, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Thessaloniki “G. Gennimatas”, Ethnikis Aminis 41, Thessaloniki 54635, Kentrikí Makedonía, Greece. pkonsb@auth.gr
Received: September 9, 2025 Revised: October 15, 2025 Accepted: November 24, 2025 Published online: February 18, 2026 Processing time: 150 Days and 11.5 Hours
Abstract
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common degenerative spinal disorder in older adults and a leading indication for surgery. Decompression via laminectomy remains the gold standard when conservative measures fail, but the addition of posterior fusion in cases without clear instability remains controversial. Anatomical and biomechanical considerations lie at the center of this debate. Central canal stenosis, lateral recess narrowing, and degenerative spondylolisthesis represent the main contributors to LSS, but they also raise the question of whether they signal true instability. Definitions of instability vary considerably across studies and guidelines, and thresholds for diagnosis remain inconsistent. While fusion is appropriate in the presence of instability, the lack of standardized criteria causes an uncertainty that may influence surgeons to fuse in cases without having definitive radiographic criteria for instability. The aim of this review is to compare laminectomy alone with laminectomy plus posterior fusion in the surgical management of LSS. Emphasis is given on anatomical and biomechanical considerations, instability definitions, clinical outcomes, and guideline recommendations. High-quality multicenter randomized trials are needed to develop universally accepted instability definitions, guide management of borderline cases, and optimize patient outcomes.
Core Tip: Lumbar spinal stenosis is common in older adults, and laminectomy is the gold standard when surgery is required. The decision to add posterior fusion, however, is less clear when instability is not well defined. Spinal fusion is an irreversible intervention that permanently alters spinal biomechanics, making careful patient selection essential. This review explores the anatomical and biomechanical factors behind the controversy, the varying definitions of instability, and how these shape surgical practice. By comparing laminectomy alone with laminectomy plus fusion, we highlight current uncertainties and emphasize the need for clearer criteria and stronger evidence to guide surgeons in managing borderline cases.