Expandable endoprostheses in skeletally immature patients: Where we are

Abstract

Approximately 45 percent of malignant bone tumors are seen under the age of 16 and one of the important results of growth plate sacrification in patients with immature skeletons is limb inequality. Until the early 1990s, the treatment options for these patients were rotationplasty or amputation. Multimodal approaches that combine imaging, chemotherapy, and surgical techniques have enabled the development of limb-preserving methods with satisfactory results. In order to overcome inequality problems, expandable prostheses have been developed in the 1980s. Extendable endoprosthesis replacements have been improved over the years and are now an established and safe alternative. Noninvasive prostheses appear to be advantageous compared to minimally invasive expandable prostheses that require multiple surgical procedures, but the complication rate remains high. Therefore, although expandable prostheses are not the definitive answer to the treatment of bone sarcomas in skeletally immature children, they are still a suitable interim choice until full adulthood is achieved. Due to reported high complication rates, the procedures require significant experience and are recommended for use only in specialized cancer centers.

Keywords: Bone sarcoma; Expandable endoprostheses; Limb salvage surgery; Non-invasive; Minimal-invasive; Invasive; Extendible endoprostheses

Core Tip: Extendable endoprosthesis replacements have been improved over the years and are now an established and safe alternative. Noninvasive prostheses appear to be advantageous compared to minimally invasive expandable prostheses that require multiple surgical procedures, but the complication rate remains high. Due to reported high complication rates, the procedures require significant experience and are recommended for use only in specialized cancer centers.