Published online Oct 18, 2022. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i10.903
Peer-review started: December 24, 2021
First decision: February 15, 2022
Revised: February 27, 2022
Accepted: September 9, 2022
Article in press: September 9, 2022
Published online: October 18, 2022
Processing time: 296 Days and 18.3 Hours
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary total hip replacement (THR) is one of the most important threats in orthopedic surgery, so one important surgeon’s target is to avoid or early diagnose a PJI. Although the incidence of PJI is very low (0.69%) in our department, with an average follow-up of 595 d, this infection poses a serious threat due to the difficulties of treatment and the lower functional outcomes after healing.
To study the incidence of PJI in all operations occurring in the year 2016 in our department to look for predictive signs of potential infection.
We counted 583 THR for 578 patients and observed only 4 cases of infection (0.69%) with a mean follow-up of 596 d (min 30, max 1451). We reviewed all medical records to collect the data: duration and time of the surgery, presence, type and duration of the antibiotic therapy, preoperative diagnosis, blood values before and after surgery, transfusions, presence of preoperative drugs (in particularly anticoagulants and antiaggregant, corticosteroids and immunosuppressants), presence of some comorbidities (high body mass index, blood hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiac ischemia, diabetes, rheumatological conditions, previous local infections).
No preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative analysis showed a higher incidence of PJI. We did not find any class with evident major odds of PJI. In our study, we did not find any border value to predict PJI and all patients had similar values in both groups (non-PJI and PJI). Only some categories, such as female patients, showed more frequency of PJI, but this difference related to sex was not statistically significant.
We did not find any category with a higher risk of PJI in THR, probably due to the lack of few cases of infection.
Core Tip: In this study, we evaluated the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection in all interventions occurring in the year 2016 at our department at IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. We reviewed all operated patients to look for predictive signs of potential infection to explore methodological approaches that could better inform daily orthopedic practice. We reviewed the duration and time of surgery, presence, type and duration of antibiotic therapy, preoperative diagnosis, some blood values before and after surgery, transfusions, the presence of preoperative drugs, and the presence of some comorbidities.