Published online Mar 18, 2019. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i3.128
Peer-review started: July 27, 2018
First decision: August 20, 2018
Revised: October 18, 2018
Accepted: November 26, 2018
Article in press: November 27, 2018
Published online: March 18, 2019
Processing time: 142 Days and 17.7 Hours
To compare rotating versus fixed-bearing Press-Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma posterior stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with the new “J curve” femoral design in terms of clinical outcomes and anterior knee pain.
We retrospectively analyzed 39 patients who underwent primary total knee replacement surgery for knee osteoarthritis using the PFC Sigma PS TKA with either fixed (FP group, 20 cases) or rotating platform (RP group, 19 cases) treated between 2009 and 2013 by the same surgeon. The two groups were homogeneous for age, gender, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, pre-operative clinical and functional scores, and prosthetic alignment at two years after surgery. We analyzed clinical outcomes score at two years follow-up using Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Performance Score, Short Form (SF) 36, and anterior knee pain assessed by the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) patellar score.
No differences were found in KSS, Knee Performance Score, and SF-36 outcome scores. A statistically significant difference was found in the HSS Patella score objective (FP: 22.36; RP: 28.75; P < 0.05), HSS Patella score total (FP: 73.68; RP: 86.50; P < 0.05), and KOOS symptoms (FP: 73.49; RP: 86.44; P < 0.05).
Rotating platform in PFC Sigma PS TKA appears to reduce the short-term incidence of anterior knee pain compared to the fixed platform.
Core tip: Rotating platform in Press-Fit Condylar Sigma posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty reduces the short-term incidence of anterior knee pain compared to the fixed platform.