The selection of graft type for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains a topic of debate, taking into consideration patient characteristics, as well as the type and level of sports involvement. The aim of this scoping review was to investigate patient characteristics that might influence the selection of graft type for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. PubMed and Scopus were searched to identify articles for inclusion. All included studies focused on one or more patient characteristics involved in the decision-making process regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft, including the hamstrings tendon (HT), patellar tendon (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT). Out of the 1,977 initial studies, 27 studies were included in this review. The BPTB graft seems to be the preferred choice in young patients, females, and athletes-especially those engaged in pivoting sports. The HT graft seems to be the preferred choice in less active and older patients, along with those involved in sports where knee extensors are vital. The HT graft is not preferable in patients with a small body height and graft diameter. Moreover, surgeon preferences were also of importance for graft selection. The success of a specific graft type in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is highly dependent on the patient's characteristics and type of sport. Patient characteristics such as age, gender, body height, graft diameter, and the patient's activity level should all be considered when choosing the appropriate graft type.

Background: The isolated rectus femoris tendon (RT) is a less commonly used autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Graft selection is a critical part of ACL reconstruction, especially in revision surgery.

This study compares patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) between revision ACL reconstruction with an RT autograft and a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft. We hypothesized that the RT autograft will yield comparable functional results and high patient satisfaction.

This was a cohort study; the level of evidence is III. Methods: Fifty-five patients (RT n = 28; HT n = 27) who underwent revision ACL reconstruction were included in this study, with a mean follow-up time of 40.3 months (range, 16.4-64.8) for RT and 61.2 months (range, 34.6-86.3) for HT. Apart from the harvesting technique, the surgical technique was the same for both groups. Clinical and intraoperative data were collected for our postoperative registry. In addition, funcinal outcome was measured using the International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), the Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and numeric rating scale (NRS). The type and frequency of postoperative complications were documented. Results: At the final follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the RT and HT groups in the IKDC (mean ± SD: 74.7 ± 10.9 vs. 74.9 ± 12.9), Lysholm score (90.9 ± 15.0 vs. 89.0 ± 14.6), or Tegner activity scale (median [IQR]: 5 [4-6] vs. 5 [4-6]). The mean femoral tunnel diameter was 9.0 mm (range, 7.5-10 mm) for the RT and 8.2 mm (range 7.0-9.5 mm) for the HT. The use of the RT reduced the need for a two-stage procedure by 50% compared to HT (n = 5 vs. n = 10), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.11). Stability measured by the Lachman test improved significantly in both groups from the pre- to postoperative period. Retear of the ACL graft was observed in two patients in both groups (7.1% RT and 7.4% HT). Conclusions: The RT and HT autografts achieved similar outcomes in PROMs for revision ACL reconstruction. Good tendon quality with parallel fibers and adjustable thickness characterize the RT. A tendency for a reduced rate of two-stage surgery with RT was noticed.

The incidence of revision ACL reconstruction is rising. Surgeons should be aware of all the available graft options. The isolated RT expands the range of autografts available for ACL reconstruction.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), as an adjunct to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, is gaining popularity among pediatric and sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons for the treatment of ACL injury, especially in the female, hyperflexible, and high-risk athlete population. The addition of LET or anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction is typically recommended at the time of index ACL reconstruction surgery and is performed after the ACL graft is tensioned. Rotational instability has been described in cases where the ACL graft was malpositioned too vertically, and in those cases, ACL revision is indicated. In our case, ACL reconstruction was performed in isolation in a hyperflexible, high-risk (volleyball) female athlete, and she had persistent complaints of rotational instability despite an intact and well-positioned ACL graft on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. She demonstrated excessive internal rotation of the tibia in relation to the femur and exhibited symptomatic anterolateral instability on clinical examination, with a negative pivot shift but pain on internal rotation stress. She underwent a second surgery consisting of isolated modified Lemaire LET after examination under anesthesia (EUA) demonstrated negative Lachman and pivot shift. Second-look arthroscopy demonstrated an intact quadriceps autograft ACL graft. She recovered uneventfully, and her rotational instability problem was resolved. She returned to sports 12 months after the surgery and has been pleased with her result.

(1)Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) can be added to increased rotational stability in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.(2)Although typically added during the index procedure, it can be successfully completed later if needed.(3)The ACL confers both anteroposterior and rotational stability to prevent excessive anterior translation and excessive internal rotation of the tibia with respect to the femur.(4)LET can augment the ACL graft in preventing rotational instability in the setting of an ACL-deficient knee.

To evaluate patients who had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with preoperative hyperextension and compare physical examination (KT-1000 and pivot shift) and patient-reported outcome measures of patients who recovered the entire hyperextension with patients who did not.

Patients aged 18 to 60 years with more than 5° of knee hyperextension who had anatomic ACL reconstruction with any graft from June 2013 to June 2021 and at least a 24-month follow-up were evaluated retrospectively. Hamstrings and patellar tendon grafts were fixed around 20° to 30° of flexion and in full extension, respectively. Patients who could recover hyperextension were compared with patients who did not. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data, including physical examination and patient-reported outcome measures, were evaluated.

Of the 225 patients evaluated, 48 (21.3%) did not recover hyperextension, and 177 recovered full range of motion. Patients who did not recover hyperextension had a larger graft diameter (8.7 ± 0.7 mm [confidence interval, 8.502-8.898 mm] vs 8.3 ± 0.7 mm [confidence interval, 8.197-8.403 mm]; P = .018). Regarding the postoperative subjective variables, patients who recovered hyperextension showed improvement on all scales (International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Forgotten Joint Score, and Global Perceived Effect) evaluated compared with patients who did not recover the range of motion. Patients who recovered hyperextension also showed more laxity on physical examination, measured by the KT-1000 (1.8 ± 0.8 vs 1.1 ± 1.0; P = .0006) and the pivot shift (62.1% [grade 0] and 37.9% [grade 1] vs 79.2% [grade 0] and 20.8% [grade 1]; P = .027).

Patients with knee hyperextension who regained range of motion after ACL reconstruction have worse knee laxity than patients who regained full extension but not hyperextension. However, patients who recover full range of motion showed higher scores on subjective function scales, including a greater number of patients who achieved patient acceptable symptom state for the International Knee Documentation Committee score.

Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

This study aimed to determine the trends and indications for anterolateral complex augmentation during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) among international orthopedic sports surgeons.

An electronically distributed survey was sent out to international surgeons with high-volume experience in complex ligament reconstructions and revision surgery attending the 2024 Freddie Fu Panther Sports Medicine Symposium. The survey was sent prior to the meeting with questions related to the use of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALL-R) during ACL-R. Sessions pertaining to anterolateral complex augmentation were held during the symposium to inform about current clinical practices among attendees.

A total of 49 surgeons were identified from 5 different geographic regions prior to the meeting date and were sent an electronic survey, of which 48 responded (98% response rate). Among the surgeons who reported performing anterolateral complex augmentation procedures (n = 45), a total of 39 (87%) respondents reported using only the LET technique, 2 (4%) reported using only the ALL-R technique, and 4 (9%) reported using both techniques during ACL-R. The most common indication for anterolateral complex augmentation was a high-grade pivot shift, which 39 of 43 (91%) respondents ranked in their top 3 indications. In the setting of primary ACL-R, respondents added LET when using hamstring tendon autograft in 38% of cases on average compared with 34% of cases when using either bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft or quadriceps tendon autograft. In the setting of revision ACL-R, LET was added in an average of 68% of cases for a first-time revision ACL-R and in 84% of cases for a multiple-revision ACL-R.

The most common indication for ACL-R with anterolateral complex augmentation was a high-grade pivot shift and most respondents preferred LET over ALL-R. Respondents performed LET in a comparable percentage of cases of primary ACL-R using hamstring tendon, bone-patellar tendon-bone, and quadriceps tendon autografts, and this number increased with the number of revision ACL-Rs. Based on the results of this survey, surgeons may consider adding LET in cases of revision ACL-R or in patients with a high-grade pivot shift.

Level V.

The management of persisting instability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) includes isolated lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT). The present study investigates the outcomes following isolated LEAT to address ongoing instability following ACLR without LEAT. Patients with ongoing symptomatic instability following ACLR with a radiologically intact and well-positioned graft who underwent an isolated LEAT between January 2017 and March 2022 were retrospectively recruited. Patients completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and mean 26 months postoperatively. Twelve knees in 11 patients underwent an isolated LEAT. All Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score domains improved significantly between pre- and postoperative measurements (pain 60.9-91.7, p = 0.002; symptoms 62.5-93.8, p = 0.003; activities of daily living 64.3-95.2, p = 0.002; sport 61.9-82.5, p = 0.012; quality of life 17.2-80.2, p = 0.002). One patient required revision ACL surgery 19 months following their subsequent LEAT procedure. An isolated LEAT demonstrated clinically significant improvements in patient function and activity with acceptable surgical morbidity and should be considered as an option for appropriate cases with instability despite an intact ACL graft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:  Level IV prospective case series.

Some patients submitted to isolated ACL reconstruction may have symptomatic postoperative rotational instability. The objective of this study was to evaluate a population with mild rotatory instability after ACL reconstruction, which was submitted to an isolated extra-articular procedure.

Patients submitted to an isolated extra-articular procedure after ACL reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Only patients presenting anterior knee instability of less than 5 mm, pivot-shift of a maximum of 1+, and ACL graft intact were included. Demographic data, physical examination and subjective functional scales were evaluated.

Twenty patients were included. The mean age was 27.0 ± 7.3 years. The follow up time after the extra-articular procedure was 27.5 ± 6.2 months. The KT-1000 decreased from 3.0 mm ± 0.7 mm to 2 mm ± 0.4 mm (P = 0.00016). The pivot-shift improved from 100% of grade 1 positivity to 30% (6/20 patients) of grade 1 positivity (P < 0.0001). The IKDC showed no difference (74.4 ± 11.8 vs. 87.6 ± 5.8; P = 0.087), but the percentage of patients who passed the PASS IKDC cut-off value increased from 45% (9/20) to 95% (19/20) (P = 0.0012). The Lysholm increased from 81.1 ± 7.3 to 91.2 ± 5.7 (P = 0.0001).

Patients submitted to an isolated extra-articular procedure due to residual instability after ACL reconstruction showed improvement in physical examination (KT-1000 and pivot-shift) and subjective functional scales. This procedure can be considered for a specific population with minor instabilities and intact ACL graft, avoiding a complete ACL revision.

Persistent mildly abnormal knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is an ongoing clinical problem.

To compare the clinical outcomes of revision ACLR (rACLR), rACLR and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), or isolated LET in patients with a grade ≥2 pivot shift after ACLR with an intact or partially torn graft and a new, symptomatic medial meniscal tear.

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

A retrospective review of all patients with a new, symptomatic medial meniscal tear diagnosed after a primary ACLR was performed. Patients were included if they demonstrated a grade ≥2 pivot shift on physical examination with an intact or partially torn ACL graft. Exclusion criteria included complete graft rupture. The senior author's management evolved in a practice change design from rACLR to rACLR with LET, to isolated LET over the study period. The primary outcomes were the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 2 years postoperatively.

A total of 47 patients, with 16 in the rACLR group, 12 in the rACLR and LET group, and 19 in the isolated LET group were included. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar. At 2 years, the rACLR group IKDC score was 86.1 ± 6.6 and was lower than the rACLR and LET group (91.9 ± 4.4; P = .009; 95% CI, -10.4 to -1.2) and the isolated LET group scores (91.7 ± 3.0; P = .004; 95% CI, -9.7 to -1.6). The Lysholm score was lower in the rACLR group (85.8 ± 6.3) when compared with the rACLR and LET group (91.8 ± 4.6; P = .03; 95% CI, -11.8 to -0.39). There was no difference in any Tegner scores at 2 years (P = .09).

In patients with grade ≥2 pivot shift after an ACLR with an intact or partially torn graft and a new, symptomatic medial meniscal tear, the addition of an LET with or without rACLR led to improved PROs compared with an isolated rACLR. An isolated LET in this patient population should be considered an acceptable treatment option.

A lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is increasingly being utilized to augment an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction because it has been shown to reduce the risk of postreconstruction graft failure or recurrent rotatory instability. Various femoral fixation techniques are available, including the use of an interference screw, staple, or suture anchor.

To determine and compare the biomechanical properties of an LET graft when using an interference screw, staple, or suture anchor for the femoral fixation for a modified Lemaire LET.

Controlled laboratory study.

Eighteen fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were obtained and randomly assigned via a random group generator to undergo a modified Lemaire LET using either an interference screw, a staple, or a suture anchor for femoral fixation. The specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 20 mm/min until graft failure. The maximum failure load, stiffness, and failure mode for each specimen were recorded.

The mean failure load was highest for the interference screw (252.7 ± 131.2 N), followed by the staple (151.8 ± 34.1 N) and the suture anchor (105.7 ± 16.4 N). There was a significant difference in failure load between the interference screw and the suture anchor (P = .015). There was no significant difference between the staple and the interference screw (P = .101) or the suture anchor (P = .577). There was no significant difference in graft stiffness across all fixation methods (P = .089).

All 3 femoral fixation methods achieved adequate failure loads, although the interference screw had a greater failure load than the suture anchor and there was no significant difference between these implants and the staple. There were no significant differences in stiffness between the fixation methods.

The maximum failure load occurred with an interference screw for femoral fixation of a modified Lemaire LET; however, because of socket size, this implant may be at greater risk of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tunnel collision compared to a smaller-diameter suture anchor drill hole. The failure load of the suture anchor was the lowest; however, it appears sufficient for stable fixation based on the force experienced by an LET graft reported in the literature.

The addition of an extra-articular reinforcement, such as the anterolateral ligament (ALL) or a Lemaire's procedure, in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions has shown good clinical results, with greater graft protection and a lower rerupture rate. Despite being a reproducible procedure, its application in cases of large, muscled knees or in obese patients can be challenging. This Technical Note describes the "Open-ALL" technique, using a mini-open approach for a combined anterior cruciate ligament and ALL reconstruction.

To compare the surgical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autograft (HA) plus lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), isolated all-soft tissue quadriceps autograft (QA), and isolated HA.

A retrospective review was performed comparing high-risk patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with isolated HA, isolated QA, or HA + LET from August 2013 to January 2023. High-risk patients, as determined by high-grade pivot shift or generalized ligament laxity, with at least a 2-year follow-up, were included. Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were compared at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Retear rate, postoperative pivot-shift grade, return to sport, and complications were recorded.

In total, 159 patients (56 HA, 47 HA + LET, and 56 QA) were included. At 6 months postoperatively, the HA International Knee Documentation Committee score was significantly lower than that of the HA + LET and QA groups (P < .0001). Similarly, the Lysholm score was significantly lower in the HA cohort at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively (P < .0001-.02). There was no difference in the rate of achieving the minimally important clinical difference between the cohorts for either of these outcome scores. The retear rate was significantly higher in the HA group (17.9%) compared to the HA + LET (4.3%) and QA (1.8%) cohorts (P = .01). The rate of postoperative pivot shift of grade 2 or more was also higher in the isolated HA group (P = .04).

The use of an all-soft tissue QA or HA + LET for ACL reconstruction resulted in a lower retear rate and postoperative pivot-shift grade compared to an isolated HA graft in high-risk patients at 2 years postoperatively. There was no difference in the rate of achieving the minimal clinically important difference between the cohorts. The QA and HA + LET reconstruction options may improve stability and decrease the failure rate compared with HA reconstruction alone.

III, retrospective cohort study.

As a result of increased incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in young athletes, there is a rise in the indications surgical ACL reconstruction procedures. The value of anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction emerges as a proposed solution to prevent graft failures and improve stability in this high demanding category of patients. The purpose of this study is to present our experience with a novel hamstring auto-grafting technique, the single antegrade sling graft (SASG), for combined reconstruction of both ACL and ALL using autologous gracilis (GR) and semitendinosus (ST) grafts utilizing a single femoral tunnel and double tibial tunnels.

From January 2020 to December 2021, 21 soccer players were operated utilizing the SASG technique, a modification of the technique of SANTI study group. Inclusion criteria were participating in pivoting sport, high-grade pivot shift examination (Grade 2-3), and evidence of a lateral femoral notch sign or Segond's fracture on preoperative imaging. Patients were assessed for 2 years postoperatively by Lachman's test for anteroposterior laxity and pivot shift test for rotational laxity. The postoperative outcomes were assessed by Tegner-Lysholm and International knee documentation committee scores. Also, the postoperative complications such as stiffness, infection and graft failure were reported.

21 male soccer players with a mean age 26.4 years were included in this study. After 2 years follow up there was a statistically significant improvement in the both post-operative functional scores, P value < 0.001. Fifteen patients (71.4%) could return to their preoperative sport activity level with no giving-way symptoms. Only one case of graft failure was reported in the follow up.

The single antegrade sling graft (SASG), for combined reconstruction of both ACL and ALL yielded good results in terms of stability and return to sports. The technique is reproducible, and results are comparable to the available published literature.

To compare postoperative activity levels between patients who received an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with- and without a lateral extra-articular procedure (LEAP).

The primary objective is to examine whether patients treated with an ALCR and LEAP have a greater chance to return to sport (RTS) and return to their pre-injury level of sport (RTPS). The re-rupture rates between the two groups will also be analysed as this is of great influence on the RTS and RTPS.

A thorough search according to PRISMA guidelines was conducted through the PubMed and Embase databases in May 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and retrospective cohort studies on patients who underwent primary ACLR with- or without a LEAP were included. Postoperative Tegner score, RTS, RTPS and re-rupture rate were evaluated. All articles were revised according to Cochrane risk of bias tools (RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I).

Twenty-four studies were included after examining 966 titles, abstracts and manuscripts. A total of 33,527 patients were included in this review with a weighted mean age of 24.9 years. Pooled data demonstrates that the ACLR + LEAP group shows significantly higher postoperative Tegner scores (MD, 0.43 [95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.65]; p < 0.01). 62% of patients who underwent ACLR + LEA returned to their pre-injury level of sport compared to 40% in ACLR group (reported in nine studies).

This meta-analysis demonstrates that patients undergoing a LEAP procedure in addition to ACLR return to higher postoperative activity levels and are more likely to return to their pre-injury level of sport. These results -in addition to further research- may help dictate when to add a LEAP, and whether LEAP in addition to ACLR should become the golden standard.

Level III, retrospective cohort studies have been analysed, alongside RCT's, and thus this is the level of evidence.

Acute compartment syndrome is a rare donor-site complication of peroneus longus tendon graft harvesting. A case of leg compartment syndrome following peroneus longus tendon harvest for a revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is described. Symptoms began on the first day after surgery, including intense pain in the lateral aspect of the leg and dorsum of the foot and motor and sensory deficits of the common peroneal nerve. Emergency decompressive fasciotomy was necessary. The patient presented a complete resolution of symptoms and neurological deficit 24 days after surgery. Surgeons harvesting this graft should keep in mind the possibility of this complication in case of unusual pain in the early postoperative period so that they can quickly diagnose and treat this threatening condition.

To survey the ACL study group (ACLSG) members to determine the current practice patterns surrounding the use and methodology of lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs), including anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) during ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

A web-based questionnaire was distributed to members of the ACLSG during the 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2023 biennial meetings. Questions explored the indications and techniques when incorporating LEAPs in ACLR.

Analysis of survey responses found that the reported use of LEAPs in both primary and revision ACLR increased between 2016 and 2023 and that surgeons were using lateral augmentation more frequently over time. Surgical techniques were stable across survey years, with most surgeons using iliotibial band (ITB) autograft attached at Gerdy's tubercle, passed under the lateral collateral ligament (LCL), and anchored proximal/posterior to the lateral femoral epicondyle.

Survey responses demonstrate that LEAPs are becoming more common among ACL surgeons in the ACL SG, with the modified Lemaire LET being the predominant technique. This aligns with recent clinical studies showing improved outcomes and reduced risk of failure in ACLR with lateral augmentation compared to ACLR alone.

Level V, Expert Opinion.

Background/Objectives: Lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) has been advocated in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to improve knee stability and furthermore, decrease failure rates. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes, knee laxity, and failure rates after revision ACLR with LET (ACLR + LET) versus without LET. It was hypothesized that ACLR + LET improves clinical outcomes and reduces the failure rate. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted to examine patients who underwent revision ACLR with and without LET between 2017 and 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patients with coronal malalignment (>5°), posterior tibial slope >12°, and concomitant injuries to collateral ligaments were excluded. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score, the Lysholm score, and the Tegner activity scale (TAS). Anterior knee laxity was measured with a Rolimeter and side-to-side difference (SSD) was determined. Revision ACLR failure was defined as ACL revision surgery and SSD > 5 mm. Group comparisons were performed using chi-square-, independent-samples students t-test or Mann-Whitney-U tests. Results: Of 56 eligible patients, 45 (80%, follow up, 23 isolated rACLR vs. 22 rACLR + LET) were included with a mean follow-up of 45.6 ± 15.8 months. Postoperative PROMs were not statistically different between rACLR and rACLR + LET groups (IKDC: 73.0 ± 18.9 vs. 68.7 ± 16.6, n.s.; Lysholm: 84.8 ± 12.3 vs. 77.7 ± 16.2, n.s.). Both groups showed similar TAS (rACLR vs. rACLR +LET (5; range 4-6 vs. 4; range 3-5; n.s.). Anterior knee laxity SSD was 2.4 ± 1.3 mm in the rACLR group and 1.8 ± 1.8 mm in the rACLR + LET group (n.s.). The failure rate was 13% in the rACLR group compared to 4.5% in the rACLR + LET group (n.s.). Conclusions: Isolated revision ACLR showed comparable postoperative patient-reported outcome measures and anterior knee laxity compared to ACLR + LET at mid-term follow up. The addition of a LET demonstrated a lower, though non-significant, failure rate after revision surgery. However, future studies with a prospective, randomized design and an increased number of patients are needed to clearly identify the exact indication for the use of additional LET.

To evaluate the current utilization trends of practicing surgeons performing and lateral extra-articular augmentation (LEA) at the time of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

The survey was distributed via e-mail in August 2023 to members of the Arthroscopy Association of North America who identified as knee surgeons and was available online on the Arthroscopy Association of North America website from January to September 2023. The 18-question survey was designed regarding surgeons' surgical utilization patterns of LEA during ACLR. Survey questions were created based on prior published research and recommendations regarding indications for LEA, as well as surgeon factors that have been shown to influence operative decision-making. Data were analyzed by surgeon geographics, procedure preferences, patient-based decision factors, surgeon-based decision factors, and surgeon age.

The survey was completed by 165 sports medicine surgeons who identified as arthroscopic knee surgeons. Majority practice types included private practice (42.1%), academic centers (26.8%), and hospital systems (20.7%). Surgeon age was 50.36 years (range, 33-77 years). In total, 6.8% perform <20 ACLRs per year, 30.2% perform 20 to 40, 26.5% perform 40 to 60, 10.5% perform 60 to 80, and 25.9% perform >80 per year. Of the surgeons, 79.4% conduct LEA, with the modified Lemaire being the most common technique (43.5%), followed by other lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) techniques (42.0%) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALL) (27.5%). Some surgeons (14.5%) use more than 1 technique. High-volume (>60 ACLR/year) surgeons were more likely to perform LEA (23.1% vs 10.0%, P = .061) and more likely to perform anterolateral ligament reconstruction (32.2% vs 16.5%, P = .034). Younger surgeons (age <50) were more likely to use the modified Lemaire (44.4% vs 24.3%, P = .014). Decision-making to perform LEA weighted highly on patient hyperlaxity, pivot-shift severity, knee hyperextension, sport type, and age, respectively. The most reported surgeon-related factor influencing LEA utilization was training bias (38.9%).

Most orthopaedic surgeons with diverse geographics, demographics, practice setting, and ACLR volume perform LEA. Younger surgeons perform more frequently LEA, and surgeons admit to training bias in decision-making. Patient factors highly impacting utilization of LEA are hyperlaxity, pivot-shift severity, knee hyperextension, sport, and age.

LEA procedures for ACLR have become increasingly utilized in populations at high risk for rerupture. However, there is not currently a clear standard of care with regard to LEA procedure type or indications for augmentation.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has shown an upswing in popularity since the role of antero-lateral rotatory instability (ALRI) in ACL tears has become better understood. Its primary aim is to restore antero-lateral rotatory stability and hence reduce stresses placed on the ACL graft in high-risk individuals which should reduce graft failure rates. Many techniques have been described for LET using a variety of fixation methods (screws, anchors, etc.). Most of these techniques rely on a large incision laterally. We describe a novel technique ('mini-LET') which uses a 3-4 cm incision, to improve cosmesis.

ACL tears are the most common injuries in kabaddi, an inherently violent high pivoting and high-velocity direct contact sport. Combined ACL and MCL injuries and combined ACL and ALL injuries have been better understood but there is a lacuna of literature on these combined injuries in kabaddi players and no literature on combined AMRI and ALRI injuries. The present prospective cohort study aims to assess knee outcomes and return to sport for these injuries in elite kabaddi players.

A prospective cohort of 26 elite kabaddi players with clinical and MRI findings of ACL and MCL high-grade partial or complete tears were recruited. After ACL reconstruction and MCL repair, the resultant pivot shift was assessed against the now intact medial pillar and those with high-grade or explosive pivot were addressed using a modified deep Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis. Pain scores (VAS) and knee outcomes (IKDC and Lysholm scores) were assessed pre-operatively and at regular intervals until 1-year follow-up. Return to sport and complications were also assessed.

There was significant improvement in pain and knee scores throughout the study period, with most patients achieving full scores by six months duration. Return to sport was 96% and return to sport at pre-injury level was 77%. Complication rate of the combined triple procedure was low (< 5%), with most complications being minor.

The triple procedure of ACL reconstruction, MCL repair and Lateral extraarticular tenodesis successfully addressed the combined AMRI and ALRI in elite kabaddi players with a high rate of return to sport, excellent knee outcomes and low complication rate.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01268-3.

Several studies have demonstrated suture repair of ramp lesions of the medial meniscus via a posteromedial approach was associated with a significantly lower rate of secondary meniscectomy. However, these studies are not long-term and highlight the need for extended follow-up research to better understand the outcomes over a more extended period.

To evaluate the long-term results and reoperation rate for the failure of arthroscopic all-inside suture repair of ramp lesions of the medial meniscus via a posteromedial approach during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

All patients who underwent all-inside suture repair of the posterior segment of the medial meniscus (ramp lesion) via a posteromedial approach during ACL reconstruction at a minimum follow-up of 10 years were included in the study. Side-to-side anterior laxity was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative functional assessment was based on the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score for activities of daily living and the Tegner activity scale for sporting ability. Reinterventions for meniscal repair failure and other complications were also recorded at the last follow-up.

A total of 81 patients met the inclusion criteria for this study. Two patients had an ACL graft rupture with a new ramp lesion and were excluded from the analysis. Additionally, 15 patients were lost to follow-up, leaving a total of 64 patients in the final analysis. The mean follow-up was 124.8 months (range, 122.4-128.4 months). Mean side-to-side difference in anterior laxity significantly improved from 7.4 ± 1.5 mm (range, 5-12 mm) to 0.4 ± 1.3 mm (range, -3 to 4 mm) (P = .01). The mean subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score increased from 64.3 ± 13.4 (range, 34-92) before the operation to 91.1 ± 10.1 (range, 49-100) at the last follow-up (P = .001). The Tegner activity scale score at the last follow-up (6.3 ± 1.6) was lower than that before the trauma (7.1 ± 1.6) (P = .02). Fourteen patients (21.9%) had a failed meniscal repair and were reoperated. The mean time from initial repair to reoperation was 64.5 months (range, 13-126 months), and the median was 60.6 months. The multivariate analysis, including parameters such as lateral tenodesis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; P = .50), preoperative Tegner score (HR, 1.66; P = .41), preoperative laxity (HR, 1.75; P = .35), age at surgery (HR, 1.02; P = .97), and number of sutures (HR, 2.38; P = .19), did not reveal any factors associated with suture failure.

The results show that arthroscopic repair of ramp lesions of the medial meniscus during ACL reconstruction using a posteromedial approach has a high failure rate at the 10-year follow-up, with half of these suture failures occurring within 5 years after the initial repair.

The study hypothesized that the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) had a significant effect on ACL graft healing.

A total of 80 patients were divided into two cohorts matched for gender, age, body mass index, time from surgery to post-operative MRI and graft diameter. Forty patients underwent ACL reconstruction alone, while 40 underwent ACLR in addition to LEAT. Patients underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan at 12 months post-surgery; tunnel apertures were measured using multiplanar reformation, graft healing was assessed using signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) in three regions of interest and finally graft maturity and integration were classified using the Howell and Ge scale, respectively. In addition, clinical evaluation and patient-reported outcome measures were collected.

The mean femoral tunnel widening at 12 months post-surgery was 39.8 ± 14.0% in the ACLR + LEAT group and 55.2 ± 12.7% in the ACLR alone group (p < 0.05). The mean tibial tunnel widening was 29.3 ± 12.7% in the ACLR + LEAT group and 44.4 ± 12.1% in the ACLR group (p < 0.05). The mean adjusted graft SNQ was 9.0 ± 14.9 in the ACLR + LEAT group and 9.5 ± 11.4 in the ACLR group (n.s.).

At 1 year post-operatively, we noted significantly less femoral and tibial tunnel widening in the ACLR + LEAT group. LEAT did not result in a statistically significant effect on graft healing.

Level III.

To compare return-to-sport (RTS) rates, graft failure rates, and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) with additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) versus isolated R-ACLR.

A retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent R-ACLR with or without a modified Lemaire LET procedure was performed. Seventy-four patients with at least 2 years of follow-up who had high-grade positive pivot-shift test findings were included. Concomitant procedures such as meniscectomy and meniscal repair were collected, along with any complications and/or graft failure. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form score were collected. The ability to RTS was defined as fully, partially, or not returned.

Of the patients, 39 underwent isolated R-ACLR (mean age ± standard deviation, 29.2 ± 12.2 years) whereas 35 underwent an additional LET procedure (mean age, 24.6 ± 7.4 years). The mean length of follow-up in the R-ACLR group was 56.6 ± 26.5 months compared with 44.3 ± 17.6 months in the R-ACLR-LET group (P = .02) (range, 24-120 months). Patient-reported outcome measures were higher in the R-ACLR-LET group, with the KOOS Activities of Daily Living (93.5 ± 2.0 vs 97.2 ± 1.6, P = .03) and KOOS Sport (63.0 ± 3.6 vs 74.3 ± 3.8, P = .05) subdomain scores reaching the level of statistical significance. No differences were found in the other KOOS subdomain scores or the International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Failure rates were not significantly different between the groups (12.8% for R-ACLR vs 11.4% for R-ACLR-LET, P = .99). There were 13 patients (72.2%) in the R-ACLR group and 14 patients (60.8%) in the R-ACLR-LET group who did not RTS.

R-ACLR with additional LET showed similar failure and RTS rates to isolated R-ACLR after failed ACLR. The R-ACLR-LET group showed better functional results with significantly higher KOOS subdomain scores for activities of daily living, as well as sports and recreation. However, this study was unable to recommend the modified Lemaire LET procedure to be routinely used in R-ACLR patients.

Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

To determine the most common indications for lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

A systematic review of the literature was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 2000 to the present (June 2022). Studies that met the following criteria were included: patients of any age who underwent LET in addition to ACLR, studies reporting at least 1 indication for LET, and observational/randomized controlled trial study designs including prevalence of indications. Publications had to be reported in English and peer reviewed and to have originated in the United States or countries offering identical protocols and procedures.

A total of 463 studies were identified from the initial search, 23 of which met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Eight of the 23 studies (34.8%) used a modified Lemaire technique, seven (30.4%) used a MacIntosh modified by Arnold-Coker, and eight (34.8%) used other techniques to perform LET. A total of 2,125 patients (53% female, 47% male [3 studies did not report sex]) underwent ACLR augmented with LET. The indications along with prevalence were as follows: positive pivot shift test (grade ≥2) (19 of 23, 82.6%), revision ACLR (12 of 23, 52.2%), ligamentous laxity (11 of 23, 47.8%), general sports participation (11 of 23, 47.8%), age less than 25 years (8 of 23, 34.8%), high risk of graft failure (5 of 23, 21.7%), and positive Lachman test (4 of 23, 17.4%).

Pivot shift grade ≥2 was the most common reason orthopaedic surgeons chose to add LET to ACLR, with revision ACLR, patient age <25, and general sports participation following closely behind.

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

A P value of <.05 is often used to denote statistical significance; however, in many scenarios, this threshold is vulnerable to a small number of outcome reversals. This study joins a body of studies within the orthopaedic literature that evaluate the statistical fragility of existing research via metrics such as fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ).

The purpose of this study was to investigate the statistical fragility of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative studies on the topic, given the resurgent interest in lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to augment primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It was hypothesized that the outcomes reported in these studies would be statistically fragile.

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Comparative studies and RCTs regarding LET as an adjunct procedure to ACLR published between 2000 and 2022 were analyzed. Descriptive characteristics, dichotomous outcomes, and continuous outcomes were extracted. The FI and continuous FI (CFI) were calculated by the number of event reversals to change significance; the FQ and continuous FQ (CFQ) were calculated to normalize the fragility metrics per sample size.

Of 455 studies screened, 29 studies were included (9 RCTs, 20 comparative); 79.3% of included studies were published after 2020. A total of 48 dichotomous and 265 continuous outcomes were analyzed. The median FI was 9.0 (IQR, 7.0-13.3), with FQ of 0.1 (IQR, 0.04-0.17); the median CFI was 7.8 (IQR, 4.2-19.6), with CFQ of 0.12 (IQR, 0.08-0.19). The FQ and CFQ for studies on LET with revision ACLR were larger (0.117 and 0.113, respectively) than those focused on primary ACLR (0.042 and 0.095, respectively).

Studies focused on LET with primary ACLR were more fragile than those on LET with revision, which suggests that further research on the indications for LET with primary ACLR is necessary. Future orthopaedic comparative research should include fragility metrics alongside traditional P values.

To determine the mean contact pressure, peak contact pressure, and mean contact area of the lateral tibiofemoral joint in lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) with tension on the graft in tibial neutral and external rotation.

A total of eight Thiel-embalmed cadaveric knees were prepared and divided into two groups (4 knees in each group): the LET-NR group (lateral extra-articular tenodesis tension in neutral rotation) and (2) the LET-ER group (lateral extra-articular tenodesis tension in external rotation). Each knee was prepared according to the corresponding technique. A hydraulic testing system (E10000, Instron) simulates an axial load of 735 ​N for 10 ​s in each group.

The LET-ER group exhibited a statistically significant higher peak contact pressure compared to the LET-NR group. The peak contact pressure values in the LET-NR and LET-ER groups were 702.3 ​± ​233.9 ​kPa and 1235.5 ​± ​171.4 ​kPa, respectively (p ​= ​0.010, 95% CI, -888.0 to -178.5). The mean contact pressure values in the LET-NR and LET-ER groups were 344.9 ​± ​69.0 ​kPa and 355.3 ​± ​34.9 ​kPa, respectively (p ​= ​0.796, 95% CI, -105.1-84.2). The mean contact area values in the LET-NR and LET-ER groups were 36.8 ​± ​3.1 mm2 and 33.3 ​± ​6.4 mm2, respectively (p ​= ​0.360, 95% CI, -5.2-12.2).

The peak contact pressure of the lateral tibiofemoral joint is greater in LET when the graft is tensioned in external rotation than in neutral rotation. However, no statistically significant difference in the mean contact pressure or the mean contact area was observed between the two groups.

III.

This article aims to provide a new surgical technique for rotational instability in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Two main groups of surgical procedures can be identified in the treatment of anterolateral knee instability: lateral extra-articular tenodesis and anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Although the importance of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in anterolateral complex injuries is well known, the superiority of lateral extra-articular tenodesis over anterolateral ligament reconstruction or vice versa has not yet been shown. Both techniques show improved outcomes and reduced graft failure rates. The presented procedure can be considered a modification of the technique first described by Lemaire. Better tensioning can be achieved through cortical suspension by identifying the anisometric point on the lateral femur and performing a medial pullout on the femoral side. The advantages of this technique are better fine-tuning and tensioning, less invasiveness, and adjustable cortical fixation, which allows for a precise, incremental tensioning of the graft, ensuring circumferential healing of the graft within the socket and reducing the risk of graft laceration, which may happen with interference screws. Internal bracing provides excellent contact pressure between the femoral button and femoral cortex, ensuring that adequate tensioning is applied to the graft.

» The rate of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure in at-risk populations remains unacceptably high and necessitates thorough evaluation of native alignment and concomitant injuries.» Posterior tibial slope of >12° is a substantial risk factor of ACLR failure and should be corrected through anterior closing wedge osteotomy.» Varus malalignment of >5° exacerbates stress on the ACL graft, increases ACLR failure risks, and should be considered for correction through high tibial osteotomy at the time of revision ACLR.» Injuries to the anterolateral ligamentous complex are prevalent in ACL ruptures, and high-risk patients have shown benefit from anterolateral ligament reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis in the revision setting.» Addressing posterolateral corner, collateral ligament, and meniscal injuries, during revision ACLR, is vital to mitigate increased graft forces and optimize knee stability and functional outcomes.

The Stability Study was a multicenter, pragmatic, parallel groups, randomized clinical trial comparing hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with or without the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis in young patients at high risk of graft failure. Having recruited 618 patients with a 5% loss to follow up, we were able to demonstrate a clinically and statistically significant reduction in clinical failure and graft rupture at 2 years postoperative. No differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were demonstrated between groups; however, patients who experienced an adverse event had significantly worse PROs than those who did not.

Only a few anatomic studies have described an isolated rectus femoris tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study aims to demonstrate a new surgical technique utilising the rectus femoris tendon for ACL reconstruction. This study hypothesises that the rectus tendon autograft will yield satisfying postoperative outcomes in terms of stability, with minimal complications at the harvest site.

This retrospective study investigated the outcomes of 28 revision ACL reconstructions using a rectus tendon autograft with a mean follow-up of 41.7 (range, 24.0-64.8) months. A 3 cm longitudinal incision was used to harvest the rectus tendon with an open tendon stripper. Intraoperative collected data included the length of the tendon and thickness of a 4-fold graft. Further outcome parameters include anterior cruciate ligament stability and range of motion. Additionally, postoperative complications, especially donor site morbidity, were documented in type and frequency.

The mean tendon length measured 32.4 cm (range, 30-35 cm). After preparing a 4-fold graft, the mean diameter was 9.2 mm (range, 8.0-10 mm) at the tibial and 9.0 mm (range, 7.5-10 mm) at the femoral end. Stability evaluated by the Lachman test improved significantly from 2 (Interquartile range (IQR), 2-3) preoperatively to 0 (IQR, 0-1) postoperatively (p < .001). Rerupture of the anterior cruciate ligament graft was observed in 2 patients (7.1%). Four patients showed a persistent extension deficit of about 5 degrees postoperatively. Two of them underwent revision surgery due to a Cyclops lesion. Only one patient complained of prolonged pain at the harvest site (3.6%).

The 4-fold rectus tendon represents a novel autograft technique in revision ACL reconstruction. This study provides evidence of appropriate graft dimensions and satisfying postoperative outcomes regarding stability. The technique is associated with a low complication rate at the harvest site.

Case series; Level of evidence, IV.

Clinical studies have demonstrated significant advantages of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) and lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) over isolated ACLR in terms of reducing graft rupture and reoperation rates. However, most of the published studies have included young patients, and no studies have focused on patients aged >30 years.

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of isolated ACLR versus ACLR + LEAP at midterm follow-up in patients aged >30 years. The hypothesis was that patients who underwent combined procedures would experience significantly lower rates of graft rupture.

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Patients >30 years of age who underwent primary ACLR + LEAP between January 2003 and December 2020 were propensity matched at a 1:1 ratio to patients who underwent isolated ACLR. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed to determine graft rupture rates, knee stability, reoperation rates, and complications. Graft survivorship was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors associated with the occurrence of graft failure were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Two groups of 551 patients each were included in the study, and the mean follow-up was 97.19 ± 47.23 months. The overall mean age was 37.01 ± 6.24 years. The LEAP group consisted of 503 (91.3%) patients who had anterolateral ligament reconstruction and 48 (8.7%) patients who had a Lemaire procedure. Overall, 19 (1.7%) patients had graft failure: 15 (2.7%) in the no-LEAP group and 4 (0.7%) in the LEAP group (P = .0116). The risk of graft failure was significantly associated with the absence of LEAP (31 vs 12; hazard ratio, 3.309; 95% CI, 1.088-10.065; P = .0350) and age between 30 and 35 years (hazard ratio, 4.533; 95% CI, 1.484-13.841; P = .0080). A higher rate of reoperation for secondary meniscectomy was found in the no-LEAP group (5.6% vs 2.2%; P = .0031).

Patients aged >30 years who underwent combined ACLR and LEAP experienced a >3-fold lower risk of ACL graft failure compared with those who underwent isolated ACLR. Furthermore, the group without LEAP experienced a higher rate of secondary meniscectomy.

A reliable evaluation of anterolateral rotatory instability in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knee is important to help surgeons determine which patients might need concurrent anterolateral augmentation procedures.

The purpose of this study was to systematically review studies that assess the intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of instruments used to measure anterolateral rotatory laxity of the knee.

A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases for original, English-language studies evaluating the reliability of objective or instrument-based anterolateral rotatory laxity of the knee until October 31, 2022. Reliability data were extracted from text, tables, and figures.

Twelve studies, with patients between the ages of 14-63 years, were included. The instruments used to measure anterolateral rotatory knee laxity included inertial sensors (n ​= ​9), magnetic resonance imaging (n ​= ​1), and navigation systems (n ​= ​2). The global intra-observer intraclass correlation coefficient for these devices was between 0.63 and 0.97, and the global inter-observer reliability was between 0.63 and 0.99.

Instrument-based anterolateral rotatory knee laxity assessment has moderate to good intra- and inter-observer reliability. Evaluating anterolateral instability in ACL-deficient knees with these devices could help in decision-making when considering anterolateral augmentation.

IV.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are one of the most common knee injuries experienced by active individuals engaging in cutting sports. Despite improved surgical techniques and rehabilitation, the return to sport rate and re-tear rates remain unsatisfactory. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is a procedure that has been growing in interest when performed in conjunction with ACL reconstruction. The benefits of adding an LET procedure to an ACL surgery may include greater rotational stability, decreased re-tear rates, and improved return to play. Level of evidence: V.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are becoming more common in younger and older athletes. Approximately 250,000 ACL injuries occur each year, requiring the need for an effective and reproducible surgical technique.

The 3-incision outside-in technique utilizes the donor quadriceps tendon, an extraordinarily strong graft, without damage from autogenous harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstrings. While some data suggest higher re-rupture risk with donor tissue, this is counterbalanced by avoiding secondary surgical site damage.

The ruptured ACL is removed and the intercondylar notch is cleaned to visualize the anatomical ACL insertion site. Using the 3-tunnel technique a gaff is passed through the intercondylar notch, through a puncture hole (incision 1) and a rear entry guide hooked to its tip. The guide point is pulled into the knee and placed in posterior aspect of the anatomic footprint of the native ACL. Through incision 2, a guide pin is drilled to this point and overdrilled with a 10-mm drill. The edges of the hole in the intercodylar notch are smoothed with a currette. The tibial footprint is cleared, a tibial aiming guide placed. Through incision 3, a guide pin is placed and over drilled with a 10-mm drill followed by a Gore-Tex reamer to ensure no impingement would inhibit graft passage. The proximal bone of a quadriceps tendon graft is sized through a 10-mm sizer and compacted. Two holes are drilled to hold sutures for the proximal aspect of the femoral graft. The quadriceps tendon graft is sized to fit through a 9-mm tunnel and the free end whipped with a stitch before being passed from outside-in through the smoothed tunnels. The femoral bone block is tapped to have a press fit initially and then is fixed with a Milagro screw. The knee is cycled ten times to remove slack and the interference fit guide pin is placed on the anterior aspect of the graft, and fixed with the knee at 15° to 30° of flexion. Stability is tested with confirmation of no impingement, and then an extra-articular reconstruction with a semitendinosus allograft is performed. The extra articular reconstruction is placed at the point between Gerdy's tubercle and the fibular head, passed under the skin and the iliotibial band, and then inserted just anterior and superior to the ACL femoral drill hole.

Patient outcomes in our initial experience are comparable to our autogenous bone-tendon-bone (BTB) procedures without anterior knee pain. Return to sport is similar with autogenous procedures, with a delay of 6 to 12 months. In addition, there is a possibility for acceleration of healing with the addition of platelet-rich plasma and hyaluronic acid between 1 and 3 months postsurgery. We have insufficient data so far to determine if the re-rupture rate will decline compared with reported outcomes.

The 3-incision technique with allograft quadriceps tendon for ACL reconstruction is a reproducible surgical technique that avoids harvest from the patient's own body.

The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

The lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be considered in selected patients to diminish the risk of persistent rotatory instability and achieve a protective effect on the graft. Several techniques have been described in the literature to treat rotatory instability. Usually, a strip of the iliotibial band (ITB) is harvested from its middle while leaving the distal insertion, then passed underneath the lateral collateral ligament and fixed on the lateral aspect of the distal femur with various fixation methods such as staples, screws, anchors or extracortical suspensory devices. Despite their effectiveness, these fixation methods may be associated with complications such as lateral pain, over-constraint and tunnel convergence.

This study presents a detailed surgical description of a new technique to perform an LET during ACL reconstruction with any type of graft fixing the ITB strip with the sutures of the ACL femoral button, comparing its pros and cons in relation to similar techniques found in the literature.

This technique represents a reproducible, easy to learn and inexpensive solution to perform a lateral extra-articular tenodesis associated with an ACL reconstruction using the high-resistance sutures of the femoral button.

To summarise the surgical techniques and clinical outcomes in paediatric and adolescent patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (r-ACLR).

Three databases (MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE) were searched from inception to 29 July 2023. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on demographics, surgical details, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), rates of instability, rupture and return to sport (RTS) were extracted.

Eight studies comprising 706 (711 knees) patients were included (48.7% female). The mean age at r-ACLR was 17.1 years (range: 16.5-18.0). Autografts (67.5%) were more common than allografts (32.2%) in revision, with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) being the most prevalent autograft source (59.6%). Bone grafts were used in seven patients (4.8% of 146 patients). The most common femoral and tibial fixation techniques were interference screws (37.6% and 38.1%, of 244 patients, respectively). The most common tunnelling strategy was anatomic (69.1% of 236 patients), and meniscus repairs were performed in 39.7% of 256 patients. The re-rupture rate was 13.0% in 293 patients. RTS at the same level or higher was 51.6% in 219 patients. The mean (SD) Lysholm score was 88.1 (12.9) in 78 patients, the mean (SD) Tegner score was 6.0 (1.6) in 78 patients, and the mean (SD) IKDC score was 82.6 (16.0) in 126 patients.

R-ACLR in paediatric and adolescent patients predominantly uses BPTB autografts and interference screw femoral and tibial fixation with concomitant meniscal procedures. Rates of re-rupture and RTS at the same level or higher were 13.0% and 51.6%, respectively. Information from this review can provide orthopaedic surgeons with a comprehensive understanding of the most commonly used operative techniques and their outcomes for revision ACLR in this population.

Level IV.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a common clinical injury, and ACL reconstruction has reached a very mature stage. However, with the accumulation of cases, scholars have found that isolated ACL reconstruction may not completely solve the problem of knee rotational stability. With the increase in our understanding of knee joint structure, ACL combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction has become accepted by most scholars, and this operation has also achieved good clinical results. At present, there is no unified surgical method for ACL combined with ALL reconstruction. There are differences in bone tunnel location, reconstruction methods, and graft selection. Compared with the independent reconstruction of the ACL and ALL during the operation, shared tendon graft reconstruction of the ACL and ALL has the advantages of preserving tendon and avoiding tunnel convergence. So far, there is no relevant literature summarizing the reconstruction of the ACL and ALL with a shared tendon graft. This paper reviews the anatomic study of the ALL, the study of isometric points, surgical indications, and surgical methods and their classification for shared tendon graft reconstruction of the ACL and ALL.

This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) alone, ACLR with lateral tenodesis, and ACL and ALL reconstruction.

A retrospective cohort of prospectively collected data on all ACL procedures was performed at Aspetar Specialized Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital between January 2020 and January 2021. Patients were treated with ACLR alone, ACLR with lateral tenodesis, or ACLR with ALL reconstruction. The primary outcome was the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (sIKDC) score. The secondary outcomes were the ACL Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores, pivot shift grade, subjective knee stability, and subjective pain on activity.

A total of 100 cases were included. The most common technique was ACLR with lateral tenodesis (42%), followed by ACLR alone (38%) and ACL with ALL reconstruction (20%). The mean age was 28.15 years (15-60), and 94% of the patients were males. Meniscal procedures were more frequent in the ACLR alone group (65.8%). There was no association between subjective stability, sIKDC, ACL-RSI, and pivot shift grade and the three ACLR techniques while adjusting for age, sex, and concomitant meniscus procedures at six weeks, 12 weeks, six months, and nine months. However, there was a significant decrease in postoperative flexion in the ACL and ALL reconstruction group by a mean of 22° (95% CI - 40.7 - 3.4; P = 0.02) at 6 weeks compared to ACLR alone, which was not evident on later follow-ups.

ACLR with/without lateral augmentation procedures yields similar subjective IKDC, ACL-RSI, pivot shift grade, and subjective knee instability at short-term follow-up. Therefore, lateral extra-articular augmentation procedures are safe to be performed.

Tibial spine fractures (TSFs) are avulsion fractures at the site where the anterior cruciate ligament inserts onto the tibial eminence. TSFs typically affect children and adolescents aged 8-14 years. The incidence of these fractures has been reported to be approximately 3 per 100,000 per year, but the rising involvement of paediatric patients in sporting activities is increasing the number of these injuries. TSFs are historically classified on plain radiographs according to the Meyers and Mckeever classification system, which was introduced in 1959, but the renewed interest in these fractures and the increasing use of magnetic resonance imaging led to the recent development of a new classification system. A reliable grading protocol for these lesions is paramount to guide orthopedic surgeons in determining the correct treatment for young patients and athletes. TSFs can be addressed conservatively in the case of nondisplaced or reduced fractures or surgically in the case of displaced fractures. Different surgical approaches and, specifically, arthroscopic techniques have been described in recent years to ensure stable fixation while limiting the risk of complications. The most common complications associated with TSF are arthrofibrosis, residual laxity, fracture nonunion or malunion, and tibial physis growth arrest. We speculate that advances in diagnostic imaging and classifications, combined with greater knowledge of treatment options, outcomes, and surgical techniques, will likely reduce the occurrence of these complications in paediatric and adolescent patients and athletes, allowing them a timely return to sports and everyday activities.

Results from the Stability Study suggest that adding a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to a hamstring tendon autograft reduces the rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure in high-risk patients. The purpose of this study is to report adverse events over the 2-year follow-up period and compare groups (ACLR alone vs. ACLR + LET).

Stability is a randomized clinical trial comparing hamstring tendon ACLR with and without LET. Patients aged 14-25 years with an ACL deficient knee were included. Patients were followed and adverse events documented (type, actions taken, resolution) with visits at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Adverse events were categorized as none, minor medical, minor surgical, contralateral ACL rupture, or graft rupture. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected at each visit included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC), and ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACL-QOL).

In total, 618 patients were randomized (mean age 18.9 years, 302 (49%) male). Forty-five patients (7%) suffered graft rupture; 34 (11%) in the ACLR group compared to 11 (4%) in the ACLR + LET group (RRR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.83, p < 0.001). There were no differences in effusion or infection rates between groups. The ACLR + LET group experienced an increased number of hardware removals (10 vs. 4). Overall, the rate of minor medical events (11%), minor surgical events (7%), and ipsilateral or contralateral ACL tears (10%) were low considering the high-risk patient profile. Increasing severity of adverse events was associated with lower PROMs at 24 months post-operative. Patients in the ACLR + LET group reported greater degree of pain at 3 months only. There were no clinically significant differences in range of motion between groups.

The addition of LET to hamstring tendon autograft ACLR in young patients at high risk of re-injury resulted in a statistically significant reduction in graft rupture. While the addition of LET may increase rates of hardware irritation, there was no significant increase in overall rates of minor medical adverse events, minor surgical events, or overall re-operation rates. The concerns regarding complications associated with a LET did not materialize in this study.

Level I.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is being performed more frequently with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) to decrease graft failure rates. The posterior tibial slope (PTS) affects ACL graft failure rates. The effect of ACLR + LET on tibial motion and graft forces with increasing PTS has not been elucidated.

LET would decrease anterior tibial translation (ATT), tibial rotation, and ACL graft force versus ACLR alone with increasing tibial slope throughout knee range of motion.

Controlled laboratory study.

Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (mean donor age, 40.5 years; all female) were tested in 4 conditions (intact, ACL cut, ACLR, and ACLR + LET) with varying PTSs (5°, 10°, 15°, and 20°) at 3 flexion angles (0°, 30°, and 60°). Specimens were mounted to a load frame that applied a 500-N axial load with 1 N·m of internal rotation (IR) torque. The amount of tibial translation, IR, and graft force was measured.

Increasing PTS revealed a linear and significant increase in graft force at all flexion angles. LET reduced graft force by 8.3% (-5.8 N) compared with ACLR alone at 30° of flexion. At the same position, slope reduction resulted in reduced graft force by 17% to 22% (-12.3 to -15.2 N) per 5° of slope correction, with a 46% (-40.7 N) reduction seen from 20° to 5° of slope correction. For ATT, ACLR returned tibial translation to preinjury levels, as did ACLR + LET at all flexion angles, except full extension, where ACLR + LET reduced ATT by 2.5 mm compared with the intact state (P = .019).

Increased PTS was confirmed to increase graft forces linearly. Although ACLR + LET reduced graft force compared with ACLR alone, slope reduction had a larger effect across all testing conditions. No other clinically significant differences were noted between ACLR with versus without LET in regard to graft force, ATT, or IR.

Many authors have proposed LET in the setting of ACLR, revision surgery, hyperlaxity, high-grade pivot shift, and elevated PTS, but the indications remain unclear. The biomechanical performance of ACLR + LET at varying PTSs may affect daily practice and provide clarity on these indications.

Tibial anterolateral rotary instability associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears is a well-documented and difficult problem with a long history of solutions. The lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has undergone multiple refinements in technique, largely focusing on the femoral site insertion using either an interference screw versus a staple for adequate fixation. In this article, we present an improved technique using a suture anchor as an alternative to a staple or an interference screw with secure fixation to insert the LET graft onto the femur. This technique diminishes the chance of ACL tunnel-LET drilling convergence, minimizes the footprint required for adequate graft fixation, and allows the surgeon to dial in the correct tension necessary for adequate augmentation of an ACL reconstruction.

The addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has become increasingly popular to address residual rotatory knee instability. The purpose of this article is to review the anatomy and biomechanics of the anterolateral complex (ALC) of the knee, outline different LET techniques, and provide biomechanical and clinical evidence for its use as an augmentation procedure with ACLR.

Rotatory knee instability has been identified as a common contributor to ACL rupture in both the primary and revision settings. Several biomechanical studies have shown that LET reduces strain on the ACL by decreasing excess tibial translation and rotation. Additionally, in vivo studies have demonstrated restoration of side-to-side differences in anterior-posterior knee translation, higher rates of return to play, and overall increased patient satisfaction following combined ACLR and LET. As a result, various LET techniques have been developed to help offload the ACL graft and lateral compartment of the knee. However, conclusions are limited by a lack of concrete indications and contraindications for use of LET in the clinical setting. Recent studies have shown that rotatory knee instability contributes to native ACL and ACL graft rupture and LET may provide further stability to reduce rates of failure. Further investigation is needed to establish concrete indications and contraindications to determine which patients would most benefit from added stability of the ALC.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction can be used as an augmentation procedure in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and are thought to minimize rotational instability, lower re-rupture rates of the ACL graft and improve functional outcomes after surgery. Young patients with high-grade pivot shift or generalized laxity participating in high demand/pivoting sports are considered as the ideal candidates for such a procedure. Both in LET and in ALL reconstruction, femoral fixation of the graft using an interference screw remains a challenge due to the possibility of tunnel convergence of the two tunnels created in the femur, namely the ACL femoral tunnel and the tunnel created in the lateral femur for the LET or ALL procedure. With this technical note, we aim to describe a safe approach for femoral tunnel creation by providing the surgeon not only with instructions for a safe orientation but also with the possibility to check for a possible tunnel collision by using the arthroscope through the anteromedial portal. Although instructions can be used both for LET and ALL reconstruction (same femoral tunnel), a modified Lemaire LET is extensively described since this procedure is the authors' preference for augmenting anatomic ACL reconstruction.