Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rising globally, with patellar management impacting outcomes. Resurfacing reduces pain and revision rates but poses complications, while non-resurfacing lowers costs but risks persistent pain. This study updates previous meta-analyses by comparing the functional and economic outcomes of both approaches.

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing in TKA with functional outcomes in adults were included. Five databases were searched until February 6, 2024. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Any disagreements were resolved by a third author. Statistical analysis used a random-effects model, reporting mean differences (MD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to assess heterogeneity and reliability.

A total of 49 studies (34 RCTs, 15 observational) were included from 963 screened records. Analysis of 22 studies found no significant difference in Knee Society Score (KSS) function between resurfacing and non-resurfacing (MD 2.03; 95% CI 0.58-3.48; p = 0.59, I2 = 53%). Resurfacing significantly reduced anterior knee pain (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.42-0.87; p = 0.007, I2 = 70%). However, no significant differences were observed in pain scale, range of motion (ROM), or Oxford Knee Score. Three studies assessed economic outcomes using Incremental Net Benefit (INB) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) showed no significant cost-effectiveness.

Patellar resurfacing in TKA significantly reduces anterior knee pain but shows no advantage in KSS function, pain scale, Oxford Knee Score, ROM, or cost-effectiveness. Surgical decisions should be individualized to optimize patient outcomes.

Patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) involves surgical manipulation of the extensor mechanism, which can weaken or devascularize the patellar bone, quadriceps, and patellar tendon. Patella resurfacing may, in theory, increase the risk of postoperative extensor mechanism disruption (EMD).

We systematically searched the Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed databases to identify randomized controlled trials that reported the overall incidence of complications and surgery for EMD for resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae in patients who underwent primary TKA with a 2-year follow-up. There were nine studies included in the meta-analysis, representing 1,569 patients, 773 of whom (49%) underwent patella resurfacing. Study selection was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A common-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effects as log odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P < 0.05 was considered significant.

The unadjusted incidence of postoperative patellar fracture was equivalent for patients who did not have patella resurfacing (0.26%) and for those who had resurfacing (0.38%) (P = 0.51). Postoperative patellar tendon tears were not reported in any patients. Quadriceps tendon tears were also uncommon, with one instance occurring in the unresurfaced group (0.13%) and one instance in the resurfaced group (0.13%) (P = 0.74). Meta-analysis revealed no significant association between patella resurfacing and sustaining any EMD-related complication (OR 0.22, 95% CI: -1.24 to 0.80) or requiring surgery for EMD (OR 0.22, 95% CI: -0.92 to 1.36).

In this large patient sample, the 2-year incidence of EMD-related complications after TKA was low. However, a meta-analysis of the pooled data suggests that patella resurfacing in TKA is not associated with the incidence of postoperative EMD-related complications or surgery for EMD.

III.

Routine patellar resurfacing remains controversial in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study reports the experience of a high-volume arthroplasty surgeon who stopped routinely resurfacing patellae for a 3-year period.

All primary TKAs performed by a single surgeon between January 2018 and September 2022 with minimum 1-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Data were analyzed between cohorts-nonresurfaced and resurfaced patellae-and between phases-universal and selective resurfacing. Outcomes included reoperation, patellar complications, and patient-related outcome measure scores.

Five hundred four primary TKAs, with mean 24-month follow-up, were included. Patellar resurfacing was performed in 77% of the overall cohort, including 58% in the selective and 100% in the universal phases. Reoperation (7.6% vs 0.3%; P < .001) and patellar complications (8.4% vs 1.3%; P < .001) were higher in the nonresurfaced vs resurfaced cohort. Eight of the 9 reoperations in the nonresurfaced group were for secondary resurfacing, and all were female (P = .017). Mean 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Health (P = .037) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index Pain scores (P = .002) were better in the resurfaced cohort. Selective resurfacing demonstrated a higher reoperation rate (3.3% vs 0.4%; P = .022) and worse Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index Pain (P = .026) and Knee Society Knee Functional scores (P = .042).

Cessation of routine patellar resurfacing led to inferior clinical results and an unacceptably high early reoperation rate, specifically among women. The generalizability of these findings may be limited due to surgeon-specific factors; however, we urge caution in surgeons who consider similar changes in practice.

Level III.

Orthopaedic surgeons hold differing opinions on replacing the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for knee osteoarthritis, sparking a continued discussion on the optimal approach. Patellar resurfacing (PR) replaces the patella's surface with a prosthetic component, aiming to enhance joint function and reduce anterior knee pain. However, it has potential complications such as avascular necrosis, fractures, and patellar clunk syndrome. This analysis evaluates the effectiveness of TKA with and without PR, highlighting the variations in outcomes between the two methods. Findings suggest that resurfacing is associated with improved clinical outcomes, activity level, patient satisfaction, and pain relief. Nevertheless, the decision should be individualized based on patient preferences and circumstances. Additional long-term randomised controlled trials incorporating outcome measures specific to patellar function are required to better understand the effects of PR versus non-resurfacing in TKA.

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased significantly over the past decade in the United States, likely due to modern patella-friendly implants, complications with resurfacing, and the knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study evaluated revision-free survivorship out to 8.5 years in a cohort of contemporary primary TKAs with patella-friendly femoral components and unresurfaced patellae.

A total of 1,053 consecutive primary TKAs with unresurfaced patellae were retrospectively reviewed. A selective patellar nonresurfacing protocol was used for all cases. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were calculated based on patellar revision and the latest follow-up. An aggressive lateral patellar facetectomy was performed in 78% (823 of 1,053) of cases. The cohort was 62% women and 43% American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I or II with a mean age and body mass index of 65 years (range, 35 to 94) and 35 kg/m2 (range, 18 to 65), respectively.

A total of 4 (0.4%, 4 of 1,053) unresurfaced patellae were revised. Three were resurfaced as part of other procedures: 2 for global instability and one for aseptic loosening at a mean of 1.6 years; and one patella was resurfaced by an outside surgeon for unexplained pain. The all-cause revision-free survivorship estimate specifically related to the patella was 98.9% (95% confidence interval, 98 to 100) out to 8.5 years. No significant difference in survivorship was related to patellae with or without a lateral patellar facetectomy (99.5 versus 98.1%, P ≥ .191); however, 3 of 4 patellar revisions occurred in TKAs without a lateral patellar facetectomy (P = .035).

The results of this study demonstrate excellent revision-free survivorship related to unresurfaced patellae, particularly when a lateral facetectomy was performed. These early to midterm results using modern patella-friendly femoral components are promising and comparable to resurfaced patellae in the literature.

IV.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most effective treatment for end-stage adult knee osteoarthritis, but it has been reported that patient satisfaction may vary. A malfunction of the patellofemoral joint may produce anterior knee pain (AKP) for several reasons. While some surgeons systematically resurface the patella despite the risk of potential complications such as fracture, loosening, or wear of the patella, others prefer to preserve it to reduce AKP and revision rates. This study aimed to evaluate whether patellar resurfacing had better clinical and functional outcomes, complications, and revision rates in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

We conducted a prospective cohort study, including patients who underwent bilateral simultaneous TKA in which the patella was replaced in one knee and preserved in the other, with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. We assessed clinical and functional outcomes with the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); complications and revision rates were also registered.

The final series consisted of 43 patients with 86 knee arthroplasties. After a mean of 7.6 years of follow-up, no significant differences were found regarding KSS (clinical: 82.8 ± 7.4 versus 83.2 ± 3.4, p = 0.92; functional 89.1 ± 8.2: versus 90.4 ± 6.8; p = 0.99), VAS (2.0 ± 0.9 versus 1.8 ± 1.0; p = 0.84), complications (10.5% versus 8.1%; p = 0.57), or revision rates (2.3% versus 2.3%; p = 0.99) when comparing patellar resurfacing versus retention.

In the context of total knee arthroplasty, patellar replacement did not demonstrate statistically significant differences concerning patellar retention in clinical nor functional outcomes, AKP, complications, or revision rates after a minimum of 7 years of follow-up.

During total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patellar retention is performed when the cartilage is fairly well preserved and the thickness of the patella is relatively thin. However, clinical outcomes of the non-resurfaced patella in TKA according to the cartilage status are lacking in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) according to the grade and location of the patellar cartilage lesion in TKA patients.

The outcomes of 165 osteoarthritis patients (186 knees) who underwent cemented mobile-bearing TKA without patellar resurfacing were assessed and classified according to the grade and location of the patellar cartilage lesion. PROMs using the Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, the Knee Society Score (Knee Society Function Score and Knee Society Knee Score), and the Hospital for Special Surgery score were evaluated preoperatively and at postoperative 2, 4, 6, and 8 years. The correlations between PROMs and the grade and location of the cartilage lesion were assessed. Additionally, radiologic outcomes including the patellar tilt angle and patellar height were assessed and their correlation with the grade of cartilage lesion was analyzed. Analysis of variance was used to determine statistical significance.

There was no significant difference between PROMs according to the grades and locations of cartilage lesions at any postoperative follow-up. Radiologic parameters also showed no significant differences according to the grades of patellar cartilage lesions.

The grade and location of the patellar cartilage lesion had no influence on clinical outcomes in mobile-bearing TKA with patellar retention at short- and long-term follow-up.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a mature procedure recommended for correcting knee osteoarthritis deformity, relieving pain, and restoring normal biomechanics. Although TKA is a successful and cost-effective procedure, patient dissatisfaction is as high as 50%. Knee pain after TKA is a significant cause of patient dissatisfaction; the most common location for residual pain is the anterior region. Between 4% and 40% of patients have anterior knee pain (AKP).

To investigate the effect of various TKA procedures on postoperative AKP.

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane from January 2000 to September 2022. Randomized controlled trials with one intervention in the experimental group and no corresponding intervention (or other interventions) in the control group were collected. Two researchers independently read the title and abstract of the studies, preliminarily screened the articles, and read the full text in detail according to the selection criteria. Conflicts were resolved by consultation with a third researcher. And relevant data from the included studies were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software.

There were 25 randomized controlled trials; 13 were comparative studies with or without patellar resurfacing. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the experimental and control groups (P = 0.61). Six studies were comparative studies of circumpatellar denervation vs non-denervation, divided into three subgroups for meta-analysis. The two-subgroup meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the experimental and the control groups (P = 0.31, P = 0.50). One subgroup meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (P = 0.001). Two studies compared fixed-bearing TKA and mobile-bearing TKA; the results meta-analysis showed no significant difference between the experimental and control groups (P = 0.630). Two studies compared lateral retinacular release vs non-release; the meta-analysis showed a significant difference between the experimental and control groups (P = 0.002); two other studies compared other factors.

Patellar resurfacing, mobile-bearing TKA, and fixed-bearing TKA do not reduce the incidence of AKP. Lateral retinacular release can reduce AKP; however, whether circumpatellar denervation can reduce AKP is controversial.

The primary management modalities for the patella in TKA include patellar resurfacing, patellar non-resurfacing, patellar resurfacing with denervation, and patellar non-resurfacing with denervation. Traditionally, meta-analyses have predominantly focused on examining comparisons between two management modalities. However, this study performed a network meta-analysis to compare all four patellar management interventions to identify the most optimal approach for patellar management in TKA.

A computer-based search of PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), The Cochrane Library, Web of science, Embase, and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify randomized controlled trials focusing on the four management interventions for the patella in TKA. Comparisons included two-by-two comparisons as well as those involving more than two concurrent comparisons. The search timeframe spanned from inception to June 30, 2023. Two independent authors extracted the data and evaluated the quality of the literature. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias (ROB) tool was used to evaluate the overall quality of the literature. Subsequently, a network meta-analysis was conducted using the "gemtc" package of the R-4.2.3 software. Outcome measures such as anterior knee pain (AKP), reoperation rate, and patient satisfaction rate were evaluated using odd ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Additionally, the knee society score (KSS), function score (FS), and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated using mean differences (MD) with associated 95% CI. The different treatment measures were ranked using the surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA).

A total of 50 randomized controlled trials involving 9,283 patients were included in the analysis. The findings from this network meta-analysis revealed that patellar resurfacing exhibited significantly lower postoperative reoperation rate (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.63) and AKP (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.32-1) compared to non-resurfacing. Additionally, patellar resurfacing exhibited higher postoperative KSS clinical scores in comparison with non-resurfacing (MD: 1.13, 95% CI 0.18-2.11). However, for postoperative FS, ROM, and patient satisfaction, no significant differences were observed among the four management interventions.

Patellar resurfacing emerges as the optimal management modality in primary TKA. However, future studies should aim to reduce sources of heterogeneity and minimize the influence of confounding factors on outcomes.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023434418 identifier: CRD42023434418.

Background and objective Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful surgical procedure. However, there is a lack of consensus about whether to resurface the patella or not. This study was aimed at evaluating the outcome of patellar resurfacing in terms of a decrease in the incidence of anterior knee pain after TKA and assessing whether patellar resurfacing is beneficial in improving functional outcomes. Materials and methods This prospective comparative study included 100 patients undergoing TKA who were randomly allotted to the patellar resurfacing or non-resurfacing group. Functional evaluation was done based on the Knee Society Score, and the pain was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperatively and after one year. Results There was a significant improvement in the Knee Society scores as well as the pain scores in both groups postoperatively. The patellar resurfacing group showed statistically significant improvement as compared to the non-resurfacing group in the Knee Society clinical and functional scores as well as the VAS at the end of one year. Conclusion Patellar resurfacing during TKA provides better clinical and functional outcomes as well as more relief from anterior knee pain as compared to non-resurfacing of the patella.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the influence of patellar resurfacing following cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on the incidence of anterior knee pain, knee-specific patient-reported outcome measures, complication rates, and reoperation rates.

A systematic review of MEDLINE, PubMed, and Google Scholar was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) according to search criteria. Search terms used included: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, and patellar retaining. RCTs that compared patellar resurfacing versus unresurfaced in primary TKA were included for further analysis. Studies were evaluated using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network assessment tool for quality and minimization of bias. Data were synthesized and meta-analysis performed.

There were 4,135 TKAs (2,068 resurfaced and 2,027 unresurfaced) identified in 35 separate cohorts from 33 peer-reviewed studies. Anterior knee pain rates were significantly higher in unresurfaced knees overall (odds ratio (OR) 1.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 2.83; p = 0.006) but more specifically associated with CR implants (OR 1.95; 95% CI 1.0 to 3.52; p = 0.030). There was a significantly better Knee Society function score (mean difference (MD) -1.98; 95% CI -1.1 to -2.84; p < 0.001) and Oxford Knee Score (MD -2.24; 95% CI -0.07 to -4.41; p = 0.040) for PS implants when patellar resurfacing was performed, but these differences did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference for these scores. There were no significant differences in complication rates or infection rates according to implant design. There was an overall significantly higher reoperation rate for unresurfaced TKA (OR 1.46 (95% CI 1.04 to 2.06); p = 0.030) but there was no difference between PS or CR TKA.

Patellar resurfacing, when performed with CR implants, resulted in lower rates of anterior knee pain and, when used with a PS implant, yielded better knee-specific functional outcomes. Patellar resurfacing was associated with a lower risk of reoperation overall, but implant type did not influence this.

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of patella rim electrocautery "denervation" versus no denervation in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

We conducted a single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Patients aged 40 years or older, due to undergo a TKA who did not have patella resurfacing (usual care) were randomized with or without circumferential patella electrocautery. This was undertaken according to a randomly generated sequence of treatment allocation that was placed into numbered, sealed opaque envelopes. Participants were blinded to treatment allocation. There was no crossover. The primary outcome was Oxford Knee Score at 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were Bartlett Patella Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and 12-Item Short Form Survey. Linear regression analyses were performed with adjustments by age, sex, and baseline (preoperative) scores. There were 142 participants recruited, of which 49 (35%) were allocated to the denervation intervention. Recruitment was stopped early when interim statistical analyses confirmed adequate numbers in both groups despite an imbalance in early treatment allocation rates due to the randomization method. The mean patient age was 71 years (range, 50 to 85) and 51% (n = 74) were women.

No difference in Oxford Knee Score was detected at 1 year (mean difference [MD] 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.28 to 5.03). No difference was detected in Bartlett Patella Score (MD 0.490; 95% CI -1.61 to 2.59) or 12-Item Short Form Survey (MD 0.196; 95% CI -2.54 to 2.93). A statistically significant difference in WOMAC was detected, but at a level less than the minimal clinically important difference for WOMAC (MD 4.79; 95% CI 1.05 to 8.52).

No clinically relevant benefit was detected from patella rim electrocautery in patients undergoing TKA who did not have patella resurfacing (including no benefit in terms of anterior knee pain). This treatment is therefore not recommended for clinical practice.

Level 1.

Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) femoral components are designed to provide a more optimal articular surface for the patella whether or not it has been resurfaced. Previous systematic reviews comparing outcomes of patellar resurfacing and no resurfacing combine both historic and modern designs.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of patellar resurfacing in modern "patellar friendly" implants on (1) incidence of anterior knee pain, (2) patient reported outcomes (3) complication rates, and (4) reoperation rates compared with unresurfaced patellae in primary TKA.

MEDline, PubMed and google scholar studies were evaluated using SIGN assessment tool and data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.2 on only randomised controlled trials. The search terms were: arthroplasty, replacement, knee (Mesh), TKA, prosthesis, patella, patellar resurfacing, patellar retaining.

Thirty-two randomised controlled studies were identified that reported the type of TKA implant used: 11 used modern "patellar friendly" implants; and 21 older "patellar non-friendly" implants. Among "patellar friendly" TKAs there were no significant differences in anterior knee pain rates between resurfaced and unresurfaced groups. Patellar resurfacing with "patellar friendly" implants had significantly higher clinical (mean difference (MD) -0.77, p = 0.007) and functional (MD -1.87, p < 0.0001) knee society scores (KSS) than unresurfaced counterparts but these did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Resurfacing with "patellar friendly" implants was not associated with a significant (p = 0.59) difference in the Oxford knee score (OKS), in contrast when a "patellar non-friendly" implant was used there was a significant difference (MD 3.3, p = 0.005) in favour of resurfacing. There was an increased risk of reoperation for unresurfaced TKAs with "non-patellar friendly" implants (Odds ratio (OR) 1.68, 95% CI 1.03-2.74, p = 0.04), but not for unresurfaced patellae with "patellar friendly" implants (OR 1.17, CI 0.59-2.30).

Patellar resurfacing in combination with a modern patellar friendly implant was not associated with a lower rate of anterior knee pain, complications, or reoperations compared to not resurfacing, nor did it give a clinically significant improvement in knee specific function. In contrast patellar resurfacing in combination with a "non-friendly" TKA implant was associated with a significantly better OKS and lower reoperation rate. Implant design should be acknowledged when patellar resurfacing is being considered.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a lifesaving procedure for advanced gonarthrosis. However, patella resurfacing (PR) in TKA remains a controversial procedure, leading to extensive discussions amongst orthopedic surgeons, regarding its indications and results. Based on these premises, we present a clinical case of a 70-year-old Caucasian woman admitted for pain, swelling and limitation of left knee joint mobility. Her medical history records an Ahlback stage IV gonarthrosis with simultaneous bilateral TKA surgery performed in different hospital, when two NexGen cemented total prostheses were implanted with patellar resurfacing being performed only on the right side. Our clinical (American Knee Society Score, Lonner and Feller scales) and radiological evaluations (CT scan and Xray) revealed left patellar arthrosis and a slight lateral subluxation of the patella. The chosen treatment plan was revision surgery for PR and patellar prosthesis with a cemented patellar component, cross-linked polyethylene, no 32 NexGen model with 8.5 mm thickness. The immediate and distant postoperative evolution was favorable. Extensive literature review shows that, at present, PR remains at surgeon's discretion mainly based on his previous results. Therefore, we believe there is an imperative need to develop high quality studies based on accurate scientific evidence to universally establish valid guidelines for PR in TKA.

During total knee arthroplasty, femur and tibia parts are regularly replaced, while resurfacing the patellar or not is an ongoing discussion. To compare revision rate, anterior knee pain rate, patient-reported outcome measures, complication, radiographic, and clinical outcomes after patellar resurfacing versus non-resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases were searched on 25 April 2021 to enroll randomized controlled trials that compared patellar resurfacing versus non-resurfacing. We used the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess the certainty of evidence. Our primary outcome was revision rate and secondary outcomes was anterior knee pain rate. Outcomes were pooled using the random-effect model and presented as risk ratio (RR), or mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Fifty studies (5586 knees) were included. Significant reductions in patellar revision rate (RR 0.41, 95% CI [0.19, 0.88]; P = 0.02; I²  = 24.20%) and non-patellar revision rate (RR 0.64, 95% CI [0.55, 0.75]; P < 0.001; I²  = 0%) were seen after patellar resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing significantly reduced the anterior knee pain rate than nonresurfacing (RR 0.72, 95% CI [0.57, 0.91]; P = 0.006; I²  = 69.5%). Significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures were found. However, these differences were inconsistent and lacked clinical importance. Patellar resurfacing resulted in a significant lower rate of patellar clunk (RR 0.58, 95% CI [0.38, 0.88]; P = 0.01; I²  = 0%), a higher patellar score (MD 1.24, 95% CI [0.67, 0.81]; P < 0.001; I²  = 73.8%), but prolonged surgical time (MD 8.59, 95% CI [5.27, 11.91]; P < 0.001; I²  = 88.8%).

The clear relationship is that patellar resurfacing reduces revisions, anterior knee pain, and patellar clunk. It will be interesting to compare the initial cost with the revision cost when required and cost-utility analysis with long-term results in future studies.

Patellar resurfacing is optional during total knee replacement (TKR). Some surgeons always resurface the patella, some never resurface, and others selectively resurface. Which resurfacing strategy provides optimal outcomes is unclear. We assessed the effectiveness of patellar resurfacing, no resurfacing, and selective resurfacing in primary TKR.

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, and bibliographies were searched to November 2021 for randomised-control trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes for two or more resurfacing strategies (resurfacing, no resurfacing, or selective resurfacing) in primary TKR. Observational studies were included if limited or no RCTs existed for resurfacing comparisons. Outcomes assessed were patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, and further surgery. Study-specific relative risks [RR] were aggregated using random-effects models. Quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

We identified 33 RCTs involving 5,540 TKRs (2,727 = resurfacing, 2,772 = no resurfacing, 41 = selective resurfacing). One trial reported on selective resurfacing. Patellar resurfacing reduced anterior knee pain compared with no resurfacing (RR = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.44-0.96)); there were no significant differences in PROMs. Resurfacing reduced the risk of revision surgery (RR = 0.63, CI = 0.42-0.94) and other complications (RR = 0.54, CI = 0.39-0.74) compared with no resurfacing. Quality of evidence ranged from high to very low. Limited observational evidence (5 studies, TKRs = 215,419) suggested selective resurfacing increased the revision risk (RR = 1.14, CI = 1.05-1.22) compared with resurfacing. Compared with no resurfacing, selective resurfacing had a higher risk of pain (RR = 1.25, CI = 1.04-1.50) and lower risk of revision (RR = 0.92, CI = 0.85-0.99).

Level 1 evidence supports TKR with patellar resurfacing over no resurfacing. Resurfacing has a reduced risk of anterior knee pain, revision surgery, and complications, despite PROMs being comparable. High-quality RCTs involving selective resurfacing, the most common strategy in the UK and other countries, are needed given the limited observational data suggests selective resurfacing may not be effective over other strategies.

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial as recent meta-analyses have not shown its clear superiority; however, most authors recommend it because it is associated with less frequent anterior knee pain and need for reoperation. We aimed to clarify the changes in patellar cartilage thickness in no patellar resurfacing TKA using a ceramic femoral component on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Between 2009 and 2014, 40 consecutive patients (59 knees) were included in this study. All patients underwent TKA using zirconia ceramic femoral implants without patellar resurfacing. Indications for no patellar resurfacing TKA were absence of anterior knee pain, patellar compression pain, and osteoarthritic changes in the patellofemoral joint on plain radiography. The mean postoperative follow-up duration was 81.5 months (range, 25-131 months). Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed preoperatively and 5 years after TKA. Patellar cartilage thickness was evaluated preoperatively and every year for 5 years after TKA using MRI T2-weighted imaging. The patellar cartilage was divided into three regions of interest: medial, central, and lateral. To standardise the variation in patellar thickness among patients, the percent cartilage thickness was calculated.

The implant's position was appropriate in all cases. Compared to preoperative scores, 5 years postoperatively, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score and Oxford knee score significantly improved from 52.1 to 84.7; mean tilting angle and congruence angle did not change significantly; mean lateral shift ratio significantly increased from 7.1% to 14.6%; cartilage thickness significantly decreased (P < 0.05); and the percentage cartilage thickness of the central, medial, and lateral cartilage zones gradually thinned to less than half. Four patients underwent conversion to patellar resurfacing due to anterior knee pain, without loosening the femoral and tibial implants.

The patellar cartilage thickness decreased to less than half its preoperative level within 5 years after no patellar resurfacing TKA; this would led to clinical problems and conversion to patellar resurfacing.

Level III.

The benefit of patellar denervation (PD) in patellar resurfacing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still debatable. This prospective, randomized controlled trial investigated whether circumferential PD should be performed in patellar resurfacing TKA.

A total of 241 patients who underwent unilateral TKA were randomized into PD or non-PD groups. Incidence, intensity, and presentation time of anterior knee pain (AKP) and clinical outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively.

The incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the PD group (6.4% vs 16.2%, P = .032). The intensity of AKP and patient satisfaction scores were significantly better in the PD group at 3 months but not after 3 months. The presentation time of AKP mostly occurs at 3 months after surgery. The Knee Society score, range of motion, Oxford score, patellar score, activity of daily living score, and visual analog scale of overall knee pain were not significantly different between the two groups during the follow-up period.

Given that PD can improve AKP and patient satisfaction at an early period postoperatively without jeopardizing clinical outcomes at no additional cost, this inexpensive procedure readily available in nearly every operation room is strongly recommended during primary TKA with patellar resurfacing.

The decision to resurface the patella as part of total knee arthroplasty may be influenced by the surgeon's preference, education, training, tradition and geographic location. Advocates for non-resurfacing or selectively resurfacing may claim no difference in patient reported outcomes, and that resurfacing is associated with increased risks such as extensor mechanism injury or malalignment, problems with the design of the patella component and technical issues intraoperatively.

To critically examine factors that should be considered in addition to patient reported outcomes in the decision process of resurfacing or non-resurfacing of the patella in total knee arthroplasty.

A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify factors that may influence decision making in addition to knee specific patient reported outcome measures such as surgical risks, patient quality of life, procedure cost, re-operation rate, implant design, surgeons learning curve and the fate of remaining cartilage in native patellae.

Patient-reported outcomes are equivocal for resurfacing and non-resurfacing. Critical analysis of the available literature suggests that the complications of resurfacing the patella are historic, which is now lower with improved implant design and surgical technique. Routine resurfacing was cost-effective in the long term (potential saving £104 per case) and has lower rates of revision (absolute risk reduction 4%). Finally, surgical judgment in selective resurfacing was prone to errors.

Patella resurfacing and non-resurfacing had similar patient-reported outcomes. However, patella resurfacing was cost-effective and was associated with a lower rate of re-operation compared to non-resurfacing.

The patellar resurfacing is still a controversial and unresolved problem. The choice to use the patellar resurfacing in the total knee prosthesis (TKP) is decided by the surgeon's experience; he analyzes the thickness, the shape, consumption of the surface and he chooses the use of patellar resurfacing or to limit itself to cheiloplasty, denervation, or often to the release of the lateral wing ligament. He also assesses the metabolic state of the bone linked to Osteoporosis and the potential fragility of the joint and kneecap in particular. Bone loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKP) may lead to periprosthetic fractures that are associated with significant costs (morbidity, economic, etc.) and pose a challenge to operative fixation. The literature doesn't express a definitive judgment on the two options, since the results can be overlapped on average. Each option has advantages and disadvantages to be considered in the overall balance of the patellar operation. In reality, however, this technical choice requires more consolidated decision-making criteria so as to minimize the incidence of post-surgical femoral-patellar pain syndrome, the second cause of failure, which frequently leads to revision of the implant. The balance between experience and evidence can be a compromise in the choice of surgery. The experience documented in the literature must identify the parameters capable of constructing an algorithm aimed not only at the secondary resurfacing rate, but at the overall clinical evaluation. This has implications also for the rehabilitation of these patients after surgery.

Whether resurface the patella or not in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was controversial. In 2013, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RTCs). After that, plenty of studies have been carried out, but there still existed a great deal of controversy. In order to update our previous study, we conducted this update meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of patellar resurfacing in TKA.

Databases were searched for RCTs comparing the outcomes of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in TKA. Outcomes of knee relevant indicators were analysed. To see the short- and long-term effects, we calculated the data in total and divided the patients who were followed up for ≤ 3 years and ≥ 5 years into two subgroups as well.

Thirty-two trials assessing 6887 knees were eligible. There was a significant difference in terms of reoperation (in total and ≥ 5 years), Knee Society Score (KSS), function score (in total and ≥ 5 years) and noise. While no significant difference was found in the following items: reoperation (≤ 3 years), anterior knee pain (AKP), function score (≤ 3 years), range of motion (ROM), Oxford score, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analogue score (VAS), Feller score, patellar tilt and the patients' satisfaction.

We found that patellar resurfacing could reduce the occurrence of reoperation and noise after surgery, as well as increase the KSS and function score, while it might not influence the outcomes such as AKP, ROM, Oxford score, KOOS, VAS, Feller score, patellar tilt and the patients' satisfaction. The results are different from our previous finding in the meta-analysis. In conclusion, we prefer patellar resurfacing in TKA.

The prevalence of obesity is increasing. The association with knee osteoarthritis is well documented, resulting in the population requesting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for invalidating symptoms to be heavier in nature. The purpose of the current analysis was to assess the association between preoperative body mass index (BMI) and short-term revision rate after TKA. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of implant fixation method on the association between BMI and survivorship.

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data (Dutch Arthroplasty Register; LROI). All primary TKA procedures in patients >18 years of age with registered BMI were selected (n = 121,819). Non-obese patients (BMI 18-25) were compared with overweight (BMI 25-30) and class I-III obese (BMI >30, >35, >40) patients. Crude all-cause revision rates were calculated using competing risk analysis. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were determined with Cox multivariable regression analyses for all-cause, septic and aseptic revision and secondary patellar resurfacing.

Revision rates were 3.3% for non-obese patients, 3.5% for overweight patients, 3.7% for class I obese patients, 3.6% for class II obese patients and 3.7% for class III obese patients. Class III obese patients had a significant higher risk for septic revision compared with non-obese patients (HR 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.22). Class I obese patients had a higher risk for secondary patellar resurfacing (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.08). All-cause and aseptic revision rates were similar between BMI groups.

Obesity appeared to be associated with some short-term revision risks after TKA, but was not associated with an overall increase in revision rate.

Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty remains a controversial topic.Some surgeons routinely resurface the patella to avoid the increased rates of postoperative anterior knee pain and reoperation for secondary resurfacing, whilst others selectively resurface based on the presence of preoperative anterior knee pain, damaged articular cartilage, inflammatory arthritis, isolated patellofemoral arthritis, and patellar subluxation and/or maltracking. A third group of surgeons never resurface the patella.The anatomy and biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint as well as the advances in surgical techniques and prosthetic design must be taken into account when making a decision about whether to resurface the patella. Accurate component implantation if the patella is resurfaced becomes crucial to avoid complications.In our institution before 2008 we were performing a selective resurfacing of the patella, but in the last decade we have decided to always resurface it, with good outcomes and low complication rate. A reproducible surgical technique may be helpful in reducing the risk of postoperative anterior knee pain and complications related to implants.In this article we analyse the current trend and controversial topics in dealing with the patella in total knee arthroplasty, and discuss the available literature in order to sustain our choice. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:785-792. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190075.

The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (JBJS) from 1988 to 2000 was previously analyzed. The purpose of this current study was to analyze the quality of reporting of RCTs published in JBJS from 2001 to 2013 to identify trends over time and potential areas of improvement for future clinical trials.

A manual search of the JBJS database identified RCTs published between January 2001 and December 2013. Quality assessments, using the Detsky quality-of-reporting index (Detsky score), a modified Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and abstraction of relevant data identifying predictors of quality, were conducted.

A total of 5,780 publications were identified in JBJS from 2001 to 2013, with 285 RCTs (4.9%), representing an increase from the prior 13-year period. The overall mean transformed Detsky score (and standard error) increased significantly (p < 0.001) from 68.1% ± 1.67% to 76.24% ± 0.72%. The percentage of multicenter RCTs decreased from 67% to 31%. The percentage of positive trials also decreased from 80% to 50.5%, as did the mean sample size (212 to 166). Regression analysis indicated that trials with an epidemiologist as the first author and nonsurgical trials were significantly associated (p = 0.001) with a higher overall trial quality score. The categories of the lowest mean methodology scores were randomization and concealment, eligibility criteria, and reasons for patient exclusion, as identified with the Detsky score, and patient and assessor blinding, as identified with the risk-of-bias assessment.

The quantity and quality of published RCTs in JBJS have increased in the 2001 to 2013 time period compared with the previous time period. Although these improvements are encouraging, trends to smaller, single-center trials were also observed. To efficiently determine the efficacy of orthopaedic treatments and limit bias, high-quality randomized trials of appropriate sample size and rigorous design are needed.

Anterior knee pain, which has a prevalence of 4% to 49% after TKA, may be a cause of patient dissatisfaction after TKA. To limit the occurrence of anterior knee pain, patellar denervation with electrocautery has been proposed. However, studies have disagreed as to the efficacy of this procedure.Questions/purposes We evaluated patients undergoing bilateral, simultaneous TKA procedures without patellar resurfacing to ask: (1) Does circumferential patellar cauterization decrease anterior knee pain (Kujala score) postoperatively compared with non-cauterization of the patella? (2) Does circumferential patellar cauterization result in better functional outcomes based on patient report (VAS score, Oxford knee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) than non-cauterization of the patella? (3) Is there any difference in the complication rate (infection, patellar maltracking, fracture, venous thromboembolism, or reoperation rate) between cauterized patellae and non-cauterized patellae?

Seventy-eight patients (156 knees) were included in this prospective, quasi-randomized study, with each patient serving as his or her own control. Patellar cauterization was always performed on the right knee during simultaneous, bilateral TKA. Five patients (6%) were lost to follow-up before the 2-year minimum follow-up interval. A single surgeon performed all TKAs using the same type of implant, and osteophyte excision was performed in all patellae, which were left unresurfaced. Patellar cauterization was performed at 2 mm to 3 mm deep and approximately 5 mm circumferentially away from the patellar rim. The preoperative femorotibial angle and degree of osteoarthritis (according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system) were measured. Restoration of the patellofemoral joint was assessed using the anterior condylar ratio. Clinical outcomes, consisting of clinician-reported outcomes (ROM and Kujala score) and patient-reported outcomes (VAS pain score, Oxford knee score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), were evaluated preoperatively and at 1 month and 2 years postoperatively. Preoperatively, the radiologic severity of osteoarthritis, based on the Kellgren-Lawrence classification, was not different between the two groups, nor were the baseline pain and knee scores. The mean femorotibial angle of the two groups was also comparable: 189° ± 4.9° and 191° ± 6.3° preoperatively (p = 0.051) and 177° ± 2.9° and 178° ± 2.1° postoperatively (p = 0.751) for cauterized and non-cauterized knees, respectively. The preoperative (0.3 ± 0.06 versus 0.3 ± 0.07; p = 0.744) and postoperative (0.3 ± 0.06 versus 0.2 ± 0.07; p = 0.192) anterior condylar ratios were also not different between the cauterized and non-cauterized groups.

At the 2-year follow-up interval, no difference was observed in the mean Kujala score (82 ± 2.9 and 83 ± 2.6 for cauterized and non-cauterized knees, respectively; mean difference 0.3; 95% confidence interval, -0.599 to 1.202; p = 0.509). The mean VAS pain score was 3 ± 0.9 in the cauterized knee and 3 ± 0.7 in the non-cauterized knee (p = 0.920). The mean ROM was 123° ± 10.8° in the cauterized knee and 123° ± 10.2° in the non-cauterized knee (p = 0.783). There was no difference between cauterized and non-cauterized patellae in the mean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for symptoms (86 ± 4.5 versus 86 ± 3.9; p = 0.884), pain (86 ± 3.8 versus 86 ± 3.6; p = 0.905), activities (83 ± 3.2 versus 83 ± 2.8; p = 0.967), sports (42 ± 11.3 versus 43 ± 11.4; p = 0.942), and quality of life (83 ± 4.9 versus 83 ± 4.7; p = 0.916), as well as in the Oxford knee score (40 ± 2.1 versus 41 ± 1.9; p = 0.771). Complications were uncommon and there were no differences between the groups (one deep venous thromboembolism in the cauterized group and two in the control group; odds ratio 0.49, 95% CI, 0.04-5.56; p = 0.57).

Patellar cauterization results in no difference in anterior knee pain, functional outcomes, and complication rates compared with non-cauterization of the patella in patients who undergo non-resurfaced, simultaneous, bilateral, primary TKA with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. We do not recommend circumferential patellar cauterization in non-resurfaced patellae in patients who undergo TKA.

Level II, therapeutic study.

Medial osteoarthritis (OA) knees with symptomatic patellofemoral (PF) arthritis were not recommended for UKA in the past. However, UKA has shown good clinical results in patients with medial OA knee with symptomatic PF arthritis. On the contrary, this procedure is not recommended for patients with severe PF OA. Patella denervation (PD) by circumferential electrocautery can reduce the severity and incidence of anterior knee pain in TKA. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies reporting anterior knee pain and complications of medial UKA with PD in severe PF OA.

We have conducted a prospective comparative study to assess the short-term results of anterior knee pain and complications after medial UKA with PD or without PD in medial compartment arthritis and severe PF arthritis patients.

This prospective comparative study was conducted from January 2018-September 2019 at Pranungkaew Hospital, Nonthaburi, Thailand. A total of 66 patients with medial compartment and severe patellofemoral arthritis were allocated to UKA with or without patella denervation. The primary outcomes were Kujala anterior knee pain scale and complications measured at 6 months after the surgery.

Sixty-six patients (37 patients undergoing UKA with PD and 27 patients undergoing UKA without PD) of medial compartment and severe lateral facet patellofemoral arthritis (62 female, 4 male; mean age 60.16 (5.03) years; 17 PF grade III, 49 PF grade IV) were included in this study. The mean preoperative Kujala scores were 54.96 (range 30-80) (SD 2.59) in the no-PD group (group I) and 47.77 (range 27-75) (1.62) in the PD group (group II), respectively (p value = 0.009). All baseline characteristics were also comparable between treatment groups except the preoperative Kujala score. The mean final value of Kujala score was 70.22 (range 50-96) (2.40) in the no-PD group (group I) and 80.10 (range 60-95) (SD 1.50) in the PD group (group II), respectively (p value < 0.001). The mean difference of Kujala score was statistically significantly higher by 9.88 (4.48, 15.28) points in the PD group when compared to the no-PD group. There were no complications in both groups after surgery.

Patellar denervation seems to provide short-term benefits improving the Kujala score in patients with PF OA undergoing UKA.

III. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03676179.

Management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty is a matter of constant debate. Numerous studies have assessed and compared the mechanical and clinical results of total knee arthroplasty with native as well as resurfaced patellae. However, the consensus has not been reached yet on this subject. This study aims to compare the outcome between patella resurfaced (PR) and non-resurfaced patellae (NPR) after a follow-up of minimum 10 years following total knee arthroplasty.

This is a retrospective study including 63 subjects (103 knees) who had undergone total knee arthroplasty with a follow-up of 10-14 years. In this study, we evaluated the knees implanted with either press fit condylar (PFC) sigma (Depuy, Johnson & Johnson) or Nexgen (CR flex/LPS flex) (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) implants. Whether to perform patella resurfacing or not and choice of implants as well as implant design (posterior stabilized/cruciate retaining) was surgeons' preference. At final follow-up, clinical and functional outcome was assessed using Knee Society Scores (KSS), and comparison of difference between pre-op scores and scores at final follow-up among resurfaced versus non-resurfaced patellae groups was carried out. Patello-femoral function was assessed at final follow-up using Feller's score and the results were compared between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae.

The mean follow-up was 140 months (range 124-168 months). There were 62 knees with their patella resurfaced and 41 knees with non-resurfaced patellae There was no significant difference in the mean pre-op Knee Society Scores between PR (46.29 ± 5.17) and NPR (47.34 ± 5.95), p value 0.34. Similarly there was no significant difference in their pre-op functional score as well PR (38.53 ± 5.14) and NPR (39.22 ± 6.79), p value 0.56. Both groups had significantly improved post-operative Knee Society Scores PR (85.95 ± 5.23) and NPR (84.65 ± 5.30). However, there is no difference between these groups, p value 0.22. Functional scores also maintained significant improvement at final follow-up. Between the two groups, the resurfaced group showed a significantly higher functional score at final follow-up: PR (70.90 ± 7.73) and NPR (66.44 ± 7.12), p value 0.02. Feller's score at final follow-up for PR group was (23.36) and NPR group was (21.98), p value 0.001, which showed clear superiority of PR over NPR.

After a minimum follow-up of 10 years, there were no differences in clinical results; however, the knee function score and patello-femoral function scoring was found to be significantly higher with patella resurfacing and it was persistent across all the subgroups we had included in the study-posterior stabilized/cruciate retaining or between implants made by two different manufacturers.

Selectively resurfacing the patella based on a patient's risk of secondary patella resurfacing (SPR) may be the optimal strategy for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, exactly which factors increase the risk of SPR is unknown. Utilizing New Zealand Joint Registry data, we investigated the following: (1) What patient and surgical factors are more prevalent among TKA patients who received SPR compared to those who did not? and (2) What is the difference in Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) between those who receive SPR and those who do not?

Prevalence of various patient and surgical factors was compared between 197 non-resurfaced TKAs that proceeded to SPR and 31,399 that did not. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the odds ratio for each factor that differed between groups. Six-month postoperative OKS for each group was utilized for comparison.

Posterior-stabilized designs had an odds ratio of 1.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.66; P = .001) when compared to cruciate-retaining designs. When compared to age less than 55, age >75 and age 65-74 had odds ratios of 0.27 (95% CI 0.16-0.46; P < .001) and 0.44 (95% CI 0.28-0.69; P < .001) respectively. Six-month OKS was lower among those who received SPR (37.27 vs 27.26; P < .001).

Younger age, posterior-stabilized design, and a low 6-month OKS were associated with SPR.

The aim of this study is to provide an overview of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in primary total knee arthroplasty summarizing the available high-quality evidence.

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2019, Issue 3), Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase. We excluded nonrandomized trials, trials on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or revision surgery, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Trials that met our inclusion criteria were assessed using a binary outcome measure of whether they reported statistically significant findings. These were then classified according to the intervention groups (surgical approach, tourniquet use, design, etc.).

Four hundred and three RCTs met the inclusion criteria and were included. The total number of patients in those 403 RCTs was 47,675. Only 33 RCTs (8.2%) reported significant differences between the intervention and the control groups. The trials were grouped into surgical approach 34, tourniquet 31, minimally invasive surgery 13, patient specific instrumentation 30, knee design 37, fixation 27, mobile bearing 47, navigation 50, polyethylene 19, technique 27, patella resurfacing 26, drain 19, closure 16, and others 27 RCTs.

For the vast majority of patients, a standard conventional total knee arthroplasty with a surgical approach familiar to the surgeon using standard well-established components, with or without tourniquet, without surgical drain leads to satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the treatment of choice for severe osteoarthritis of the knee. Many studies have been performed comparing mobile- and fixed-bearing designs; however, there are insufficient data regarding the patellar position in either system. This study aimed to compare the resultant patellar position with a mobile- versus a fixed-bearing TKA and the influence of both designs on clinical outcomes.

In this prospective randomized study, between 2007 and 2009, 160 TKA patients were assessed; 79 received a mobile-bearing and 81 received a fixed-bearing implant, for medial compartment osteoarthritis. A posteriorly stabilized, HLS Noetos knee prosthesis (Tornier, Saint-Ismier, France) was used in all cases. The only difference between the groups was whether the tibial component incorporated a fixed or mobile bearing. The patella was resurfaced in all cases. The International Knee Society Score (KSS) and the patellar tilt and translation were compared post-operatively. Patellar translation and patellar tilt analyses were subdivided into two subgroups (< 5 mm vs > 5 mm and < 5° vs > 5°).

The KSS was not statistically different between the groups at a mean follow-up of 7.4 years (range 5-11 years). Patellar translation and patellar tilt were not statistically different between the groups. When considering the patellar translation subgroup analysis, a significantly increased risk of patellar translation, greater than 5 mm, was found in the mobile-bearing group compared to fixed-bearing group (OR = 2.3; p = 0.048) without generating any meaningful difference in clinical outcomes.

The theoretical advantages of mobile-bearing implants compared to fixed-bearing implants were not demonstrated in this randomized study, at mid-term follow-up. In daily practice, the choice between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing designs should be based on the experience and clinical judgment of the surgeon.

Prospective randomized study, level I.

We aimed to confirm the long-term effect of patellar nonresurfacing (patellar decompression) in preventing anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to investigate the possible complications.

Among patients who underwent primary TKA after being diagnosed as having advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 4) at our institution from January 2004 to December 2010, 121 patients who were followed up for more than 7 years were included in this study. Patients who underwent TKA with and without patellar decompression were classified as the study group and control group, respectively. A clinical knee rating score was used to compare the postoperative clinical outcomes between groups. To identify complications after patellar decompression, simple radiographs (weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral views, patella in 30° and 45° axial views, and whole scanogram) were taken during follow-up.

There were no complications such as patellar fracture, osteonecrosis, and subluxation. At 2 years after surgery, the prevalence of anterior knee pain was 12.7% and 18.0% in the study group and control group, respectively (p = 0.42), and the number of patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis grade II or over was lower in the study group (p = 0.03). At 7 years after surgery, the prevalence of anterior knee pain was 18.3% and 24.0% in the study group and control group, respectively (p = 0.45), and there was no statistically significant intergroup difference in the number of patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis grade II or over (p = 0.11).

Patellar nonresurfacing TKA reduces anterior knee pain in the early postoperative period. The procedure can be considered a relatively safe option with fewer complications; however, its effectiveness appears to decrease over time.

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a controversial issue after more than 4 decades of TKA. Despite a growing body of evidence from registry data, resurfacing is still based largely on a surgeon's preference and training. The purpose of this study is to provide long-term outcomes for patellar resurfaced compared to when the patella is not resurfaced.

Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (1999-2017) were used for this study. The analysis included 570,735 primary TKAs undertaken for osteoarthritis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 17-year cumulative percent revision rates were used to compare revision rates between 4 subgroups: minimally stabilized (MS) patellar resurfacing, posterior stabilized (PS) patellar resurfacing, MS unresurfaced, and PS unresurfaced patella. Additional analyses of the patellar implant type and a comparison of inlay and onlay patellar resurfacing were also performed.

For all primary TKA, procedures where the patella was not resurfaced have a higher rate of revision compared to procedures where the patella was resurfaced (HR, 1.31; confidence interval, 1.28-1.35; P < .001). Unresurfaced PS knees have the highest cumulative percent revision at 17 years (11.1%), followed by MS unresurfaced (8.8%), PS resurfaced (7.9%), and MS resurfaced (7.1%). Inlay patellar resurfacing has a higher rate of revision compared to onlay patellar resurfacing (HR, 1.27; confidence interval, 1.17-1.37; P < .001).

Resurfacing the patella reduces the rate of revision for both MS and PS knees. MS knees with patellar resurfacing have the lowest rate of revision. Onlay patella designs are associated with a lower revision rate compared to inlay patella designs.

The management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of patellar resurfacing in TKA.

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare outcomes between knees receiving patellar resurfacing vs those not receiving resurfacing during primary TKA. Outcomes of interest were the Knee Society Scores, reoperation rates, anterior knee pain, patient satisfaction, Oxford Knee Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscores, and range of motion.

Twenty RCTs met all eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. There were statistically significant differences favoring the resurfaced group in the knee component and functional component of Knee Society Scores that were not clinically significant. There was an increased risk of reoperation among knees that did not receive resurfacing with number needed to treat to prevent one case of reoperation of 25 knees (for reoperation for any reason) and 33 knees (for reoperation for anterior knee pain). There were no statistically significant differences in any other outcomes.

The only clear relationship is that knees that do not receive patellar resurfacing are more likely to receive reoperation, most often for secondary resurfacing. However, the disease burden of differing complication profiles associated with resurfacing and nonresurfacing groups remains unclear. Continuing to collect data from large, well-designed RCTs would be beneficial in guiding management of the patella during TKA.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a feasible and cost-effective procedure. However, resurfacing of the patella sparks a heated debate. Anterior knee pain after TKA was supposed to be correlated to the patellofemoral joint, and the resurface of the patella was believed to be effective to avoid this complication.

A meta-analysis was performed to update current evidence concerning the outcomes of patellar resurfacing versus retaining for total knee arthroplasty. The first outcomes of interest were to compare the rate of anterior knee pain and revision surgeries.

This study was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted accessing the main databases: Embase, Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus. All the prospective clinical trials comparing the outcomes between patellar resurfacing versus retaining were included in this study. Only articles classified as level of evidence I to II were considered for inclusion. Only studies reporting a minimum 24 months follow-up were included. The following data were extracted: demographic baseline, anterior knee pain, reoperations, clinical scores (HSS, KSS and related subscales) and range of motion (ROM). Studies solely reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were included.

In favor of the resurfacing group, we observed a statistically significant reduced rate of anterior knee pain (odd ratio 1.73) and reoperation (odd ratio 3.24). In the resurfacing group, a prevalence of anterior knee pain of 11.15% was detected, whereas in the retaining group it amounted to 17.39%. Furthermore, a greater KSS pain (+ 0.97%), KSS clinical (+ 0.23%), KSS functional (+ 2.44%), KSS overall (+ 2.47%) and HSS (+ 5.64%) were reported. In the retaining group, we found a better range of motion (+ 3.09°).

Based on the main findings of this meta-analysis, patellar resurfaced TKA was demonstrated to have performed superior overall. Patellar resurfacing detected a lower rate of postoperative anterior knee pain and reoperation. Moreover, the resurfacing group showed greater value of the HSS, KSS and related subscales. In favor of the retaining group, a slightly better ROM was evidenced.

Level II, meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials.

Currently, the decision to resurface the patella is often made irrespective of the presence of patellar arthritis. The purpose of this study is to utilize the existing literature to assess cost-utility of routinely vs selectively resurfacing the patella.

Prospective randomized studies of patella resurfacing vs non-resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were identified through literature review. Data from these studies represented probabilities of varied outcomes following TKA dependent upon patella resurfacing. Using previously validated utility scores from the McKnee modified Health Utilities Index, endpoint utility values were provided for each potential outcome.

Literature review yielded a total of 14 studies with 3,562 patients receiving 3,823 TKAs, of which 1,873 (49.0%) patellae were resurfaced. Persistent postoperative anterior knee pain occurred in 20.9% vs 13.2% (P < .001) and patella reoperation was performed in 3.7% vs 1.6% (P < .001) of unresurfaced and resurfaced patella, respectively. In studies excluding those with arthritic patellae, the incidence of anterior knee pain was equivalent between groups and reoperation decreased to 1.2% vs 0% (P = .06). Patella resurfacing provided marginally improved quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) for both selective and indiscriminate patella resurfacing. When including all studies, the incremental cost per QALY was $3,032. However, when analyzing only those studies with nonarthritic patellae, the incremental cost per QALY to resurface the patella increased to $183,584.

Patellar resurfacing remains a controversial issue in TKA. Utilizing data from new prospective randomized studies, this analysis finds that routinely resurfacing arthritis-free patellae in TKA are not cost-effective.

The optimum strategy regarding resurfacing the patella in total knee replacement (TKR) remains debated, with wide national and international variability. To minimize the confounders of a direct comparison of cases with or without resurfacing, we performed an instrumental variable analysis examining revision risk on the basis of surgeon preference for patellar resurfacing in TKR, specifically examining the subsequent patellar revision risk and all-cause revision risk among cases of surgeons preferring to perform resurfacing on a selective basis compared with those whose preference is to routinely resurface or who infrequently perform resurfacing.

Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from 1999 to 2016 were obtained to assess the cumulative percent revision, hazard ratio, and revision diagnoses for 3 cohorts, grouped according the surgeons' patellar-resurfacing preferences: infrequently (<10% of the time), selectively (10% to <90% of the time), or routinely (≥90% of the time). To avoid confounding from implant design or surgeon performance, only minimally stabilized TKRs using hybrid or cemented fixation and performed by surgeons performing ≥50 TKR procedures per year were included.

A total of 136,116 procedures were included, with patients in all 3 cohorts having similar demographics. The selectively resurfaced cohort had a higher patellar revision risk compared with the routinely resurfaced cohort, with this risk being greatest in the first 4.5 years following the primary procedure, including 306% higher in the first 1.5 years, and remaining 50% higher after 4.5 years. In a subgroup analysis, increased revision risk was observed among males, females, those <65 years of age, and those ≥65 years of age. The infrequently resurfaced cohort had the highest risk of subsequent patellar revision, up to 482% higher, as seen in the first 1.5 years after the primary procedure, compared with the routinely resurfaced cohort. Additionally, the risk of all-cause revision was 20% higher for the selectively resurfaced cohort compared with routinely resurfaced.

Surgeons who preferred selective resurfacing of the patella had a higher risk of patellar revision than those who had preference for routine resurfacing of the patella. Overall, a greater preference for resurfacing resulted in a lower risk of patellar revision.

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The comminuted distal radius fractures among elderly people are usually linked to osteoporosis, and repairing them in this context is a therapeutical challenge. Several teams have reported good results of radius resurfacing. The goal of our study was to evaluate the usability of the wrist in a new series of patients after surgery. We performed a monocentric retrospective study on the data of the medical files. All the included patients were older than 65 years and received a wrist hemiarthroplasty according to the criteria that have been established by the in charge medical team. Eleven patients have been included, their average age was 80.4 years old, and the average follow-up was 18.3  months. The average QuickDASH Score was 59 (27-95). The Visual Analogue Scale for pain was in average 3.8/10 and the average mobility was: flexion 36° (12-50), extension 27° (12-50), radial deviation 15° (12-15), ulnar deviation 26° (12-40), pronation-supination range of motion 164° (150-170). The average measured strength was 44% (16-72%) of the strength of the unaffected hand. Our results are rather modest, probably because of insufficient follow-up and very severe fractures. Furthermore, the implant that has been used does not take into account the distal radioulnar joint. Another bound of this treatment is the complexity of surgical revision in case of bad result. So far, hemiarthroplasty cannot be considered as the standard treatment for complex fractures of the distal radius.

The need of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a subject of debate. This systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses aimed to assess and analyze current evidence regarding patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing in TKA.

A systematic literature search was performed in March 2017 in PubMed, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared TKA with and without patellar resurfacing considering as outcomes re-operations rate, complications, anterior knee pain, functional scores. The quality of meta-analyses was evaluated with AMSTAR score and the most relevant meta-analysis was determined by applying the Jadad algorithm.

Ten meta-analyses, published between 2005 and 2015, were included in the systematic review. Two studies found a significantly increased Knee Society Score in the resurfacing group. According to four meta-analyses, anterior knee pain incidence was lower in resurfacing group. Six of the included studies described a greater risk of re-intervention in the non-resurfacing groups. The overall quality of included studies was moderate. The most relevant meta-analysis reported no differences in functional scores and incidence of anterior knee pain between the groups.

Comparable outcomes were found when comparing patellar resurfacing and non-resurfacing in TKA. The higher risk of re-operations after non-resurfacing should be interpreted with caution due to the methodological limitations of the meta-analyses regarding search criteria, heterogeneity and the inherent bias of easier indication to reoperation when the patella is not resurfaced. There is no clear superiority of patellar resurfacing compared to patellar retention.

Level II, systematic review of meta-analyses.

Anterior knee pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains one of the important reasons for patient dissatisfaction. The management of patellofemoral joint is controversial and a decision whether to resurface the patella or not, is important. The present study compares the clinical and radiological outcomes between patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in patients undergoing bilateral TKA.

This is a prospective comparative study with 60 patients undergoing bilateral simultaneous TKA (120 knees) with posterior stabilized Hi flex fixed bearing knee (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana), by two surgeons. The patients were allocated to the two groups of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing of patella. In nonresurfacing group, patellaplasty was done. Patients with clinicoradiological signs of tricompartmental arthritis were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included unilateral TKA, rheumatoid arthritis, postseptic arthritis, previous high tibial osteotomy, or unicondylar knee arthroplasty cases. Patients were assessed using Knee Society Score (KSS), Modified Samsung Medical Centre Score (MSMCS), Feller patellar score. Radiological evaluation was performed at 1 year using congruence angle and patellar tilt angle.

Mean followup was 19 months (range 12-25 months). Mean KSS, MSMCS, Feller patellar scores in resurfacing group were 82.67, 10.68, and 25.97, respectively and in nonresurfacing group were 82.93, 10.48, and 24.90, respectively. Mean congruence angle in resurfacing group was -12.83° and in nonresurfacing group was -12.383° (P = 0.917) and mean patellar tilt angle in resurfacing is 8.07 and nonresurfacing group is 7.97 (P = 0.873).

There was no statistically significant difference in short-term clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes in the two groups and therefore, routine patellar resurfacing for patient undergoing TKA is not advantageous.

The theoretical benefits of a mobile bearing design in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) include increased articular surface conformity with a reduction in both polyethylene wear and implant interface shear. However, to date these theoretical advantages have not been translated into published evidence of superior survivorship. This paper presents the results of a prospective, non-comparative study evaluating the performance of the mobile bearing Low Contact Stress LCS Complete Rotating Platform TKA in a largely cementless cohort without patellar resurfacing.

237 consecutive patients (240 knees) undergoing primary TKA were prospectively recruited. All received the LCS Complete Rotating Platform TKA (DePuy International, Leeds, UK). Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed at 3, 12, 60 and 120 months post-operatively. Radiographic evaluation was performed by an independent external surgeon.

The mean age was 70.3 years. 77.5% of cases were cementless. Radiographic assessment suggested excellent femoral component fixation. 22 tibial radiolucent lines (RLLs) > 1 mm were observed in 12 knees. No RLLs were progressive. There have been two revisions; one for late infection and one for aseptic loosening. No patients underwent secondary patellar resurfacing. The cumulative implant survivorship, using component revision for any reason as the endpoint, was 98.9% (95% CI, 95.6 to 99.7%) at 10 years.

The excellent survivorship at a minimum 10-year follow-up supports the use of uncemented porous coated fixation without patellar resurfacing with the non-posterior stabilized LCS Complete Rotating Platform TKA.

The fragility index (FI) may prove to be a powerful metric of trial robustness. The FI is the minimum number of patient events that would need to become nonevents in order to nullify a significant result. The fragility quotient (FQ) is the FI divided by the total sample size. This study evaluates the robustness of the 20% of orthopaedic clinical trials that were cited as having strong evidence in the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Clinical Practice Guidelines and that could be analyzed with these indices.

From the AAOS recommendations with strong evidence, we extracted the randomized controlled trials that were cited as having supporting evidence that could be analyzed with the FI. Each trial's FI was calculated using the fragility calculator (http://www.fragilityindex.com). With use of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0, we evaluated the likelihood of bias. We also performed a post hoc power analysis of eligible studies.

The median FI for the 72 trials was 2 events, and the median FQ was 0.022. Of the 72 trials, only 3 (4.2%) were at a low risk of bias, and 35 (48.6%) were at a high risk of bias. Thirty-eight (53%) of the trials were underpowered. We identified a strong correlation between a trial's FI or FQ and the trial's power.

Our study found that trials that provided strong evidence for orthopaedic surgery guidelines were largely fragile, underpowered, and at risk of bias.

This meta-analysis (MA) aims at comparing the clinical outcomes of resurfacing and nonresurfacing the patella in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Randomized controlled trials were included by retrieving data from electronic English databases. Both fixed and random-effects models were employed, and standardized mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Stata13.1 software was used for statistical analysis for all the studies included to compare the differences in improving Knee Society Clinical Score and Knee Society Function Score as well as the reduction in rates of infection, reoperation, and anterior knee pain.

A total of 394 studies were initially included in this MA. About 20 randomized controlled trials which met the inclusion criteria were finally enrolled in this MA. The results of our MA showed that the reoperation rate of the patellar resurfacing group was lower than that of the nonresurfacing group. The subgroup analysis was performed according to the follow-up time and revealed that the increase in the Knee Society Clinical Score was higher in the patellar resurfacing group than that in the nonresurfacing group in the follow-up period of 1 to 2 years. The risk of reoperation rate was lower in the patellar resurfacing group than that in the nonresurfacing group, while there were no statistical differences in the follow-up time over 2 years.

Our study suggests that during the follow-up of 1 to 2 years, patellar resurfacing can significantly increase the Knee Society Clinical Score and reduce the reoperative rates in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate this technique through an analysis of comparative studies in the current literature.

We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases using various combinations of the keywords "Knee," "Replacement," "Prosthesis," "Patella," "Resurfacing," and "Arthroplasty." All articles relevant to the subject were retrieved, and their bibliographies were hand searched for further references relevant to primary patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals were included in this systematic review.

The percentage for a reoperation was 1% for the patellar resurfacing group (17/1636) and 6.9% for the non-resurfacing group (118/1699) (odds ratio [OR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.29, P < .00001). The patellar resurfacing group showed a significantly higher postop Knee Society Score (KSS) pain (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.68-2.35, P = .004) and postop Hospital for Special Surgery score (OR 4.35, 95% CI 3.21-5.49, P < .00001), over the non-resurfacing group.

Based on the outcome scores of KSS (pain), KSS (function), and Hospital for Special Surgery postop, patellar resurfacing TKAs have performed better than non-resurfaced TKAs. The lower secondary operation and revision rates for patellar resurfaced TKAs also demonstrate that this technique is the more effective option. However, the full impact of patellar resurfacing still needs to be critically evaluated by larger randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up.