• VOSviewer
• antimicrobial
• bibliometrics
• citespace
• therapeutic drug monitoring

• DEI
• DEI(多元化、公平性和包容性)
• Sur Global
• colaboración
• collaboration
• conservation
• diversity
• ecology
• equidad
• equitable participation
• equity
• global south
• inclusivity
• inclusión
• participación equitativa
• regiones tropicales
• representación
• representation
• tropical regions
• 代表性
• 公平参与
• 公平性,全球南部,热带地区
• 包容性
• 合作

• Biodiversity
• Conservation of Natural Resources/methods
• Research

• FZT 118 German Research Foundation (DFG)
• 202548816 German Research Foundation (DFG)

• bibliometric
• literature review
• stroke
• upper limb dysfunction
• visualized analysis

• National Natural Science Foundation of China

• Humans
• Research Personnel/psychology
• Peru
• Bolivia
• Ecuador
• Publications/statistics & numerical data
• Publishing

• ERANet Joint Call 2016–2017
• German Research Foundation

• Bibliometrics
• CiteSpace
• Hot spot
• Research progress
• Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection
• VOSViewer

• Bibliometrics
• Humans
• Scimitar Syndrome/surgery
• Biomedical Research/trends

• Child
• Humans
• Male
• Female
• Orthopedics
• Authorship
• Publishing
• Periodicals as Topic
• Bibliometrics

• arab world
• bibliometrics
• bladder cancer
• embase
• pubmed
• urology

• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/epidemiology
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
• Humans
• Bibliometrics
• Arab World
• Biomedical Research
• Middle East/epidemiology

• GPD
• developing nations
• rare diseases
• survey
• undiagnosed diseases

• Infant, Newborn
• Humans
• Undiagnosed Diseases
• Rare Diseases/diagnosis
• Rare Diseases/epidemiology
• Global Health
• Delivery of Health Care
• Health Expenditures

• P50 HD105351 NICHD NIH HHS

• bioinvasions
• biosecurity frameworks
• biosecurity guidelines
• marine
• nonindigenous species

• King Abdullah University of Science and Technology

• Bibliometrics analysis
• Citation analysis
• Citation classics
• Total anomalous pulmonary venous connection

• 82170307 National Natural Science Foundation of China

• Cultural evolution
• digital humanities
• economic development
• history of science

• bibliometric study
• coronavirus disease
• epidemic
• monkeypox
• outbreak
• smallpox
• virus

• Alternative data
• Big data
• Economic analysis
• Google Mobility
• Google Trends

• Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
• Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

• Philippine neurology
• Philippines
• bibliometrics
• neurology
• research productivity

• Humans
• Bibliometrics
• Biomedical Research
• Cost of Illness
• Delivery of Health Care
• Efficiency

• Africa
• Bibliometric analysis
• Electricity
• Renewable energy
• Research trend

• Bibliometrics
• Climate Change
• Efficiency
• Renewable Energy
• South Africa

State electricity company is an Indonesian government-owned corporation with a monopoly on Indonesia's electricity distribution. Sulfur dioxide (SO₂) pollution is produced by burning fossil fuels with coal and oil-fired power plants. At the combined cycle power plant (CCPP), the state electricity company has the largest role in SO₂ production. In addition, SO₂ can cause respiratory tract dysfunction, decreased lung function, eye irritation, throat irritation, and coughing at certain concentrations. This study aims to assess the magnitude of SO₂ exposure to workers health at CCPP Indralaya unit, Indonesia. The research is a quantitative study using the environmental health risk assessment (EHRA) method. Purposive sampling was used to obtain 32 respondents. The results revealed that the average SO₂ concentration was 0.085 mg/m³. The non-carcinogenic intake was 0.0025 mg/kg/day for real-time exposure and 0.0069 mg/kg/day for lifetime exposure. The Risk Quotient (RQ) for real-time exposure obtained is 0.0959, and RQ for lifetime exposure is 0.2668, indicating an RQ = 1. The study concluded that the CCPP Indralaya unit is not at-risk cause non-carcinogenic due to SO₂ exposure. Regardless, precautions must ensure that workers' exposure to SO₂ or other emissions gases produced by CCPP activities does not endanger their health.

The present most modern and highly advanced 21’st century is the era of science and technology. In human history, universities are the basic birthplace of higher education, research, and innovation and play a significant role in the countries’ performance, prosperity, and economic progress. Worldwide, there is a swift shift in the pattern of biological, environmental, economic, and educational systems. This broader change is rotating around the higher academia and its allied innovative research impact. The leading universities develop a culture and curricula as per need and demand and produce knowledge and skills-based professional graduates. The universities prepare graduates to keep in view their country’s requirements and compete with their peers at international levels.

Moreover, worldwide, universities are transforming towards higher doctorate degrees (D.Sc / S.Dc) to provide an elevated helipad to the applicant to compete in this modern and highly advanced era. The higher doctoral degree, D.Sc, is earned 6-8 years after the post Ph.D. The candidates with higher academic titles, professional skills, and innovative research could compete and achieve top-ranked positions worldwide. Many universities worldwide, including the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, promote D.Sc degree programs in various science disciplines, including medical sciences. This manuscript explores the dynamics of a higher doctorate and its significance, need, and demand in academia to compete globally.

• Academic title
• D.Sc
• Doctor of Science
• Higher Doctorate

• Bibliometric analysis
• Southeast Asia
• burden of disease
• dementia
• scientometrics
• socioeconomic factors

• Central Asia
• Peer Review
• Publications
• Publons
• Publons Ranking
• Universities

• Bibliometrics
• Humans
• Peer Review
• Publications/statistics & numerical data
• Research Personnel

• Academic productivity
• Bibliometrics
• Economic indicators
• Internal medicine

• Bibliometrics
• Gross Domestic Product
• Humans
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development
• Rheumatology

• Bacterial central nervous system infection
• Bibliometric analysis
• Southeast Asia

• Asia, Southeastern
• Bibliometrics
• Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data
• Central Nervous System Infections
• Humans

Background: The COVID 19 pandemic increased publication productivity enormously with numerous new COVID-19-related articles appearing daily, despite the fact that many health care workers in the partially overburdened national health care systems were faced with major challenges. Methods: In a cross-sectional, observational, retrospective study we compared and correlated 17 epidemiologic, health care system-related and health-economic factors from medical databases and intergovernmental organisations potentially influencing the COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 publication productivity between 1 January and 30 April 2020 amongst the 30 countries most severely affected by the pandemic. These factors were additionally correlated with the national pre-COVID-19 publication rate for the same pre-year period to identify potential changes in the general publication behaviour. Findings: COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 publication rates correlated strongest with access to and quality of health care (ρ = 0.80 and 0.87, p < 0.0001), COVID-19 cases per capita (ρ = 0.78 and 0.72, p < 0.0001), GDP per capita (ρ = 0.69 and 0.76, p < 0.0001), health spending per capita (ρ = 0.61 and 0.73, p < 0.0001) and the pre-COVID-19 Hirsch-Index (ρ = 0.61 and 0.62, p = 0.002 and <0.0001). Ratios of publication rates for “Cancer”, “Diabetes” and “Stroke” in 2020 versus the pre-year period were 0.88 ± 0.06, 1.02 ± 0.18 and 0.9 ± 0.20, resulting in a pooled ratio of 0.93 ± 0.06 for non-COVID-19 publications. Interpretation: There are marked geographic and national differences in publication productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both COVID-19- and non-COVID-19 publication productivity correlates with epidemiologic, health care system-related and healtheconomic factors, and pre-COVID publication expertise. Countries with a stable scientific infrastructure appear to maintain non-COVID-19 publication productivity nearly at the pre-year level and at the same time use their resilience to produce COVID-19 publications at high rates.

• COVID-19
• Sars-CoV2, publication productivity, research activity
• pandemic

This viewpoint article argues that the impacts of the novel coronavirus COVID-19 call for transformative e-Tourism research. We are at a crossroads where one road takes us to e-Tourism as it was before the crisis, whereas the other holds the potential to transform e-Tourism. To realize this potential, e-Tourism research needs to challenge existing paradigms and critically evaluate its ontological and epistemological foundations. In light of the paramount importance to rethink contemporary science, growth, and technology paradigms, we present six pillars to guide scholars in their efforts to transform e-Tourism through their research, including historicity, reflexivity, equity, transparency, plurality, and creativity. We conclude the paper with a call to the e-Tourism research community to embrace transformative research.

• transformative research
• covid-19
• e-tourism
• research paradigm
• technology paradigm
• growth paradigm

• Bibliometric
• Malaysia
• Publications
• Rheumatology

• Asia
• Indexed journal
• Medical education
• Research

Lassa fever has been a public health concern in the West African sub-region where it is endemic and a latent threat to the world at large. We investigated the trend in Lassa fever research using bibliometric approach.

We used the SCOPUS database employing “Lassa fever” as search descriptor. The most common bibliometric indicators were applied for the selected publications.

The number of scientific research articles retrieved for Lassa fever research from 1970 to 2017 was 1101. The growth of publications was more linear (r = 0.67) than exponential (r = 0.53). The duplication time of the scientific articles was 9.19 years. Small number of authors were responsible for bulk of the article production (transience index of 78.89%). The collaboration index was 4.59 per paper. The Bradford core consisted of 19 journals in which Journal of Virology was at the top (4.6%). Majority of the output were from USA government agencies. United States was the most productive country. Joseph B. McCormick was the most productive author, while New England Journal of Medicine published the two most cited articles.

The growth of scientific Literature on Lassa fever was of linear pattern with high transient authors indicating low productivity and non-specialized authors from other related areas publishing sporadically. This study provides a helpful reference for medical virologists, epidemiologist, policy decision makers, academics and Lassa fever researchers.

• Bibliometric analysis
• Lassa
• Lassa fever
• Lassa research

Bibliometrics is increasingly used to assess the quantity and quality of scientific research output in many research fields worldwide. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have documented the main characteristics of arthroplasty publications from different countries. This study aimed to evaluate the worldwide research productivity and status of Turkey in the field of arthroplasty using bibliometric methods and to provide an insight into the arthroplasty research for surgeons and researchers.

The Web of Science database was searched to identify arthroplasty articles published between 2006 and 2016. The contributions of countries were evaluated based on publication count, citation average, h-index and publication rate in the top 10 ranked journals. Each countries publication output was adjusted according to population size.

A total of 26.167 articles were identified. World arthroplasty publications were increased significantly over time (p < .005). The United States was the most productive country with 9007 articles (34,4% of total) followed by England with 2939 articles (11,4 of total) and Germany with 1881 articles (7,1% of total). According to average citations per item, Scotland was in the first place followed by Denmark and Sweden, whereas in the first place according to publication output adjusted by population size was Switzerland followed by Denmark and Scotland. The United States was also in the first place according to h-index and publication rate in the top 10 ranked journals. Founding average was 28,8% (7539 of 26164) for the arthroplasty articles that were analyzed in the study.

There is a rapid increase in the number of articles in arthroplasty research from 2006 to 2016. The United States was the most productive country as measured by total publications in the arthroplasty field. However, some small European countries with high in-come have higher quality of articles and better productivity when adjusted for population. Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and research foundation had positive affect on arthroplasty publications, both qualitatively and quantitatively.

• arthroplasty
• bibliometric analysis
• productivity
• research
• worldwide

• Arthroplasty/methods
• Arthroplasty/statistics & numerical data
• Bibliometrics
• Biomedical Research/methods
• Biomedical Research/standards
• Humans
• Turkey

The purpose of this study was to conduct a bibliometric analysis of orthopaedic academic output in the United States.

Publications based on city and state origin, corrected for population size, median household income, total number of surgeons, and the number of various subspecialties were evaluated. The 15 highest-ranked orthopaedic journals were audited from 2010 to 2014 and then subdivided into anatomic regions and 14 subspecialties.

A total of 8,100 articles were published during the study period. Most originated from New York, California, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and Minnesota. New York published the greatest number by city, followed by Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, and Rochester. When adjusted for the number of publications per city, surgeons per population, publications per surgeon population, publications per population, and publications per median income per capita, Vail and New York led in two and Stanford in one of the metrics.

New York was the leader for the total publications, greatest activity within subspecialties, and publications per surgeon/population and per median income/capita. Vail was the leader for publications/surgeon and population. The top four cities of New York, Philadelphia, Boston, and Chicago were responsible for 28% of the academic output over the 5-year study period.

Medical research can have an enormous positive impact on human health. Health research improves the quality of human lives and society which plays a vital role in social and economic development of the nation. Financial support is crucial for research. However, winning a research grant is a difficult task. A successful grant-winning application requires two key elements: one is an innovative research problem with best probable idea/plan for tackling it and appropriate planning of budget. The aim of the present paper is to give an insight on funding agencies providing funding for health research including traditional Indian medicine (from an Indian perspective) and key points for planning and writing budget section of a grant application.

• Grant writing
• Planning budget
• Research grant

• Africa/epidemiology
• Authorship
• Bibliometrics
• Biomedical Research
• Canada
• Cooperative Behavior
• Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data
• Europe
• Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology
• Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/virology
• Humans
• International Cooperation
• Publishing
• United States

• Bibliometric
• Citations
• Scopus
• WNV
• West Nile virus

• Bibliometrics
• Biomedical Research
• Canada
• France
• Humans
• Research
• West Nile Fever/epidemiology
• West Nile virus

• Arab countries
• Diet
• Non-communicable diseases
• Nutrition
• Research agenda

To perform a bibliometric analysis of publications rates in orthopedics in the top 15 orthopaedic journals.

Based on their 2015 impact factor, the fifteen highest ranked orthopaedic journals between January 2010 and December 2014 were used to establish the total number of publications; cumulative impact factor points (IF) per country were determined, and normalized to population size, GDP, and GDP/capita, comparison to the median country output and the global leader.

Twenty-three thousand and twenty-one orthopaedic articles were published, with 66 countries publishing. The United States had 8149 publications, followed by the United Kingdom (1644) and Japan (1467). The highest IF was achieved by the United States (24744), United Kingdom (4776), and Japan (4053). Normalized by population size Switzerland lead. Normalized by GDP, Croatia was the top achiever. Adjusting GDP/capita, for publications and IF, China, India, and the United States were the leaders. Adjusting for population size and GDP, 28 countries achieved numbers of publications to be considered at least equivalent with the median academic output. Adjusting GDP/capita only China and India reached the number of publications to be considered equivalent to the current global leader, the United States.

Five countries were responsible for 60% of the orthopaedic research output over this 5-year period. After correcting for GDP/capita, only 28 of 66 countries achieved a publication rate equivalent to the median country. The United States, United Kingdom, South Korea, Japan, and Germany were the top five countries for both publication totals and cumulative impact factor points.

• Bibliometrics
• Orthopedic surgery
• Impact factor
• Publication productivity

• Ischemic stroke
• epidemiology
• outcome
• research and development

• Impact factor
• Research impact
• Research policy

• Biomedical Research/organization & administration
• Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data
• Humans
• Journal Impact Factor
• Models, Theoretical
• Saudi Arabia
• Schools, Medical
• Time