1
|
Seth M, Kohli S, Dayal M, Choudhury A. Comparison of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and lignocaine in femoral nerve block to position fracture femur patients for central neuraxial blockade in Indian population. Acute Crit Care 2024; 39:275-281. [PMID: 38863358 PMCID: PMC11167411 DOI: 10.4266/acc.2023.01606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with a fractured femur experience intense pain during positioning for neuraxial block for definitive surgery. Femoral nerve block (FNB) is therefore often given prior to positioning for analgesia. In our study, we compare the onset and quality of block of 0.25% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, and 1.5% lignocaine for FNB in fracture femur patients. METHODS Seventy-five adult femur fracture patients were equally and randomly divided into three groups to receive 15 ml of either 0.25% bupivacaine (group B), 0.5% ropivacaine (group R), or 1.5% lignocaine (group L) for FNB prior to positioning for neuraxial blockade. Onset and quality of block were assessed, as well as improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) score, ease of positioning, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS Percentage decrease in VAS was found to be highest in group R (82.8%) followed by groups L and B. Time to achieve a VAS of less than 4 was found to be 26.2±2.4 minutes in group B, 8.5±1.9 minutes in group R, and 4.1±0.7 minutes in group L (P<0.001). In group B, 12 patients required additional fentanyl to achieve a VAS <4. Patient positioning was reported to be satisfactory in all patients in group R and L, while in B it was satisfactory in 13 (52%) patients only. Patient acceptance of FNB was 100% in group R and L, but only 64% in group B. CONCLUSIONS Based on our findings, 0.5% ropivacaine is a favorable choice for FNB due to early onset, ability to yield a good quality block, and good safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manik Seth
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Santvana Kohli
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Madhu Dayal
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Arin Choudhury
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kamel I, Ahmed MF, Sethi A. Regional anesthesia for orthopedic procedures: What orthopedic surgeons need to know. World J Orthop 2022; 13:11-35. [PMID: 35096534 PMCID: PMC8771411 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery. Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia. Patient evaluation for regional anesthesia should include neurological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and hematological assessments. Neuraxial blocks include spinal, epidural, and combined spinal epidural. Upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks include interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary. Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks include femoral nerve block, saphenous nerve block, sciatic nerve block, iPACK block, ankle block and lumbar plexus block. The choice of regional anesthesia is a unanimous decision made by the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the patient based on a risk-benefit assessment. The choice of the regional block depends on patient cooperation, patient positing, operative structures, operative manipulation, tourniquet use and the impact of post-operative motor blockade on initiation of physical therapy. Regional anesthesia is safe but has an inherent risk of failure and a relatively low incidence of complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), nerve injury, falls, hematoma, infection and allergic reactions. Ultrasound should be used for regional anesthesia procedures to improve the efficacy and minimize complications. LAST treatment guidelines and rescue medications (intralipid) should be readily available during the regional anesthesia administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ihab Kamel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Muhammad F Ahmed
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| | - Anish Sethi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19140, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vinod M, Malashree G, Goud ES, Ravikumar K. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to 0.25% bupivacaine in ultrasound guided femoral nerve block for preoperative positioning and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective surgery for fracture shaft of femur. Anesth Essays Res 2022; 16:98-103. [PMID: 36249150 PMCID: PMC9558656 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_152_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Femur fracture causes excruciating pain and surgical repair is recommended. To obtain satisfactory patient co-operation in the perioperative period, various analgesics have been used. Femoral nerve block (FNB) provides an excellent alternative for analgesia in the perioperative period. Dexmedetomidine of up to 2 μg.kg−1 has been used in FNB as adjuvants in lower limb surgeries. Aims: The aim was to study the effect of addition of Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine in FNB on the comfort of positioning for subarachnoid block (SAB) and postoperative analgesia. Materials and Methods: Prospective, randomized, double-blind design was followed. Seventy American Society of Anesthesiologist I and II patients aged 18–70 years of either gender were randomly allocated into Group B (20 mL 0.25% Bupivacaine + 2 mL Normal Saline) and Group BD (received 20 mL 0.25% Bupivacaine + Dexmedetomidine 2 μg.kg−1 diluted to 2 mL) for FNB. Numerical rating scale (NRS) was recorded before and after FNB and comfort of positioning graded. After 10 min, subarachnoid block (SAB) was administered. NRS was recorded postoperatively until 24 h. Results: The comfort of positioning improved in both the groups after FNB but was statistically not significant when compared among the groups (P = 0.7). Duration of postoperative analgesia was significantly higher in the Group BD (741 min ± 97 min) compared to the Group B (440 min ± 45 min) (P = 0.001) and was statistically significant. Conclusion: FNB improved the comfort of positioning for SAB, but the addition of Dexmedetomidine did not have any added advantages with respect to comfort of positioning. However, the addition of Dexmedetomidine significantly increased the duration of postoperative analgesia with minimal hemodynamic changes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Cunningham DJ, LaRose MA, DeLaura IF, Zhang GX, Paniagua AR, Gage MJ. Regional anesthesia does not decrease inpatient or outpatient opioid demand in femoral shaft fracture surgery. Injury 2021; 52:3075-3084. [PMID: 34294430 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Regional anesthesia (RA) may be used in femoral shaft fracture surgery to decrease pain and opioid consumption. However, the impact of RA on inpatient and outpatient opioid demand in patients undergoing femoral shaft fracture surgery is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of RA on inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand in patients undergoing femoral shaft fracture surgery. METHODS Inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand in all patients undergoing femoral shaft fracture surgery was recorded at a single, Level I trauma center from 7/2013 - 7/2018 (n=436). In addition to RA, baseline and treatment factors including age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking, chronic opioid use, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, injury mechanism, additional injuries, open injury, and additional inpatient surgery were recorded. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariable models were used to evaluate the impact of RA on inpatient opioid consumption and outpatient opioid demand. RESULTS Adjusted models demonstrated increases in inpatient opioid consumption in patients with RA (6.9 estimated OE's without RA vs 8.8 OE's with RA from 48-72 hours post-op, p<0.05) but no significant differences at other timepoints (10.3 estimated OE's without RA vs 9.2 OE's with RA from 0-24 hours post-op, 8.2 vs 8.8 from 24-48 hours post-op, p>0.05). Estimated cumulative outpatient opioid demand did not differ significantly in patients with RA (82.3 OE's without RA vs 94.8 with RA from discharge to two-weeks, 105.4 vs 116.3 OE's to 6-weeks, and 124.5 vs 137.9 OE's to 90-days, all p>0.05). Late opioid refills were significantly more common in patients with RA (1.57 odds at 2-weeks to 6-weeks, 1.69 odds at 6-weeks to 90-days, p<0.05) DISCUSSION: In femoral shaft fracture surgery, RA was not associated with decreased opioid demand after adjusting for baseline patient and treatment characteristics. These results provide a real-world estimate of the impact of RA on opioid demand in femoral shaft fracture surgery and encourage providers to seek alternative analgesic modalities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective, therapeutic cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Cunningham
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 200 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
| | - Micaela A LaRose
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center 3710, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Isabel F DeLaura
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center 3710, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Gloria X Zhang
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center 3710, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Ariana R Paniagua
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center 3710, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Mark J Gage
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 200 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maniar A, Macachor J, Chiew WLA, Kumar CM, Imani F, Rokhtabnak F. Nuts and Bolts of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Pain After Hip Fracture for Everyday Anesthetist. Anesth Pain Med 2021; 11:e116099. [PMID: 34692438 PMCID: PMC8520681 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.116099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
A range of peripheral nerve blocks is available to treat hip fracture pain, leaving clinicians confused on choice. No single block appears to be outstanding. The article described the relevant anatomy, technical approach, risk associated, and practicability to facilitate a better understanding of the various approaches available. The clinician should be able to make an informed decision based on local requirements and logistics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amjad Maniar
- Department of Anaesthesia, Satya Sai Orthopaedic and Multispecialty Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | - Joselo Macachor
- Department of Anaesthesia, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Yishun, Singapore
| | | | - Chandra M. Kumar
- Department of Anaesthesia, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Yishun, Singapore
| | - Farnad Imani
- Pain Research Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Faranak Rokhtabnak
- Department of Anesthesiology, Firoozgar General Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bantie M, Mola S, Girma T, Aweke Z, Neme D, Zemedkun A. Comparing Analgesic Effect of Intravenous Fentanyl, Femoral Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Block During Spinal Anesthesia Positioning in Elective Adult Patients Undergoing Femoral Fracture Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain Res 2020; 13:3139-3146. [PMID: 33273851 PMCID: PMC7705271 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s282462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Femoral fracture is the most painful bone injury and performing spinal anesthesia is extremely challenging due to very poor positioning unless we have a very good mode of analgesia. Intravenous strong opioids are commonly used but to date nerve blocks are also being utilized. The reliability and effectiveness of the aforementioned methods are not conclusive to practice worldwide. The objective of the study was to compare the analgesic effect of intravenous fentanyl, femoral nerve block (FNB) and fascia iliaca block (FICB) during positioning patients with femoral fracture for spinal anesthesia. Methods A randomized controlled trial study was conducted on 72 elective adult patients with femoral fracture aged 18–65 years and ASA I and II those were allocated randomly into three groups. The intravenous fentanyl (IVFE) group received 1µg/kg IV fentanyl, FNB group received nerve stimulator guided FNB with 30 mL of 1% lidocaine with adrenaline and FICB group received FICB with 30 mL of 1% lidocaine with adrenaline. Pain intensity in numeric rating score (NRS), time to perform spinal anesthesia, quality of positioning and patient acceptance were assessed. SPSS version 26 and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to analyze data and p value <0.05 was considered significant. Results NRS Pain score during positioning was significantly lower in FNB and FICB groups than IVFE group [median (IQR)]; 2 (1–2.5), 2 (2–3)) vs. 3 (3–4) respectively; P<0.001 and P=0.001. However, FNB and FICB groups were not significantly different with (P=1.000). Time to perform spinal anesthesia was significantly longer in IVFE group 9.5 (9–10) minutes than both FNB and FICB groups 7 (6–8), 8 (6–8) respectively, P<0.001. The quality of positioning was significantly lower in the IVFE group than both FNB and FICB groups (P<0.001). Conclusion Preoperative FNB and FICB reduce pain score during positioning, shorten time to perform spinal anesthesia, better patient positioning and higher patient acceptance in a patient undergoing elective femoral bone fracture surgery. Trial Registration Pan African Clinical Trial Registry, PACTR202006669166858, registered on June 19, 2020. https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=12127.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melaku Bantie
- Debre Berhan University, College of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia
| | - Simeneh Mola
- Dilla University, College of Medicine and Health Science, Dilla, Ethiopia
| | - Timsel Girma
- Dilla University, College of Medicine and Health Science, Dilla, Ethiopia
| | - Zemedu Aweke
- Dilla University, College of Medicine and Health Science, Dilla, Ethiopia
| | - Derartu Neme
- Dilla University, College of Medicine and Health Science, Dilla, Ethiopia
| | - Abebayehu Zemedkun
- Dilla University, College of Medicine and Health Science, Dilla, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review was published originally in 1999 and was updated in 2001, 2002, 2009, 2017, and 2020. Updating was deemed necessary due to the high incidence of hip fractures, the large number of official societies providing recommendations on this condition, the possibility that perioperative peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) may improve patient outcomes, and the major role that PNBs may play in reducing preoperative and postoperative opioid use for analgesia. OBJECTIVES To compare PNBs used as preoperative analgesia, as postoperative analgesia, or as a supplement to general anaesthesia versus no nerve block (or sham block) for adults with hip fracture. Outcomes were pain on movement at 30 minutes after block placement, acute confusional state, myocardial infarction, chest infection, death, time to first mobilization, and costs of an analgesic regimen for single-injection blocks. We undertook the update to look for new studies and to update the methods to reflect Cochrane standards. SEARCH METHODS For the updated review, we searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 11), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (Ovid SP, 1966 to November 2019); Embase (Ovid SP, 1974 to November 2019); and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (EBSCO, 1982 to November 2019), as well as trial registers and reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing use of PNBs compared with no nerve block (or sham block) as part of the care provided for adults 16 years of age and older with hip fracture. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened new trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 tool, and extracted data. When appropriate, we pooled results of outcome measures. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 49 trials (3061 participants; 1553 randomized to PNBs and 1508 to no nerve block (or sham block)). For this update, we added 18 new trials. Trials were published from 1981 to 2020. Trialists followed participants for periods ranging from 5 minutes to 12 months. The average age of participants ranged from 59 to 89 years. People with dementia were often excluded from the included trials. Additional analgesia was available for all participants. Results of 11 trials with 503 participants show that PNBs reduced pain on movement within 30 minutes of block placement (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.25 to -0.86; equivalent to -2.5 on a scale from 0 to 10; high-certainty evidence). Effect size was proportionate to the concentration of local anaesthetic used (P = 0.0003). Based on 13 trials with 1072 participants, PNBs reduce the risk of acute confusional state (risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.90; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 12, 95% CI 7 to 47; high-certainty evidence). For myocardial infarction, there were no events in one trial with 31 participants (RR not estimable; low-certainty evidence). From three trials with 131 participants, PNBs probably reduce the risk for chest infection (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.89; NNTB 7, 95% CI 5 to 72; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on 11 trials with 617 participants, the effects of PNBs on mortality within six months are uncertain due to very serious imprecision (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.60; low-certainty evidence). From three trials with 208 participants, PNBs likely reduce time to first mobilization (mean difference (MD) -10.80 hours, 95% CI -12.83 to -8.77 hours; moderate-certainty evidence). One trial with 75 participants indicated there may be a small reduction in the cost of analgesic drugs with a single-injection PNB (MD -4.40 euros, 95% CI -4.84 to -3.96 euros; low-certainty evidence). We identified 29 ongoing trials, of which 15 were first posted or at least were last updated after 1 January 2018. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PNBs reduce pain on movement within 30 minutes after block placement, risk of acute confusional state, and probably also reduce the risk of chest infection and time to first mobilization. There may be a small reduction in the cost of analgesic drugs for single-injection PNB. We did not find a difference for myocardial infarction and mortality, but the numbers of participants included for these two outcomes were insufficient. Although randomized clinical trials may not be the best way to establish risks associated with an intervention, our review confirms low risks of permanent injury associated with PNBs, as found by others. Some trials are ongoing, but it is unclear whether any further RCTs should be registered, given the benefits found. Good-quality non-randomized trials with appropriate sample size may help to clarify the potential effects of PNBs on myocardial infarction and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Guay
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- Teaching and Research Unit, Health Sciences, University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Sandra Kopp
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liang Y, Lv L, He L, Deng W, Chen C, Li J. A Randomized Controlled Trial of FNB versus FICB for Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures Before Spinal Anesthesia. Clin Interv Aging 2020; 15:1113-1119. [PMID: 32764898 PMCID: PMC7360407 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s251025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Patients with femoral neck fractures often suffer severe pain. This randomized controlled clinical study compared the effect of femoral nerve block (FNB) and fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in this population. Patients and Methods Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: FNB group (femoral nerve block, n=23) or FICB group (fascia iliaca compartment block, n=23). Before positioning for spinal anesthesia, patients received FNB with 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine or FICB with 40 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and during hip flexion after admission to the operation room; at 3, 5, 8, and 10 min after analgesia intervention; and during positioning for spinal anesthesia. Positioning was attempted after 10 min of analgesia intervention in each group. Time required to perform spinal anesthesia, quality of positioning, and patient satisfaction were documented. Results The VAS scores in the FNB group were significantly lower than those in FICB group at 3 and 5 min after analgesia intervention (P=0.000). However, there were no significant differences in VAS between groups at 8 or 10 min or during positioning. Conclusion FNB and FICB produce similar analgesic effects in patients with femoral neck fractures, but FNB has a more rapid onset of pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Liang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Lv Lv
- Emergency Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Liang He
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Deng
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Jiaxing (Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University), Jiaxing, People's Republic of China
| | - Cai Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingjuan Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee KH, Lee SJ, Park JH, Kim SH, Lee H, Oh DS, Kim YH, Park YH, Kim H, Lee SE. Analgesia for spinal anesthesia positioning in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures: Dexmedetomidine-ketamine versus dexmedetomidine-fentanyl. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20001. [PMID: 32443302 PMCID: PMC7253505 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2019] [Revised: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Elderly patients with femoral fractures are anticipated to endure the most pain caused by positional changes required for spinal anesthesia. To improve pain relief, we compared the analgesic effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine-ketamine and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combinations to facilitate patient positioning for spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures. Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to two groups and received either 1 mg/kg of intravenous ketamine (group K) or 1 μg/kg of intravenous fentanyl (group F) concomitant with a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 10 minutes, then dexmedetomidine infusion only was continued at 0.6 μg/kg/h for following 20 minutes, and titrated at a rate of 0.2 to 0.6 μg/kg/h until the end of surgery. After completion of the infusion of either ketamine or fentanyl, the patients were placed in the lateral position with the fracture site up. The pain score (0 = calm, 1 = facial grimacing, 2 = moaning, 3 = screaming, and 4 = unable to proceed because of restlessness or agitation) was used to describe the pain intensity in each step during the procedure (lateral positioning, hip flexion, and lumbar puncture), and quality score (0 = poor hip flexion, 1 = satisfactory hip flexion, 2 = good hip flexion, and 3 = optimal hip flexion) was used to describe the quality of posture. Group K showed a median pain score of 0 (0-1), 0 (0-0) and 0 (0-0) in lateral positioning, hip flexion and lumbar puncture, respectively, while group F showed a score of 3 (2.75-3), 3 (2-3) and 0 (0-1), respectively. The pain score in lateral positioning (P < .0001) and hip flexion (P < .0001) was significantly lower in group K than group F. Group K showed the significantly higher quality scores of spinal anesthesia positioning (P = .0044) than group F. Hemodynamic adverse effects, such as bradycardia, hypotension, and desaturation, were not significantly different between the groups. The administration of dexmedetomidine-ketamine showed a greater advantage in reducing pain intensity and increasing the quality with patient positioning during spinal anesthesia in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures, without any serious adverse effects.
Collapse
|
10
|
Gupta M, Kamath SS. Comparison of preoperative ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block versus femoral nerve block for proximal femur fractures before positioning for spinal anesthesia: an observational study. Korean J Pain 2020; 33:138-143. [PMID: 32235014 PMCID: PMC7136299 DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.2.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe pain associated with proximal femur fractures makes the positioning for regional anesthesia a challenge. Systemic administration of analgesics can have adverse effects. Individually, both the fascia iliaca block (FIB) and femoral nerve blocks (FNB) have been studied. However, there is little evidence comparing the two. The aim of this study was to compare the overall efficacy of the two blocks in patients with proximal femur fracture before positioning for spinal anesthesia. Methods ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class I, II, and III patients scheduled for elective and emergency surgery with the diagnosis of proximal femur fracture between October 2018 and June 2019 were included in the study. The patients were assigned to two groups by convenience nonprobability sampling of 35 each. Results Our study showed a reduction in visual analogue scale scores at 3, 4, and 5 minutes after administration of the FIB being 5.1 ± 1.1, 4.1 ± 1.3, and 2.8 ± 0.8, and those after the FNB as 4.4 ± 1.1, 3.3 ± 1.1, and 2.1 ± 1.4 with P < 0.05, which was statistically significant. The mean first rescue analgesia time for the FIB was 7.1 ± 2.1 hours, while for the FNB it was 5.2 ± 0.7 hours. The P value was less than 0.001, which was significant. Conclusions Both ultrasound guided FNB and FIB techniques provide sufficient analgesia for patient's positioning before spinal anesthesia. However, the duration of postoperative analgesia provided by FIB was greater than that of the FNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meeta Gupta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College of Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Shaila Surendra Kamath
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kasturba Medical College of Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alrefaey AK, Abouelela MA. Pericapsular nerve group block for analgesia of positioning pain during spinal anesthesia in hip fracture patients, a randomized controlled study. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA 2020; 36:234-239. [DOI: 10.1080/11101849.2020.1828017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alrefaey K. Alrefaey
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Mohamed A. Abouelela
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hsu YP, Hsu CW, Chu KCW, Huang WC, Bai CH, Huang CJ, Cheng SW, Chen JH, Chen C. Efficacy and safety of femoral nerve block for the positioning of femur fracture patients before a spinal block - A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0216337. [PMID: 31048897 PMCID: PMC6497313 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The evidence supporting the benefit of femoral nerve block (FNB) for positioning before spinal anesthesia (SA) in patients suffering from a femur fracture remains inconclusive. In the present study, the authors intended to determine the efficacy and safety of FNB versus an intravenous analgesic (IVA) for positioning before SA in patients with a femur fracture. Method PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases were searched up to January 2018. We included randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and observational studies that compared FNB versus IVA for the positioning of patients with femur fracture receiving SA. The primary outcome was pain scores during positioning within 30 min before SA. Secondary outcomes were the time for SA, additional analgesic requirements, anesthesiologist’s satisfaction with the quality of positioning for SA, participant acceptance, and hemodynamic changes. A random-effects model was used to synthesize the data. We registered the study at PROSPERO with an ID of CRD42018091450. Results Ten studies with 584 patients were eligible for inclusion. FNB achieved significantly lower pain scores than IVA during positioning within 30 min before SA (pooled standardized mean deviation (SMD): -1.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.84 to -0.70, p < 0.05). A subgroup analysis showed that the analgesic effect was larger in patients in the sitting position for SA than a non-sitting position (sitting position vs non-sitting: pooled SMD: -1.75 (p < 0.05) vs -0.61 (not significant). A multivariate regression showed that the analgesic effect was also associated with age and the total equivalent amount as lidocaine after adjusting for gender (age: coefficient 0.048, p < 0.05; total equivalent amount as lidocaine: coefficient 0.005, p < 0.05). Patients receiving FNB also had a significantly shorter time for SA, greater anesthesiologist satisfaction, and higher patient acceptance than patients receiving IVA. The use of local anesthetics did not produce significant clinical hemodynamic change. Conclusion Compared to IVA, FNB was an effective and safe strategy for the positioning of femur fracture patients for a spinal block, particularly patients who received SA in the sitting position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Pin Hsu
- Emergency Department, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Emergency, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Wang Hsu
- Emergency Department, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Emergency, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Karen Chia Wen Chu
- Emergency Department, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Emergency, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Cheng Huang
- Emergency Department, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Emergency, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chyi-Huey Bai
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Jen Huang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Wei Cheng
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jin-Hua Chen
- Graduate Institute of Data Science, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Biostatistics Center, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Education and Research, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- * E-mail: (CC); (JHC)
| | - Chiehfeng Chen
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Evidence-based Medicine Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
- * E-mail: (CC); (JHC)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Regional anesthesia for the acute trauma patient is increasing due to the growing appreciation of its benefits, development of newer techniques and equipment, and more robust training. Block procedures are expanding beyond perioperative interventions performed exclusively by anesthesiologists to paramedics on scene, emergency medicine physicians, and nurse-led services using these techniques early in trauma pain management. Special considerations and indications apply to trauma victims compared with the elective patient and must be appreciated to optimize safety and clinical outcomes. This review discusses current literature and future directions in the growing role of regional anesthesia in acute trauma care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian R Slade
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine, 325 9th Avenue, Box 359724, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
| | - Ron E Samet
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Trauma Anesthesiology, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
|
15
|
Tam CW, Rainer TH. Femoral Nerve Block for Pain Management of Femoral Fractures in the Emergency Department: Evidence Based Topic Review. HONG KONG J EMERG ME 2017. [DOI: 10.1177/102490790501200308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
16
|
Kendall MC, Robbins ZM, Cohen A, Minn M, Benzuly SE, Triebwasser AS, McCormick ZL, Gorgone M. Selected highlights in clinical anesthesia research. J Clin Anesth 2017; 43:90-97. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Revised: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
17
|
Faiz SHR, Derakhshan P, Imani F, Alebouyeh MR, Rahimzadeh P, Memarian A. A Comparative Study on the Effect of Femoral Nerve Block (FNB) Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FIC) on Analgesia of Patients with Isolated Femoral Shaft Fracture During Spinal Anesthesia. Trauma Mon 2017; In Press. [DOI: 10.5812/traumamon.63245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2025] Open
|
18
|
Guay J, Parker MJ, Griffiths R, Kopp S, Cochrane Anaesthesia Group. Peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 5:CD001159. [PMID: 28494088 PMCID: PMC6481480 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001159.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various nerve blocks with local anaesthetic agents have been used to reduce pain after hip fracture and subsequent surgery. This review was published originally in 1999 and was updated in 2001, 2002, 2009 and 2017. OBJECTIVES This review focuses on the use of peripheral nerves blocks as preoperative analgesia, as postoperative analgesia or as a supplement to general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery. We undertook the update to look for new studies and to update the methods to reflect Cochrane standards. SEARCH METHODS For the updated review, we searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 8), MEDLINE (Ovid SP, 1966 to August week 1 2016), Embase (Ovid SP, 1988 to 2016 August week 1) and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (EBSCO, 1982 to August week 1 2016), as well as trial registers and reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving use of nerve blocks as part of the care provided for adults aged 16 years and older with hip fracture. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed new trials for inclusion, determined trial quality using the Cochrane tool and extracted data. When appropriate, we pooled results of outcome measures. We rated the quality of evidence according to the GRADE Working Group approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 31 trials (1760 participants; 897 randomized to peripheral nerve blocks and 863 to no regional blockade). Results of eight trials with 373 participants show that peripheral nerve blocks reduced pain on movement within 30 minutes of block placement (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.14 to -0.67; equivalent to -3.4 on a scale from 0 to 10; I2 = 90%; high quality of evidence). Effect size was proportionate to the concentration of local anaesthetic used (P < 0.00001). Based on seven trials with 676 participants, we did not find a difference in the risk of acute confusional state (risk ratio (RR) 0.69, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.27; I2 = 48%; very low quality of evidence). Three trials with 131 participants reported decreased risk for pneumonia (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.89; I2 = 3%; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 7, 95% CI 5 to 72; moderate quality of evidence). We did not find a difference in risk of myocardial ischaemia or death within six months, but the number of participants included was well below the optimal information size for these two outcomes. Two trials with 155 participants reported that peripheral nerve blocks also reduced time to first mobilization after surgery (mean difference -11.25 hours, 95% CI -14.34 to -8.15 hours; I2 = 52%; moderate quality of evidence). One trial with 75 participants indicated that the cost of analgesic drugs was lower when they were given as a single shot block (SMD -3.48, 95% CI -4.23 to -2.74; moderate quality of evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS High-quality evidence shows that regional blockade reduces pain on movement within 30 minutes after block placement. Moderate-quality evidence shows reduced risk for pneumonia, decreased time to first mobilization and cost reduction of the analgesic regimen (single shot blocks).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Guay
- University of SherbrookeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of MedicineSherbrookeQuebecCanada
| | - Martyn J Parker
- Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of OrthopaedicsPeterborough City HospitalCBU PO Box 211, Bretton GatePeterboroughCambridgeshireUKPE3 9GZ
| | - Richard Griffiths
- Peterborough and Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of AnaesthesiaEdith Cavell HospitalBretton GatePeterboroughCambridgeshireUKPE26 2UA
| | - Sandra Kopp
- Mayo Clinic College of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine200 1st St SWRochesterMNUSA55901
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hartmann FVG, Novaes MRCG, Carvalho MRD. [Femoral nerve block versus intravenous fentanyl in adult patients with hip fractures - a systematic review]. Rev Bras Anestesiol 2016; 67:67-71. [PMID: 27838114 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjan.2016.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip fractures configure an important public health issue and are associated with high mortality taxes and lose of functionality. Hip fractures refer to a fracture occurring between the edge of the femoral head and 5cm below the lesser trochanter. They are common in orthopedic emergencies. The number of proximal femoral fractures is likely to increase as the population ages. The average cost of care during the initial hospitalization for hip fracture can be estimated about US$ 7,000 per patient. Femoral fractures are painful and need immediate adequate analgesia. Treating pain femoral fractures is difficult because there are limited numbers of analgesics available, many of which have side effects that can limit their use. Opiates are the most used drugs, but they can bring some complications. In this context, femoral nerve blocks can be a safe alternative. It is a specific regional anesthetic technique used by doctors in emergency medicine to provide anesthesia and analgesia of the affected leg. OBJECTIVE To compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous fentanyl versus femoral nerve block before positioning to perform spinal anesthesia in patients with femoral fractures assessed by Pain Scales. METHODS A systematic review of scientific literature was conducted. Studies described as randomized controlled trials comparing femoral nerve block and traditional fentanyl are included. Two reviewers (MR and FH) independently assessed potentially eligible trials for inclusion. The methodology assessment was based on the tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration for assessment of bias for randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Medline and Lilacs were searched for all articles published, without restriction of language or time. RESULTS Two studies were included in this review. Nerve blockade seemed to be more effective than intravenous fentanyl for preventing pain in patients suffering from a femoral fracture. It also reduced the use of additional analgesia and made lower the risk for systemic complications. Femoral nerve block reduced the time to perform spinal anesthesia to the patient who will be subjected to surgery and facilitate the sitting position for this. CONCLUSION The use of femoral nerve block can reduce the level of pain and the need for additional analgesia. There are less adverse systemic events associated with this and the procedure itself does not offer greater risks. More studies are required for further conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flávia Vieira Guimarães Hartmann
- Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brasil; Hospital Militar de Área de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil; Fundacão de Ensino e Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brasil; Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brasil.
| | - Maria Rita Carvalho Garbi Novaes
- Farmácia Hospitalar, Departamento de Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brasil; Universidad del Chile, Santiago, Chile; Fundação de Ensino e Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Madabushi R, Rajappa GC, Thammanna PP, Iyer SS. Fascia iliaca block vs intravenous fentanyl as an analgesic technique before positioning for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing surgery for femur fractures-a randomized trial. J Clin Anesth 2016; 35:398-403. [PMID: 27871563 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2015] [Revised: 08/18/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Pain arising from femur fractures is of severe nature. Surgery for fixation of femoral fractures may be done under spinal anesthesia. We conducted this study to compare the analgesic efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) and intravenous fentanyl (IVF) before positioning for spinal anesthesia. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING Operating room. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS Sixty patients aged 25 to 75 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists status I to III, undergoing surgery for femur fracture were chosen for the study and randomized into 2 groups. Patients in group FICB received the block with 30 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine 15 minutes before the subarachnoid block. Patients in group IVF received intravenous fentanyl at 0.5 μg/kg body weight repeated up to a maximum of 3 doses. Spinal was administered using 12 to 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with glucose 80 mg/mL in patients of both groups. MEASUREMENTS Preprocedural and postprocedural parameters such as visual analog scale (VAS) scores, sitting angle, quality of positioning, and time to perform the spinal were recorded. Patients were also assessed in the first 24 hours for analgesic requests. MAIN RESULTS Preprocedural VAS scores were similar in both groups. The "VAS after" was 24.72±15.70 mm in group FICB vs 61.22±18.18 mm in group IVF (P=.01). The drop in VAS scores was significantly more in the FICB group. Sitting angle improved significantly in the FICB group. (56.17°±16.54° vs 21.38°±23.90°; P=.01). Patients in group FICB also needed less time for spinal and had better quality of positioning. Postoperative analgesic requirement was lesser in group FICB. CONCLUSION Fascia iliaca block offers superior analgesia compared to IVF in patients with femur fracture before positioning for spinal anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajashree Madabushi
- Department of Anesthesiology, MS Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, Bangalore, India.
| | - Geetha C Rajappa
- Department of Anesthesiology, MS Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, Bangalore, India
| | - Prathima P Thammanna
- Department of Anesthesiology, MS Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, Bangalore, India
| | - Sadasivan S Iyer
- Department of Anesthesiology, MS Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kumar D, Hooda S, Kiran S, Devi J. Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided FICB in Patients with Hip Fracture. J Clin Diagn Res 2016; 10:UC13-6. [PMID: 27630930 DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2016/17802.8123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2015] [Accepted: 05/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hip fractures are often encountered in the elderly and present special problems to the anaesthesiologist. Fascia iliaca compartment block is another technique with the intent to block all the three nerves like 3-in-1 nerve block. AIM To evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided fascia iliaca compartment block to facilitate positioning of patients with hip fracture for spinal anaesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study was conducted in 50 patients aged between 40-80 years, belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III undergoing surgery for hip fracture. All 50 patients received an ultrasound guided Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) in the premedication room with 30 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine by 23G spinal needle. Sensory blockade was evaluated 5, 10 and 20 minutes after ropivacaine administration using loss of perception to cold in the lateral, anterior and medial part of the thigh. Visual analogue scale scores were noted before the block, 20 minutes after block and during positioning for spinal anaesthesia. Patient's acceptance for FICB was evaluated 24 hour after arriving back to the orthopaedics ward using a two-point score. Any episode of hypotension or bradycardia was noted and managed accordingly. RESULTS In lateral part of thigh, at 5 minutes sensory blockade was present in 33 patients (66%) and at 10 minutes sensory blockade was present in 45 cases (90%). In anterior part of thigh, sensory blockade was present in 34 cases (68%) at 5 minutes time interval and at 10 minutes sensory blockade was present in 48 cases (96%). In medial part of thigh, 28 cases (56%) had sensory blockade at 5 minutes and at 10 minutes in 43 cases (86%). Sensory blockage was same at 20 minutes as on 10 minutes interval in all thigh parts. Before FIC block average VAS was 7.5 which was decreased to average of 2.94 at 20 minutes after block which was statistically significant (p<0.01). During positioning for spinal anaesthesia, 46 patients had VAS less than 4. Positioning during spinal anaesthesia was assessed unsatisfactory (0) in 2 cases (4%), satisfactory (1) in 5 cases (10%), good (2) in 25 cases (50%) and excellent (3) in 18 cases (36%). CONCLUSION Ultrasound guided FICB can be performed safely without complications in controlling pain for patients with hip fracture. Performing an FICB before positioning for spinal anaesthesia provides good pain management and facilitates spinal performance with wide patient acceptance, hence improving overall quality and efficiency of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devender Kumar
- Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesia, AIIMS , Delhi, India
| | - Sarla Hooda
- Head of Department and Senior Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, PGIMS , Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | - Shashi Kiran
- Senior Professor, Department of Anaesthesia, PGIMS , Rohtak, Haryana, India
| | - Jyoti Devi
- Junior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hindu Rao Hospital , Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hartmann FVG, Novaes MRCG, de Carvalho MR. Femoral nerve block versus intravenous fentanyl in adult patients with hip fractures - a systematic review. Braz J Anesthesiol 2016; 67:67-71. [PMID: 28017173 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2015.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip fractures configure an important public health issue and are associated with high mortality taxes and lose of functionality. Hip fractures refer to a fracture occurring between the edge of the femoral head and 5cm below the lesser trochanter. They are common in orthopedic emergencies. The number of proximal femoral fractures is likely to increase as the population ages. The average cost of care during the initial hospitalization for hip fracture can be estimated about US$ 7,000 per patient. Femoral fractures are painful and need immediate adequate analgesia. Treating pain femoral fractures is difficult because there are limited numbers of analgesics available, many of which have side effects that can limit their use. Opiates are the most used drugs, but they can bring some complications. In this context, femoral nerve blocks can be a safe alternative. It is a specific regional anesthetic technique used by doctors in emergency medicine to provide anesthesia and analgesia of the affected leg. OBJECTIVE To compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous fentanyl versus femoral nerve block before positioning to perform spinal anesthesia in patients with femoral fractures assessed by Pain Scales. METHODS A systematic review of scientific literature was conducted. Studies described as randomized controlled trials comparing femoral nerve block and traditional fentanyl are included. Two reviewers (MR and FH) independently assessed potentially eligible trials for inclusion. The methodology assessment was based on the tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration for assessment of bias for randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Medline and Lilacs were searched for all articles published, without restriction of language or time. RESULTS Two studies were included in this review. Nerve blockade seemed to be more effective than intravenous fentanyl for preventing pain in patients suffering from a femoral fracture. It also reduced the use of additional analgesia and made lower the risk for systemic complications. Femoral nerve block reduced the time to perform spinal anesthesia to the patient who will be subjected to surgery and facilitate the sitting position for this. CONCLUSION The use of femoral nerve block can reduce the level of pain and the need for additional analgesia. There are less adverse systemic events associated with this and the procedure itself does not offer greater risks. More studies are required for further conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flávia Vieira Guimarães Hartmann
- Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal, Brasília, DF, Brazil; Hospital Militar de Área de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brazil; Fundacão de Ensino e Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil; Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
| | - Maria Rita Carvalho Garbi Novaes
- Farmácia Hospitalar, Departamento de Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil; Universidad del Chile, Santiago, Chile; Fundação de Ensino e Pesquisa em Ciências da Saúde, Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Preoperative fascia iliaca compartment block for positioning patients with hip fractures for central nervous blockade: a randomized trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2015; 39:394-8. [PMID: 25068412 DOI: 10.1097/aap.0000000000000133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Appropriate pain management may positively affect outcome following hip fractures. Positioning patients for spinal anesthesia (SA) can be extremely painful. Peripheral nerve blockades are gaining popularity in this setting. This prospective, randomized study compares the efficacy of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) to intravenous (IV) fentanyl for positioning hip fracture patients for SA. METHODS Forty-one patients scheduled for hip fracture surgery were randomized to receive a bolus dose of IV fentanyl (IVFE) 1.5 μg/kg (IVFE group) or an FICB using 40 mL ropivacaine 0.5% (FICB group) 5 or 20 minutes before positioning for SA, respectively. Numeric rating pain scale scores before and following the analgesic intervention, time needed and quality of patient position for SA performance, postoperative analgesia in terms of time to first IV morphine dose demand and morphine consumption during the first 24 hours, and patient satisfaction were documented. RESULTS Compared with the IVFE group, the FICB group showed significantly lower numeric rating pain scale scores in all instances following the analgesic intervention (P < 0.001), shorter spinal performance time (P = 0.001), and better quality of position (P = 0.001). Postoperative morphine consumption was lower (P = 0.026), the time to first dose demand was longer (P = 0.001), and patient satisfaction rates were higher (P < 0.001) in the FICB group. CONCLUSIONS Performing an FICB before positioning for SA provides superior pain management compared with IVFE administration, facilitates spinal performance, and yields satisfactory postoperative analgesia and wide patient acceptance, hence improving overall quality and efficiency of care.
Collapse
|
24
|
Jadon A, Kedia SK, Dixit S, Chakraborty S. Comparative evaluation of femoral nerve block and intravenous fentanyl for positioning during spinal anaesthesia in surgery of femur fracture. Indian J Anaesth 2015; 58:705-8. [PMID: 25624533 PMCID: PMC4296354 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.147146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal anaesthesia is the preferred technique to fix fracture of the femur. Extreme pain does not allow ideal positioning for this procedure. Intravenous fentanyl and femoral nerve block are commonly used techniques to reduce the pain during position for spinal anaesthesia however; results are conflicting regarding superiority of femoral nerve block over intravenous fentanyl. AIMS We conducted this study to compare the analgesic effect provided by femoral nerve block (FNB) and intra- venous (IV) fentanyl prior to positioning for central neuraxial block in patients undergoing surgery for femur fracture. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized prospective study 60 patients scheduled for fracture femur operation under spinal were included. Patients were distributed in two groups through computer generated random numbers table; Femoral nerve block group (FNB) and Intravenous fentanyl group (FENT). In FNB group patients received FNB guided by a peripheral nerve stimulator (Stimuplex; B Braun, Melsungen, AG) 5 minutes prior to positioning. 20mL, 1.5% lidocaine with adrenaline (1:200,000) was injected incrementally after a negative aspiration test. Patients in the fentanyl group received injection fentanyl 1 μg/kg IV 5 mins prior to positioning. Spinal block was performed and pain scores before and during positioning were recorded. Statistical analysis was done with Sigmaplot version-10 computer software. Student t-test was applied to compare the means and P < 0.05 was taken as significant. RESULTS VAS during positioning in group FNB: 0.57 ± 0.31 versus FENT 2.53 ± 1.61 (P = 0.0020). Time to perform spinal anesthesia in group FNB: 15.33 ± 1.64 min versus FENT 19.56 ± 3.09 min (P = 0.000049). Quality of patient positioning for spinal anesthesia in group FNB 2.67± 0.606 versus FENT 1.967 ± 0.85 (P = 0.000027). Patient acceptance was less in group FENT (P = 0.000031). CONCLUSION Femoral nerve block provides better analgesia, patient satisfaction and satisfactory positioning than IV fentanyl for position during spinal anaesthesia in patients of fracture femur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashok Jadon
- Department of Anesthesia, Tata Motors Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
| | - Sunil Kumar Kedia
- Department of Anesthesia, Tata Motors Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
| | - Shreya Dixit
- Department of Anesthesia, Tata Motors Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
A comparison of three techniques (local anesthetic deposited circumferential to vs. above vs. below the nerve) for ultrasound guided femoral nerve block. BMC Anesthesiol 2014; 14:6. [PMID: 24460975 PMCID: PMC3933203 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2013] [Accepted: 01/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fractured neck of femur generally requires operative fixation and is a common cause of admission to hospital. The combination of femoral nerve block and spinal anesthesia is a common anesthetic technique used to facilitate the surgical procedure. The optimal disposition of local anesthetic (LA) relative the femoral nerve (FN) has not been defined. Our hypothesis was: that the deposition of LA relative to the FN influences the quality of analgesia for positioning of the patient for performance of spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was verbal rating (VRS) pain scores 0–10 assessed immediately after positioning the patient to perform spinal anesthesia. Methods With Institutional ethical approval and having obtained written informed consent from each, 52 patients were studied. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01527812). Patients were randomly allocated to undergo to one of three groups namely: intention to deposit lidocaine 2% (15 ml) i. above (Group A), ii. below (Group B), iii. circumferential (Group C) to the FN. A blinded observer assessed i. the sensory nerve block (cold) in the areas of the terminal branches of the FN and ii. VRS pain scores on passive movement from block completion at 5 minutes intervals for 30 minutes. Immediately after positioning the patient for spinal anesthesia, VRS pain scores were recorded. Results Pain VRS scores during positioning were similar in the three groups [Above group/Below group/Circumferential group: 2(0–9)/0(0–10)/3(0–10), median(range), p:0.32]. The block was deemed to have failed in 20%, 47% and 12% in the Above group, Below group and Circumferential group respectively. The median number of needle passes was greater in the Circumferential group compared with the Above group (p:0.009). Patient satisfaction was greatest in the Circumferential group [mean satisfaction scores were 83.5(19.8)/88.1(20.5)/93.8(12.3), [mean(SD), p=0.04] in the Above, Below and Circumferential groups respectively. Conclusions We conclude that there is no clinical advantage to attempting to deposit LA circumferential to the femoral nerve (relative to depositing LA either above or below the nerve), during femoral nerve block in this setting.
Collapse
|
26
|
Black KJL, Bevan CA, Murphy NG, Howard JJ, Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group. Nerve blocks for initial pain management of femoral fractures in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 2013:CD009587. [PMID: 24343768 PMCID: PMC11751595 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009587.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children and adolescents with femoral fractures are almost always admitted to hospital. They invariably start their hospital experience in the Emergency Department, often requiring transfer to a specialist children's hospital. They require analgesia or anaesthesia so that radiographs can be obtained and for management of their fractures. The initial care process involves from two to six transfers from stretcher to stretcher/imaging/operating-suite table or hospital bed within the first few hours, so prompt pain relief is essential. Systemic analgesia can be provided orally or parenterally. Alternatively, a nerve block may be used where local anaesthetic is injected around a nerve to block sensation or freeze the involved area. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of femoral nerve block (FNB) or fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for initial pain management of children with fractures of the femur (thigh bone) in the pre-hospital or in-hospital emergency setting, with or without systemic analgesia. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (11 January 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2012 Issue 12), MEDLINE (1946 to January Week 1 2013), EMBASE (1980 to 2013 Week 01), Google Scholar (31 January 2013) and trial registries (31 January 2013). We handsearched recent issues of specialist journals and references of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of FNB or FICB for initial pain management compared with systemic opiates in children (aged under 18 years) with fractures of the femur receiving pre-hospital or in hospital emergency care. Primary outcomes included failure of analgesia at 30 minutes, pain levels during procedures and transfers (e.g. to a stretcher or hospital ward) for up to eight hours, and adverse effects. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently extracted data using a pre-piloted form. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias for the included study and assessed quality of the evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach; i.e. as very low, low, moderate or high. Meta-analysis of results was not possible as we found only one trial that could be included in the review. MAIN RESULTS We included one randomised trial of 55 children aged between 16 months to 15 years. It compared anatomically-guided FICB versus systemic analgesia with intravenous morphine sulphate. The small sample size and the high risk of bias relating to lack of blinding resulted in a low quality rating for all outcomes.Overall, the trial provided low quality evidence for better pain management in the FICB group. Fewer children in the FICB group had analgesia failure at 30 minutes than in the morphine group (2/26 (8%) versus 8/28 (29%); risk ratio (RR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 1.20; P value 0.09). The trial did not report on pain during procedures or transfers, or application of analgesia. The trial provided low quality evidence that FICB has a better safety profile than morphine, with only four (15%) reports of redness and pain at the injection site, and no reports of the type of adverse effects of systematic analgesia that occurred in the morphine group, such as respiratory depression (six cases (21%)) and vomiting (four cases (14%)). No long-term adverse events were reported for either intervention. Clinically significant pain relief was achieved in both groups at five minutes; with limited evidence of greater initial pain relief in the FICB group. Based on an inspection of graphically-presented data, at least 46% (12/26) of children in the FICB group had no supplementary medication (mainly analgesia) for the six hours of the study, while only 5% (1 or 2/28) of children in the intravenous morphine group went without additional analgesia. There was insufficient evidence to determine whether child or parental satisfaction with the method of analgesia favoured either method. Resource use was not measured. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Low quality evidence from one small trial suggests that FICB provides better and longer lasting pain relief with fewer adverse events than intravenous opioids for femur fractures in children. Well conducted and reported randomised trials that compare nerve blocks (both FNB and FICB) with systemic analgesia and that use validated pain scores are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen JL Black
- University of British ColumbiaDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of PediatricsBC Children's Hospital4480 Oak StVancouverBCCanadaV6H 3N1
| | - Catherine A Bevan
- Royal Alexandra Children's HospitalChildrens' Emergency DepartmentEastern RoadBrightonSussexUKBN2 5BE
| | - Nancy G Murphy
- IWK Regional Poison CentreIWK Emergency Department5950 University AvenueHalifaxNSCanadaB3K 6R8
| | - Jason J Howard
- IWK Health CentreDepartment of SurgeryPO Box 9700, 5850 University AvenueHalifaxNSCanadaB3K 6R8
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Luger TJ, Kammerlander C, Benz M, Luger MF, Garoscio I. Peridural Anesthesia or Ultrasound-Guided Continuous 3-in-1 Block: Which Is Indicated for Analgesia in Very Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture in the Emergency Department? Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2012; 3:121-8. [PMID: 23569705 PMCID: PMC3598445 DOI: 10.1177/2151458512470953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical relevance of preoperative acute pain management and cardiovascular stability by ultrasound-guided continuous 3-in-1 nerve block in very elderly patients with hip fracture when compared to epidural anesthesia (PDA). METHODS To study the analgesic effect, we enrolled 37 very elderly patients with hip fractures, of whom 3 patients with dementia had to be excluded. Thus, 34 patients were randomized to 1 of the 3 groups: group A (ultrasound-guided continuous 3-in-1 block, bupivacaine; n = 10, dropout rate: 0), group B (PDA, bupivacaine; n = 14, dropout rate: 8), and group C (systemic pain therapy, piritramide/paracetamol; n = 10, dropout rate: 0). Pain intensity was assessed preoperatively and up to 24 hours postoperatively using a visual analog scale, verbal rating scale, analgesic consumption, scale of well-being, and cardiocirculatory parameters (eg, serum troponin T). RESULTS Our data show that in the preoperative period both regional anesthesia (RA) procedures (analgesia responders after 1 hour: 86.7% and 100%; P = .001) were superior to systemic analgesia (analgesia responders: 46.7%), and the rescue medication requirement in the 2 RA groups was significantly lower (P = .02). Serum troponin T level increased only in the systemic analgesia group (P = .04). In the emergency department, the disadvantage of PDA in geriatric patients with hip fracture was the fact that procedures were more complex, resulting in a high dropout rate (57.1%). The use of PDA has to be critically discussed for ethical concerns. CONCLUSION In the specific situation of acute hospital admission, the ultrasound-guided continuous 3-in-1 block appears to be indicated as a stress-free means of providing adequate preoperative pain relief in very elderly patients with hip fracture. However, these findings should be corroborated by studies involving larger numbers of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J. Luger
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christian Kammerlander
- Department of Traumatology and Sports Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maureen Benz
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Markus F. Luger
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Thüringen-Kliniken “Gregorius Agricola” GmbH, Saalfeld, Germany
| | - Ivo Garoscio
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Iamaroon A, Raksakietisak M, Halilamien P, Hongsawad J, Boonsararuxsapong K. Femoral nerve block versus fentanyl: Analgesia for positioning patients with fractured femur. Local Reg Anesth 2010; 3:21-6. [PMID: 22915864 PMCID: PMC3417943 DOI: 10.2147/lra.s8600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Fracture of femur is a painful bone injury, worsened by any movement. This prospective study was performed to compare the analgesic effects of femoral nerve block (FNB) with intravenous (IV) fentanyl prior to positioning patients with fractured femur for spinal block. Patients and methods Sixty-four ASA I–III patients aged 18–80 years undergoing surgery for femur fracture were randomized into two groups. Fifteen minutes before spinal block, the FNB group received nerve stimulator-assisted FNB with a mixture of 20 mL bupivacaine 0.5% and 10 mL normal saline 0.9%, and the fentanyl group received two doses of IV fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg with a five-minute interval between doses. Numeric rating pain scores were compared. During positioning, fentanyl in 0.5 μg/kg increments was given every five minutes until pain scores were ≤4. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the groups according to pain scores, need for additional fentanyl, and satisfaction with positioning before spinal block. Conclusion We were unable to demonstrate a benefit of FNB over IV fentanyl for patient positioning before spinal block. However, FNB can provide postoperative pain relief, whereas side effects of fentanyl must be considered, and analgesic dosing should be titrated based on pain scores. A multimodal approach (FNB + IV fentanyl) may be a possible option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arissara Iamaroon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Pain therapy after surgical procedures of the lower extremity is an important goal, whereas insufficient analgesia leads to an essential reduction of the patient's mobility and convalescence. If possible, regional anaesthetic and intrathecal procedures for pre-, intra- and postoperative analgesia should be used. Systemic analgesics should not be used preoperatively, whereas non-opioids and opioids are recommended postoperatively. Surgical options that adequately reduce pain are intra-articular injection of local anaesthetics alone or in combination with opioids and cooling and physiotherapeutic treatment regimens after joint procedures. There is no scientific rationale as an argument for inserting drains. The surgical approach depends more on the individual patient's anatomical characteristics. Whereas the regional analgesic regimen is more effective than systemic therapy, sufficient tools for pain reduction during surgical procedures of the lower extremity are at the orthopaedic surgeon's disposal, too.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J P Simanski
- Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Sporttraumatologie Köln-Merheim, Lehrstuhl für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie der Universität Witten-Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, 51109, Köln, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gille J, Gille M, Gahr R, Wiedemann B. [Acute pain management in proximal femoral fractures: femoral nerve block (catheter technique) vs. systemic pain therapy using a clinic internal organisation model]. Anaesthesist 2009; 55:414-22. [PMID: 16320011 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-005-0949-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of catheter-mediated femoral nerve block analgesia with systemic pain therapy in patients with proximal femoral fractures in the pre-operative and post-operative setting using a protocol for coordinating pain management. METHODS In a prospective randomised trial of patients attending the emergency department, 100 individuals were selected with a clinically diagnosed proximal femoral fracture. Patients were divided into two equal groups A and B. Group A (n=50) received a catheter-mediated femoral nerve block with 1% prilocaine (40 ml) and post-operatively 0.2% ropivacaine (30 ml) 6 hourly. Group B (n=50) initially received intravenous metamizol (1 g) and a fixed combination of oral tilidine (100 mg) + naloxone (8 mg). Patients aged 90 years or more received a reduced dose (tilidine 75 mg + naloxone 6 mg). In the post-operative period regular oral ibuprofen (400 mg, 8 hourly) in addition to oral tilidine (50 mg) + naloxone (4 mg) was given as required for break through pain. Pain intensity was measured using a verbal rating scale (VRS) from 1 to 5: pain free (=1), mild pain (=2), moderate pain (=3), severe pain (=4), excruciating pain (=5). Pain scores were recorded at rest (R), during passive anteflection (30 degrees) of the hip (PA) on arrival and at 15 and 30 min after initial administration of analgesia. Thereafter, recordings were made 4 times a day up to the third post-operative day. RESULTS Pain scores were comparable for both groups on admission (VRS in R 2.50 vs. 2.46; VRS during PA 4.30 vs. 4.34). Significant pain relief was achieved in both groups following initial administration of analgesia, but the total pain scores in group A were significantly lower than in group B (VRS in R 1.22 vs. 1.58, p<0.01 and VRS during PA 2.66 vs. 3.26; p<0.001). No difference was noted between the two groups during the first 3 post-operative days. No severe complications occurred as a result of analgesia, however, the catheter was dislodged in 20% of patients in group A resulting in the need for systemically administered analgesia. CONCLUSION All patients presenting with proximal femoral fractures should receive adequate analgesia within the emergency department even prior to radiographic imaging. Femoral nerve block should be considered as the method of choice. The insertion of a femoral nerve block catheter has the dual advantage of early analgesia permitting repeated clinical examination in addition to continued post-operative pain management. The cumbersome logistics inherent in this technique within the clinical setting limits its practical application. An initial single-shot regional nerve block followed by a systemic post-operative analgesia protocol was considered an appropriate alternative. The execution of safe, consistent and appropriate regional nerve block anaesthesia is reliant on formal guidelines and protocols as agreed by the multidisciplinary teams involved with patient-directed pain management and good clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Gille
- Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Intensiv- und Schmerztherapie, Städt Klinikum St Georg, Leipzig, Germany. Jochen.Gille@sankt georg.de
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sandby-Thomas M, Sullivan G, Hall JE. A national survey into the peri-operative anaesthetic management of patients presenting for surgical correction of a fractured neck of femur*. Anaesthesia 2008; 63:250-8. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05328.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
32
|
Minville V, Colombani A. Résponse:. Can J Anaesth 2007. [DOI: 10.1007/bf03026880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
33
|
Hu P, Harmon D, Frizelle H. Patient comfort during regional anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2007; 19:67-74. [PMID: 17321932 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2005] [Revised: 02/20/2006] [Accepted: 02/21/2006] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Regional anesthesia has many advantages, which include low cost, ease of administration, and avoidance of risks associated with general anesthesia. Injection of local anesthetic via a needle as part of a regional anesthetic technique can be a stressful experience. The goal is to produce a relaxed patient who is comfortable and cooperative throughout the duration of surgery. The topics of regional anesthetic techniques, drug combinations, and adjunct measures such as sedation have been described extensively in the literature. The issue of patient comfort has not been reviewed in its entirety. This review seeks to collate known information in a systematic format and provide a framework for patient comfort during regional anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Hu
- Department of Anaesthesia, Beaumont Hospital, and Mater Misercordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gregoretti C, Decaroli D, Miletto A, Mistretta A, Cusimano R, Ranieri VM. Regional anesthesia in trauma patients. Anesthesiol Clin 2007; 25:99-116, ix-x. [PMID: 17400159 DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2006.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Medical and surgical treatment of the trauma patient has evolved in the last decade. Treatment of pain from multiple fractures or injured organs and surgical anesthesia with regional anesthesia techniques have been used to reduce post-traumatic stress disorder and reduce the adverse effects of general anesthesia. Neuraxial blocks and peripheral nerve block techniques should be practiced by trained emergency and operatory room staff. This article reviews recent publications related to the role of regional anesthesia in trauma patients in the prehospital, emergency, and operatory room settings. It also describes indications, limitations, and practical aspects of regional anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Gregoretti
- Dipartimento Emergenza Accettazione, ASO CTO-CRF-Maria Adelaide, Via Zuretti 29, 10129 Torino, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Minville V, Castel A, Asehnoune K, Chassery C, Lafosse JM, Nguyen L, Colombani A, Fourcade O. Le propofol pour réaliser une rachianesthésie en position latérale chez les victimes d’une fracture du fémur. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53:1186-9. [PMID: 17142652 DOI: 10.1007/bf03021579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of propofol before positioning elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture in the lateral decubitus position, to perform a spinal anesthetic. METHODS In this prospective and descriptive study, 79 consecutive patients, > 75 yr old, with a femoral neck fracture were included. Propofol, 0.5 mg x kg(-1), was administered. If loss of consciousness was not obtained (Ramsay score < or = 3/6), then additional doses of 0.25 mg x kg(-1) were given until a Ramsay score of 4 or 5 was attained. Then, the patient was turned to the lateral decubitus position, the fractured side up. The efficacy of propofol was assessed by observing a grimace during positioning and asking the patients if they had recall of pain. Hemodynamic data and oxygen saturation were collected. RESULTS Forty-three patients required a single injection, 34 required two injections and only two patients required three injections. No grimace and no recall of pain were recorded during the study. There was no desaturation (SpO(2) < 92 %), and hypotension, defined as a systolic blood pressure decrease > 30% from baseline, was observed. CONCLUSION Propofol is a simple and efficacious means of providing comfort while positioning elderly patients with a femoral head fracture before performing spinal anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Minville
- Département d'anesthésie et de réanimation, CHU Toulouse - Rangueil, Université Paul Sabatier, 1, 31400 Toulouse, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|