Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the gold standard for inhibitor eradication to restore the clinical efficacy of factor replacement therapy in haemophilia. However, as ITI often requires frequent administration over extended periods, it can be considered burdensome for patients and healthcare resources. Therefore, there is a need to optimise ITI treatment, particularly in patients who failed previous ITI attempts.

The ReITIrate study aimed to prospectively evaluate rescue ITI with efmoroctocog alfa, an extended half-life recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (herein rFVIIIFc), within a limited 60-week timeframe in patients with severe haemophilia A and inhibitors who failed previous ITI attempts.

ReITIrate was a phase IV, open-label, single-arm, interventional, multicentre study.

Primary endpoint was ITI success (negative titre, <0.6 BU/mL; incremental recovery >66%; elimination half-life ⩾7 hours) within 60 weeks. Exploratory immunophenotype analyses were performed to characterise anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and cellular immune responses.

Nine of 16 enrolled subjects completed the ITI period during ReITIrate, of which one subject attained all 3 ITI success criteria after 46 weeks with no relapse. Two subjects achieved partial success (one subject met 2/3 success criteria; one met all criteria, but not simultaneously, with inhibitor recurrence). One additional subject (ITI failure) achieved negative inhibitor titre. Across these four subjects, median (range) time to negative titre was 19 (11-60) weeks. No new safety concerns were identified. IgG4 was the major contributor to the ADA IgG response. Subjects with partial/complete ITI success had fewer IgG subclasses involved than those who failed/withdrew. Immunophenotyping indicated an increase in regulatory T-cells (CD4+CD25+CD127low), supporting the ability to perform sensitive blood sampling to identify immune tolerance markers.

This study demonstrates that ITI with rFVIIIFc given within a limited timeframe has potential benefit in a difficult-to-treat inhibitor haemophilia population who failed previous ITI attempts.

NCT03103542.

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy is currently unaffordable in China. Management of hemophilia A children with high-titer inhibitor is therefore a challenge.

To describe the ITI strategy using plasma-derived factor VIII/von Willebrand factor concentrate (pdFVIII/VWF) +/- immunosuppression and to report its efficacy in children with hemophilia A having poor-risk status for ITI success.

A prospective pilot study on children with hemophilia A having poor-risk status (all with at least inhibitor titer > 10 BU pre-ITI initiation). Patients received ~50 IU/kg FVIII every other day using domestic intermediate purity pdFVIII/VWF products, either alone or in combination with rituximab +/- prednisone.

Sixteen patients with median age 2.9 (range, 2.2-13.2) years and median pre-ITI inhibitor titer 30.7 (range, 10.4-128) BU were enrolled. Analysis at median 14.7 (range, 12.4-22.6) months' follow-up showed a total response rate of 87.5%. This included success (achieving inhibitor < 0.6 BU) in 13 patients (81.3%) in a median of 8.8 (range, 3.2-11.8) months, and partial success (achieving inhibitor < 5 BU but > 0.6BU) in 1 (6.3%). Compared to the pre-ITI period, the mean bleeds/month during ITI was 0.51 (64.0% reduction), and joint bleeds/month was 0.34 (64.3% reduction). This low-dose ITI strategy cost less by 70% to 87% than that for the high-dose FVIII regimen. No severe adverse events were observed.

This low-dose ITI strategy of pdFVIII/VWF +/- immunosuppression achieved relatively satisfactory outcomes in children with hemophilia A inhibitor having poor-risk status. This low-dose regimen showed economic advantages and is therefore suitable for using in China. However, further study in a larger cohort with a longer follow-up time is needed.

Inhibitor (neutralizing antibodies) development remains the most significant complication in patients with severe congenital hemophilia A receiving exogenous factor VIII (FVIII). Although our understanding of the pathophysiology of inhibitor development has advanced, the knowledge gained has not yet translated into a robust decline in incidence, with the overall risk remaining at ∼30%. Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) is the only current method to successfully eradicate an inhibitor and achieve long-term tolerance. Although current practice utilizes a wide variety of ITI regimens, identification of an optimal regimen has not emerged. Over the last decade, the number of replacement products available in hemophilia has greatly expanded. The cumulative evidence with each product for use in ITI is often lacking. Most recently emicizumab, a humanized monoclonal bi-specific antibody that substitutes for the scaffolding effect of FVIIIa was approved; this agent prevents bleeding in both inhibitor and non-inhibitor patients. The use of emicizumab will bring about a new era in care that will require clinicians to challenge current practice paradigms including use and administration of ITI. This review will summarize the main clinical ITI data and practices for patients with severe congenital hemophilia A with inhibitors (CHAwI) over the last four decades and will highlight current studies in the field, with attention to open questions.

Hemophilia A is a bleeding disorder characterized by the absence or dysfunction of blood coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Patients are treated with regular infusions of FVIII concentrate. In response to treatment, approximately 30% of patients with severe hemophilia A develop inhibitory antibodies targeting FVIII. Both patient and treatment related risk factors for inhibitor development have been described. Multiple studies comparing the immunogenicity of recombinant and plasma-derived FVIII have yielded conflicting results. The randomized controlled SIPPET (Survey of Inhibitors in Plasma-Product Exposed Toddlers) trial demonstrated an increased risk of inhibitor development of recombinant FVIII when compared to von Willebrand factor (VWF)-containing plasma-derived FVIII. Presently, it is unclear which mechanism underlies the reduced immunogenicity of plasma-derived FVIII. In this review we address the potential role of VWF on FVIII immunogenicity and we discuss how VWF affects the immune recognition, processing and presentation of FVIII. We also briefly discuss the potential impact of glycan-composition on FVIII immunogenicity. It is well established that VWF shields the uptake of FVIII by antigen presenting cells. We have recently shown that VWF binds to the surface of dendritic cells. Here, we present a novel model in which surface bound FVIII-VWF complexes regulate the internalization of FVIII. Binding of FVIII to VWF is critically dependent on sulfation of Tyr1699 (HVGS numbering) in the light chain of FVIII. Incomplete sulfation of Tyr1699 has been suggested to occur in several recombinant FVIII products resulting in a loss of VWF binding. We hypothesize that this results in alternative pathways of FVIII internalization by antigen presenting cells which are not regulated by VWF. This hypothetical mechanism may explain the reduced immunogenicity of VWF containing plasma-derived FVIII concentrates as found in the SIPPET study.

The German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) conducted a rapid report to assess the therapy of hemophilia patients. Based on a systematic literature search the IQWiG identified 16 studies which show that there is now sufficient information regarding questions that previously lacked data. A benefit assessment of prophylactic and on-demand-treatment concerning different treatment outcomes shows the superiority of the prophylactic therapy regarding major bleedings for all age groups. For the group of youths and adults the analysis shows additional benefits concerning health status and pain within the preceding four weeks. The alignment of guidelines with the identified evidence shows minor correspondence between the guidelines' references and included studies. However, the guidelines' statements primarily correspond with the results of the conducted benefit assessment.

The IQWiG's rapid report shows prophylactic therapy to be superior to on-demand therapy. These findings represent a clear indication for attending physicians and payers for prophylaxis in patients with severe hemophilia A.

Several plasma-derived intermediate and high-purity concentrates containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) and factor VIII (FVIII) are currently available. The main role of these products in the management of the pediatric population is represented by the replacement therapy in patients with severe or intermediate forms of von Willebrand disease, in whom other treatments are ineffective or contraindicated. Another important role of VWF/FVIII concentrates in children may be their use in immune tolerance induction (ITI) protocols. ITI is particularly recommended for hemophilia A children who have developed an inhibitor against FVIII, currently the most serious complication of substitutive treatment in hemophilia. Although recombinant concentrates may represent the preferred option in children with hemophilia A, VWF/FVIII concentrates may offer an advantage in rescuing patients who failed previous ITI.

The rising incidence of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against therapeutic factor VIII prompted the conduct of studies to answer the question as to whether this rise is related to the introduction of recombinant factor VIII products. The present article summarizes current opinions and results of non-clinical and clinical studies on the immunogenic potential of recombinant compared to plasma-derived factor VIII concentrates. Numerous studies provided circumstantial evidence that von Willebrand factor, the natural chaperone protein present in plasma-derived factor VIII products, plays an important role in protecting exogenous factor VIII from uptake by antigen presenting cells and from recognition by immune effectors. However, the definite contribution of von Willebrand factor in reducing the inhibitor risk and in the achievement of immune tolerance is still under debate.

Development of neutralizing inhibitors against factor VIII (FVIII) is a major complication of haemophilia A treatment.

The ongoing, international, open-label, uncontrolled, observational immune tolerance induction (ObsITI) study evaluates ITI, the standard of care in patients with inhibitors.

Forty-eight prospective patients in this interim analysis received a single plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized, FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII/VWF) for ITI. According to recommended Bonn protocol, 'low responders' at ITI start (<5 BU) received 50-100 IU FVIII kg(-1) daily, or every other day; 'high responders' (≥5 BU) received 100 IU FVIII kg(-1) every 12 h.

Forty of 48 patients (83.3%), had at least one risk factor for poor ITI-prognosis at ITI start (i.e. age ≥7 years, >2 years since inhibitor diagnosis, inhibitor titre ≥10 BU at the start of ITI, or prior ITI failure). Nonetheless, 34 patients (70.8%) achieved complete success, 3 (6.3%) partial success, 1 (2.1%) partial response; ITI failed in 10 patients (20.8%), all with poor prognosis factors. All six low responders achieved complete success. ITI outcome was significantly associated with inhibitor titre level at ITI start (P = 0.0068), number of poor prognosis factors for ITI success (P = 0.0187), monthly bleeding rate during ITI (P = 0.0005) and peak inhibitor titre during ITI (P = 0.0007). Twenty-two of 35 high responder patients (62.9%) with ≥1 poor prognosis factor achieved complete success.

Treatment with a single pdFVIII/VWF concentrate, mainly according to the Bonn protocol, resulted in a high ITI success rate in haemophilia A patients with inhibitors and poor prognosis for ITI success.

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors constitutes a huge burden for affected patients and families and poses a large economic burden for a chronic disease. Concerted research efforts are attempting to optimize the therapeutic approach to the prevention and eradication of inhibitors. The Italian ITI Registry has provided data on 110 patients who completed ITI therapy as at July 2013. Analysis of independent predictors of success showed that, together with previously recognized factors - namely inhibitor titre prior to ITI, historical peak titre and peak titre on ITI - the type of causative FVIII gene mutation also contributes to the identification of patients with good prognosis and may be useful to optimize candidate selection and treatment regimens. Numerous studies have demonstrated that inhibitor reactivity against different FVIII products varies and is lower against concentrates containing von Willebrand factor (VWF). An Italian study compared inhibitor titres against a panel of FVIII concentrates in vitro and correlated titres with the capacity to inhibit maximum thrombin generation as measured by the thrombin generation assay (TGA). Observations led to the design of the PredictTGA study which aims to correlate TGA results with epitope specificity, inhibitor reactivity against different FVIII concentrates and clinical data in inhibitor patients receiving FVIII in the context of ITI or as prophylactic/on demand treatment. At the immunological level, it is known that T cells drive inhibitor development and that B cells secrete FVIII-specific antibodies. As understanding increases about the immunological response in ITI, it is becoming apparent that modulation of T-cell- and B-cell-mediated responses offers a range of potential new and specific approaches to prevent and eliminate inhibitors as well as individualize ITI therapy.

Treatment of patients with hemophilia A and B has undergone significant advances during the past 2 decades. However, despite these advances, the development of antibodies that inhibit the function of infused clotting factor remains a major challenge and is considered the most significant complication of hemophilia treatment. This chapter reviews current tools available for the care of patients with inhibitors and highlights areas where progress is imminent or strongly needed. For management of bleeding, bypassing agents remain the mainstay of therapy. Recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrates are similarly effective in populations of patients with hemophilia and inhibitors; however, individuals may show a better response to one agent over another. Recent studies have shown that prophylaxis with bypassing agents can reduce bleeding episodes by ∼50%-80%. The prophylactic use of bypassing agents is an important tool to reduce morbidity in patients before they undergo immune tolerance induction (ITI) and in those with persistent high titer inhibitors, but cost and lack of convenience remain barriers. Because of the significant burden that inhibitors add to the individual patient and the health care system, inhibitor eradication should be pursued in as many patients as possible. ITI is an effective tool, particularly in patients with severe hemophilia A and good risk profiles, and leads to a return to a normal factor VIII response in ∼60% of patients. However, for the group of patients who fail to respond to ITI or have hemophilia B, new and improved tools are needed.

It has been postulated that factor VIII (FVIII) products containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) may improve immune tolerance induction (ITI) success rate in patients with haemophilia A and poor prognostic factors.

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of a FVIII/VWF concentrate (BIOSTATE) for ITI in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A (SHA) and inhibitors, from January 2003 to December 2011 at 3 paediatric-only Haemophilia Treatment Centres in Australia. Response to ITI was assessed at or before 33 months and at completion of ITI. Fifteen male patients with SHA were included in the analysis.

BIOSTATE was used for primary ITI in 8 patients (2 years, range 1.1-11.5 years) and for salvage ITI in 7 patients (9.9 years, range 1.1-15.4). At the end of the observation period there were 11 patients who achieved a complete response with BIOSTATE after a median duration of 21 months (range 5-85 months); a partial response was achieved in 2 patients in whom ITI is ongoing. Therefore, the overall response rate was 86.6%. Two patients were deemed treatment failures: one due to non-compliance after 18 months of ITI and another in whom a partial response had not been achieved after 22 months of ITI.

BIOSTATE was well-tolerated and effective when used for primary or salvage ITI in this cohort of paediatric patients with SHA and a high-level inhibitor.

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is recognized as the first choice treatment in haemophilic patients with inhibitors, with the aim of restoring safe and effective standard factor VIII replacement and, particularly, prophylaxis in children. For the latter, literature data and clinical practice support the optimal cost utility ratio of ITI. Indeed, the high success rate, the low incidence of inhibitor recurrence after successful ITI and the possibility of preventing joint deterioration, enable one to predict a considerable long-term reduction of costs in the majority of treated patients. Therefore, in spite of high costs and open issues about optimal regimens, ITI is actually attempted in virtually all children with inhibitors. Few patients with long-standing inhibitors presently undergo ITI, particularly in the case of severe bleeding tendency. In this setting, uncertainties concerning management are amplified by the paucity of literature data and psychological reluctance by both patients and treaters due to the perceived poor prognosis and the demanding treatment (also in terms of costs). However, clinical data suggest that the role of age at ITI start and of time interval from inhibitor diagnosis, as predictors of ITI outcome, should be considered in a larger framework of proposed and more established prognostic factors. Moreover, optimising ITI management, particularly with respect to inhibitor titre at ITI start and avoidance of adverse events or interruption of treatment, may also contribute to improve outcomes. Although the economic constraints of the present era significantly affect resources for such a high-cost treatment, the individual cost-utility ratio (bleeding tendency and risk of fatal bleeding, arthropathy and need for orthopaedic surgery, comorbidities, quality of life) should be assessed carefully to determine whether ITI is a suitable option and thus not preclude adults from the opportunity of inhibitor eradication.

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy is the foundation of treatment in hemophilia A and is effective unless a patient develops an alloantibody (inhibitor) against exogenous FVIII. Inhibitor development is currently the most significant treatment complication seen in patients with hemophilia and is associated with considerable morbidity and a decreased quality of life. The development of an inhibitor is the result of a complex interaction between a patient's immune system and genetic and environmental risk factors. The mainstay of treatment is the eradication of the inhibitor through immune tolerance. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding inhibitor risk factors, eradication, and hemostatic bypassing agents.

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) can overcome inhibitory factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies in haemophilia A patients receiving FVIII replacement therapy. The objective was to evaluate the use of sucrose-formulated, full-length recombinant FVIII (rFVIII-FS) for ITI therapy. Patients (<8 years at ITI start) with severe haemophilia A and a peak inhibitor titre >5 Bethesda units (BU) who underwent ITI with any rFVIII-FS dose for ≥ 9 months (or until success) were eligible for this retrospective study. Efficacy analyses included descriptions of ITI treatment regimens and outcomes; ITI success was determined solely at the discretion of the investigator. Safety analyses included assessment of adverse events. Of 51 enrolled patients, 32 [high dose (≥ 85 IU kg(-1) day(-1)), n = 21; low dose, n = 11] were eligible for analysis. ITI was successful in 69% (22/32) of patients (high dose, 66.7%; low dose, 72.7%) after a median of 1.4 years (range, 0.1-3.6 years). Influencing factors for ITI success were start of ITI <1 year after inhibitor detection and an inhibitor titre <10 BU at ITI start. All patients successfully tolerized with ITI continued to receive rFVIII-FS prophylaxis as maintenance therapy, with no inhibitor recurrence from the end of ITI until study enrolment. Use of rFVIII-FS for ITI was effective and well tolerated; success rates were similar to those in published studies.

Outcomes for patients with hemophilia have improved dramatically over the past 50 years. With the increased availability of safe clotting factor concentrates, the primary focus in clinical management is now the prevention of long-term complications, most notably the debilitating hemophilic arthropathy that is associated with severe disease. This article reviews evidence-based approaches for managing both children and adults with hemophilia. Definitive evidence of improved clinical results from primary prophylaxis started in young patients with severe hemophilia A and a minimal bleeding history is presented. Furthermore, recent studies showing benefits for initiating prophylaxis in older adolescents and adults with established joint disease are examined. Inhibitors to factor VIII are the most problematic complication of factor replacement therapy. Patient-specific and treatment-related factors that contribute to the risk of inhibitor formation are discussed and controversies and clinical evidence related to approaches for tolerance induction are reviewed.

Only a fraction of patients with hemophilia A develop a neutralizing antibody (inhibitor) response to therapeutic infusions of factor VIII. Our present understanding of the underlying causes of the immunogenicity of this protein is limited. In the past few years, insights into the uptake and processing of FVIII by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) have expanded significantly. Although the mechanism of endocytosis remains unclear, current data indicate that FVIII enters APCs via its C1 domain. Its subsequent processing within endolysosomes allows for presentation of a heterogeneous collection of FVIII-derived peptides on major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II, and this peptide-MHC class II complex may then be recognized by cognate effector CD4(+) T cells, leading to anti-FVIII antibody production. Here we aim to summarize recent knowledge gained about FVIII processing and presentation by APCs, as well as the diversity of the FVIII-specific T-cell repertoire in mice and humans. Moreover, we discuss possible factors that can drive FVIII immunogenicity. We believe that increasing understanding of the immune recognition of FVIII and the cellular mechanisms of anti-FVIII antibody production will lead to novel therapeutic approaches to prevent inhibitor formation in patients with hemophilia A.

The management of patients with inhibitors is the greatest challenge facing haemophilia health professionals. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) can be successful in eliminating the inhibitor in the majority of patients, provided it is started soon after the inhibitor develops and the titre of the inhibitor is <10 BU at commencement of ITI. Acute bleeding is treated using one of two bypassing agents, which exhibit similar efficacy and safety. Surgery in inhibitor patients is challenging and should only be carried out in experienced centres.

Acquired Haemophilia is a severe, rare and potentially life-threatening bleeding that affects both males and females with an incidence of 1.5 cases/million/year. Mucocutaneous haemorrhages or haematomas are the typical expression of this disease as a consequence of a decrease in FVIII activity and the presence of a FVIII inhibitor, which differs from congenital haemophilia. We report a case of a 71 year-old-man who presented with spontaneous haematomas and severe anaemia and suffered from vascular disease. At admission, all haemostatic and laboratory data were diagnostic for idiopathic AHA. Treatment with by-passing agents such as rFVIIa was contraindicated because of the risk of thromboembolic events. Despite the fact that administration of FVIII concentrates in AHA is recommended only in patients with an inhibitor titre<5.0 BU, the physicians decided to use pdFVIII/vWF with corticosteroids in this patient. One month later, the FVIII was within the normal range and the inhibitors had disappeared. In our case, pdFVIII/vWF resulted in a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of acquired haemophilia A in a patient at high thromboembolic risk.

Development of FVIII inhibitors is currently the most severe and challenging complication of haemophilia A treatment and represents a very large economic burden for a chronic disease. As a result, clinical research is making major efforts to optimize the therapeutic approaches for this condition. In this section we will review some important aspects of the management of haemophilia in adults, including an overview of bleeding in women with von Willebrand disease, an analysis of FVIII consumption in patients with severe haemophilia A, an update of the ongoing RES.I.ST study, long-term prophylaxis and experience from the Pro.Will study, current evidence relating to economic aspects of the treatment of haemophilic patients with inhibitors (based on the PROFIT study), and an overview of musculoskeletal complications in adults with severe bleeding disorders.

The development of inhibitors that neutralize the function of clotting factor VIII (FVIII) is currently the most challenging complication associated with the treatment of hemophilia A as it increases the disease-related morbidity and mortality. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only documented strategy to eradicate persistent inhibitors in severe hemophilia A patients. Several studies have been conducted so far to identify patient- and treatment-related factors associated with greater ITI success. The currently available literature on ITI in hemophilia A will be critically reviewed in this article. In particular, we will focus on the role of the type of FVIII product on ITI outcome by analyzing the clinical and experimental data.

In high-income countries, the large availability of coagulation factors for replacement therapy of patients with hemophilia A has raised the life expectancy of these lifelong bleeders to that of males from the general population. The practicing clinician is offered a multitude of choices among several commercial brands of factor VIII extracted from human plasma or engineered from mammalian cell cultures by means of recombinant DNA technology. This article has the goal to offer our opinions on how to choose among the different products, that we consider interchangeable relevant to their clinical efficacy in the control of bleeding and safety from pathogen transmission. Hence, the main determinants of our choices are price and the risk of occurrence of factor VIII inhibitory alloantibodies. With this as background, we present the rationale underlying the choices for different categories of patients with severe hemophilia A: previously untreated patients, multiply treated patients, and patients undergoing immune tolerance induction with large doses of factor VIII to eradicate inhibitors. Mention is also made to the possible strategies that should be implemented to make available coagulation factors for replacement therapy in developing countries.

Inhibitors are a serious complication for patients with severe hemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the primary method for eradicating these inhibitors. The role of type of concentrate and in particular the use of von Willebrand factor-containing, plasma-derived factor VIII (VWF/pd-FVIII) concentrate in primary or rescue ITI remains unclear.

To report retrospective collection of data on the use of a single VWF/pd-FVIII concentrate in primary and rescue ITI.

Retrospective chart review of hemophilia A inhibitor patients at 11 US institutions who received VWF/pd-FVIII concentrate in primary or rescue ITI.

Primary ITI was carried out in eight inhibitor patients with a 75% complete and partial success. Secondary ITI was carried out in 25 inhibitor patients, with 52% attaining complete or partial success.

This report represents the largest group of primarily pediatric, high-titer inhibitor patients treated with a single VWF/pd-FVIII concentrate. It adds retrospective data to the use of VWF-containing plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate in primary and rescue ITI, particularly in those patients with characteristics of poor response to ITI.

The management of patients with congenital haemophilia who develop alloantibodies against factors of the propagation phase of blood coagulation, commonly known as inhibitors, is the most important challenge facing haemophilia caregivers at present, as this complication not only compromises the efficacy of replacement therapy but also consumes an enormous amount of economic resources. Development of inhibitors further complicates the clinical course of severe haemophilia, with a prevalence of up to 30% in patients with haemophilia A (factor VIII deficiency) and up to 5% in those with haemophilia B (factor IX deficiency) and haemophilia C (factor XI deficiency). While the short-term goal of treatment of patients who develop alloantibodies is the control of bleeding, the eradication of the inhibitor is the main long-term goal. The management of severe bleeding episodes and the eradication of the autoantibody are also the mainstays of treatment of patients with acquired haemophilia, a rare but life-threatening haemorrhagic condition characterized by the development of inhibitory autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII. The most recent options available for treating patients with congenital haemophilia complicated by inhibitors and acquired haemophilia because of autoantibodies against factor VIII are summarized in this review article.

Anamestic inhibitors represent the major complication of haemophilia therapy now that clotting factor concentrates are virtually free of pathogen-transmission risk. Conventional clotting factor replacement is usually insufficient to prevent or treat bleeding in a haemophilia patient with a high responding inhibitor so that alternative treatment with bypassing agents is required. Despite their relative efficacy, their use does not achieve the same invariable haemostasis that patients without inhibitors do following treatment with factor concentrate replacement. This has led to the attempt to eradicate such inhibitors with immune tolerance induction. Success is not invariable, however, and many patients with long-term persistent high-titre inhibitors continue to experience great morbidity. Recently, this has given rise on a limited basis to attempts to use bypassing agents in prophylaxis regimens in an effort to alleviate this extreme morbidity. Each of these strategies is discussed in the context of their relative benefits and risks.

Replacement of the congenitally deficient factor VIII or IX through plasma-derived or recombinant concentrates is the mainstay of treatment for hemophilia. Concentrate infusions when hemorrhages occur typically in joint and muscles (on-demand treatment) is able to resolve bleeding, but does not prevent the progressive joint deterioration leading to crippling hemophilic arthropathy. Therefore, primary prophylaxis, ie, regular infusion of concentrates started after the first joint bleed and/or before the age of two years, is now recognized as first-line treatment in children with severe hemophilia. Secondary prophylaxis, whenever started, aims to avoid (or delay) the progression of arthropathy and improve patient quality of life. Interestingly, recent data suggest a role for early prophylaxis also in preventing development of inhibitors, the most serious complication of treatment in hemophilia, in which multiple genetic and environmental factors may be involved. Treatment of bleeds in patients with inhibitors requires bypassing agents (activated prothrombin complex concentrates, recombinant factor VIIa). However, eradication of inhibitors by induction of immune tolerance should be the first choice for patients with recent onset inhibitors. The wide availability of safe factor concentrates and programs for comprehensive care has now resulted in highly satisfactory treatment of hemophilia patients in developed countries. Unfortunately, this is not true for more than two-thirds of persons with hemophilia, who live in developing countries.

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only therapeutic approach that can eradicate factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in patients with hemophilia A. Predictors of ITI outcome are still debated, and the role of F8 gene mutations in this is not well established.

To investigate the relationship between F8 genotype and ITI outcome in patients with severe hemophilia A and high-responding inhibitors.

F8 mutations were identified in 86 patients recruited as part of the Italian ITI registry (the PROFIT study). ITI outcome was centrally reviewed according to the following definitions: success (undetectable inhibitor and normal FVIII pharmacokinetics), partial success (inhibitor titer < 5 BU mL(-1) and/or abnormal FVIII pharmacokinetics), and failure.

F8 mutations known to be associated with a high risk of inhibitor development (large deletions, inversions, nonsense mutations and splice site mutations) were found in 70 patients (81%); among these, the intron 22 inversion was present in 49 patients (57%). In 16 patients (19%) lower-risk F8 defects (small insertions/deletions and missense mutations) were identified. The latter group of patients showed a significantly higher ITI success rate than those carrying high-risk mutations [13/16 (81%) vs. 33/70 (47%); risk ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.1, P = 0.01]. On multivariate analysis, the mutation risk class remained a significant predictor of success [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 6.2, 95% CI 1.1-36.0, P = 0.04], as were inhibitor titer at ITI start (< 5 BU mL(-1), OR 11.8, 95% CI 3.5-40.2, P < 0.001), and peak titer during ITI (< 100 BU mL(-1), OR 11.4, 95% CI 3.2-40.8, P < 0.001).

ITI success is influenced by F8 genotype. This knowledge should contribute to the stratification of prognosis, and to the clinical choices made for ITI in patients with high-responding inhibitors.

In Western countries, the treatment of patients with inhibitors is presently the most challenging and serious issue in haemophilia management, direct costs of clotting factor concentrates accounting for >98% of the highest economic burden absorbed for the healthcare of patients in this setting. Being designed to address questions of resource allocation and effectiveness, decision models are the golden standard to reliably assess the overall economic implications of haemophilia with inhibitors in terms of mortality, bleeding-related morbidity, and severity of arthropathy. However, presently, most data analyses stem from retrospective short-term evaluations, that only allow for the analysis of direct health costs. In the setting of chronic diseases, the cost-utility analysis, that takes into account the beneficial effects of a given treatment/healthcare intervention in terms of health-related quality of life, is likely to be the most appropriate approach. To calculate net benefits, the quality adjusted life year, that significantly reflects such health gain, has to be compared with specific economic impacts. Differences in data sources, in medical practice and/or in healthcare systems and costs, imply that most current pharmacoeconomic analyses are confined to a narrow healthcare payer perspective. Long-term/lifetime prospective or observational studies, devoted to a careful definition of when to start a treatment; of regimens (dose and type of product) to employ, and of inhibitor population (children/adults, low-responding/high responding inhibitors) to study, are thus urgently needed to allow for newer insights, based on reliable data sources into resource allocation, effectiveness and cost-utility analysis in the treatment of haemophiliacs with inhibitors.

The development of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products, fuelled by the need for improved safety of treatment arising from the dramatic widespread blood-borne virus transmission in the 1970-1980s revolutionized the care of children with haemophilia A over the last two decades. The larger availability of perceived safer replacement therapy associated with the introduction of rFVIII products reassured the haemophilia community and there was a strong push in some Western countries to treat haemophilic children only with rFVIII. Moreover, this significantly contributed in the 1990s to the diffusion outside Northern Europe of prophylactic regimens implemented at an early age to prevent bleeding and the resultant joint damage (i.e. primary prophylaxis), together with the possibility of home treatment. These changes led to a substantial improvement of the quality of life of haemophilic children and of their families. The general agreement that primary prophylaxis represents the first-choice treatment for haemophilic children has been recently supported by two randomized controlled trials carried out with rFVIII products, providing evidence on the efficacy of early prophylaxis over on-demand treatment in preserving joint health in haemophilic children. However, the intensity and optimal modalities of implementation of prophylaxis in children, in particular with respect to the issue of the venous access, are still debated. A number of studies also supports the role of secondary prophylaxis in children, frequently used in countries in which primary prophylaxis was introduced more recently. With viral safety now less than an issue and with the more widespread use of prophylaxis able to prevent arthropathy, the most challenging complication of replacement therapy for children with haemophilia remains the risk of inhibitor development. Despite conflicting data, there is no evidence that the type of FVIII concentrate significantly influences the complex multifactorial process leading to anti-FVIII alloantibodies, whereas other treatment-related factors are likely to increase (early intensive treatments due to surgery or severe bleeds) or reduce (prophylaxis) the risk. Although the optimal regimen is still uncertain, eradication of anti-FVIII antibodies by immune tolerance induction (ITI), usually with the same product administered at inhibitor detection, should be the first-choice treatment for all patients with recent onset inhibitors. This issue applies particularly to children, as most patients undergo ITI at an early age, when inhibitors usually appear. The availability of a stable and long-lasting venous access represents a leading problem also in this setting. These and other topics concerning rFVIII treatment of haemophilic children were discussed in a meeting held in Rome on 27 February 2008 and are summarized in this report.